Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Anyone ever go faster with less lift? [Re: polyspheric] #3019170
02/26/22 06:50 PM
02/26/22 06:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,039
Mt Morris Michigan
mopar dave Offline OP
master
mopar dave  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,039
Mt Morris Michigan
I was never good with that kind of math, but i did set up my pushrod checker yesterday to 9" which gave me 1 thread out the bottom of the rocker and my intake valve clearances were less. I did not write anything down and thought maybe my dial indicator was not quite the same position as when i measured with the 9 1/16 long pushrod. I discounted my figures and moved on because those results were opposite of what i thought they should be. That is interesting and worth noting.

Re: Anyone ever go faster with less lift? [Re: Cab_Burge] #3019172
02/26/22 06:53 PM
02/26/22 06:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,039
Mt Morris Michigan
mopar dave Offline OP
master
mopar dave  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,039
Mt Morris Michigan
I thought my wear patter looked good with the 9 1/16 pushrod and flat tappet.

HS 2.jpg
Re: Anyone ever go faster with less lift? [Re: mopar dave] #3019242
02/26/22 10:23 PM
02/26/22 10:23 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,985
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,985
Apollo, PA.
Changing pushrod length won't effect that.

Re: Anyone ever go faster with less lift? [Re: B1MAXX] #3019781
02/28/22 06:00 PM
02/28/22 06:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
6
65signet Offline
mopar
65signet  Offline
mopar
6

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
To answer your original question, i did go alot faster with less lift with a 360 and iron heads.


1965 Plymouth Barracuda 273 M/SA
1970 Plymouth Duster 360/904 10.60s with J heads
Re: Anyone ever go faster with less lift? [Re: polyspheric] #3024710
03/16/22 09:27 PM
03/16/22 09:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 403
Romulus, MI
GTS340 Offline
mopar
GTS340  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 403
Romulus, MI
Originally Posted by polyspheric
When he posts something that he later realizes was incorrect

Some of my work: http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/mopar-tech.htm
Find some mistakes.


http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/mpcam-tech-c.htm
Well junior, all these specs are wrong. But when you just compile other people's info instead of taking actual measurements I understand.
You also had the bore spacing for the modern hemi listed incorrectly for a good bit. But let me guess, just a typo??

Re: Anyone ever go faster with less lift? [Re: mopar dave] #3024746
03/17/22 01:40 AM
03/17/22 01:40 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
I'm interested too.
More specifically on the exhaust side.
The exhaust lobe/lifter/pushrod has to open the exhaust valve against both cylinder pressure (times valve head area) and the valve spring pressure all multiplied by the rocker ratio.
The additional exhaust airflow at high lift may not be worth all the extra valve train strain and losses. The exhaust is going to exit under much higher pressure, and overlap is at low lifts defined by duration and LSA.
The Intake opens into an evacuated chamber, and only has atmospheric pressure to push air into the chamber (NA).
Many race heads will use smaller exhaust valves so a larger intake can be installed. Larger intake has more curtain area (area for overlap and flow), where the smaller exhaust valve takes less pressure to open against the post ignition cylinder pressure.

Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1