Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Interesting dyno test of ancient dual quads [Re: moparx] #3029132
03/31/22 09:40 AM
03/31/22 09:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
Originally Posted by moparx
[quote=Mike P]“…….Thats 63 years old!!!!!.......”

Hell I wish I was only 63 years old. rolleyes ]


ME TOO !!!! boogie

i would like to use a pair of Thermo-Quads on a CH28 if i could find a cheap intake.
i have a 446 with a 590 cammed, edelbrock head'ed engine sitting here i could put into my charger, or try a T-Quad log ram intake for my humpback.
beer
you would really have to cut one up to do thermoquads. not opposed to it but work. i do believe from a performance stand point the 1407 is probably ideal and would max out the as cast manifold. i would like to try a pair of 1407's one of these days.

Re: Interesting dyno test of ancient dual quads [Re: 2boltmain] #3029826
04/02/22 01:06 AM
04/02/22 01:06 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,096
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,096
Bend,OR USA
He must not know anything about the early AFB air flow ratings, those stock small bolt pattern AFB barely flowed 400 CFM originally each. shruggy
I wish he had stated the actual carb #s instead of ASSUMING that they were 625 CFM Carter AFB shruggy
I've owned and race several cars with stock dual quad sets up like that one years ago wrench
We never made the fuel systems good enough to feed the motors more fuel than they needed, they always show the plugs being dead lean at WOT realcrazy shruggy WE didn't know what we hadn't learn yet whiney shruggy


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Interesting dyno test of ancient dual quads [Re: Cab_Burge] #3029870
04/02/22 07:55 AM
04/02/22 07:55 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
those stock carbs were nowhere near 625cfm each.

Re: Interesting dyno test of ancient dual quads [Re: lewtot184] #3029966
04/02/22 01:43 PM
04/02/22 01:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,307
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,307
north of coder
if i had to give an educated guess, i would say they "might" be around 395cfm each.
beer

Re: Interesting dyno test of ancient dual quads [Re: 2boltmain] #3054726
06/30/22 05:07 PM
06/30/22 05:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,711
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,711
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Quote
There is the Modman.

twocentsTo me it looks like someone from marketing made a conceptual sketch of an interchangeable top manifold using a magic marker on a Mcdonalds napkin while they were eating lunch. Then somebody picked up the napkin and sent it off to the pattern shop. Nobody including Indy wants to tell you how it compares to any other intakes including their own. Can it putt around town or is it an 8500rpm race only piece? It would be killer if it actually fits somewhere between the Edelbrock dual planes and the Indy tub style intakes. I know there are a few running in NSS but I haven't seen any comparison with any of the other manifolds that are available. Have there been any comparative tests posted or published? If anybody has experience with these please post results and thoughts.

Last edited by GomangoCuda; 06/30/22 05:23 PM.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1