Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? #2792512
07/04/20 03:16 AM
07/04/20 03:16 AM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
C
cudabill Offline OP
member
cudabill  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
I'm repairing my '70 Barracuda from back to front, still a long way from the front, but thinking about daily driver suspension with a modern feel. Just want to keep up with modern cars in traffic on modern performance rubber. I do plan to keep the heavy 383.

Mini-tubbed it since I replaced about all the rear sheet metal, may or may not narrow the rear axle. Will add chassis stiffeners also, but plan to keep drum brakes in the rear. Haven't yet started spring relocation, before I start cutting, for a modern ride, is it worth it to instead go 4-link?

Up front I don't see a need to replace the torsion springs but want the feel of rack and pinion. Is that a common way to go, or is it normal for everyone to spend $5-8K on tubular front?

Last edited by cudabill; 07/04/20 03:36 AM.

Current:'70 Barracuda 383 Gran Coupe project,
Past highlights: Datsun roadster/Olds V8, Porsche 924/buick V6, '89 IROC-Z, '00 Vette/procharged LS3, ML63, 335i, 914, 944T, '39 LaSalle sedan project
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: cudabill] #2792591
07/04/20 11:30 AM
07/04/20 11:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
If you want a modern car just buy a modern car. There is no easy solution for re-engineering an old car into a new car. Most of the aftermarket kits for Mopars are designed to increase header clearance for drag racing, they are not designed to provide a modern handling experience. The only setup that I know of that has the capability of providing a modern feel would be a full frame conversion. But that is a huge job and there are only a few shops in the country that could pull it off correctly and the cost would be enormous. So back to my first point, if you want a modern car just go buy one. If you want a classic car that rides and handles better than it did when new then that can be accomplished but it won't have rack and pinion or ABS or airbags, etc.

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: AndyF] #2792603
07/04/20 11:59 AM
07/04/20 11:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
iagree


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: jcc] #2792827
07/05/20 02:07 AM
07/05/20 02:07 AM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
C
cudabill Offline OP
member
cudabill  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
What I'm reading is rack and pinion is not recommended unless you do a full frame (like a Schwartz g-machine frame), and there's no reason for a tubular k-member unless you need clearance for headers.

So seems like leaf springs and stock k-member suspension is the way to go for a street car.

Last time I drove a '60s muscle car was a '69 big block Camaro, it felt like a pickup truck.


Current:'70 Barracuda 383 Gran Coupe project,
Past highlights: Datsun roadster/Olds V8, Porsche 924/buick V6, '89 IROC-Z, '00 Vette/procharged LS3, ML63, 335i, 914, 944T, '39 LaSalle sedan project
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: cudabill] #2792828
07/05/20 02:23 AM
07/05/20 02:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,451
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,451
So Cal
Originally Posted by cudabill
What I'm reading is rack and pinion is not recommended unless you do a full frame (like a Schwartz g-machine frame), and there's no reason for a tubular k-member unless you need clearance for headers.

So seems like leaf springs and stock k-member suspension is the way to go for a street car.

Last time I drove a '60s muscle car was a '69 big block Camaro, it felt like a pickup truck.


What does your Cuda drive like before you started working on it?

Last edited by autoxcuda; 07/05/20 02:24 AM.
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: autoxcuda] #2792833
07/05/20 03:51 AM
07/05/20 03:51 AM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
C
cudabill Offline OP
member
cudabill  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
Slow and brief. I bought it not running, and got it running enough to move it in and out of my shop at home.

latest.jpg

Current:'70 Barracuda 383 Gran Coupe project,
Past highlights: Datsun roadster/Olds V8, Porsche 924/buick V6, '89 IROC-Z, '00 Vette/procharged LS3, ML63, 335i, 914, 944T, '39 LaSalle sedan project
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: cudabill] #2792843
07/05/20 06:36 AM
07/05/20 06:36 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,748
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,748
ohio
I drive my 69 B body a lot, I don't think it's too far off from newer standards. At least for daily driving. Admittedly the steering coupler and pitman are getting loose.

I did rebuild the front end with urethane bushings and the offset upper bushings to get camber to negative. 5 and caster to 2.5.

Im looking to do better tires, shocks and sway bars. Im plenty happy with the original springs

Unless you're building a track car, I don't think you need much more than that.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: cudabill] #2792950
07/05/20 12:45 PM
07/05/20 12:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Originally Posted by cudabill
What I'm reading is rack and pinion is not recommended unless you do a full frame (like a Schwartz g-machine frame), and there's no reason for a tubular k-member unless you need clearance for headers.

So seems like leaf springs and stock k-member suspension is the way to go for a street car.

Last time I drove a '60s muscle car was a '69 big block Camaro, it felt like a pickup truck.

I wrote a whole book on the subject so I'd say start by reading the book. The short summary is that Mopar musclecars were designed 50 years ago using 50 year old tools and techniques. The early unibody designs are flexible which makes the car feel funny in a corner. They didn't feel funny 50 years ago but now that people have 20 years of experience driving solid cars a muscle car feels flexible when you go around a corner.

If you are willing to cut and weld on a musclecar then add subframe connectors, torque boxes, inner fender supports, additional cross members, shock supports, etc. Once you have the chassis as stiff as you are willing to make it then do a total rebuild of the suspension and use high quality shocks (Koni, Fox or Bilstein) use modern upper a arms (Firm Feel or Hotchkis) use high rate torsion bars, use a big anti-sway bar and have the steering box rebuilt and tightened up (Firm Feel).

After you do all of that the car will handle okay. Kind of like a new Honda. Not like a new BMW or Porsche but well enough that you'll feel comfortable driving it at 50 mph around a curve that says 35 mph.

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: AndyF] #2793155
07/05/20 09:40 PM
07/05/20 09:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
"Handling" is a very subjective goal.. Modern day "handing: IMO, if mainly looking for bang for buck, A Miata and a new big bad Vette comes to mind at the top of the list. I'll still always take my old Mopars, but it will never compare to a long list of modern cars, at any budget I have or would care to spend.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: AndyF] #2793221
07/06/20 03:10 AM
07/06/20 03:10 AM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
C
cudabill Offline OP
member
cudabill  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
Gotcha, this car was pretty far gone and not a special combo (383 2bbl Gran Coupe) so I can cut and weld and stiffen it up. It's nice to be able to read a book and learn from the pains of others. Thanks AndyF!


Current:'70 Barracuda 383 Gran Coupe project,
Past highlights: Datsun roadster/Olds V8, Porsche 924/buick V6, '89 IROC-Z, '00 Vette/procharged LS3, ML63, 335i, 914, 944T, '39 LaSalle sedan project
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: cudabill] #2793308
07/06/20 10:07 AM
07/06/20 10:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,723
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,723
A collage of whims
What AndyF says.
The older cars lacked the chassis stiffness modern cars have.
When the chassis flexes, it affects the suspension's response.
Even the input is confused, since the chassis is also responding.
A stiff chassis allows the suspension & steering to do their job better, with more consistency, too.
As for steering itself, more caster really helps.

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: topside] #2793324
07/06/20 11:01 AM
07/06/20 11:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,404
Michigan
MarkZ Offline
Worthy
MarkZ  Offline
Worthy

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,404
Michigan
Borgeson box and steering coupler from Bergman. You're not going to get any better than that utilitzing factory style parts. It eliminates the slop at 12 o' clock, tightens the steering up and adds more ratio. I bought two of their boxes and have been very pleased with the results. Feels like rack and pinion. If you go the route do yourself a favor and order a pump to go along with it as well since it has the correct valving to match the box. You can get everything through Bergman Autocraft.


1987 Fifth Avenue - 512/518/D60
Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: AndyF] #2793359
07/06/20 11:55 AM
07/06/20 11:55 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Mountain View, CA
6
68rrunner Offline
enthusiast
68rrunner  Offline
enthusiast
6

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Mountain View, CA
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by cudabill
What I'm reading is rack and pinion is not recommended unless you do a full frame (like a Schwartz g-machine frame), and there's no reason for a tubular k-member unless you need clearance for headers.

So seems like leaf springs and stock k-member suspension is the way to go for a street car.

Last time I drove a '60s muscle car was a '69 big block Camaro, it felt like a pickup truck.

I wrote a whole book on the subject so I'd say start by reading the book. The short summary is that Mopar musclecars were designed 50 years ago using 50 year old tools and techniques. The early unibody designs are flexible which makes the car feel funny in a corner. They didn't feel funny 50 years ago but now that people have 20 years of experience driving solid cars a muscle car feels flexible when you go around a corner.

If you are willing to cut and weld on a musclecar then add subframe connectors, torque boxes, inner fender supports, additional cross members, shock supports, etc. Once you have the chassis as stiff as you are willing to make it then do a total rebuild of the suspension and use high quality shocks (Koni, Fox or Bilstein) use modern upper a arms (Firm Feel or Hotchkis) use high rate torsion bars, use a big anti-sway bar and have the steering box rebuilt and tightened up (Firm Feel).

After you do all of that the car will handle okay. Kind of like a new Honda. Not like a new BMW or Porsche but well enough that you'll feel comfortable driving it at 50 mph around a curve that says 35 mph.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kASM04zuHlo We can do a lot better than most modern muscle cars and a few imports

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: 68rrunner] #2793548
07/06/20 05:41 PM
07/06/20 05:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,386
Pikes Peak Country
T
TC@HP2 Offline
master
TC@HP2  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,386
Pikes Peak Country
Overall, geometry of a 70 Cuda front suspension is much better than that of a 69 Camaro. The Cuda can be improved on to make it even better. It may never be as precise as a new car, but it certainly can be better than what you recall.

The rear steer layout of a Mopar doesn't really lend itself well to R&P set ups. It creates more compromises than its worth for simply improved feel. Get a better box for improved feel, step up the rest of the system to Firm Feel or Hotchkis specs, and leave it at that.

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: cudabill] #2793581
07/06/20 06:38 PM
07/06/20 06:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Originally Posted by cudabill
Gotcha, this car was pretty far gone and not a special combo (383 2bbl Gran Coupe) so I can cut and weld and stiffen it up. It's nice to be able to read a book and learn from the pains of others. Thanks AndyF!


I spent several years designing and building parts with Tim for his red Valiant. That car would go 160 mph on the front straight at Portland International and he would drive it to work but it wasn't much fun to ride in. It was kind of brutal actually. Lowered, no noise insulation, no radio, no AC, no heater, etc. And while that car was one of the fastest Mopars around, it couldn't consistently beat production mid-level super car such as a Z06 or a race influenced Porsche with a good driver. The total outlay of time and money into the Valiant was at least equal to the cost of a Z06 but it wasn't as good of a car. That is just simple economics. Hard for a guy in his garage to beat 50 years of factory engineering and their economies of scale.

Moral of the story is to have fun and enjoy yourself. Trying to re-engineer a 50 year old musclecar is probably a doomed effort unless you have an exceptional skill set and/or professional help.

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: AndyF] #2793590
07/06/20 06:59 PM
07/06/20 06:59 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,212
nowhere
S
Sniper Offline
master
Sniper  Offline
master
S

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,212
nowhere
Originally Posted by AndyF

Moral of the story is to have fun and enjoy yourself. Trying to re-engineer a 50 year old musclecar is probably a doomed effort unless you have an exceptional skill set and/or professional help.


Or a Valiant body on a Z06 chassis

Re: Rack and pinion with stock-ish suspension? [Re: Sniper] #2793748
07/07/20 02:32 AM
07/07/20 02:32 AM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
C
cudabill Offline OP
member
cudabill  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 37
SF Bay Area
A previous car I owned was a '00 Corvette, bought with a procharger for $40k. Two supercharger upgrades, three forged engines and two transmissions etc. cost another $35k, the more power it had, the less traction it had even downshifting on the freeway. Ended up driving it slow and carefully, and left me wistfully browsing ads for $70k Ferrari 360s. It's an illness.

This Barracudas project though is about hands-on experience and the journey.


Current:'70 Barracuda 383 Gran Coupe project,
Past highlights: Datsun roadster/Olds V8, Porsche 924/buick V6, '89 IROC-Z, '00 Vette/procharged LS3, ML63, 335i, 914, 944T, '39 LaSalle sedan project






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1