Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Honestly, cam selection toughest part #2743560
02/16/20 01:50 PM
02/16/20 01:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
'
'70Satellite Offline OP
member
'70Satellite  Offline OP
member
'

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Hey all. I'm sure you have seen this question a thousand times, but here's another. I'm putting as much info below as possible to help make the best decision.

1970 Plymouth Satellite 2 door
3.55 posi
Street driven only, no racing, weekend cruiser
Need vacuum for power brakes
Need reliability and drive ability
1977 440 out of a New Yorker being rebuilt, along with the 1977 727 tranny.
Block bored .030', decked, align bored, and of course crack checked and pressure tested(all good)
452 Heads resurfaced, crack tested and pressure tested(all good)
Still deciding on pocket porting, but right now heads stock
Original crank ground and reusing
SCAT H-Beam rods
KB pistons
Comp ratio according to shop will be 9.4-9.5/1
1970 cast intake
1970 Carter AVS 750 carb
Doug's headers
2.5" dual exhaust with Flowmaster 40 Series
Will be running 91 octane

The machine shop has been great to deal with, and I am in no way questioning them. I value their opinion but as this is my first build, I always like other opinions from those with far more experience than I. The next decision will be on camshaft. Lets assume the heads stay stock. Lets assume the intake gets upgraded at some point, but not for a year or two. I will list the cams being suggested by various people so far. I would appreciate any and all opinions. Just to be clear, the above parts have been already purchased, so those won't be changed or swapped out.

Mopar Performance Cam P4452783

Lunati 10230702

CompCams XE268H

Crower 271

Summit 6401

Hughes SEH2832BL

Melling MTD-2

I've personally spoken to all these manufacturers, and given them the exact information above, and these are their recommendations. Obviously I'd like to have a pretty aggressive idle, but not at the expense of drive-ability or reliability. So please, let me know your opinions. A 2400 Stall converter is also a possibility to upgrade along with whatever the tranny re-builder suggests. Low end and mid range torque or priorities over pure HP. Estimates for this motor are in the 325-350hp range right now, depending on camshaft i guess. Thank you for your suggestions.

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743587
02/16/20 02:41 PM
02/16/20 02:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
Easier to comment if you posted the cam data rather than just the part numbers:
Nominal duration
.050" duration
LSA
Installed CL

Obviously I'd like to have a pretty aggressive idle, but not at the expense of drive-ability
Those are opposites, especially with a low stall converter.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: polyspheric] #2743599
02/16/20 02:53 PM
02/16/20 02:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 562
Ohio
L
lockjaw-express Offline
mopar
lockjaw-express  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 562
Ohio
Buy your custom Cam from Dwayne Porter!!!

He really knows what is best for Mopars.

My 2 cents, Mark

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: lockjaw-express] #2743610
02/16/20 03:25 PM
02/16/20 03:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,963
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Online content
master
gregsdart  Online Content
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,963
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
I agree on contacting Dwayne. The cam/ converter combo is obviously critical here. I would ask for a converter that would act like a converter with the same stall charactoristics as a 1970 Hemi 10 3/4 inch stock unit. Have it built to handle the torque of the 440, which shouldn't be very expensive. At most those converters might stall 2800? But the street manners will be like a (almost) stock converter. With that type of converter, you will need a conservative cam that will run smoothly at 1800 to 2000 rpm and probably peak about 5500 at most, maybe 5200. The most fun is just driving around in a responsive combo, very similar to a stocker. The more radical a combo gets, the less fun it is to cruise around in IMHO

Last edited by gregsdart; 02/16/20 03:26 PM.

8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743612
02/16/20 03:26 PM
02/16/20 03:26 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179
California, U.S.A.
T
Torquemonster440 Offline
member
Torquemonster440  Offline
member
T

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179
California, U.S.A.
Just a few things to consider.. cams are sized according to their duration... not lift.. something in the 235° @.050" range would be a
Good starting point for what you're looking for. Just remember as said before the most critical relationship here is between cam and converter. These two have to play well together or the combo will respond poorly. Also remember LSA "lobe separation angle" will have a large impact on idle quality i.e. vacuum signal for power brakes. A "tighter" LSA [ 108° ] range will have more aggressive characteristics at idle.. (less vacuum) a "wider" LSA [ 112° ] range
will have a much smoother idle (more vacuum) better for power brakes. So as with all component selections when building a performance engine there are trade offs... it just depends on where your priorities lie...driveability vs. Max power.If it's never gonna be raced look for something that will work well
from a durability standpoint also... (no crazy aggressive ramp rates). Just remember.. if you stick a cam in it and hate it, it can be changed. It might take a few tries to nail down exactly what you want. And what you want in a performance camshaft may change in 5 years ? Who knows ? Most importantly have fun.

Last edited by Torquemonster440; 02/16/20 03:38 PM.

1966 Satellie.. 12.55 @107.75. 906 heads. 3780 lbs.
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743627
02/16/20 03:55 PM
02/16/20 03:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
'
'70Satellite Offline OP
member
'70Satellite  Offline OP
member
'

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743631
02/16/20 04:01 PM
02/16/20 04:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,479
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,479
So. Burlington, Vt.
Headers or ex manifolds?

Quench dome pistons and proper quench distance set or not?


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: fast68plymouth] #2743656
02/16/20 05:02 PM
02/16/20 05:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
'
'70Satellite Offline OP
member
'70Satellite  Offline OP
member
'

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Doug's headers, with 2" primaries and 3.5" collectors. Regarding the quench question, I don't have the answer. I assume the machine shop has that information, and I'll try to get it.

Last edited by '70Satellite; 02/16/20 05:03 PM.
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743666
02/16/20 05:31 PM
02/16/20 05:31 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179
California, U.S.A.
T
Torquemonster440 Offline
member
Torquemonster440  Offline
member
T

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 179
California, U.S.A.
Originally Posted by '70Satellite
Doug's headers, with 2" primaries and 3.5" collectors. Regarding the quench question, I don't have the answer. I assume the machine shop has that information, and I'll try to get it.


Have you bought those headers yet? They're great quality, but a poor match for a stock intake and mild hydraulic cam. Somthing with a 1 3/4" primary or smaller would be a better match.

Last edited by Torquemonster440; 02/16/20 05:58 PM.

1966 Satellie.. 12.55 @107.75. 906 heads. 3780 lbs.
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: Torquemonster440] #2743672
02/16/20 05:47 PM
02/16/20 05:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,913
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,913
usa
i have a 69 r/t with a very similar engine build (kb184 pistons, stock intake and carb, stock exhaust, mopar 272/.455 cam) to what your putting together. I would use the summit 6401 or the crower 271 cams and forget about the rest. if headers are what you want then buy the smallest tube. I would consider cast manifolds but small headers are o.k. a good fuel pump like the carter 6903 is a must. my car has power brakes and believe it or not I've had a difficult time getting enough vacuum to operate them with near stock cams; so avoid the cute idle thing. pocket porting is worth while and I like the ferrea 2.08/1.74 valves in those stock heads.

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743736
02/16/20 08:38 PM
02/16/20 08:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,007
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,007
Bend,OR USA
Do you want the best power or the best manners when it comes to WOT driving work
If power go big, if nice sound and okay performance go little on everything, carb, cam and exhaust twocents
As far as the mufflers your choosing I wouldn't use them Flow stoppers tsk Look for a straight through flow design mufler and mount them behind the rear end so the exhaust tips are even with or stick out a little behind the rear bumper.
Have you consider a three inch exhaust system? If not I would worktwocents Summit offers them and they work great on both A and B bodies cars up scope

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/16/20 08:39 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: Torquemonster440] #2743743
02/16/20 08:55 PM
02/16/20 08:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
'
'70Satellite Offline OP
member
'70Satellite  Offline OP
member
'

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Yes, the headers are sitting in my basement. It was what was recommended for now, and going forward looking at not only head work, but the upgrade to an aftermarket intake. I know it sounds easy to just grab an aluminum intake right now, but if i don't curb spending at least for now this project is going to get a little out of control.

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: Cab_Burge] #2743745
02/16/20 09:00 PM
02/16/20 09:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
'
'70Satellite Offline OP
member
'70Satellite  Offline OP
member
'

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
The exhaust is already in the car, sitting behind the 318. It will just get cut back from the manifolds to the header connection when the engine is in the car. It's really about manners and driveability, and vacuum for PB. The tricky part with cams seems to be having a cam that you can eventually grow in to with upgrades, like intake, head work, etc. Just trying to make the best choice. I actually like the sound of the exhaust with the 318, so we will see with the mild 440. Keep in mind, the engine builder/machine shop has said HP with this set up is going to be in the 325-350 range. Pretty mild. Thank you for your input. Much appreciated.

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743759
02/16/20 09:26 PM
02/16/20 09:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,600
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,600
in a cattle trailer down by th...
If you want an aggressive idle I don't think any of those cams are going to give it to you in a 440.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon!
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: Guitar Jones] #2743773
02/16/20 10:07 PM
02/16/20 10:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
'
'70Satellite Offline OP
member
'70Satellite  Offline OP
member
'

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 19
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Well, from what i have been learning, a thumping idle, and a car with good street manners for weekend cruising may not go hand in hand. The top priority is driveability and reliability, so I guess the idle not so important actually. Hey, I'm learning still. First Mopar. First restore and engine build. As far as off the shelf cams, It seems like the Crower 271 or the Lunati 702 or 703 are popular.

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743775
02/16/20 10:11 PM
02/16/20 10:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,979
s. e. pa.
C
calrobb2000 Offline
top fuel
calrobb2000  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,979
s. e. pa.
hi

look at crane 272 max power .

it will do every thing you you have listed !

i have power brakes app 16 in vac at idle !

12.9 at 107 with 3.55 in 3700 lb car drive any where !

Last edited by calrobb2000; 02/16/20 10:11 PM.
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743776
02/16/20 10:30 PM
02/16/20 10:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,808
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,808
Kirkland, Washington
Originally Posted by '70Satellite
Well, from what i have been learning, a thumping idle, and a car with good street manners for weekend cruising may not go hand in hand. The top priority is driveability and reliability, so I guess the idle not so important actually. Hey, I'm learning still. First Mopar. First restore and engine build. As far as off the shelf cams, It seems like the Crower 271 or the Lunati 702 or 703 are popular.


I run the Lunati 703 (used to be the 60303...494/513) in a 30 over 440. The 702 is pretty mild.

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743780
02/16/20 10:36 PM
02/16/20 10:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
W/r/t I assume the machine shop has that information
Your heads have a cast chamber recess which is not filled by dome pop-up, but should be.
The common practice is mill all 8 recessed surfaces to the same depth (use the lightest cut that will do this), use domed pistons (KB makes one) and fit the P-H clearance to .035-.040" @ TDC.
If zero or negative deck clearance is used (similar to OEM pistons) the engine will be more knock sensitive and (may) require a slower or conservative spark curve.
If you go down to a 10" converter you can live with a bigger cam like 240° @ .050" (and great idle) but lose some mileage. You shouldn't go too high on stall, or you will have some converter slip at low cruising speed due to your axle ratio - your best cruising RPM will be above your stall speed.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743781
02/16/20 10:38 PM
02/16/20 10:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,753
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,753
Windsor, ON, Canada
I would recommend something less than 230 dur @0.050".

Here is why:
1) you want good vacum for PB
2) you want a bit of a lumpy idle, but not overdo it

I used to run this Crower Compu-Pro 282HDP in a SB 360 motor. With 3.55 gearing and 9.5:1 CR it was a blast, loved the street manners, no complaints. The car still pulled pretty good vacum, I think about 12-14" if I remember (it was a good 20 yrs ago).

I stepped up to a Hughes Engines HE3844AL (238/244 @0.050" on 108LSA) on my last build. That cam really needed a 4k converter in a heavy car like mine. It is pretty rumpy alright, but only pulls 7" of vacum, the throttle response suffers. Now, the car overall combo is very different than when the Crower was in. I am running a 4.10 gear now for one and 10.5:1 CR.

So while I throughly enjoy my current setup, given what you stated as your goals and focus I would recommend you watch the duration @0.050".

Re: Honestly, cam selection toughest part [Re: '70Satellite] #2743789
02/16/20 10:57 PM
02/16/20 10:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,007
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,007
Bend,OR USA
Your going to have to try pretty hard to only make 325 HP with any 440 motor 9.5 to 1 compression with decent stock type heads dual plane intake and 750 CFM carb. up Been there done that work shruggy
If you do decide to dyno test it let us know your results and what brand engine dyno up
All the pump gas iron head street and strip motors I've built,35+, have all made at least 400 HP on CA pump swill on a DTS engine dyno in Ontario,CA work
The last one was more of a all out street terror, it made 535 HP with a single 850 CFM Holley on a Eddy RPM dual plane intake boogie up devil
I haven't built and dyno tested a stock stroke 440 motor since 2002 or so shruggy
Stroke it with big heads and hold on to your seat belt grin

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/16/20 11:27 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1