Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: racerx]
#3092330
11/07/22 03:04 PM
11/07/22 03:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
Also many ignition boxes will retard the timing at higher RPM's and that is the reason for lost power not spark intensity. Is this common with MSD's or you are talking about your cheaper systems Crane/Mallory boxes never herd before It's easy enough to dial back in with a grid... IF it is an issue. I got a grid when they were fairly new (2016?) and used it with a crank trigger, 6AL using the "Legacy" connector. I upgraded to the proper grid amplifier (7 series) after about a season and have had no problems. I did rewire the car, prior to install. I hear lots of issues with ign / electronics are caused by poor and or old wiring.
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Tig]
#3092334
11/07/22 03:11 PM
11/07/22 03:11 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,096 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,096
Bend,OR USA
|
When I switch to the early MSD race boxes, 404B and 404C, my hemi car started way better and idled way better than it had with the Mopar race chrome box with the blue heat sink and the Hayes,which later became knowns as Stinger ignitions, race boxes Same thing later on using the 7 race boxes, I liked the MSD7AL2 races boxes the best, not the MSD7AL3 do to having one fail after 15 minutes running during a engine dyno test I have two MSD7C boxes, one early and one later box, they are not the same looking They both tested good when I got them several years back, probably use them on some of my future street cars
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 11/07/22 03:14 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: racerx]
#3092346
11/07/22 03:46 PM
11/07/22 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
If you want to add data logging, and you want to eventually add boost. Buy an EFI system and use just the ignition side of it. Data logging like crazy built in, precise ignition control etc. I would do that and run 8 coils.
I know of a guy that has the Holley system in place now and he data logs though it.And he's preparing to go plug on coil setup. All ignition boxes retard. Doesn’t matter what name is on the box. And spark intensity does matter.
Last edited by madscientist; 11/07/22 03:47 PM.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#3092347
11/07/22 03:46 PM
11/07/22 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,160 Plymouth, MI
Blusmbl
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,160
Plymouth, MI
|
I'll stick w/ my dinosaur 6AL. If I ever "upgrade" again, it'll be to an old 7AL-3, or something similar, just to see if the 7 is worth any power. The only time I've killed an old analog box was when I tried to crank it w/ a nearly dead battery. x2 on this as well. I haven't ever had an issue with the analog 6AL's. I have one of those plus the start/step retard module and it works great. If I ever get to the point where I need additional ignition features I'd do what Clark suggested, move to something like a Megasquirt, Haltech or Holley EFI just to handle the timing side. The grid system looks great but they seem finicky.
'18 Ford Raptor, random motorcycles, 1968 Plymouth Fury III - 11.37 @ 118
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: madscientist]
#3092359
11/07/22 04:26 PM
11/07/22 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,018 Tulsa OK
Bad340fish
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,018
Tulsa OK
|
If you want to add data logging, and you want to eventually add boost. Buy an EFI system and use just the ignition side of it. Data logging like crazy built in, precise ignition control etc. I would do that and run 8 coils.
I know of a guy that has the Holley system in place now and he data logs though it.And he's preparing to go plug on coil setup. All ignition boxes retard. Doesn’t matter what name is on the box. And spark intensity does matter. It must happen with EFI systems as well. Mine has a "spark latency" setting that can be adjusted to compensate for this problem if you happen to have it.
68 Barracuda Formula S 340
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#3092452
11/07/22 11:03 PM
11/07/22 11:03 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,334 Heaven
EvilB1Dart
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,334
Heaven
|
FWIW I have three cars with MSD Grids in them, there is also one in the heads up car. We have only had ONE fail in all the years using them and that was from some welding for a front bump steer kit hit the crank trigger pickup wire and fried it. Otherwise they have been trouble free and one of them is on its 7th year in the dragster Same here. Last 3 cars and current car have Grids. Also have a Grid in the boxes for my son's project car. I like it, but honestly, I like the Digital 7531 box I've used in the past. I have actually considered ripping it out and going backwards....LOL....to a 7531. But have never had an issue with any of the Grids. Had one in my street car with a lot of road time.
"Any fool can know. The point is to understand"
- A. Einstein
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Bad340fish]
#3092471
11/08/22 12:06 AM
11/08/22 12:06 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
If you want to add data logging, and you want to eventually add boost. Buy an EFI system and use just the ignition side of it. Data logging like crazy built in, precise ignition control etc. I would do that and run 8 coils.
I know of a guy that has the Holley system in place now and he data logs though it.And he's preparing to go plug on coil setup. All ignition boxes retard. Doesn’t matter what name is on the box. And spark intensity does matter. It must happen with EFI systems as well. Mine has a "spark latency" setting that can be adjusted to compensate for this problem if you happen to have it. I’m sure it does. All electronics have a slew rate.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: racerx]
#3092530
11/08/22 11:09 AM
11/08/22 11:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540 Milwaukee WI
TRENDZ
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
|
Also many ignition boxes will retard the timing at higher RPM's and that is the reason for lost power not spark intensity. Is this common with MSD's or you are talking about your cheaper systems Crane/Mallory boxes never herd before A whole lot of people don’t know this or check this, or are capable of checking this. Most modern EFI control boxes address this with a comp table. Usually only happens with mag sensors. No way I would spend the money on a Digital 7 when there are much better and reliable options out there, and your current ignition is working fine. Others opinions have merit, but I see no reason to dive in half way.
"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: TRENDZ]
#3092674
11/08/22 08:05 PM
11/08/22 08:05 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,066 Mo.
racerx
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,066
Mo.
|
Also many ignition boxes will retard the timing at higher RPM's and that is the reason for lost power not spark intensity. Is this common with MSD's or you are talking about your cheaper systems Crane/Mallory boxes never herd before A whole lot of people don’t know this or check this, or are capable of checking this. Most modern EFI control boxes address this with a comp table. Usually only happens with mag sensors. No way I would spend the money on a Digital 7 when there are much better and reliable options out there, and your current ignition is working fine. Others opinions have merit, but I see no reason to dive in half way. with this statement but I'm in a position to upgrade my box at a decent price with room for growth ( more options) right now seeing the only thing that's different from my digital 6 is hotter mj 's (130 verse 190) and the data logging etc.
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: racerx]
#3092769
11/09/22 09:21 AM
11/09/22 09:21 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
Also many ignition boxes will retard the timing at higher RPM's and that is the reason for lost power not spark intensity. Is this common with MSD's or you are talking about your cheaper systems Crane/Mallory boxes never herd before A whole lot of people don’t know this or check this, or are capable of checking this. Most modern EFI control boxes address this with a comp table. Usually only happens with mag sensors. No way I would spend the money on a Digital 7 when there are much better and reliable options out there, and your current ignition is working fine. Others opinions have merit, but I see no reason to dive in half way. with this statement but I'm in a position to upgrade my box at a decent price with room for growth ( more options) right now seeing the only thing that's different from my digital 6 is hotter mj 's (130 verse 190) and the data logging etc. We picked up a little ET retarding the timing 2 degree's from 5000 to 7500RPM, from a 35 degree base, easy to do using a grid. Theoretically, the older analogue Ignition units should have more of an issue with latency / propagation delay due to the components and the design used. Digital stuff is way quicker in this respect so intrinsically more accurate at maintaining a requested timing curve. A hotter spark (more energy) helps at the top end as the primary / secondary coil field doesn't have time to drop to zero at high RPM (field collapse, de-saturation of the coil). In effect your spark gets weaker as the change of field is less, especially true if you have only one coil feeding multiple cylinders. it's physics, you can't get away from it, the square type coils suffer from this less than the canister types due to a more efficient design so I'm led to believe. Just my 2 penneth, not wishing to start an argument here just a reasoned discussion
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Tig]
#3092825
11/09/22 12:14 PM
11/09/22 12:14 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,066 Mo.
racerx
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,066
Mo.
|
Also many ignition boxes will retard the timing at higher RPM's and that is the reason for lost power not spark intensity. Is this common with MSD's or you are talking about your cheaper systems Crane/Mallory boxes never herd before A whole lot of people don’t know this or check this, or are capable of checking this. Most modern EFI control boxes address this with a comp table. Usually only happens with mag sensors. No way I would spend the money on a Digital 7 when there are much better and reliable options out there, and your current ignition is working fine. Others opinions have merit, but I see no reason to dive in half way. with this statement but I'm in a position to upgrade my box at a decent price with room for growth ( more options) right now seeing the only thing that's different from my digital 6 is hotter mj 's (130 verse 190) and the data logging etc. We picked up a little ET retarding the timing 2 degree's from 5000 to 7500RPM, from a 35 degree base, easy to do using a grid. Theoretically, the older analogue Ignition units should have more of an issue with latency / propagation delay due to the components and the design used. Digital stuff is way quicker in this respect so intrinsically more accurate at maintaining a requested timing curve. A hotter spark (more energy) helps at the top end as the primary / secondary coil field doesn't have time to drop to zero at high RPM (field collapse, de-saturation of the coil). In effect your spark gets weaker as the change of field is less, especially true if you have only one coil feeding multiple cylinders. it's physics, you can't get away from it, the square type coils suffer from this less than the canister types due to a more efficient design so I'm led to believe. Just my 2 penneth, not wishing to start an argument here just a reasoned discussion Thank you
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: racerx]
#3092844
11/09/22 01:32 PM
11/09/22 01:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,355 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,355
Las Vegas
|
Never seen anything gained by taking timing out in high gear on an NA car and have tried on a few different cars. The one thing I have seen that ALWAYS works is adding timing in lower gears to base in an NA car. It has always netted quicker ET's....
IMO the Grid is much more use friendly than the old 7530, 7531 and 75301 box, but otherwise the results are the same. Just sold my last two digital 7 boxes to fellow members here
Last edited by Al_Alguire; 11/09/22 01:34 PM.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#3092874
11/09/22 03:33 PM
11/09/22 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
Never seen anything gained by taking timing out in high gear on an NA car and have tried on a few different cars. It's possible had other issues, we went from a single 4 to a T/R and it wanted less timing. We had run the single 4 up to 38 Degrees max timing. Since it ran just as well / slightly better with less timing with the T/R we left it at that. Does seem to cruise better with more timing in the mid rpm range though
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#3092892
11/09/22 04:18 PM
11/09/22 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,019 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,019
MN
|
Never seen anything gained by taking timing out in high gear on an NA car and have tried on a few different cars. The one thing I have seen that ALWAYS works is adding timing in lower gears to base in an NA car. It has always netted quicker ET's....
IMO the Grid is much more use friendly than the old 7530, 7531 and 75301 box, but otherwise the results are the same. Just sold my last two digital 7 boxes to fellow members here I know many years ago, John Hagen's Pro Stock car was pulling timing out in high gear. At the time he was running a couple MPH faster then Glidden. Glidden was the only one to figure it out, and asked John how much timing he was taking out? "I don't know what you're talking about Bob?" LOL. Years ago, I once dropped the timing from 36* to 31*, to see if I could kill some ET. The car picked up over 1 mph, and went faster... I bought one of those boxes from you Al. I know it fires the car up...
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: ignition overboard.
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#3093048
11/10/22 08:20 AM
11/10/22 08:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540 Milwaukee WI
TRENDZ
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
|
Never seen anything gained by taking timing out in high gear on an NA car and have tried on a few different cars. The one thing I have seen that ALWAYS works is adding timing in lower gears to base in an NA car. It has always netted quicker ET's....
IMO the Grid is much more use friendly than the old 7530, 7531 and 75301 box, but otherwise the results are the same. Just sold my last two digital 7 boxes to fellow members here This is a totally valid and sensible point of view. Tested and proven. I assume based on a dyno tuned engine with an optimized timing map. It sort of proves that timing maps should be load based. A dyno is putting maximum load on the engine in determining maximum power output. It shows you only maximum load timing. Taking some of that load away (through gear selection) should require more timing. Given a large majority of end users don’t have dyno tuned engines, or load based timing, it is easy to see how “high gear retarting” and “added timing in low gear” can be interchanged definitions based on your point of reference. Regardless of your point of reference, load based timing is the best way of using the energy your engine is capable of making throughout the run. This is another net positive for using efi to control timing.
Last edited by TRENDZ; 11/10/22 08:39 AM. Reason: punctuation
"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"
|
|
|
|
|