Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Horrendous fuel mileage #2758207
03/31/20 10:27 PM
03/31/20 10:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Now that my '72 Dart is finally on the road, I have noticed absolutely abysmal fuel consumption. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised because big cams are not known for economy, but still...

It's a 451 with a slightly reground Mini-Express (.652, 272@.050). 10.3 compression. 4780-2 double pumper with a Quick Fuel 12-700 baseplate, converted to 4-corner idle and adjustable orifices. I'm still adjusting and trying different settings but at the moment it has 70/78 jets and an 8.5 PV driving .053 PVCR.

Idles at 1200 rpm, 8" vacuum, 13:1 AFR on the gauge. Highway cruise 14-15:1 at 60 mph (3000 rpm, 3.91 gears, A833) and 14" vacuum. Tends to go over-rich with the whole t-slot flowing before the mains come on (12:1 at low speed moderate throttle). Idle timing is 27 degrees, slow centrifugal advance to about 35 degrees at high rpm, plus a vacuum advance can (to ported vacuum). Goes to around 48 degrees revving in neutral.

It's a reasonable estimate but I used at least 5 gallons of 93 pump alcohol-free, and have 21.9 miles on the odometer (correct speedo gear) shock
No, it's not leaking anywhere or blowing black smoke... shruggy

Now that does includes a lot of idling, throttle winging, and heavy pedal application on the back roads up to 40 mph and 4000 rpm, and a few miles on the highway doing 50-80 blasts.

Many years ago I had an A-body with a basically stock 383 except for .484 purple cam, DP-4B, 750 vac sec, A-833 and 3.23 rear. Averaged around 12 mpg mixed, could get 15 highway if I stayed at 60 mph, and my worst tank was all stop & go 1/4 mile at a time, 8.3 mpg.

So I would like to know what kind of fuel consumption others with big cams (who actually bother to measure) are getting.
Thanks.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758212
03/31/20 10:34 PM
03/31/20 10:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
dIc dOc Deity ! Online penguin-006
The village idiot's idiot
dIc dOc Deity !  Online Penguin-006
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
Either there IS a leak or the plugs must be SOOT BLACK eek

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758217
03/31/20 10:43 PM
03/31/20 10:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,055
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Offline
master
A727Tflite  Offline
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,055
Michigan
Why don’t you start with a real MPG test instead of guessing what you have - you mention idling, winging the motor, etc.

Top the tank, warm the motor up and go 30 or 40 miles sustained speed then top it off again.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #2758220
03/31/20 10:47 PM
03/31/20 10:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
That would be the first thought, which is why I included all the data I could think of. The AFR gauge on the dash doesn't agree with you ... nor is there any black smoke even on flooring it, or pig-rich smell to the exhaust at idle. If that much gas were leaking somewhere it'd be easy to find by nose and by eye.

I think it's just operating in an inefficient rpm range for much of my testing (3500 and below), plus working both those accelerator pumps a lot of the time work

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: A727Tflite] #2758222
03/31/20 10:50 PM
03/31/20 10:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Originally Posted by Transman
Why don’t you start with a real MPG test instead of guessing what you have - you mention idling, winging the motor, etc.

Top the tank, warm the motor up and go 30 or 40 miles sustained speed then top it off again.



I'm sure it will do better at highway cruise, and that is in the plan once we get some decent weather and aren't on stay-at-home lockdown... not sure the local authorities would consider Mopar cruising an essential activity wink On the other hand, I would be plenty of distance from others except at the gas station!

Even if I'm off 50% which is really unlikely, that'd still be only 7 mpg.
What I really was looking for is other people's mpg with strokers and big cams smile

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758231
03/31/20 11:17 PM
03/31/20 11:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
dIc dOc Deity ! Online penguin-006
The village idiot's idiot
dIc dOc Deity !  Online Penguin-006
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
are you running a mechanical fuel pump ?

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #2758236
03/31/20 11:34 PM
03/31/20 11:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,882
Grand Prairie,Texas
stumpy Offline
I Win
stumpy  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,882
Grand Prairie,Texas
That 3:91 gear isn't helping the mileage any. That combo sounds like 8 to10 mpg to me.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: stumpy] #2758252
04/01/20 12:47 AM
04/01/20 12:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,908
Nebraska
4
4406bbl Offline
top fuel
4406bbl  Offline
top fuel
4

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,908
Nebraska
Ya I think about 8.... my stock 68 gtx 440, auto, 3.91 got 11 at 60, with light brown plugs, near white pipes, no afr gear back then. It got a little worse in town, way worse on saturday nights.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758269
04/01/20 02:43 AM
04/01/20 02:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,275
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,275
West Coast, USA
Try locking out your dizzy at 35 and hook the vacuum advance to manifold vacuum. You'll have to dial back your idle, but it should help considerably. You can always swap it back to what you have if you don't like it. Your low end responsiveness and mileage should improve significantly.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: jbc426] #2758287
04/01/20 07:14 AM
04/01/20 07:14 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,913
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,913
usa
low rpm 8" of vacuum with an 8.5" power valve? i'd start here. low rpm is always the fuel waste'er with a bunch of camshaft overlap. loose torque converters waste energy and low gears don't help matters. holley DP'ers aren't known for fuel efficiency either.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758319
04/01/20 10:01 AM
04/01/20 10:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,549
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,549
Rittman Ohio
Sounds about right to me shruggy My Savoy with a 493 ,620 cam and 3,54 gears, 1050 QF carb. gets about 40 miles on 15 gallons of fuel just normal driving with a couple of full throttle blasts. It really drinks the fuel on 100 MPH blasts.
Gus beer


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: lewtot184] #2758349
04/01/20 11:20 AM
04/01/20 11:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Originally Posted by lewtot184
low rpm 8" of vacuum with an 8.5" power valve? i'd start here.


Thanks for the comments.
The common "wisdom" of PV 2" below idle vacuum is pure baloney, especially with a big cam. Holley just says that for people who don't have a wideband sensor wink Others say half the cruise vacuum which is what I'm closer to. The PV does not flow fuel at idle.

My cruise vacuum is 14" and I also made my PVCRs a normal size (.053 on a .073 main jet). That is another area I'll experiment with someday, maybe try a 9.5 or a 6.5 depending on what it likes. It's neat to be cruising at 14:1 AFR, push the throttle to accelerate and watch the gauge swing down to 12.5 just as intended up

Quote
low rpm is always the fuel waste'er with a bunch of camshaft overlap. loose torque converters waste energy and low gears don't help matters. holley DP'ers aren't known for fuel efficiency either.


I agree... and the DP has two accelerator pumps and they do get used. Out of the box, the DP is known to be way rich since it's intended for strip use WOT, not cruising, and the PVCR is ridiculously oversized.
Like I said, I'm trying to maximize the (relatively) low speed manners. No torque converter here, I am strictly a gear-rower drive

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: jbc426] #2758351
04/01/20 11:24 AM
04/01/20 11:24 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Originally Posted by jbc426
Try locking out your dizzy at 35 and hook the vacuum advance to manifold vacuum. You'll have to dial back your idle, but it should help considerably. You can always swap it back to what you have if you don't like it. Your low end responsiveness and mileage should improve significantly.


Thanks, it's on the list of possible tweaks already smile
Since I drive it on the street mostly, do I want to be locked out? Concerned over pinging at low speed work As you say, I can try it and see.

What I have now is actually a super-light spring so that it cranks easy, then it hits the loop of a heavy OEM spring as soon as it starts... So to lock it out and still be able to start hot, I'd just put in another super-light spring instead, at least for a test.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: fourgearsavoy] #2758353
04/01/20 11:26 AM
04/01/20 11:26 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Originally Posted by fourgearsavoy
Sounds about right to me shruggy My Savoy with a 493 ,620 cam and 3,54 gears, 1050 QF carb. gets about 40 miles on 15 gallons of fuel just normal driving with a couple of full throttle blasts. It really drinks the fuel on 100 MPH blasts.
Gus beer


40/15 = 2.7 mpg eek
So I am in the ballpark, at least for the "too much is just right" crowd.

Oh well, I didn't build this toy for economy up but I may need to get a bigger fuel cell!

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758356
04/01/20 11:34 AM
04/01/20 11:34 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
dIc dOc Deity ! Online penguin-006
The village idiot's idiot
dIc dOc Deity !  Online Penguin-006
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
Originally Posted by DrCharles
Originally Posted by fourgearsavoy
Sounds about right to me shruggy My Savoy with a 493 ,620 cam and 3,54 gears, 1050 QF carb. gets about 40 miles on 15 gallons of fuel just normal driving with a couple of full throttle blasts. It really drinks the fuel on 100 MPH blasts.
Gus beer


40/15 = 2.7 mpg eek
So I am in the ballpark, at least for the "too much is just right" crowd.

Oh well, I didn't build this toy for economy up but I may need to get a bigger fuel cell!


Sounds like WOT mpg on a Hellcat !

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758359
04/01/20 11:38 AM
04/01/20 11:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,913
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,913
usa
Originally Posted by DrCharles
Originally Posted by lewtot184
low rpm 8" of vacuum with an 8.5" power valve? i'd start here.


Thanks for the comments.
The common "wisdom" of PV 2" below idle vacuum is pure baloney, especially with a big cam. Holley just says that for people who don't have a wideband sensor wink Others say half the cruise vacuum which is what I'm closer to. The PV does not flow fuel at idle.

My cruise vacuum is 14" and I also made my PVCRs a normal size (.053 on a .073 main jet). That is another area I'll experiment with someday, maybe try a 9.5 or a 6.5 depending on what it likes. It's neat to be cruising at 14:1 AFR, push the throttle to accelerate and watch the gauge swing down to 12.5 just as intended up

Quote
low rpm is always the fuel waste'er with a bunch of camshaft overlap. loose torque converters waste energy and low gears don't help matters. holley DP'ers aren't known for fuel efficiency either.


I agree... and the DP has two accelerator pumps and they do get used. Out of the box, the DP is known to be way rich since it's intended for strip use WOT, not cruising, and the PVCR is ridiculously oversized.
Like I said, I'm trying to maximize the (relatively) low speed manners. No torque converter here, I am strictly a gear-rower drive
if the power valve is fluttering, and I think it is, at idle or low rpm then it will bleed fuel. I don't know where the power valve should be half of cruise vacuum comes from but I wouldn't prescribe to that for a moment. i say half of your lowest vacuum reading.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: lewtot184] #2758393
04/01/20 12:54 PM
04/01/20 12:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,642
So Near, Yet So Far
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,642
So Near, Yet So Far
What do the spark plugs look like?
Does the exhaust smell like fuel? Or bring tears to your eyes?
What's the stock PV supposed to be?

Most similar experiences I can relate:
My 438" Street Hemi RR, pretty big old-school low-vacuum Crower cam, 4.10s & 4-speed could burn through gas like crazy before we tweaked the carbs.
Like a full tank in 100 miles, with a few bursts of acceleration.
It'd wet the plugs and burn your eyeballs standing near its tailpipes.
36* total + vac advance, original AFBs, headers, 10.8:1, MSD6.
Leaned it some with staggered jetting, leaner metering rods & stiffer springs for the rods.
Got significantly better mileage - guesstimate 6-7MPG, including a few "exercises" every time I drove it - and the plugs & aroma cleared up.
Had a cammy 446" RB in a '64 Savoy, 727, 3000 stall & 4.10s, also thirsty, never accurately checked MPG but seemed about 6-7 as well.
Never tried to maximize MPG on either, mostly town & "hey, the road's empty" - so I'd bet on better #s at sustained cruise @ light throttle.

Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: lewtot184] #2758396
04/01/20 12:59 PM
04/01/20 12:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,479
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Online content
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Online Content
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,479
So. Burlington, Vt.
I bet on an actual “all around” mileage test, without excessive wot blasts and throttle winging...... you’ll end up at 7-9mpg....... which wouldn’t surprise me at all........ and is about what I’d “expect”.

I also think you’ll find that any kind of “enthusiastic” driving will very quickly cut that average way down......like to 40-50%.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: DrCharles] #2758427
04/01/20 02:40 PM
04/01/20 02:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,275
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,275
West Coast, USA
Originally Posted by DrCharles
Originally Posted by jbc426
Try locking out your dizzy at 35 and hook the vacuum advance to manifold vacuum. You'll have to dial back your idle, but it should help considerably. You can always swap it back to what you have if you don't like it. Your low end responsiveness and mileage should improve significantly.


Thanks, it's on the list of possible tweaks already smile
Since I drive it on the street mostly, do I want to be locked out? Concerned over pinging at low speed work As you say, I can try it and see.

What I have now is actually a super-light spring so that it cranks easy, then it hits the loop of a heavy OEM spring as soon as it starts... So to lock it out and still be able to start hot, I'd just put in another super-light spring instead, at least for a test.


My 493" RB has 10.2 to 1 compression and cranks 200 psi warm. It is an aluminum headed stick car with high-quench, reverse-dome pistons and heart shaped chambers. We only have 91 octane out here on the left coast, but I never hear any detonation or have hard starting issues with the dizzy locked out at 35*.

I am running the old DC mechanical carbs, and never go full throttle bellow 3000 rpm.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Horrendous fuel mileage [Re: jbc426] #2758487
04/01/20 04:57 PM
04/01/20 04:57 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline OP
master
DrCharles  Offline OP
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
I have iron heads on (for now), sometime later on this year I will put the Dwayne-massaged Speedmasters on. Good quench for both.
The most initial timing I could run with good hot starting was 22 degrees. At 24 it would begin to fight the starter sometimes.
Plugs are light tan BTW.

Time to get a better fuel tank sender, too. The foam float in my current (vertical sliding) one is hard and brittle... and with the tank full to nearly the bottom of the filler opening, the dash gauge only reads 3/4! Yes, I have the proper resistance (240-33 SW gauge). As thirsty as this beast is, I want a more accurate gauge.

Thanks for the comparable data points, everyone. Today I went and got some more gas in cans, and filled it up actually slightly further than before, one 2 gal. can and there is still a gallon left in the 2.5 gal can. So it actually used 3 to 3.5 gallons (not 4.5) for 21.9 miles of blasting around. That's more like it (6 to 7 mpg), I can live with that. apimp

Will report back once I put a few more highway miles on it. Now to clearance the #2 header tube where it's rattling against the shock tower...without removing the header hammer

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1