Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Lower Control arm bushing options #2734757
01/20/20 07:17 AM
01/20/20 07:17 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,827
Houston, Tx
hemi68charger Offline OP
master
hemi68charger  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,827
Houston, Tx
Operation Lower Control Arm bushings;
Ok, so in the process of replacing my friend's front strut bushings in his 71 six pack Challenger R/T I discovered during my post- teardown inspection that the LC arm bushing are shot. So, with that said that needs attention. The old way of thinking for me was stay away from the poly LC arm bushing since they always squeak. Has the technology improved with a better product?
Thoughts?

FB_IMG_1579518831579.jpgFB_IMG_1579518827415.jpg

Troy
Houston Mopar Connection Club
'69 Charger Daytona 440 - auto - 4.10 Dana (now with 426 hemi)
'69 Charger 500 440 - 4speed - 3.54 Dana
'70 Road Runner 383 - 4speed - a/c (now with 440)
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: hemi68charger] #2734773
01/20/20 08:56 AM
01/20/20 08:56 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
wv
73bbroadrunner Offline
member
73bbroadrunner  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
wv
I bought a set of poly for my roadrunner and get 0 squeak with Firm Feel inc. greasable lower control arm pins. www.firmfeel.com

IMG_1047.JPG
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: 73bbroadrunner] #2734775
01/20/20 09:01 AM
01/20/20 09:01 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
wv
73bbroadrunner Offline
member
73bbroadrunner  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
wv
Very nice cars by the way!

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: hemi68charger] #2734807
01/20/20 10:20 AM
01/20/20 10:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
Poly, only way to go, they don't squeak if installed/lubricated properly, I've been installing nothing but poly on my customers vehicles as well as my own for 30+ yrs, never had a poly failure....


Mike

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: DAYCLONA] #2734814
01/20/20 10:36 AM
01/20/20 10:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline
master
NachoRT74  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
IMHO, needs to be matched with poly strut rods bushings... if still rubber there will be smashed easily, because poly allows to the control arm get in and out and rubber won't hold it. That was my experience using poly there and keeping rubber on strut rods


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: NachoRT74] #2734881
01/20/20 01:11 PM
01/20/20 01:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
DAYCLONA Offline
I Live Here
DAYCLONA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
Originally Posted by NachoRT74
IMHO, needs to be matched with poly strut rods bushings... if still rubber there will be smashed easily, because poly allows to the control arm get in and out and rubber won't hold it. That was my experience using poly there and keeping rubber on strut rods




Agreed, Poly through out, toss the rubber....

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: DAYCLONA] #2734898
01/20/20 01:57 PM
01/20/20 01:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,711
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,711
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Does the poly stiffen, slowdown or restrict movement? Would it be detrimental or advantageous for a strip or street/strip car?


In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: GomangoCuda] #2734939
01/20/20 03:22 PM
01/20/20 03:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Mattax Offline
top fuel
Mattax  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Rubber.
Exception would be nylon with greasible 'pins' for situation where want to minimize every bit of suspension compliance.
Penalty is more maint and slightly higher NVH.
Reaction strut bushings are place I would consider poly
But then strut rod placement must be checked and if needed, bushing thickness modified.
Otherwise you may find the LCA being pushed back (or forward) from its proper position - especially when using nylon or poly LCA bushings.

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: Mattax] #2735073
01/20/20 09:38 PM
01/20/20 09:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,990
s. e. pa.
C
calrobb2000 Offline
top fuel
calrobb2000  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,990
s. e. pa.
hi,

Prothane long life no squeek !

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: Mattax] #2735342
01/21/20 05:17 PM
01/21/20 05:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,704
MICHIGAN
DynoDave Offline
master
DynoDave  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,704
MICHIGAN
Originally Posted by Mattax
Reaction strut bushings are place I would consider poly
But then strut rod placement must be checked and if needed, bushing thickness modified.
Otherwise you may find the LCA being pushed back (or forward) from its proper position - especially when using nylon or poly LCA bushings.


I understand the concept of what you're saying. If it doesn't take this thread too far into the weeds, can you describe how strut rod placement is checked?


DynoDave
Walter P. Chrysler Club - Great Lakes Region
Member # 12304
1970 Plymouth Duster
1972 Dodge Charger Rallye
https://wichargerguy.proboards.com/
1977 Chrysler Cordoba
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: DynoDave] #2735355
01/21/20 06:12 PM
01/21/20 06:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,893
Harriman NY
7
71GTX471 Offline
top fuel
71GTX471  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,893
Harriman NY
With the LCA installed @ static ride height when the strut rod is attached it shouldn't push or pull {deflect} the LCA too much in either direction.

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: DynoDave] #2735356
01/21/20 06:18 PM
01/21/20 06:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
Point of order, the LCA and the "brake struts" are designed with conflicting arcs. If there was for arguments sake, zero compliance in the system, thee wheel would locked solid. vertically. with no compliance There has to be compliance somewhere. I believe Mopar designed that in. The normal thought is to just reduce compliance and have better handling, however, nobody seems to ever consider when they have gone to far. I would say too far would be having the brake strut over control (ie bump steer) the LCA arm, I personally would rather the LCA arm control the brake strut ( the location of whatever compliance is needed). That being said, grease able pin Delrin bushings in the LCA and rubber struts real tight would check off most of the boxes, IMO.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: jcc] #2735454
01/21/20 10:58 PM
01/21/20 10:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,457
Sydney,Australia
tex013 Offline
top fuel
tex013  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,457
Sydney,Australia
Originally Posted by jcc
Point of order, the LCA and the "brake struts" are designed with conflicting arcs. If there was for arguments sake, zero compliance in the system, thee wheel would locked solid. vertically. with no compliance There has to be compliance somewhere. I believe Mopar designed that in. The normal thought is to just reduce compliance and have better handling, however, nobody seems to ever consider when they have gone to far. I would say too far would be having the brake strut over control (ie bump steer) the LCA arm, I personally would rather the LCA arm control the brake strut ( the location of whatever compliance is needed). That being said, grease able pin Delrin bushings in the LCA and rubber struts real tight would check off most of the boxes, IMO.


this is a question I asked in the autocross section for no answer really .
Which brand Delrin lca bushes ?
Normally I would prefer stock Moog lca bush wondering if Delrin might help for street/strip
I actually have the HD taxi strut rod bushed from MOOG , they seem a whole lot stronger than standard type . Have integral washers .
thanks ,

Tex


New best ET 10.259@129.65 .
New best MPH 130.32
Finally fitted a solid cam,
stepped it up a bit more
3690lbs through the mufflers
New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm
Power by Tex's Automotive
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: tex013] #2735457
01/21/20 11:15 PM
01/21/20 11:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Jim_Lusk Offline
I Live Here
Jim_Lusk  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by tex013
Originally Posted by jcc
Point of order, the LCA and the "brake struts" are designed with conflicting arcs. If there was for arguments sake, zero compliance in the system, thee wheel would locked solid. vertically. with no compliance There has to be compliance somewhere. I believe Mopar designed that in. The normal thought is to just reduce compliance and have better handling, however, nobody seems to ever consider when they have gone to far. I would say too far would be having the brake strut over control (ie bump steer) the LCA arm, I personally would rather the LCA arm control the brake strut ( the location of whatever compliance is needed). That being said, grease able pin Delrin bushings in the LCA and rubber struts real tight would check off most of the boxes, IMO.


this is a question I asked in the autocross section for no answer really .
Which brand Delrin lca bushes ?
Normally I would prefer stock Moog lca bush wondering if Delrin might help for street/strip
I actually have the HD taxi strut rod bushed from MOOG , they seem a whole lot stronger than standard type . Have integral washers .
thanks ,

Tex


Do NOT, under any circumstances at this time, buy Moog lower control arm bushings. They have a well-documented current problem with fitment to the pivot pin. Specifically, the pin is too loose in the inner sleeve of the bushing.

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: DynoDave] #2735469
01/22/20 12:24 AM
01/22/20 12:24 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Mattax Offline
top fuel
Mattax  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Originally Posted by DynoDave
Originally Posted by Mattax
Reaction strut bushings are place I would consider poly
But then strut rod placement must be checked and if needed, bushing thickness modified.
Otherwise you may find the LCA being pushed back (or forward) from its proper position - especially when using nylon or poly LCA bushings.


I understand the concept of what you're saying. If it doesn't take this thread too far into the weeds, can you describe how strut rod placement is checked?


Sure. I made a webpage about it long ago. It was particulalry an issue with the poly strut bushings when used on A-bodies, or at least the a-bodies with the earlier struts.

Basically I test fit the LCA and strut assembly without the strut bushings.
With no bushings, then measurements could be made for reference. This is the position of the strut relative to the K frame where the strut and LCA are not being pushed back (or forward).
Prob best to have the LCA at a somewhat horizontal position (representing typical ride ht) not hanging down.

http://www.heritech.org/cuda/bushings.html

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: tex013] #2735474
01/22/20 12:32 AM
01/22/20 12:32 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Mattax Offline
top fuel
Mattax  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Originally Posted by tex013

this is a question I asked in the autocross section for no answer really .
Which brand Delrin lca bushes ?
...


I'm using nylon LCA from firmfeel and their greasable pins. Don't know if its a listed item. If not, tell Dick you are autocrossing and thats your interested.
They do add a little vibration to the steering wheel on certain highways,
The advantage over polyu is they will not plastically deform - which is possible when running road race or autocross compounds.
If you're looking to reduce every compliance point you can, and some of us go there, then nylon over rubber is another small gain.
small - the rubber isn't that thick or that compliant - but a degree of camber under load in competition could be worth it...

Last edited by Mattax; 01/22/20 12:33 AM.
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: GomangoCuda] #2735475
01/22/20 12:36 AM
01/22/20 12:36 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Mattax Offline
top fuel
Mattax  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
Originally Posted by GomangoCuda
Does the poly stiffen, slowdown or restrict movement? Would it be detrimental or advantageous for a strip or street/strip car?

Shouldn't matter. The shock should be controlling the damping.
If you're using 90/10 shocks, then maybe, but I doubt it.

The use is mostly for reducing compliance in cornering, or in the case of the strut rods, braking.

Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: Mattax] #2735494
01/22/20 06:38 AM
01/22/20 06:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,457
Sydney,Australia
tex013 Offline
top fuel
tex013  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,457
Sydney,Australia
Originally Posted by Mattax
Originally Posted by tex013

this is a question I asked in the autocross section for no answer really .
Which brand Delrin lca bushes ?
...


I'm using nylon LCA from firmfeel and their greasable pins. Don't know if its a listed item. If not, tell Dick you are autocrossing and thats your interested.
They do add a little vibration to the steering wheel on certain highways,
The advantage over polyu is they will not plastically deform - which is possible when running road race or autocross compounds.
If you're looking to reduce every compliance point you can, and some of us go there, then nylon over rubber is another small gain.
small - the rubber isn't that thick or that compliant - but a degree of camber under load in competition could be worth it...


Thanks Mattax .
Will look them up . I know Bergman also do a delrin bush , but i think they recommend heim joint strut rods at same time and no greaseable pivot pin
Vibration is no issue , i have 80 profile tyres . Lots of comfort there .
I would think it might free up lca movement as there is no torsional twist/bind like a factory bush

Tex

Last edited by tex013; 01/22/20 06:41 AM.

New best ET 10.259@129.65 .
New best MPH 130.32
Finally fitted a solid cam,
stepped it up a bit more
3690lbs through the mufflers
New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm
Power by Tex's Automotive
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: hemi68charger] #2735526
01/22/20 10:38 AM
01/22/20 10:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,991
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,991
Benton, IL.
I had the Cuda aligned last year. Called around and found an experienced independent shop where the owner does the alignments. Although he didn't have a lot of experience with our cars, he was willing to stay at it until he got it. We used the method outlined here to align, took it for a drive and noted a drift, put it back on the rack, made an adjustment, drove it again and it was good. Cost $75.

He had me get in the car while it was on the rack. I was really surprised how much the alignment changed with my 200lbs in the driver's seat. Most of the setting indicators went from green (good) to red. It changed even more with a passenger. All the setting indicators went from green to red. I didn't tell the wife cause she is sometimes reluctant to go with me to a show on a hot afternoon. And I don't want her to have any more excuses to say no.


Master, again and still
Re: Lower Control arm bushing options [Re: DaveRS23] #2735548
01/22/20 11:39 AM
01/22/20 11:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442
NW Chicago suburban area
Mopar Mitch Offline
pro stock
Mopar Mitch  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442
NW Chicago suburban area
After 40+ years of hard-core autocross racing, I've rebuilt my front suspension and installed the Firm Feel Nylon bushings (not the poly).. I think the Nylon are actually Delrin material.

The old factory rubber LCA bushings had been replced once before (by me... about 30 years years ago)... and they did show signs of deterioration. Also, I went with poly strut bushings.

So, I should be driving the car again this summer (new engine, etc).. I'll let you know what my thoughts are about the new bushings. Handling is my #1 priority.


Mopar Mitch "Road racers and autocrossers go in deeper and come out harder!"... and rain never stops us from having fun with our cars... in fact, it makes us better drivers! Check out MOPAR ACTION MAGAZINE, August 2006 issue for feature article and specs on my autocross T/A!
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1