Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 #2686678
08/11/19 11:14 PM
08/11/19 11:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
My 2007 Ram has 338,000 miles and will surely not last forever. I am considering two options as far as a replacement: Either swap in a lower mile 5.7 or rebuild another and swap it in.
I'm curious as to which years are direct interchange. I also wonder if there is anything different that has to be done upon a fresh start.
I've done numerous engine swaps with old cars but only a few fuel injected later models. Once all the components are installed and hooked up, is there anything required to do besides turn the key and go? Does the computer need any "reflash" service or will it simply work as before?

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2686872
08/12/19 12:53 PM
08/12/19 12:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,881
Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner Offline
top fuel
RTSrunner  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,881
Pittsburgh,PA
An '03-'08 long block should swap over.Front covers and intake styles vary between car and truck engines but your parts would swap to a car block if necessary.

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2686906
08/12/19 02:14 PM
08/12/19 02:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Is it a 1500? If so it uses MDS and should be replaced with an MDS eqquiped engine. If it is heavier truck it has no MDS and can be replaced with either, if your replacement has MDS in it leave the solenoids in and not connected to anything or buy the special MDS hole plugs I sell but they are not needed if you just want to leave the solenoid in. Like was mentioned any long block from a car or truck will work as long as you follow the rules I mentioned. Cars have different oil pans, exhaust manifolds, intake manifolds and timing cover/accessory drive set ups. Also a 6.1 long block bolts in also and they are getting more affordable. No reflash or anything needed unless you put a NON MDS engine into one that came with MDS, in that case a flash can remove the check engine light code.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2686910
08/12/19 02:23 PM
08/12/19 02:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,041
MD
RTSE4ME Offline
top fuel
RTSE4ME  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,041
MD
The only thing different I do on a fresh start/new engine is priming the oil system. Use a pump to backfeed the oil pump and then the block until oil comes out the rockers.

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: HotRodDave] #2687013
08/12/19 07:43 PM
08/12/19 07:43 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Originally Posted by HotRodDave
Is it a 1500? A 6.1 long block bolts in also and they are getting more affordable. No reflash or anything needed unless you put a NON MDS engine into one that came with MDS, in that case a flash can remove the check engine light code.


The truck IS a 1500 with the MDS.
Knowing that a 6.1 can be fitted is encouraging. I would likely reuse all the front accessories, the truck oil pan and pickup, exhaust manifolds, everything that is truck specific.

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2687887
08/14/19 11:58 PM
08/14/19 11:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
I have seen 4.05 stroke rotating assemblies that can put the engine to 394-399 cubes...Sounds interesting. What about a stroke and a 6.1 cam??

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2688019
08/15/19 12:51 PM
08/15/19 12:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
If your going to think about stroking it I would think about swapping in a real 6.4, better cam, better heads, more compression... and a good used long block can be had for about the price of a stroker hit.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: HotRodDave] #2688211
08/15/19 08:35 PM
08/15/19 08:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
THere is still the issue of passing this state's tough emission regulations.
I don't know enough about making the changes between the 5.7 and 6.4 work. Intake and injectors, wiring, PCM issues...
I did a 305 to 350 swap in an '84 Chevy and only had to replace the computer chip...That was easy!

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2688846
08/17/19 06:37 PM
08/17/19 06:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
I stopped by my favorite machine shop and tried to talk with my guy about these 3G engines. He had left early but the owner was there. He had always been an abrasive and gruff dude. He didn't have much good to say about these engines, as if I somehow am the only one to have had good luck with one.

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2689145
08/18/19 06:29 PM
08/18/19 06:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806
Central Florida
larrymopar360 Offline
Stud Muffin
larrymopar360  Offline
Stud Muffin

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806
Central Florida
No I've had good luck with them and seen many high miles Police use ones. I've seen some failures too in Police use but also questionable maintenance on those. We had some usage of whatever weight oil was around in some of ours along with the oil levels not being checked frequently enough. And really I've seen more failure on early Pentastars too than 5.7's. Even our pre Eagle Heads 5.7's have been good, as have the 3.5 V6's. The 3.5's have been absolute workhorses!!! I don't care what anyone says about them. They just take the abuse and keep going!


Facts are stubborn things.
Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2689450
08/19/19 04:06 PM
08/19/19 04:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
MoparJ Offline
super stock
MoparJ  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Frankenduster
I stopped by my favorite machine shop and tried to talk with my guy about these 3G engines. He had left early but the owner was there. He had always been an abrasive and gruff dude. He didn't have much good to say about these engines, as if I somehow am the only one to have had good luck with one.


Eh, yeah, some builders out there might have less than favorable reviews about them, but so do many in regards to GM LS or Ford modular engines. It just depends on perception.

Personally, I have owned 10 vehicles of various form with either Pre Eagle (2009) 5.7s, Eagle 5.7s, or 6.1s, and all have done well. A few were well over 100k before I moved onto something else and most saw quite a few 1/4 mile passes. One example was north of 200k with just plugs, water pump, basic up keep items.

Pre 2009 5.7s shortcomings include a tendency to drop valve seats, especially if over heated, and early years saw some issues with broken connecting rods. 2009 and later versions see some issues here and there with lifters failing and eating cams, but it is mostly rectified after 2013 models.

Overall, they are pretty durable and respond well to performance add ons. Just have to be careful on not getting too crazy on any forced induction on the stock piston/ring package, as the land on the top ring is fairly thin.


2016 Ram 1500 Crew Cab: 5.7, 65RFE, 4.56 gears with locker, Hemifever tuned, AFE intake, 87mm throttle body, JBA headers, 3" Flowmaster exhaust, split to dual 2.5" exits. 13.57 best ET so far.

Searching for new A or B Body Project!
Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: MoparJ] #2689619
08/20/19 02:02 AM
08/20/19 02:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Thanks!
I am not looking to do anything with the replacement engine that I don't already do. I just need something that performs as well as this engine did when new, maybe a little more power. It has a 3.55 diff, maybe I'd swap in a 3.92 to boost low speed response along with some type of emission legal headers. That stuff won't be a problem with passing the smog check.
Are you the guy that usually coordinates the Malibu Cruise at the Spring Fling?

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2689746
08/20/19 02:11 PM
08/20/19 02:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
MoparJ Offline
super stock
MoparJ  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Frankenduster
Thanks!
I am not looking to do anything with the replacement engine that I don't already do. I just need something that performs as well as this engine did when new, maybe a little more power. It has a 3.55 diff, maybe I'd swap in a 3.92 to boost low speed response along with some type of emission legal headers. That stuff won't be a problem with passing the smog check.
Are you the guy that usually coordinates the Malibu Cruise at the Spring Fling?


A 3.92 swap with a limited slip unit would do well. More of a difference would be felt with a 4.10 set. JBA shorty headers are CARB compliant and would help a bit more, with a good tune through a programmer such as Diablo. When it comes around to smog time, just pull the tune back off.

Yes, I am the guy in past years who coordinated the cruise, but I had taken a year or so off to focus on work and busy life with a now 3 year old daughter. I might not be able to much with the Fall Fling cruise this year due to some pending work trips, but hopefully I will be back at it in the spring.


2016 Ram 1500 Crew Cab: 5.7, 65RFE, 4.56 gears with locker, Hemifever tuned, AFE intake, 87mm throttle body, JBA headers, 3" Flowmaster exhaust, split to dual 2.5" exits. 13.57 best ET so far.

Searching for new A or B Body Project!
Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: MoparJ] #2689750
08/20/19 02:43 PM
08/20/19 02:43 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Thank you for the advice and for running the cruise for all those years. I am a member of a car club and I am fully aware of the amount of time and work it takes to run events. It is a thankless job for the most part.
I remember following you up the Malibu Hills, you in the Duster, me in my Charger. I have found that the outside activities associated with the Van Nuys event are as much of an attraction as the show is itself.
I will look into the gears and headers. Thank you again.

dee que.jpg
Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2690027
08/21/19 02:14 PM
08/21/19 02:14 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 194
Springtown Pa
R
Ray408G3Hemi Offline
member
Ray408G3Hemi  Offline
member
R

Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 194
Springtown Pa
Originally Posted by Frankenduster
. What about a stroke and a 6.1 cam??



It seams to be a popular way to go, there are a lot of Die hard 3rd Gen truck guys on Hemitruckclub.com might want to hang out there for a day or 2.

I've read and talked to a lot of 3rd gen truck guys who swear by changing the rear over to 4.56s

.01 over 5.7 (3.927) with a 4.05 stroke is a 392.42CI , Lots of those builds out there. .


1963 Thunderbolt 496FE 10.80 (still a work in progress)
1968 Mustang slow a$$ 428 FE
1971 Boss 351 Mustang 11.20@115mph
1993 Lightning 10.61 @ 129mph 408Ci A3 headed NA
1996 Viper GTS
2001 Lightning 8.99 @ 155MPH 5.4 Mod Motor
2009 Ram 9.65@144MPH 463CI G3 NA
2010 Challenger 9.91 @ 139MPH 408CI G3ci NA
2019 F150 (local dealer's Lightning package) ..11.90s

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Ray408G3Hemi] #2690368
08/22/19 02:30 PM
08/22/19 02:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
MoparJ Offline
super stock
MoparJ  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Ray408G3Hemi
Originally Posted by Frankenduster
. What about a stroke and a 6.1 cam??



It seams to be a popular way to go, there are a lot of Die hard 3rd Gen truck guys on Hemitruckclub.com might want to hang out there for a day or 2.

I've read and talked to a lot of 3rd gen truck guys who swear by changing the rear over to 4.56s

.01 over 5.7 (3.927) with a 4.05 stroke is a 392.42CI , Lots of those builds out there. .



Ramforumz.com or Tuned Rams on Facebook are also great sources of information.

4.56 gears alone woke up my Crew Cab with the 65RFE trans and its less than desirable gear spacing. In conjunction with a Hemifever tune and loosening up the torque management, it flies now and runs consistent mid to high 13s on all terrain tires and full weight (5900 lbs). JBA headers are about to go on, and a 3000 Edge Converter as well for the hunt for low 13s, or high 12s with drag radials.

With my 265/70/17 rear tires, 75 mph is still a very acceptable 2450 rpm with the 4.56s.


2016 Ram 1500 Crew Cab: 5.7, 65RFE, 4.56 gears with locker, Hemifever tuned, AFE intake, 87mm throttle body, JBA headers, 3" Flowmaster exhaust, split to dual 2.5" exits. 13.57 best ET so far.

Searching for new A or B Body Project!
Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: MoparJ] #2690417
08/22/19 05:57 PM
08/22/19 05:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
I have driven almost 30,000 miles already this year so whatever I do, I can't make this truck eat a lot more gas or throw MIL codes.
I'm taking in all the suggestions and considering several things.
I looked at a 6.1 with 84,000 miles. The man wanted $5500. That is REALLY steep compared to a $1500 5.7 with the same mileage.
I am leaning toward a low mile 5.7 and using a 6.1 cam with those shorty headers. To me, that should not adversely affect the mileage or throw any codes.
I can get 3.92 gears from a wreck for a good price or just swap over the whole axle. New gears will be digging into the wallet deeper than I'm ready to do. Maybe the 3.92 isn't much of an increase over the 3.55 but I know with a car I can feel the difference between a 3.55 and a 3.91.

Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: Kern Dog] #2690421
08/22/19 06:11 PM
08/22/19 06:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
MoparJ Offline
super stock
MoparJ  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 992
Simi Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Frankenduster
I have driven almost 30,000 miles already this year so whatever I do, I can't make this truck eat a lot more gas or throw MIL codes.
I'm taking in all the suggestions and considering several things.
I looked at a 6.1 with 84,000 miles. The man wanted $5500. That is REALLY steep compared to a $1500 5.7 with the same mileage.
I am leaning toward a low mile 5.7 and using a 6.1 cam with those shorty headers. To me, that should not adversely affect the mileage or throw any codes.
I can get 3.92 gears from a wreck for a good price or just swap over the whole axle. New gears will be digging into the wallet deeper than I'm ready to do. Maybe the 3.92 isn't much of an increase over the 3.55 but I know with a car I can feel the difference between a 3.55 and a 3.91.


Although not a huge seat of the pants difference, you will still feel the 3.92 gear, particularly on the low end. The effects on fuel mileage will be insignificant at the most. Probably speaking the obvious, but it is probably time to check on the u joints at the same time as a gear swap.

If you do go anything but a stock 5.7, you will need to get a programmer in order to shut the MDS (cylinder deactivation) function off in the PCM, Speaking the obvious, you will need the proper non MDS lifters to go with a 6.1 or any other cam.

Considering you will need the tune for the different cam setup, you may as well have someone such as Jay Greene or Hemifever Tuning write a custom tune to help free up some torque management and additional power.

Hell, even if you went with a stock 5.7 and remained with a 3.55 (add normal bolt ons such as cold air intake, headers, exhaust), a custom tune will make the truck feel much more lively than current.

Justin


2016 Ram 1500 Crew Cab: 5.7, 65RFE, 4.56 gears with locker, Hemifever tuned, AFE intake, 87mm throttle body, JBA headers, 3" Flowmaster exhaust, split to dual 2.5" exits. 13.57 best ET so far.

Searching for new A or B Body Project!
Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: MoparJ] #2690496
08/22/19 10:55 PM
08/22/19 10:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Originally Posted by MoparJ
Originally Posted by Frankenduster
I have driven almost 30,000 miles already this year so whatever I do, I can't make this truck eat a lot more gas or throw MIL codes.
I'm taking in all the suggestions and considering several things.
I looked at a 6.1 with 84,000 miles. The man wanted $5500. That is REALLY steep compared to a $1500 5.7 with the same mileage.
I am leaning toward a low mile 5.7 and using a 6.1 cam with those shorty headers. To me, that should not adversely affect the mileage or throw any codes.
I can get 3.92 gears from a wreck for a good price or just swap over the whole axle. New gears will be digging into the wallet deeper than I'm ready to do. Maybe the 3.92 isn't much of an increase over the 3.55 but I know with a car I can feel the difference between a 3.55 and a 3.91.


Although not a huge seat of the pants difference, you will still feel the 3.92 gear, particularly on the low end. The effects on fuel mileage will be insignificant at the most. Probably speaking the obvious, but it is probably time to check on the u joints at the same time as a gear swap.

If you do go anything but a stock 5.7, you will need to get a programmer in order to shut the MDS (cylinder deactivation) function off in the PCM, Speaking the obvious, you will need the proper non MDS lifters to go with a 6.1 or any other cam.

Considering you will need the tune for the different cam setup, you may as well have someone such as Jay Greene or Hemifever Tuning write a custom tune to help free up some torque management and additional power.

Hell, even if you went with a stock 5.7 and remained with a 3.55 (add normal bolt ons such as cold air intake, headers, exhaust), a custom tune will make the truck feel much more lively than current.

Justin



You do NOT need to swap lifters to delete the MDS, you can simply leave the MDS solenoids in and unpluggegd, or you can buy plugs from me specially made for doing exactly this that look much better than leaving the solenoids in that are unlike others sold anywhere else or you could just run the MDS with the 6.1 cam. Adding the 6.1 cam and removing the MDS are both going to adversely affect your MPG as will swapping gears, )I have 4.10s in my truck and hate em). 6.1s are usually $3500 and ocasionally a tic under $3000 all accross the US.

http://www.car-part.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi?userSearch=int&userPID=1000&userLocation=USA&userIMS=&userInterchange=E%3EC%3EO&userSide=&userDate=2008&userDate2=2008&dbModel=22.8.1.1&userModel=Dodge%20Challenger%20(Chrysler)&dbPart=300.1&userPart=Engine&sessionID=14000000011045990&userPreference=price&userZip=59901&userLat=48.1017000&userLong=-113.7517000&userIntSelect=460943&userUID=0&userBroker=&iKey=&userPage=3

I don't know if that link will work or not but there a 2 under $3000 with under 80,000 miles right now and about 30 in the $3500 range.

A low mile 6.1 will make 400+ HP plus significantly more TQ and it will run fine with the 5.7 tuning if you want to defer some of the cost of tuning up front you can do it later. A 6.1 cam and shorty headers on a 5.7 is a nice little upgrade but it will not get you 50+ HP and 40 pounds of TQ. I have done this stuff, it works. It will still use a little more fuel but the higher compression will offset some of the loss.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Replacing a tired 5.7 with a used low mile 5.7 [Re: HotRodDave] #2690519
08/23/19 01:11 AM
08/23/19 01:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline OP
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline OP
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Thank you so much. I'm going to try that link.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1