Re: Rear Leaf Springs
[Re: buzz440]
#2767124
04/22/20 01:30 PM
04/22/20 01:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 492 Charlotte, NC
Kowal
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Charlotte, NC
|
Eaton Detroit Spring are great. I have used them three times over the years (a 69 Bee, a 68 GTX and now my Challenger) and each time worked out great. They are a bit more expensive than the other guys, but the springs are really well done. If you are crazy for “numbers”, you can swap the short leaf from each stack with either the originals in your stack (with the part numbers on them) or you can get the short leaf from Tony’s Parts.
I always order mine +1 inch which gives just a bit more rake than normal. Best to call them.
Last edited by Kowal; 04/22/20 01:31 PM.
'69 Hemi Charger 500, ‘70 U code Challenger R/T (Had but now gone: 2 A12’s. 1 Hemi GTX, 3 other B-bodies, 2 other E-bodies and an A-body...a good run!)
P.J. O'Rouke: "The old car ran perfectly, right up until it didn't."
|
|
|
Re: Rear Leaf Springs
[Re: gtx6970]
#2767628
04/23/20 08:01 PM
04/23/20 08:01 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 324 Greenwood Lake, NY
fuelishnsilly
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 324
Greenwood Lake, NY
|
A buddy of mine put a set of the MP springs in his 1970 Challenger . the car seems to sag pretty low considering how many springs are in the pack. he plans to upgrade them with either some rebuilt factory springs or have a set built at Eaton / Detroit spring I seem to recall Mopar having an issue with the metallurgy and the springs sagging fairly quick after they were installed on peoples cars. I've gotten a HD replacement set from Espo Springs N Things for my RR. Rear end sits up higher than before and all I did was change out the bottom leaf for the original to keep the part numbers on there.
inherited a 69 roadrunner from my grand pop.
|
|
|
Re: Rear Leaf Springs
[Re: buzz440]
#2767953
04/24/20 08:27 PM
04/24/20 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 492 Charlotte, NC
Kowal
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Charlotte, NC
|
Thanks for the info.... one other question , do they look oem ? what I mean are the leaf ends square cut or round and are the metal srping clamps oem looking ?
Thanks, Later.. BUZZ They look OEM, the ends of the leafs look as they should. The clamps look OEM. I will have to dig up a few pics
'69 Hemi Charger 500, ‘70 U code Challenger R/T (Had but now gone: 2 A12’s. 1 Hemi GTX, 3 other B-bodies, 2 other E-bodies and an A-body...a good run!)
P.J. O'Rouke: "The old car ran perfectly, right up until it didn't."
|
|
|
Re: Rear Leaf Springs
[Re: cdp]
#2769553
04/29/20 03:25 PM
04/29/20 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,671 albany ny
05dakota
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,671
albany ny
|
espo is not same company as eaton
Last edited by 05dakota; 04/29/20 03:25 PM.
66 ford mustang coupe. 01 mustang gt.06 mustang coupe .94 ford taurus sho.66 chrysler newport 2 dr .68 chrysler 300 vert .70 challenger r/t .73 dodge dart swinger. 74 cuda .91 chrysler lebaron vert.77 buick electra limited
5549 postonold board
|
|
|
Re: Rear Leaf Springs
[Re: 05dakota]
#2769565
04/29/20 04:05 PM
04/29/20 04:05 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,241 Az
69hemibeep
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,241
Az
|
These cars set flat from the factory without a load in them. Better weight transfer and the snubber actually worked
Last edited by 69hemibeep; 04/29/20 04:08 PM.
1969 Hemi Roadrunner 2nd owner
|
|
|
|
|