Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Sailor charged with arson #2948756
07/30/21 09:25 AM
07/30/21 09:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,008
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline OP
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline OP
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,008
Benton, IL.


Master, again and still
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: DaveRS23] #2948757
07/30/21 09:39 AM
07/30/21 09:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,517
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart Offline
Rhinotruck
Rhinodart  Offline
Rhinotruck

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,517
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
They should make him pay for it, what is a few hundred million anyway...


The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.

JB Rhinehart, Realist

A-Body's RULE!
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: Rhinodart] #2948827
07/30/21 01:21 PM
07/30/21 01:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline
master
DrCharles  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
I saw an article quoting $3 billion in damages... I think it's totaled. work

Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: DrCharles] #2948833
07/30/21 01:32 PM
07/30/21 01:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,920
Richmond, Indiana
19swinger70 Offline
master
19swinger70  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,920
Richmond, Indiana
Wow. What the heck is wrong with people?


1970 340 swinger. sublime
1967 barracuda fastback BB
55 Plymouth Project
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: DrCharles] #2948837
07/30/21 01:41 PM
07/30/21 01:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Firing squad.

Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: justinp61] #2948842
07/30/21 01:53 PM
07/30/21 01:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
Originally Posted by justinp61
Firing squad.




Nah, put to work making gravel everyday (the hard way) for the rest of his life

Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: DrCharles] #2948855
07/30/21 02:25 PM
07/30/21 02:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,008
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline OP
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline OP
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,008
Benton, IL.
"All told, the Navy clearly came to the conclusion that sending Bonhomme Richard to meet the scrapper's torch was the least bad option it had available."

www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37880...-scarp-fire-damaged-uss-bonhomme-richard


Master, again and still
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: 19swinger70] #2948864
07/30/21 02:55 PM
07/30/21 02:55 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,372
St. Charles, MO
wingman Offline
Uncreative Title
wingman  Offline
Uncreative Title

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,372
St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by 19swinger70
Wow. What the heck is wrong with people?


With all the "idol worship" attitudes that some people have in regards to members of the armed forces, I can tell you it has its share of dirtbags, jerks, and nuts just like any other profession.

Just wearing the uniform does not make you a hero.


1969 Dodge Coronet Super Bee 383 A4
1970 Plymouth Road Runner 440 FC7 (sold)
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: DaveRS23] #2948896
07/30/21 04:31 PM
07/30/21 04:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,741
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,741
Rio Linda, CA
In 1989 there was a gun turret explosion on the battleship USS New Jersey which caused numerous deaths. The first investigation into the explosion, conducted by the U.S. Navy, concluded that one of the gun turret crew members, Clayton Hartwig, who died in the explosion, had deliberately caused it.

After a more thorough investigation, the incident was attributed to an accidental misloading of the gun.

The point? Let's wait 'til all the facts are in before condemning a sailor accused by his superiors. They could be wrong AGAIN.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: John_Kunkel] #2948899
07/30/21 04:40 PM
07/30/21 04:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,251
Slidell, LA
Ronnman Offline
pro stock
Ronnman  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,251
Slidell, LA
I believe that was the USS Iowa.
Ron

Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: Ronnman] #2948908
07/30/21 05:41 PM
07/30/21 05:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,644
North Carolina
sasquatch Offline
master
sasquatch  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,644
North Carolina
I used to know and race with the E5 that was the guy at the radar console when the USS Starke was attacked in the Gulf in 1987. (mopar guy to) They tried to hang that on him to but only later found out it was faulty radar equipment that got rammed through Congress. Made his life hell for awhile. I had my own "episodes" in the Navy where they ALWAYS find the lowest man to blame for any and all issues that arise. Not saying he did or did not but "trust" an investigation like that when butts are on the line. I will hold fire pending all of them are completed.
Todd

Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: John_Kunkel] #2948925
07/30/21 06:52 PM
07/30/21 06:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,008
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline OP
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline OP
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,008
Benton, IL.
Originally Posted by John_Kunkel
In 1989 there was a gun turret explosion on the battleship USS New Jersey which caused numerous deaths. The first investigation into the explosion, conducted by the U.S. Navy, concluded that one of the gun turret crew members, Clayton Hartwig, who died in the explosion, had deliberately caused it.

After a more thorough investigation, the incident was attributed to an accidental misloading of the gun.

The point? Let's wait 'til all the facts are in before condemning a sailor accused by his superiors. They could be wrong AGAIN.


You tagged me in that response and I just want to be clear that I only posted the article. And did not make any judgement on the matter.


Master, again and still
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: Ronnman] #2948978
07/30/21 09:29 PM
07/30/21 09:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
DirectSubjection Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only
DirectSubjection  Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
Originally Posted by Ronnman
I believe that was the USS Iowa.
Ron


Correct - the Iowa. It was never fully repaired


Ride eternal, shiny and chrome
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: DaveRS23] #2949046
07/31/21 06:05 AM
07/31/21 06:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
I have previously read that there was minimum crew on the ship when the fire was discovered but I was alarmed that US Navy ships would not be wired with sensors to effectively detect fires and automatic systems to successfully fight multiple fires at once. Perhaps these sytems were disabled for maintenance?

Anti-ship missiles in vast amounts by potential adversaries have certainly have been in the news and the fires a hit would start would be extreme compared to an arson fire in below decks equipment. Navy crew members must be highly trained fire fighters, and be on ships with designed in fire fighting features superior to any potential adversary. Has the modern USA Navy forgotten this lesson from the battle of Midway ?

On the other hand, modern torpedos no longer hit the side of the hull. They explode below the keel creating a gas bubble that cracks the keel of the ship in half.

{The British torpedo that hit the former US Cruiser that Argentina renamed the Belgrano shows the massive destruction of a modern torpedo.} edit: Wiki says 3 conventional torpedos hit side of hull of Belgrano.

The only hope for a modern ship is to sink the ship/submarine/drone before it is in torpedo range, or launch mini defensive torpedos that destroy the incoming torpedo.
US Navy attempts to create such mini defensive torpedos to protect aircraft carriers have so far been a massive waste of money. Penn State University has a grant to improve mini torpedo.

Last edited by 360view; 07/31/21 02:30 PM. Reason: correction Cruiser/Battleship
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: John_Kunkel] #2949049
07/31/21 07:10 AM
07/31/21 07:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
Originally Posted by John_Kunkel
In 1989 there was a gun turret explosion on the battleship USS New Jersey which caused numerous deaths. The first investigation into the explosion, conducted by the U.S. Navy, concluded that one of the gun turret crew members, Clayton Hartwig, who died in the explosion, had deliberately caused it.

After a more thorough investigation, the incident was attributed to an accidental misloading of the gun.

The point? Let's wait 'til all the facts are in before condemning a sailor accused by his superiors. They could be wrong AGAIN.



that was the Iowa. had a high school friend that was on it at the time, said it was a horrible scene. yes they railroaded a sailor that they said was in some kind of gay lover tirangle or some crap if i remember correctly. it was found that it was something to do with powder from world war II and how it was stored and or loaded.


.




Last edited by abodyjoe; 07/31/21 07:12 AM.

It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: abodyjoe] #2949060
07/31/21 08:21 AM
07/31/21 08:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
Seems very odd to me, a modern operating warship, could be totally ruined by a single sailor, when at dock, without any significant explosive(?) device, when docked at a US modern well equipped military port.

I wonder how alj the in the heat of the battle, under attack ships, ,far out to sea survived Japaneses Kamikaze attacks in WW2.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: jcc] #2949069
07/31/21 09:09 AM
07/31/21 09:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
DirectSubjection Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only
DirectSubjection  Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
Originally Posted by jcc
Seems very odd to me, a modern operating warship, could be totally ruined by a single sailor, when at dock, without any significant explosive(?) device, when docked at a US modern well equipped military port.

I wonder how alj the in the heat of the battle, under attack ships, ,far out to sea survived Japaneses Kamikaze attacks in WW2.


Docked with a skeleton crew as I remember, only a hundred-something men on board so it could go unnoticed for a while


Ride eternal, shiny and chrome
Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: 360view] #2949085
07/31/21 09:46 AM
07/31/21 09:46 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,221
nowhere
S
Sniper Offline
master
Sniper  Offline
master
S

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,221
nowhere
Originally Posted by 360view
I have previously read that there was minimum crew on the ship when the fire was discovered but I was alarmed that US Navy ships would not be wired with sensors to effectively detect fires and automatic systems to successfully fight multiple fires at once. Perhaps these systems were disabled for maintenance?

Anti-ship missiles in vast amounts by potential adversaries have certainly have been in the news and the fires a hit would start would be extreme compared to an arson fire in below decks equipment. Navy crew members must be highly trained fire fighters, and be on ships with designed in fire fighting features superior to any potential adversary. Has the modern USA Navy forgotten this lesson from the battle of Midway ?

On the other hand, modern torpedoes no longer hit the side of the hull. They explode below the keel creating a gas bubble that cracks the keel of the ship in half.
The British torpedo that hit the former US Battleship that Argentina renamed the Belgrano shows the massive destruction of a modern torpedo.
The only hope for a modern ship is to sink the ship/submarine/drone before it is in torpedo range, or launch mini defensive torpedoes that destroy the incoming torpedo.
US Navy attempts to create such mini defensive torpedoes to protect aircraft carriers have so far been a massive waste of money.


The Belgrano was a light cruiser not a battleship.

the rest of your statement is just about as far off too. I served in the Navy, did 4 years on a destroyer and time on other ships as well. I was there when the Samuel B. Roberts hit a mine and nearly cracked in half. Nothing automated would have saved the ship, the crew did that. The worst part of that wasn't the fire, it was the water used to fight the fire, they damn near sank themselves trying to put out the fires. We ended up sending damn near every portable dewatering pump in the Persian Gulf to them, then they realized they didn't have enough gasoline to run them for long, so we sent damn near all the gasoline we had in the Gulf to them. We learned two things from that, ships need more dewatering pump and more gasoline to run them.

The main engineering spaces do have automated firefighting systems. The rest of the ship has the crew. People cry about the cost of military equipment as it is, then complaint about how it's not state of the art, without all the bells and whistles. You can't have both. A warship is a compromise, every single aspect of it is carefully balanced against needs and wants. Doesn't make sense to have a warship capable of fighting any conceivable fire automatically if all that gear leaves no room for ammo, or fuel, or provisions.

Re: Sailor charged with arson [Re: Sniper] #2949144
07/31/21 01:23 PM
07/31/21 01:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,876
Oregon
hooziewhatsit Offline
master
hooziewhatsit  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,876
Oregon
One article I read said that numerous issues colluded to make it much worse than it would have been at sea.

Because it was there under maintenance:
Lots of doors were open and had hoses/wires/whatever going through them, so they couldn't be closed off to isolate the fire.
Skeleton crew
Lots of extra maintenance/cleaning stuff laying around that wasn't normally there, ready to burn.
Fire suppression systems may have been turned off for maintenance.

Bad situation for sure, but not really relevant to what would happen at sea if a fire broke out.


If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1