Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076229
09/11/22 07:33 AM
09/11/22 07:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Thanks Brad. Keystone will have videos up toward the end of the week.


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3076237
09/11/22 08:06 AM
09/11/22 08:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,813
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,813
MI, usa
I doubt that it separates 8”. Separation is dictated by instant center location. You run Cal tracks, so the I/C is short and high. It’s going to separate. You can slow separation with tighter rear shock rebound. As long as it doesn’t spin that will help. But it will not decrease 60 ft a great amount. You are still in the area where you need power/converter flash/tune to come in earlier. How are you checking the converter flash? Converter can make or break a combo. I would have never bet my 15-1 572 would need over 5700. 6000 flash was worth a solid .10 in ET. Why low power NHRA stockers 60 ft so well? Loose converter, optimized carb, and high starting line ratio.
Doug

Last edited by dvw; 09/11/22 08:10 AM.
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3076256
09/11/22 09:57 AM
09/11/22 09:57 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA

Last edited by Brad_Haak; 09/11/22 10:04 AM.

2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076263
09/11/22 11:00 AM
09/11/22 11:00 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,159
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,159
CT
Try more initial timing? Might hit the converter a little harder. Most people running 272 @ .050 are locked out.

Whats the CR 12:1?

Have you verified that the balancer TDC mark is correct and not off a few degrees?

Last edited by GTX MATT; 09/11/22 11:01 AM.

Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: dvw] #3076264
09/11/22 11:02 AM
09/11/22 11:02 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Originally Posted by dvw
I doubt that it separates 8”. Separation is dictated by instant center location. You run Cal tracks, so the I/C is short and high. It’s going to separate. You can slow separation with tighter rear shock rebound. As long as it doesn’t spin that will help. But it will not decrease 60 ft a great amount. You are still in the area where you need power/converter flash/tune to come in earlier. How are you checking the converter flash? Converter can make or break a combo. I would have never bet my 15-1 572 would need over 5700. 6000 flash was worth a solid .10 in ET. Why low power NHRA stockers 60 ft so well? Loose converter, optimized carb, and high starting line ratio.
Doug
No Cal Tracs just superstock springs. I check flash by slow speed in high gear then wap throttle. The convertor is an 8in ATI. single adjustable Calvert shocks set on 7. The carb is fairly new so I'm still working on it, idle and transition is pretty good, now I have to tune pumps, squirters and wot jetting. We put a known good carb on and it picked up mph it had way more jet and we played with squirters. Just ran out of time. Another all day tnt at the end of the month.
So you think I should bring it off idlefrom to flash convertor harder?
I have never heard the term high starting line ratio? Ok so I researched it. 4.30x 2.74=11.78. According to chart my car should somewhere between 10.00 and 10.25. I learned something new today thanks dvw.

Last edited by carnut68; 09/11/22 11:37 AM.

America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: GTX MATT] #3076266
09/11/22 11:05 AM
09/11/22 11:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Originally Posted by GTX MATT
Try more initial timing? Might hit the converter a little harder. Most people running 272 @ .050 are locked out.

Whats the CR 12:1?

Have you verified that the balancer TDC mark is correct and not off a few degrees?
CR is 13:3. Balancer was checked whenever the cam was degreed. Initial is now 29/ 37 total.


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076269
09/11/22 11:09 AM
09/11/22 11:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076423
09/11/22 10:48 PM
09/11/22 10:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,813
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,813
MI, usa


Here's a qualifying run for the car in the video during Indy qualifying. It is a very well sorted stocker running a 440. Knowing Doug I guarantee it has the best of everything from top to bottom.

Left Doug Duell 350 C/SA 11.40 .018 1.354 4.148 6.547 102.19 8.632 10.420 125.45

Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3076472
09/12/22 07:13 AM
09/12/22 07:13 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 150
Indianapolis, In. area
B
BTBelvedere Offline
member
BTBelvedere  Offline
member
B

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 150
Indianapolis, In. area
How old are your SS springs? I had a very similar thing happen, the engine ran fine but it kept going slower and slower. I began to break things like u joints, the yoke on the rear end, and even the 65 only extension housing. Someone finally told me that they could see the entire top of the rear tire when I launched. He suggested that I look for "witness marks" on the front of the rear shocks since the rear end wrapped up so much. The shocks were almost smashed. I would have never believed the springs would allow that, but it sure did. After speaking with some stocker friends, they said as soon as the 60's begin to fall off, get new springs. Of course, that was in the days before caltracs.

Re: 60 ft issues [Re: BTBelvedere] #3076487
09/12/22 08:28 AM
09/12/22 08:28 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Originally Posted by BTBelvedere
How old are your SS springs? I had a very similar thing happen, the engine ran fine but it kept going slower and slower. I began to break things like u joints, the yoke on the rear end, and even the 65 only extension housing. Someone finally told me that they could see the entire top of the rear tire when I launched. He suggested that I look for "witness marks" on the front of the rear shocks since the rear end wrapped up so much. The shocks were almost smashed. I would have never believed the springs would allow that, but it sure did. After speaking with some stocker friends, they said as soon as the 60's begin to fall off, get new springs. Of course, that was in the days before caltracs.
About 4 yrs old. Thanks


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: dvw] #3076494
09/12/22 09:03 AM
09/12/22 09:03 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Originally Posted by dvw

Here's a qualifying run for the car in the video during Indy qualifying. It is a very well sorted stocker running a 440. Knowing Doug I guarantee it has the best of everything from top to bottom.

Left Doug Duell 350 C/SA 11.40 .018 1.354 4.148 6.547 102.19 8.632 10.420 125.45

Here's a screen shot of a pass he made during class runoffs at Indy:

Screen Shot 2022-09-01 at 8.43.19 AM.png

2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076503
09/12/22 09:43 AM
09/12/22 09:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
It's easy to see how much ET is tied to the 60 ft when you compare the above with my Challenger's best pass (from 2008) that ran similar MPH. My 60 was a 1.45x, a full tenth slower than Duell's C/SA car:
60' - 1.454
330 - 4.254
660' - 6.653 at 102.03
1000' - 8.745
1320' - 10.523 at 126.44


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076696
09/12/22 07:32 PM
09/12/22 07:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Originally Posted by Brad_Haak
It's easy to see how much ET is tied to the 60 ft when you compare the above with my Challenger's best pass (from 2008) that ran similar MPH. My 60 was a 1.45x, a full tenth slower than Duell's C/SA car:
60' - 1.454
330 - 4.254
660' - 6.653 at 102.03
1000' - 8.745
1320' - 10.523 at 126.44
I'm losing alot. My best mph was 126.1 @ Cecil ET was 10.84. I'm going to work on the carb a little. The Proform 950 had a better 60. We swapped to a Holley 1000 it worked better up top.


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3076806
09/13/22 07:37 AM
09/13/22 07:37 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Was the Holley 1000 a downleg or an annular booster version? What was the difference in ET slips between them?


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3076822
09/13/22 09:01 AM
09/13/22 09:01 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,813
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,813
MI, usa
You need to realize that running NHRA stocker or S/S numbers isn't the norm. Nor is it cheap. There are a fleet of experts behind the car in the example. I know Doug. He is a perfectionist. He knows how to chose people to get results. Just wanted to show what is possible.
Doug

Re: 60 ft issues [Re: dvw] #3076828
09/13/22 09:26 AM
09/13/22 09:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,117
Loudoun County, VA
Originally Posted by dvw
You need to realize that running NHRA stocker or S/S numbers isn't the norm... Just wanted to show what is possible.

I understand completely; the info I provided was simply to show how dependent upon the 60 ft we are, not as a "You should be running this quick, too!" to the OP. More like "Here's the Gold Standard; you have room for improvement" grin


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Brad_Haak] #3077019
09/13/22 07:11 PM
09/13/22 07:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Originally Posted by Brad_Haak
Was the Holley 1000 a downleg or an annular booster version? What was the difference in ET slips between them?
Standard out of the box Holley 1000, downleg boosters pig fat at idle 86 pmj, 96smj, 35 P squirter, 37 S. The Proform has T slot restricters.081, IFR .035 moved to lower Pmj 79, Smj 86 it was lean up top. Blue pump cam 33 squirters P and S. It had a better 60.
Proform 11.14 @ 119.7
Holley 10.88 @ 123.7
Timing was 37 total for both passes and the same lane.
I appreciate the help. That's how you learn.

Last edited by carnut68; 09/13/22 07:13 PM.

America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3077196
09/14/22 12:00 PM
09/14/22 12:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
Quote

Proform 11.14 @ 119.7
Holley 10.88 @ 123.7


This is a huge difference imo.
Especially when you factor in the slower carb had a better 60’ time.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: fast68plymouth] #3077285
09/14/22 06:54 PM
09/14/22 06:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,148
Md.
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Quote

Proform 11.14 @ 119.7
Holley 10.88 @ 123.7


This is a huge difference imo.
Especially when you factor in the slower carb had a better 60’ time.
The slower carb is going to get some jet added. I'm going to increase pvrc channel size then add mj. The car responded well to idle and transition calibration.


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: fast68plymouth] #3077424
09/15/22 09:10 AM
09/15/22 09:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,351
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,351
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
I’d try opening up the lash .004-.005 and see if that impacted the 60’ time

For perspective on the stall speed....... the Normal T/A 8” Race converter for a 440 bracket race engine would flash about 5600.
That configuration was derived long before there were Indy heads.......... so it was lotsa stall....... with small heads.
Typically, the trend would be to increase the stall speed as the heads got bigger.


iagree iagree iagree After watching the video, I think the converter is the main reason the 60' is lazy.
If that's the case, adding some lash should help the 60'. I'd do the change back to back at the track to rule out day to day changes. twocents


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1