Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3112882
01/17/23 02:32 PM
01/17/23 02:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
Glad I could help some of you. Take care.

Last edited by RustyMopar01; 01/17/23 02:33 PM.
Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3130843
03/20/23 02:14 PM
03/20/23 02:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
Originally Posted by poorboy
Put me on the thank you list for the transmission wiring deal. The OD on the RE46 in my 49 pickup (with a 96 Dakota chassis & wiring) quit functioning, and the code reader says it isn't getting input. I now know where to look, if I can get my hands into the area. Things are pretty congested on this truck.


So, I finally had the chance to get under m truck to look for the wire harness splice. Laying on my back, with the truck on jack stands as high as I can get it, there is no way I will be able to get near that splice to fix it. Maybe on a hoist, but I no longer have one available to use. My truck RE46 does not have the lock up functioning (that I can tell), nor the OD functioning, and I still get the code there is no input from the trans, but I'm not getting a limp in condition. I'm betting that splice has corrosion or broken wires.

I have access to the bottom 1/2 of the trans, and I can get my hands around to the top of the trans, I jut can't reach far enough forward to get to the wire where I suspect the splice is, nor would I be able to repair the splice in the area I suspect its in. I would be perfectly OK with relocating that wire splice to a more accessible location. If I can source the wire(s) from the computer that connect to the trans, I would run a new wire down the trans and connect it to the trans wires. Am I correct in assuming there is the feed (or return) wire from the computer and it is spliced to 3 other wires to provide information to (or from) the computer and trans solenoids?

My question is, is there a wire diagram I can get someplace that tells me which wire comes out of the computer, and how and to which wires it connects to on the trans?

I spent much time looking for the wiring from the trans going to the computer but could not see it. (my motor is very close to the firewall in my 49 truck). I am assuming it comes up the trans tunnel and joins the engine harness around the back of the motor? I have an older FSM for a Dakota, but it pre electronic trans era, so the wiring diagram in it is not helpful on this.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3130873
03/20/23 03:02 PM
03/20/23 03:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,310
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,310
north of coder
it's possible the diagram may be available from the ATSG site, but i don't know if you have to join that group or not.
i have bought manuals for the A500 and A518 from them, but nothing for the RE transmissions.
with that said, i looked at a transmission diagnostic book i have for minivans. yes, i know this is an entirely different thing, and has no bearing on a rear drive application.
however, looking at the wiring diagram, the transmission plug has ground and sense wires going to the computer, and it shows the pin out and diagrams for both, as well as the wire colors.
i'm ASSuming the RE transmission would be similar, but that's as far as i am able to go with any help.
i have no idea if this was worth anything, or if i just threw rock in a mud puddle.
beer

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: moparx] #3131274
03/21/23 10:24 PM
03/21/23 10:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
I'll look into that.
I was hoping for a Dakota ECM pin out, and the diagrams for the wire pin out at the trans connection. Good thought on a different FSM, that may be helpful.

I think I still have a 97 full sized Ram FSM on cd here (if I can find it eek ) That should at least show me the pin out at the trans connection for a RE46. The ECM on the full Ram is different then the ECM on a Dakota, and then this Dakota is a 96, so that could be a problem as well sourcing out the wire pin out of it.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3131429
03/22/23 12:39 PM
03/22/23 12:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,562
Motor City
6
6PKRTSE Offline
master
6PKRTSE  Offline
master
6

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,562
Motor City
We have an 01' Ram 1500 360 engine, trans and PCM in my Son's 99' Dakota. With a fresh rebuild I did last summer with his help.

photo0.jpegphoto1.jpeg20220624_142109.jpg20220816_195250.jpg

1963 Belvedere 440 Max Wedge Tribute
1970 Charger R/T S.E. 440 Six Pack
1970 Challenger R/T, 528 Hemi
1970 Charger 500 S.E. 440 4 BBL
1970 Plymouth Road Runner 383
1974 Chrysler New Yorker 440
1996 2500 RAM 488 V-10 4X4
2004 3500 Dually Cummins 4x4
2012 Challenger R/T Classic.
Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3131432
03/22/23 12:45 PM
03/22/23 12:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,310
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,310
north of coder
you may use the full size ram schematic as something of a guide, in that it is still an RE transmission, and just see how the wire colors are arranged on the transmission plug, and how they are arranged in the computer's plug.
one thing i have noticed over the years, looking up similar problems on different years and models with the FSM's i have [printed versions], although the wire colors may have changed, they [sometimes] go to the same cavities in the plugs.
again, i don't know if this will be any help, or further the confusion.
beer

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: moparx] #3131527
03/22/23 07:34 PM
03/22/23 07:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
Still trying to locate that FSM CD for the 97.

I may have to resort to having my wife help me... She probably moved it in a room cleanup. That's my story.... whistling

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3132414
03/26/23 10:45 AM
03/26/23 10:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
Originally Posted by poorboy
Still trying to locate that FSM CD for the 97.

I may have to resort to having my wife help me... She probably moved it in a room cleanup. That's my story.... whistling


Hopefully, it works for you. I'm just passing the information I found along.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: 6PKRTSE] #3132415
03/26/23 10:46 AM
03/26/23 10:46 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
Originally Posted by 6PKRTSE
We have an 01' Ram 1500 360 engine, trans and PCM in my Son's 99' Dakota. With a fresh rebuild I did last summer with his help.


Very nice.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: 6PKRTSE] #3132521
03/26/23 08:12 PM
03/26/23 08:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
Originally Posted by 6PKRTSE
We have an 01' Ram 1500 360 engine, trans and PCM in my Son's 99' Dakota. With a fresh rebuild I did last summer with his help.


Are you using the wire harness out of the 1500, or out of the Dakota? Or are you using an aftermarket wire harness, and is so, which one?

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3151173
06/13/23 12:23 PM
06/13/23 12:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
I'm going to drag this back to the top.

I'm back at square one again. I found the 97 Ram CD, but it won't play on my computer.

The 1st post on the transmission wiring issue says the wire from the TCM and the 2nd wire from the solenoid pack and the 3rd wire from the ECU were wired together.

I believe that splice is the reason I have an intermittent converter lock up and no OD on my 46 RE. It would be easy enough to follow the wires to their source if I could get near the splice, but I can't without removing the transmission. I can get to the plug on the solenoid pack, but not the splice.

Can anyone help me with which wire/cavity the solenoid wire is on the ECU and which wire cavity is is on the TCM? I'm not finding any info on the pin out of either module. I'm using the ECU and the TCM out of a 96 Dakota, if that matters.

In a couple months the truck is going to see 1500+ highway miles and both the OD and the lock up would be nice to have.

HELP!

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: JDMopar] #3152685
06/19/23 12:53 PM
06/19/23 12:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,478
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
J
JDMopar Offline
master
JDMopar  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,478
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
Originally Posted by JDMopar
Originally Posted by RustyMopar01
That has been on my mind and I think the seller knows this. I realize the seller is needing to get certain price but, there is a lot of unknowns at this point and not certain the seller & I can come to agreement on price at this point. But, anyways thank you everyone for answering my question. It appears last night, I found some answers regarding the transmission issues which can correlate to corrosion in a harness that communicates with the PCM as well. Anyways, thank you all again.


Can you point me in the direction of the harness corrosion issues so I can research it? My 04 Dakota is driving me nuts going into limp mode with transmission codes. Trans is getting rebuilt, but I want to eliminate all problems since it's a nice little truck that I need to be able to depend on with road trips.


Just circling back on the problem with my truck. I checked all of the wiring, relays, fuses, etc and found no problems there. Truck has a new 545RFE with all new sensors and shift solenoid and still had the same problem. Since the truck is almost 20 years old and has 230K miles on it, I decided what the heck....replace the ECM. TCM is integrated on this model. Solved the problem of it going into limp mode with a P0700 and P0750 codes and has not happened since. Truck ran great before, considering it is a 4.7, but I have even noticed it has more giddyup with the new ECM and gets slightly better gas mileage. Hopefully, this may help someone in the future. Remanned ECM was $300 in the link below.
https://www.autocomputerexchange.com/

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: JDMopar] #3152806
06/19/23 07:56 PM
06/19/23 07:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
I had my buddy pull the codes on my truck again today. I've got codes:

P1765 Trans volt relay circuit
P1763 Governor Pressure sensor too high
P0711 Trans temp sensor problem.

I have found an online RE46, RE47, & Re48 specific trans rebuild manual that has a trouble shooting procedure. According to that book the ECM and the trans are the same between the Dakota and the full sized Ram for the same year. I did a quick read of the trouble shooting and discovered that some codes automatically put the trans into failure mode, which is a 3rd only drive with or without an upshift. My truck has no upshift. They required the correct code number for trouble shooting.

That online service manual also stated that a 95 RE 46-48 had a different test procedure then the 96 and up had. In 96 the trans relay was moved into the ECU.

My biggest issue is all this stuff has been transplanted from the Dakota into my 49 truck (and yes, I'm the guy that did it), and now, almost 3 years later, I have no real idea of the Dakota's actual build date and it is long gone.

The challenge has been accepted, I'm sure not going to scrap this truck. Wish me lick as I venture into new to me territory. I will update as I stumble through this. It all starts tomorrow, after I dig a few holes (something like 20 holes!) in the yard for my wife to plant Lilies. Wish me luck on that too! LOL!

100_1017.JPG
Last edited by poorboy; 06/19/23 07:57 PM.
Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3152930
06/20/23 07:40 AM
06/20/23 07:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
Originally Posted by poorboy
I had my buddy pull the codes on my truck again today. I've got codes:

P0711 Trans temp sensor problem.



Just a heads up that I have routinely found that P0711 Trans temp sensor code set on my 1995 Ram every time I have plugged in a scanner, which is OBD-I for that last year before OBD-II.

There is not supposed to be a Trans Temp sensor on 1500 Rams, just on 2500/3500 Rams.

I even tried buying a Trans Temp sensor and plugging it into the empty electrical socket, but the code kept getting set.

It may be a factory PCM software error,
a physical 1500 Ram wiring harness fault,
or an evil spirit.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: 360view] #3153035
06/20/23 12:38 PM
06/20/23 12:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
I believe the 1765 - trans 12 volt supply relay circuit code is my problem.

This truck does have OBD2. According to the info I can find, the under hood power distribution box is suppose to have a transmission 12 volt power supply relay, those relay terminals have specific functions. My problem is, there is nothing labeled as a transmission relay in the distribution box that has 6 relays. That unidentified relay is suppose to provide the power to the transmission 12 volt solenoid power.
I
I've managed to get the wiring loose from the trans and I have gotten the harness connector down where I can at least test for the 12 volt and the .5 volt from the computer. I came in the house to bring up that RE46 trans rebuild site, and the stupid thing won't load this morning. : nervous II did make a few notes last night, so I can at lest test for the voltage, I suspect I probably don't have any at either place. Originally I suspected the splice in the harness at the top of the trans was bad. I still can't get there.

Without a relay specifically marked as the trams relay, I have no idea where the 12 volt power would come from, everything says it comes from that missing relay.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3153373
06/21/23 06:05 PM
06/21/23 06:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
Ok, I have no transmission relay anywhere that I can find. See picture of the power distribution center on my truck. This is a 96 truck with the OBD 2 system and the PCM has 3 plugs attached to it.

I have no 12 volt power to the harness connection at the trans on terminal #1. That 12 volt power is suppose to come from the trans relay.

I am unsure of the condition of the wiring at the top of the trans where the splice that has known issues is located.

I think I'm going to add my own transmission relay. According to the wiring diagrams I've found (suppose to be reprinted FSM diagrams), the 4 terminals on the relay that are used has (1) battery power, (1) ignition power, (1) PMC supplied ground wire, and (1) 12 volt powered wire to the harness connector. #1 terminal. I would run that 12 volt power wire directly to the #1 terminal, which provides power to the solenoid pack. That ignition controlled power to the relay would shut down the power when the truck is off, correct?

From what I've read, that computer supplied ground can be shut off by the PCM if it detects a fault code. This transmission has been operating a year with the existing codes. If I eliminate the PCM supplied ground and just did a straight ground, other then the PCM loosing the ability to turn off the OD and put the trans into a 3rd gear only drive, what else can happen? It wouldn't be too hard to put a shut off switch on that ground wire to kill the power from the relay.

I believe if I can power the solenoid pack, the OD would work. After some use, I may even be able to try to connect back to the PMC supplied ground.

Thoughts?

If i don't hear anything negative, its going to happen tomorrow morning!

100_1059.JPG
Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3153556
06/22/23 12:33 PM
06/22/23 12:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,061
Atlanta, GA
M
mgoblue9798 Offline
super stock
mgoblue9798  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,061
Atlanta, GA
Does the wiring harness plug at the trans end have 2, 3, or 8 wires? 2 or 3 it is a 46rh, 8 wires it is a 46re version.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: mgoblue9798] #3153649
06/22/23 07:27 PM
06/22/23 07:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,527
Freeport IL USA
The trans is most definitely an 46RE. And it is definitely a 96 production model. At this point, I suspect maybe it was an early production 96..

The good news is it now WORKS. The OD has cut the 70 mph rpm by nearly 1,000 rpm, it happily cruises along at about 2,000 at 70 mph on the cruise control where last Sat night on the same road, it wanted to turn 3,000 at 70 on the cruise control. I knew it was fixed as I pulled out of my driveway. Before it was sort of lazy leaving a stop, but now that it s downshifting, its back to being fun.

First what happened, and then the fix.

When the truck was 1st put on the road, I used the Dakota aluminum/plastic radiator. I had to modify the top radiator brackets for it to work, and both top corners were very close to the 49s curved hood sides. About 6 months into driving the truck (its 1st winter), the OEM Dakota radiator started leaking at the gasket between the top plastic tank and the aluminum core. It actually would not leak if the temp was above 15 degrees, but when it dropped below 15, it started seeping. The leak would go away shortly after the truck started. It took a few months before I actually saw where the coolant was going when I happened to look on a day it was 10 degrees outside.
I changed to a Champion aluminum radiator that better fit the confines of the truck, but that required the removal of the manual fan because of clearance. I installed an electric fan with the new radiator. While I was looking for a power source for that electric fan, I noticed the distribution box had a "fan relay" that was not being used, because there obviously was not an electric fane on the truck. I hijacked the key source 12 volt power wire from the fan relay to run my electric fan. The radiator replacement also required a moderation in the transmission cooling line routing. The new radiator was a crossflow with the trans cooler on the passenger side, the original was a top to bottom flow with the cooler in the lower tank. About 3 or 4 weeks after the radiator was installed, one of the trans cooler lines blew the hose off. I didn't know it until the truck stopped moving (about 3 miles from where the fluid trail began). I did a parking lot repair on the line, and dumped 8 quarts of AFT +4 into the trans. The trans appeared to operate OK except I noticed the OD was not functioning (the weather was warmer and we were doing more driving). The consonance here concluded the loss of the trans fluid killed the OD solenoids and probably caused deadly transmission problems. I accepted that and was waiting for a total failure, pulling this trans will be a major pita.

This post alerted me to the concept the fluid loss might not be the cause of the OD loss.

The fix: After spending much of yesterday looking for the missing trans relay, I was prepared to create a fan relay from scratch this morning, but the thought that the OD worked when the truck was first put together pushed me to find that missing relay. In my search for the trans relay, I began to wonder if one of the relays was mislabeled. The most obvious choice was the "fan relay". With the plugs off the trans, and the distribution box pulled up where I could check out the wiring, I started checking where the existing wires on the fan relay went. 4 wires. One (already cut) was a 12 volt ignition source. One was a battery power source. Both required for the trans relay. One wire was a 5 volt from the computer (required for the trans relay, but not required for a fan relay). The other wire had continuity with the #1 terminal on the trans connector (also required for the trans relay). My conclusion was, Mopar decided to use the 95 distribution box on the early 96 trucks, and substitute the fan relay that was only used on the 4 cylinder trucks as the location for the new trans relay. Not a bad idea, but they should have told at least their service department.

I restored the 12 volt ignition source back to the relay and reassembled the truck, and the OD works, and the trans also downshifts and upshifts. In a couple weeks we will run the codes again and see if we still have any transmission codes. For right now, I am a happy camper.

Re: 94-95 Ram vs 96+ Ram vs Dakota (Transmission Related) [Re: poorboy] #3154976
06/28/23 03:41 PM
06/28/23 03:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
Originally Posted by poorboy
The trans is most definitely an 46RE. And it is definitely a 96 production model. At this point, I suspect maybe it was an early production 96..

The good news is it now WORKS. The OD has cut the 70 mph rpm by nearly 1,000 rpm, it happily cruises along at about 2,000 at 70 mph on the cruise control where last Sat night on the same road, it wanted to turn 3,000 at 70 on the cruise control. I knew it was fixed as I pulled out of my driveway. Before it was sort of lazy leaving a stop, but now that it s downshifting, its back to being fun.

First what happened, and then the fix.

When the truck was 1st put on the road, I used the Dakota aluminum/plastic radiator. I had to modify the top radiator brackets for it to work, and both top corners were very close to the 49s curved hood sides. About 6 months into driving the truck (its 1st winter), the OEM Dakota radiator started leaking at the gasket between the top plastic tank and the aluminum core. It actually would not leak if the temp was above 15 degrees, but when it dropped below 15, it started seeping. The leak would go away shortly after the truck started. It took a few months before I actually saw where the coolant was going when I happened to look on a day it was 10 degrees outside.
I changed to a Champion aluminum radiator that better fit the confines of the truck, but that required the removal of the manual fan because of clearance. I installed an electric fan with the new radiator. While I was looking for a power source for that electric fan, I noticed the distribution box had a "fan relay" that was not being used, because there obviously was not an electric fane on the truck. I hijacked the key source 12 volt power wire from the fan relay to run my electric fan. The radiator replacement also required a moderation in the transmission cooling line routing. The new radiator was a crossflow with the trans cooler on the passenger side, the original was a top to bottom flow with the cooler in the lower tank. About 3 or 4 weeks after the radiator was installed, one of the trans cooler lines blew the hose off. I didn't know it until the truck stopped moving (about 3 miles from where the fluid trail began). I did a parking lot repair on the line, and dumped 8 quarts of AFT +4 into the trans. The trans appeared to operate OK except I noticed the OD was not functioning (the weather was warmer and we were doing more driving). The consonance here concluded the loss of the trans fluid killed the OD solenoids and probably caused deadly transmission problems. I accepted that and was waiting for a total failure, pulling this trans will be a major pita.

This post alerted me to the concept the fluid loss might not be the cause of the OD loss.

The fix: After spending much of yesterday looking for the missing trans relay, I was prepared to create a fan relay from scratch this morning, but the thought that the OD worked when the truck was first put together pushed me to find that missing relay. In my search for the trans relay, I began to wonder if one of the relays was mislabeled. The most obvious choice was the "fan relay". With the plugs off the trans, and the distribution box pulled up where I could check out the wiring, I started checking where the existing wires on the fan relay went. 4 wires. One (already cut) was a 12 volt ignition source. One was a battery power source. Both required for the trans relay. One wire was a 5 volt from the computer (required for the trans relay, but not required for a fan relay). The other wire had continuity with the #1 terminal on the trans connector (also required for the trans relay). My conclusion was, Mopar decided to use the 95 distribution box on the early 96 trucks, and substitute the fan relay that was only used on the 4 cylinder trucks as the location for the new trans relay. Not a bad idea, but they should have told at least their service department.

I restored the 12 volt ignition source back to the relay and reassembled the truck, and the OD works, and the trans also downshifts and upshifts. In a couple weeks we will run the codes again and see if we still have any transmission codes. For right now, I am a happy camper.


Great to hear. I hope it works you for you in the end.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1