Re: 318 build
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#2994679
12/12/21 05:36 PM
12/12/21 05:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570 USA
Hooligan
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570
USA
|
well here I go again.
looking in the stash of engine parts I have I noticed almost all of the early to late 80s #302 heads are very poor castings with lots of core shift and bad looking port openings. some better than others with not so rectangle openings and casting slag all over, bowls look bad with seems mid way from core shifting when cast.
the couple #714 heads are from 90-91 engines and would be the last of the pre-mag heads produced when magnum came out 92-93
the #714 casting are better looking untouched than any of the #302 I have on hand. nice bowls not much slag, better looking machine work nice even/matching size on port openings ect..
so bust them down and off to machine shop. new OEM 360 valves and bare #714 casting heads in hand. 2 weeks later I pick them up and do they look good so far.
I had them back cut the 1.88-1.60 valves the unshroud the head around the valves a little, with 3 angle on intake and 5 angles on exhaust. now to do a little clean up in the bowls and blend the machine cuts into the bowls with a gasket match to intake and headers.
cleaning up the Holley Street dominator as it works really well and has small port/runners and will add the 650DP to it.
having the block tanked-bore .060-cam bearings-installed
new OEM roller lifters/PR/rockes new set comp 901-16 springs
going with a Hughes roller cam but have not decided one which one yet.
if my math is correct this will put me at 328 CI and only 12 CI shy of 340 CI and big valves with small ports/runners should have good velocity filling the cyls.
I am looking at a SER0813ALN-14
smooth idle high vacuum short dur@.050 high valve lift wide LSA 114*
will be swapping in a 833OD turning 3.23/26 tire while I am at it
oh and I cant forget to mention the HIGHLY CONTRVERSAL installing the pistons backward changing pin offset/rod angle..... yep I have done it many times.
any cam suggestions?
yes typo, sorry should be a #4 not #3 SER 0814ALN-14
Hey Scratch! Looking good! Is that the Chet Herbert cam that I gave you?
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: Hooligan]
#2996073
12/17/21 10:56 AM
12/17/21 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570 USA
Hooligan
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570
USA
|
Whoops! I just took closer look at your cam, and noticed that it is a hydraulic roller. Cool!
Where did you get the machine work done? You probably stated somewhere in one of your replies, and I'll find it later.
Hmmm? Where did everybody go? I fear that I killed the 5 page long post, you had going there. (sigh)
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: Hooligan]
#2996074
12/17/21 10:58 AM
12/17/21 10:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570 USA
Hooligan
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570
USA
|
Dang... it's a 3 page long post.
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: redraptor]
#3002119
01/04/22 08:49 PM
01/04/22 08:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,528 Freeport IL USA
poorboy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,528
Freeport IL USA
|
So my info is pretty sketchy, so take it for whatever it may be worth. The 435 is the granny gear heavy duty truck trans. Most work pickup trucks that came with a 4 speed, got them in the early days. The mid 60s cars got the A833 4 speed up until around the mid 70s when the OD craze started because of fuel mileage. The a 833 was a tough bird before Mopar added the heavy duty version to use behind the 440s and the 426 Hemi. In the mid 70s, the 833 got an aluminum case instead of the cast iron version, and the OD trans got 3rd gear replaced with an OD gear (0.87 I believe) and the shift lever was flipped over so what used to be 4th was now 3rd, and visa-versa. The aluminum case could have problems under heavy abuse because the aluminum case would allow the main shaft and the secondary shafts to Waller out the holes in the case. I also believe Mopar offered a couple different 1st and 2ns gears as well to accommodate the lower powered vehicles. i believe the 1st (and maybe part of the 2nd) year production Dakota got the aluminum case OD 833 but then they got the AX-15 5 speed. The AX-15 has the on top of the trans shift handle with internal sliding rods supported in the aluminum case that shifts the gears. The trans end of an AX-15 shift handle looks a lot like the bottom of the handle of the 435 shifter, but it fits in slots on the internal sliding the shift rods. Those sliding internal shift rods do not make power shifting very easy, they move way too slow to make us old motorheads happy (at least with the ax-15 in my coupe, but its also got nearly 200K miles on it). I suspect the other lighter duty 5 speed (A535?) with the unique shifter was a short lived version of the AX -15 that had the 5 speed shifter outside of the trans body. It may have preceded the AX-15 or may have come after it. I've heard about it, but don't have any data on it. Dodge also had a few 5 speeds that had the bell attached, those bells were engine specific, and too new for me to be concerned about. The NV 3500 and the NV 4500 are suppose to be the heavy duty 5 speeds put into the full sized trucks. I believe both of those also have the shift with the internal sliding shafts. The main difference between the hydro bell and the mechanical bell is the hydro bell has provisions for mounting the hydraulic slave cylinder the replace the mechanical linkage on the older stuff. You can attach the slave cylinder to the mechanical bell, but it will take some engineering, just like you can convert the hydro bell back to a mechanical unit, but you will have to do some modifications because there is no provision to mount the ball stud for the cross bar. Understand that Mopar didn't add any trans bolt pattern that didn't fit the current available transmissions. As the available transmission choices changed over the years, the trans bolt pattern on the bell kept pace, maybe only allowing an older trans pattern for a year or two. Of course, that was when Chrysler still was owned by Chrysler. I also suspect that as Chrysler was bought and sold a few times, the parts interchange may have became more consistent, the parts for a Dakota also fit a full size truck, and probably a jeep, but it could have really gotten screwed up too, because the "new" company wanted to use "their" parts instead of the last guy's parts. Gene
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#3002751
01/06/22 10:34 PM
01/06/22 10:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,528 Freeport IL USA
poorboy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,528
Freeport IL USA
|
The difference between the 833 and the OD 833 is the aluminum case, the switched lever, and 3rd gear being replaced with the OD gear. The OD trans also probably has a larger diameter front bearing retainer. the smaller retainer bolts on, but I think there was a seal drain added to the larger diameter bearing retainer that the smaller retainer doesn't fully cover. Flipping the 3/4 gear lever on the OD trans will still shift, but when you put it in 3rd gear, you will have OD and 4th will be 1-1 gear. The flipped lever only changes which gear is engaged with the shifter in a certain position. The OD bells were all machined for the larger diameter retainer, a filler ring was available to fill the gap when a different trans was used. Back in the day, many bells were machined for the larger retainer, and a few placed offered the filler spacer, but it is probably not available these days. I believe the OD 833 was a 76-89 item in the Valarie and later years (after 84?) light duty trucks, after then it was either an automatic or the 5 speed. The 833 (std or OD) trans to bell bolt pattern was the same, but the retainer bearing housing was a different size.
The second bolt pattern on your bells may very well be for a 3 speed manual trans, not a different 4 speed. I think the 3 speed was still the base manual trans then.
Who knows for sure what Chrysler was doing in those days, probably using up what ever may have been laying in a warehouse someplace. 77/78/79 was the near bankruptcy time, and they were not back on their feet until after about 84-85. Lots of stuff went on during those years just to get a product into a customer's hands. Parts could have been substituted mid day and reverted back to the normal supply by the next day, or the next week, or when ever the extra found on the shelf stock ran out. The Omni/Horizon in 78/79 save Chrysler. The K car in 82/83 and the Minivan in 84/85 revived them, everything between was just survival.
I was a dealer tech in 86-87, you had to live through it to fully understand. I suspect things were not much different every time Chrysler has changed hands since the bankruptcy years. That is probably why accurate info on the modern stuff is so sketchy. Gene
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: Mr PotatoHead]
#3084309
10/08/22 01:31 PM
10/08/22 01:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806 Central Florida
larrymopar360
Stud Muffin
|
Stud Muffin
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806
Central Florida
|
I've been talking with him on phone. Mike is a great guy and retired back in May after 33 years, and got himself a Softail only to have someone run a red light and hit him. He suffered some pretty bad leg injuries and has been through two surgeries (so far). I'll post some pics for him soon and hopefully he'll be back on here soon. Engine is ready to fire btw.
If you are a buddy of Mike's pm me for his number if you want to call him.
Larry
Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
|
Re: 318 build
[Re: moparx]
#3084355
10/08/22 03:37 PM
10/08/22 03:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806 Central Florida
larrymopar360
Stud Muffin
|
Stud Muffin
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806
Central Florida
|
oh no ! thoughts and prayers his way for a speedy recovery ! Yes for sure. If you know him you know what a great guy he is. Always willing to help and just an overall good guy. To say he had a compound fracture in one spot is understatement. I can post some pics. Would it be going too far to post a pic of compound fracture?
Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
|
|
|