Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: INTMD8] #2719798
11/27/19 04:37 PM
11/27/19 04:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,106
Chicago Blackhawks
H
hemicar1971 Offline
master
hemicar1971  Offline
master
H

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,106
Chicago Blackhawks
If it is quarter mile performance there is more to going fast than headers or manifolds. As for Exhaust Manifolds and they are a nice factory piece I would leave them alone and find ones that are already altered or buy a set of repros and port them with no hear riser. At one time in I isle at Carlisle Mario sold Auminum Hemi exhaust manfolds. You save a lot of weight running those and I believe a few FAST hemi cars have them on. Every area of the motor can be altered for more HP like the stock intake manifold with a Vanke Mod,, changing rocker ratios. Leaving a little on the table is not a bad thing.

Last edited by hemicar1971; 11/27/19 04:38 PM.

1971 HEMI E BODY REGISTRY
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: hemicar1971] #2719803
11/27/19 05:00 PM
11/27/19 05:00 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
INTMD8 Offline
super stock
INTMD8  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
It's not an original hemi car, I believe the manifolds I have are reproductions.

Didn't know they made aluminum ones, very interesting.

Last edited by INTMD8; 11/27/19 05:00 PM.

69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: INTMD8] #2719943
11/28/19 04:26 AM
11/28/19 04:26 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,123
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,123
Bend,OR USA
I'll provide some at the track results from two of my cars, both wedge powered, not hemiroid powered, with the muffs and pipes on versus no muffs and pipes removed.
Example #1 was my 1969 Dart GTS 440 powered street and strip bracket car at LACR 1/4 mile back in the late 1990s or maybe early 2000, the car ran 12.29 ET at 109.4 MPH with a new set of M/T 105x28.5x15 with 11.0 lbs. in them on the first run at around 6:000 PM on a Friday night T&T with the 2.5 inch exhaust system that consisted of a set of Hooker 1 7/8 A body fenderwell headers hooked up with about 16.0 inches of 2.5 head pipes to a set of Thrust 2 1/2 inch in and out Corvair Turbo muffs with a set of 2.5 inch side pipes going over to the rocker panel directly in front of the rear tires. 2nd run was with 10.5 Lbs. in the slicks 45 minutes later with no other changes, the car ran 12.27 at 109.5 MPH, the last run that night was around 9:00 PM with 10.0 Lbs. in the slicks which resulted in a run of 12.23 at 109.7 MPH.
This was a 3 day event with T&T on Friday night with the gates opening at 4:30 PM , first TT at 6.:00 PM stopping at 10::00 PM. Saturday the gates opened at 8:00 A.M with the first TT at around 9:00 :AM, closing at 10:PM Sunday had the same schedule with closing at the end of racing.
I got to the track around 9:00 AM and removed the exhaust system from the headers back and let the tires down to 9.5 Lbs. with no other changes and made the first TT run around 10:30 AM, it ran 11.39 at 117.6 MPH shock I didn't believe it so I made another run at around 11:10 AM on the other side (L/S) of the track, which with that car was normally around .02 to .03 ET slower. It ran 11.42 at 117.7 MPH work
I did some similar testing with my last street and strip car at Madras, OR a 1/8 mile track it had a pump gas 512 C.I. low deck stroker motor with a six pack and a complete 3.0 exhaust system with the same Hooker headers off of the old Dart fed into 3.0 inch pipes ran to the rear of the car with a set of Magna Flow muffs that where 3.0 inch side inlet by 7.0 inch thick by 14.0 oval with a 3.0 inch center outlet with a piece of perforated straight through pipe in it, the muffs where mounted at the rear bumper with 45 degree turn downs straight out of them. That car ran a best of 7.01 ET at 95.3 MPH with the system on and it picked up to 6.98 ET at 95.5 MPH with the complete system removed confused I'm thinking the weight was where the small perforamnce gains where made, not the exhaust system restrictions work shruggy
Happy Thanksgiving to all up



Last edited by Cab_Burge; 11/28/19 04:29 AM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: hemicar1971] #2719967
11/28/19 09:43 AM
11/28/19 09:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,696
jersey
S
Spaceman Spiff Offline
master
Spaceman Spiff  Offline
master
S

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,696
jersey
Originally Posted by hemicar1971
If it is quarter mile performance there is more to going fast than headers or manifolds. As for Exhaust Manifolds and they are a nice factory piece I would leave them alone and find ones that are already altered or buy a set of repros and port them with no hear riser. At one time in I isle at Carlisle Mario sold Auminum Hemi exhaust manfolds. You save a lot of weight running those and I believe a few FAST hemi cars have them on. Every area of the motor can be altered for more HP like the stock intake manifold with a Vanke Mod,, changing rocker ratios. Leaving a little on the table is not a bad thing.


Some of the ‘62 “ Swiss cheese” catalinas had aluminum exhaust manifold, but they found that they would actually start to melt.


526 cubes of angry wedge, pushbutton shifted, 9 passenger killer!
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: INTMD8] #2726295
12/23/19 01:38 AM
12/23/19 01:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,477
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,477
Minnesota
Originally Posted by INTMD8
Originally Posted by Hemi_Joel
The dyno testing I did when I was developing my fast motors does not agree with there's whatsoever. 612 versus 588 horse, and 795 vs 762 horsepower. Nicks Hemi seemed to stumbled at the top end of the pull with the manifolds. I wonder if something was going away, or if the jetting was off?


Bringing this back from the dead.

The 612 vs 588 horsepower, was that on as-cast or ported manifolds? Trying to decide between headers and porting my manifolds.

Thanks!


On the 588 horse motor, the exhaust manifolds were bone stock. On the 762 horse, they were extrude honed and ported.


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: Hemi_Joel] #2726360
12/23/19 11:30 AM
12/23/19 11:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,492
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,492
So. Burlington, Vt.
Something that’s important to keep in mind here is........ depending on how the cam is configured...... the difference between the headers and manifolds could vary greatly.

A cam designed to minimize the losses when used with manifolds isn’t going to gain as much by going to headers as the cam that essentially requires headers is going to lose by running it with ex manifolds.
One might show a 20-30 difference....... the other could be close to 100hp.

The takeaway is....... there is no standard answer as to how much headers are worth.

As with just about everything relating to making more power...... “it depends”.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Cool shootout; 472 HEMI Stroker - Headers VS Manifolds [Re: Cab_Burge] #2726361
12/23/19 11:45 AM
12/23/19 11:45 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
Originally Posted by Cab_Burge
I'll provide some at the track results from two of my cars, both wedge powered, not hemiroid powered, with the muffs and pipes on versus no muffs and pipes removed.
Example #1 was my 1969 Dart GTS 440 powered street and strip bracket car at LACR 1/4 mile back in the late 1990s or maybe early 2000, the car ran 12.29 ET at 109.4 MPH with a new set of M/T 105x28.5x15 with 11.0 lbs. in them on the first run at around 6:000 PM on a Friday night T&T with the 2.5 inch exhaust system that consisted of a set of Hooker 1 7/8 A body fenderwell headers hooked up with about 16.0 inches of 2.5 head pipes to a set of Thrust 2 1/2 inch in and out Corvair Turbo muffs with a set of 2.5 inch side pipes going over to the rocker panel directly in front of the rear tires. 2nd run was with 10.5 Lbs. in the slicks 45 minutes later with no other changes, the car ran 12.27 at 109.5 MPH, the last run that night was around 9:00 PM with 10.0 Lbs. in the slicks which resulted in a run of 12.23 at 109.7 MPH.
This was a 3 day event with T&T on Friday night with the gates opening at 4:30 PM , first TT at 6.:00 PM stopping at 10::00 PM. Saturday the gates opened at 8:00 A.M with the first TT at around 9:00 :AM, closing at 10:PM Sunday had the same schedule with closing at the end of racing.
I got to the track around 9:00 AM and removed the exhaust system from the headers back and let the tires down to 9.5 Lbs. with no other changes and made the first TT run around 10:30 AM, it ran 11.39 at 117.6 MPH shock I didn't believe it so I made another run at around 11:10 AM on the other side (L/S) of the track, which with that car was normally around .02 to .03 ET slower. It ran 11.42 at 117.7 MPH work
I did some similar testing with my last street and strip car at Madras, OR a 1/8 mile track it had a pump gas 512 C.I. low deck stroker motor with a six pack and a complete 3.0 exhaust system with the same Hooker headers off of the old Dart fed into 3.0 inch pipes ran to the rear of the car with a set of Magna Flow muffs that where 3.0 inch side inlet by 7.0 inch thick by 14.0 oval with a 3.0 inch center outlet with a piece of perforated straight through pipe in it, the muffs where mounted at the rear bumper with 45 degree turn downs straight out of them. That car ran a best of 7.01 ET at 95.3 MPH with the system on and it picked up to 6.98 ET at 95.5 MPH with the complete system removed confused I'm thinking the weight was where the small perforamnce gains where made, not the exhaust system restrictions work shruggy
Happy Thanksgiving to all up




Thrush turbo mufflers really kill power if you're making some. I had a set on my Plymouth, and I spent 3 summers chasing various issues that made the car just feel like it was 100 HP down from where it should have been. Finally one of the last changes was mufflers (changed to Ultra Flos) and the car felt night and day different.

There was actually an episode of Motor Trend's engine masters some time later and they found that the Thrush mufflers were the worst of all the Turbo mufflers tested. Mine sure did sound good though. They were the Thrush Hush, which is different than the California Turbo model.

Last edited by GTX MATT; 12/23/19 11:47 AM.

Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1