Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
leaf spring compatibility #2675513
07/08/19 12:31 PM
07/08/19 12:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 137
midwest - USA
6
69/70 Plymies Offline OP
member
69/70 Plymies  Offline OP
member
6

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 137
midwest - USA
Need to know if a pair of factory HD leaf springs from a 1972 'Cuda will fit a 1969 Road Runner? ( Bolt hole-to-bolt hole length). Thanks for the help.

Last edited by 69/70 Plymies; 07/08/19 12:35 PM. Reason: clarity
Re: leaf spring compatibility [Re: 69/70 Plymies] #2675626
07/08/19 04:56 PM
07/08/19 04:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
massachusetts U.S.A.
1
1969ronnie Offline
super stock
1969ronnie  Offline
super stock
1

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
massachusetts U.S.A.
hi, short answer , nope. your e body has a shorter rear section .ronnie drive

Re: leaf spring compatibility [Re: 1969ronnie] #2675668
07/08/19 06:12 PM
07/08/19 06:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,669
A
Andrewh Offline
master
Andrewh  Offline
master
A

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,669
it won't but andyF makes and firmfeel sells extended front hangers so a b-body can use e-body leafs.

Re: leaf spring compatibility [Re: Andrewh] #2675718
07/08/19 08:40 PM
07/08/19 08:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,726
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,726
A collage of whims
Both have a 22" front spring section (center pin to center of front spring eye).
E-body rear section (center pin to center of rear spring eye) is 35", that era B is 36".
The shorter rear section will cause the rear shackles to either be vertical or point forward at the bottom.
Not a problem for rolling around the shop, but the springs will not work properly and the car should not be driven that way.
Using an extended front mount in the OP's scenario will move the center pin back, which moves the axle back (and the driveshaft @ ft yoke/trans).
Those front mounts are typically for using the 20" ft section SS springs in cars that have 21" or 22" section stock.

Re: leaf spring compatibility [Re: topside] #2675776
07/08/19 10:49 PM
07/08/19 10:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264
New York, USA
Chargerfan68 Offline
pro stock
Chargerfan68  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264
New York, USA
Originally Posted by topside
Both have a 22" front spring section (center pin to center of front spring eye).
E-body rear section (center pin to center of rear spring eye) is 35", that era B is 36".
The shorter rear section will cause the rear shackles to either be vertical or point forward at the bottom.
Not a problem for rolling around the shop, but the springs will not work properly and the car should not be driven that way.
Using an extended front mount in the OP's scenario will move the center pin back, which moves the axle back (and the driveshaft @ ft yoke/trans).
Those front mounts are typically for using the 20" ft section SS springs in cars that have 21" or 22" section stock.


Good information and explaination. I agree from what i’ve learned over the years. up


1.50 60Ft. , 10.75@ 127MPH Hauling 3900 LBS.
Re: leaf spring compatibility [Re: topside] #2675801
07/09/19 12:03 AM
07/09/19 12:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 137
midwest - USA
6
69/70 Plymies Offline OP
member
69/70 Plymies  Offline OP
member
6

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 137
midwest - USA
Topside,
Thank you very much for the detailed information. You have helped me and I'm sure others, as well.

Re: leaf spring compatibility [Re: 69/70 Plymies] #2675805
07/09/19 12:07 AM
07/09/19 12:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,726
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,726
A collage of whims
Glad to help; ya do a couple dozen of these things, ya learn stuff ! laugh







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1