Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040230
05/06/22 09:04 AM
05/06/22 09:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,669
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,669
Wichita
One small thing that will really wake it up is recurving the stock distributor.

Cleaning and lubing the internal weights in a stock electronic distributor and installing some Mr. Gasket #925B springs will make a world of difference.

The Moroso underdrive pulley on the crank helps a little, too, and is a bolt on swap. You can find them at swap meets pretty cheap. IIRC, one of the guys here showed an 8 hp gain from one.

Last edited by GY3; 05/06/22 09:11 AM.

'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: GY3] #3040271
05/06/22 11:01 AM
05/06/22 11:01 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,343
north of coder
moparx Online content
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Online Content
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,343
north of coder
i like and use Thermoquads.
well sorted out, and with a good re-curved distributor, even 440's are capable of good [reasonable] gas mileage in the 13-15mpg range when one keeps his foot out [or off of] the firewall.
beer

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040310
05/06/22 12:33 PM
05/06/22 12:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
Originally Posted by General Lee
I know they arent the best. But do i need more at the moment? Im not getting them rebuilt, just some new sprinfs and a valve job. I can always slap aluminum ones on in a year or 2 if i get tired of this setup. Dont wanna go to crazy either on a daily driver. And pump gas is a must for now, for 2 reasons. 1: Trudeaus awesome gas prices make it inefficient to run 91 octane on a daily driver, and the 440s gas mileage will already suck 2: we happen to have a gas tank here on the farm at home for the company trucks and thats obviously 87. Ya know, "ive never considered myself a thief, but the old man wouldnt miss just one little liter"πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†
And for pistons, i wanna do the bottom end right in one shot, i can always screw with the top end later if i feel i need more. But not the bottom end.


You're not getting them rebuilt but you are getting a valve job ???? How is that not rebuilding them ?

Alum heads will help you run on 87 pump gas with your target compression AND be a performance increase.


running up my post count some more .
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040321
05/06/22 01:07 PM
05/06/22 01:07 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
Stock rods are pressed pin, that limits your forged choices, 2355f speed -pro

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: JohnRR] #3040326
05/06/22 01:10 PM
05/06/22 01:10 PM
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
G
General Lee Offline OP
member
General Lee  Offline OP
member
G

Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by JohnRR
Originally Posted by General Lee
I know they arent the best. But do i need more at the moment? Im not getting them rebuilt, just some new sprinfs and a valve job. I can always slap aluminum ones on in a year or 2 if i get tired of this setup. Dont wanna go to crazy either on a daily driver. And pump gas is a must for now, for 2 reasons. 1: Trudeaus awesome gas prices make it inefficient to run 91 octane on a daily driver, and the 440s gas mileage will already suck 2: we happen to have a gas tank here on the farm at home for the company trucks and thats obviously 87. Ya know, "ive never considered myself a thief, but the old man wouldnt miss just one little liter"πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†
And for pistons, i wanna do the bottom end right in one shot, i can always screw with the top end later if i feel i need more. But not the bottom end.


You're not getting them rebuilt but you are getting a valve job ???? How is that not rebuilding them ?

Alum heads will help you run on 87 pump gas with your target compression AND be a performance increase.


Well i dont mean porting and the like. Theyre probably fine. If they dont leak ill use them. Might have to lap a valve or 2. I dont know. Will check with kerosene soon and go from there.

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: B1MAXX] #3040328
05/06/22 01:12 PM
05/06/22 01:12 PM
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
G
General Lee Offline OP
member
General Lee  Offline OP
member
G

Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by B1MAXX
Stock rods are pressed pin, that limits your forged choices, 2355f speed -pro


Thanks. Will they require bigger valve reliefs machined in and will i have to balance the bottom end for those?

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040341
05/06/22 01:33 PM
05/06/22 01:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,061
Atlanta, GA
M
mgoblue9798 Offline
super stock
mgoblue9798  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,061
Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by General Lee
I know they arent the best. But do i need more at the moment? Im not getting them rebuilt, just some new sprinfs and a valve job. I can always slap aluminum ones on in a year or 2 if i get tired of this setup. Dont wanna go to crazy either on a daily driver. And pump gas is a must for now, for 2 reasons. 1: Trudeaus awesome gas prices make it inefficient to run 91 octane on a daily driver, and the 440s gas mileage will already suck 2: we happen to have a gas tank here on the farm at home for the company trucks and thats obviously 87. Ya know, "ive never considered myself a thief, but the old man wouldnt miss just one little liter"πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†
And for pistons, i wanna do the bottom end right in one shot, i can always screw with the top end later if i feel i need more. But not the bottom end.


Based on the new info that you need an overbore and pistons, a set of KB flat tops or TRW six pack pistons would be the budget choice. If you are planning to upgrade to aluminum heads get the block decked to zero deck the pistons. If you pick the KB's make damn sure to open the ring gap in case you decide to tow with the truck. I am opening mine to what is recommended for a nitrous application just to be as safe as possible. I would still get with Mike Jones, Hughes, or one of the other custom cam grinders to get a modern tech cam for your application.

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040354
05/06/22 02:11 PM
05/06/22 02:11 PM
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
G
General Lee Offline OP
member
General Lee  Offline OP
member
G

Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
And by the way, i do have the stock thermoquad that came off it. It was a good running engine. I see some of you recommending this carb, so if i clean it will that work nicely with my setup? Not sure how much cfm it would be

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040360
05/06/22 02:33 PM
05/06/22 02:33 PM
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
G
General Lee Offline OP
member
General Lee  Offline OP
member
G

Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Im gonna go with those 6 pack pistons. Thanks folks. And any other info or thought, greatly appreciated. This is my first engine build, so every bit helps

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: GODSCOUNTRY340] #3040363
05/06/22 02:40 PM
05/06/22 02:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 734
New York
R/T1968R/T Offline
super stock
R/T1968R/T  Offline
super stock

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 734
New York
Originally Posted by GODSCOUNTRY340
I can't remember who did this dyno test but they got 449 horsepower out of a smogger engine without replacing pistons. Here's how they did it.

heres the article https://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/threads/dyno-testing-a-stock-1972-440.249866/


Last edited by R/T1968R/T; 05/06/22 02:40 PM.
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040392
05/06/22 04:46 PM
05/06/22 04:46 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
no pocket mods, and ....no balance, they are typically made heaver than needed for that reason.Will it be perfect no but designed that way. Balancing would be recommended for obvious reasons, if desired.

Last edited by B1MAXX; 05/06/22 04:47 PM.
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: R/T1968R/T] #3040404
05/06/22 06:02 PM
05/06/22 06:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559
Idaho
L
LaRoy Engines Offline
mopar
LaRoy Engines  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559
Idaho
Having built that engine I too don't recommend the 509 cam for his application. Here is another low compression build using the Summit 6400 cam. In fact he is off in the mountains with it at this moment.
Mountain creeper 440

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: Sniper] #3040449
05/06/22 09:35 PM
05/06/22 09:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200
Someplace you aren't
Originally Posted by Sniper
Originally Posted by SomeCarGuy
What shape is the short block now? I agree it may not be the best bang for the buck to change pistons.

No way I’d run under a 750 carb on a 440. I won’t run less than that on a 383 either. Run a small carb back to back on either engine and then tell me which one you’d use. Once you feel the power you won’t run a small carb again.

A performer rpm is the best intake I’ve found for a street effort and it did great on smogger low comp 440s I had.

I agree the factory 375 hp cam is likely on target or is at least the outer limit on a truck build.


The OP says he wants low end power and torque.

You drag racers need to keep that in mind. Soon as you bring up a 509 cam you've far exceeded what the OP wanted.

When I swapped a 360 into my M body I ran it with a 650 carb and a 750 carb. The 650 got better mileage, low end and throttle response with less top end speed, maybe 110 mph max. The 750 had better top end speed, with worse mileage and low end. Since I don't need to go past the 125 mph mark on my speedo in a street car guess which carb was the right choice?



Not sure what a 509 cam and your 360 has to do with this? A 750 on a 383 or 440 will pick up power all over the place, including low end. Exactly why I run no less. I had a 383 that was a mileage master with a tiny carb. It also made no power. Fine in a convertible. Looking back that little carb was likely the culprit to the no power, although it helped the mpg I’m sure.


I want my fair share
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040452
05/06/22 09:39 PM
05/06/22 09:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200
Someplace you aren't
Originally Posted by General Lee
I know they arent the best. But do i need more at the moment? Im not getting them rebuilt, just some new sprinfs and a valve job. I can always slap aluminum ones on in a year or 2 if i get tired of this setup. Dont wanna go to crazy either on a daily driver. And pump gas is a must for now, for 2 reasons. 1: Trudeaus awesome gas prices make it inefficient to run 91 octane on a daily driver, and the 440s gas mileage will already suck 2: we happen to have a gas tank here on the farm at home for the company trucks and thats obviously 87. Ya know, "ive never considered myself a thief, but the old man wouldnt miss just one little liter"πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†
And for pistons, i wanna do the bottom end right in one shot, i can always screw with the top end later if i feel i need more. But not the bottom end.


The issue is the pump gas iron head build won’t be all that great if you go with aluminum heads later. Plus the cost of redoing the 452s is a long way to E street edelbrocks or the china ones that are cheaper still.


I want my fair share
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: SomeCarGuy] #3040521
05/07/22 09:39 AM
05/07/22 09:39 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
This would not be the place for the 509. A cam with 228 @ .050 or less in this build. The 509 is 241*. You better be 10 to 1 or so.

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: General Lee] #3040527
05/07/22 10:40 AM
05/07/22 10:40 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,061
Atlanta, GA
M
mgoblue9798 Offline
super stock
mgoblue9798  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,061
Atlanta, GA
If you have a good thermoquad there isn't a better carb for a street driven car or truck. Best fuel mileage of any carb when properly set up.

Get your heads CC'd after any decking and valve job. Find out how far below deck your pistons are after install. You will then have the info needed to pick a cam somewhere in the 200 to 220 @.050 range for your application.

Last edited by mgoblue9798; 05/07/22 11:02 AM.
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: B1MAXX] #3040636
05/07/22 05:50 PM
05/07/22 05:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,499
God's Country Maryland
GODSCOUNTRY340 Offline
top fuel
GODSCOUNTRY340  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,499
God's Country Maryland
Originally Posted by B1MAXX
This would not be the place for the 509. A cam with 228 @ .050 or less in this build. The 509 is 241*. You better be 10 to 1 or so.



I wasn't recommending the .509 cam I was just relaying what they used in their dyno test, but you have to respect that it gave it 50 more horses. That's a pretty respectable increase for a low compression engine, remember that cam was installed before they added the closed chamber 516 heads.


I love the smell of Deer guts in the morning, it smells like... VICTORY!
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: GODSCOUNTRY340] #3040656
05/07/22 06:46 PM
05/07/22 06:46 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,225
nowhere
S
Sniper Offline
master
Sniper  Offline
master
S

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,225
nowhere
I put together a spread sheet taking the starting engine combo vs the .509 cam combo. Then the end column is all the mods before the .509 swap vs. throwing in the .509 cam. Seems like under 2900 ish, the 509 setup loses to either. Above it starts to pull away. Every thing in red is where the .509 combo makes more.

509.JPG
Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: GODSCOUNTRY340] #3040682
05/07/22 09:54 PM
05/07/22 09:54 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,965
Apollo, PA.
Originally Posted by GODSCOUNTRY340
Originally Posted by B1MAXX
This would not be the place for the 509. A cam with 228 @ .050 or less in this build. The 509 is 241*. You better be 10 to 1 or so.



I wasn't recommending the .509 cam I was just relaying what they used in their dyno test, but you have to respect that it gave it 50 more horses. That's a pretty respectable increase for a low compression engine, remember that cam was installed before they added the closed chamber 516 heads.


Yeah, I didn't think you were, just in the attachment. The idea just seemed to be catching wind.....

Re: Building a smogger 440 [Re: Sniper] #3040717
05/08/22 08:42 AM
05/08/22 08:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 695
Southern Alberta
Uberpube Offline
mopar
Uberpube  Offline
mopar

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 695
Southern Alberta
Originally Posted by Sniper
Originally Posted by Uberpube

it would pull vacuum at wot throttle with the edelbrock.


At what RPM?

Above 4k is when it really started to show, I bought the 750 off of a guy that said it wasn't enough for a 383 Chev which I doubted but it doesn't seem like it's really enough for a 440 with a dual plane. I played with it on the rollers for a few hours and tuned it in, but it was always down from the thermoquad.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1