Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? #2654813
05/12/19 10:57 PM
05/12/19 10:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
..... so I hear there were lifter? Issues with the mid teens years motors .... and the 5? Speed trannies almost in the same year mix ??? ... school me on which years to avoid ... thx

Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: dOc !] #2654818
05/12/19 11:20 PM
05/12/19 11:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,306
Laveen, Arizona
GTSDart340 Offline
pro stock
GTSDart340  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,306
Laveen, Arizona
I have a 3.6 in my 16 Durango. It's got about 55k on it, and we've had it for about 2 years. We've replaced 3 coil packs, but that's it.


1949 International KB-2 "Mater" - 302/T5

1968 Dodge Dart GTS "The Drat" - 340/727

2006 Dodge Magnum R/T - Hemi

2016 Dodge Durango Limited - 3.6
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: dOc !] #2654819
05/12/19 11:23 PM
05/12/19 11:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,068
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Offline
master
A727Tflite  Offline
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,068
Michigan
Guide issues on the early 3.6 - the 5 speed NAG trans is a pretty good unit.


Sorry - wrong engine. 3.6 had issues early on with misfire due to cracked heads and a cam passer issue.

Warranty was extended on early models for the engine I think to 150K miles.

Last edited by Transman; 05/13/19 01:21 PM.
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: A727Tflite] #2654857
05/13/19 07:50 AM
05/13/19 07:50 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,322
Michigan
C
crlush Offline
pro stock
crlush  Offline
pro stock
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,322
Michigan
Someone told me the early ones had valve seats the fell out. We had a 13 durango with 5 speed and never had a problem, my sister inlaw has it with over 100,000 still good. We have a 15 300 and its been great also.

Last edited by crlush; 05/13/19 07:52 AM.
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: dOc !] #2654952
05/13/19 12:26 PM
05/13/19 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,726
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,726
Rio Linda, CA
I think the lifter problems were with the earlier (2006-10) 3.5. Valve seat dropping was the pre-'09 5.7 Hemi.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: John_Kunkel] #2655260
05/14/19 09:27 AM
05/14/19 09:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,682
Philadelphia
R
radar Offline
top fuel
radar  Offline
top fuel
R

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,682
Philadelphia
I always avoided them because the you get better power and similar milage with a 318. I will not think twice about a slant 6 powered truck though- I had a few 225s that were great.

If the price was right I wouldn’t hesitate to daily drive a mopar v6 but it’d have to be a drive it till the wheels fall off beater.

I pulled a 3.6 out of a dakota I used as a donor for IFS & rack & pinion steering- had it for sale for months complete throttle body to pan with a trans attached. It started at $400, then $100, then free. Turns out I literally couldn’t give it away. It got disassembled and scrapped. I kept the starter and hardware.

Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: John_Kunkel] #2655316
05/14/19 11:50 AM
05/14/19 11:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,392
Highland, MI.
Sunroofcuda Offline
master
Sunroofcuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,392
Highland, MI.
Originally Posted by John_Kunkel
I think the lifter problems were with the earlier (2006-10) 3.5. Valve seat dropping was the pre-'09 5.7 Hemi.


3.6L too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5GlHp2qlDE (it's worth it to tolerate the annoying commentary in the beginning, so stick with it.......)

Also, there is an oil filter housing issue: https://youtu.be/jjGnEI1HmNY


No Man With A Good Car Needs To Be Justified
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: Sunroofcuda] #2655368
05/14/19 02:21 PM
05/14/19 02:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806
Central Florida
larrymopar360 Offline
Stud Muffin
larrymopar360  Offline
Stud Muffin

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,806
Central Florida
Definitely issues up to I believe 2015. Here's a link on the left cylinder head failure and extended warranty https://www.motortrend.com/news/chrysler-extends-pentastar-v-6-warranties/

I've never heard of it on the 3.5's and I can tell you they have been absolute workhorses in our fleet Chargers! Other than the standard wear items, the 3.5's keep on going and going and going. Less power and refinement of course than the 3.6, but we have some 3.6's with very loud lifters. Granted, they haven't been treated the best and I'm not even certain they have been getting the right viscosity oil, but that goes for both our 3.5's and 3.6's.

Our NAG1's have been durable.


Facts are stubborn things.
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: radar] #2655376
05/14/19 02:45 PM
05/14/19 02:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,838
S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY Offline
I Live Here
ZIPPY  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,838
S.E. Michigan
Originally Posted by radar
I always avoided them because the you get better power and similar milage with a 318. I will not think twice about a slant 6 powered truck though- I had a few 225s that were great.

If the price was right I wouldn’t hesitate to daily drive a mopar v6 but it’d have to be a drive it till the wheels fall off beater.

I pulled a 3.6 out of a dakota I used as a donor for IFS & rack & pinion steering- had it for sale for months complete throttle body to pan with a trans attached. It started at $400, then $100, then free. Turns out I literally couldn’t give it away. It got disassembled and scrapped. I kept the starter and hardware.


A Dakota engine would be a 3.9 Magnum/LA derivative.

Different (considerably older) engine family than the 3.6L Phoenix/Pentastar.

I researched until I couldn't stand it anymore and threw down for a 2017.
To me it seems newer=better when it comes to that particular hunk of plastic and aluminum....


Rich H.

Esse Quam Videri




Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: ZIPPY] #2655578
05/14/19 11:34 PM
05/14/19 11:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 232
Alberta Canada
PossessedDuster Offline
enthusiast
PossessedDuster  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 232
Alberta Canada
I work on city fleet vehicles and just replaced the cams and all rockers in a 2014 3.6 pentastar Charger. The bearings on the rockers failed and it ate the cam lobes. The fact the dealer stocked cams and rockers tells me something.

Last edited by PossessedDuster; 05/14/19 11:34 PM.
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: PossessedDuster] #2655800
05/15/19 07:57 PM
05/15/19 07:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Our 14 3.6 Charger has over 80,000 miles with no issues and will get 26 mpg on the interstate.

Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: justinp61] #2655852
05/15/19 09:52 PM
05/15/19 09:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,392
Highland, MI.
Sunroofcuda Offline
master
Sunroofcuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,392
Highland, MI.
I've got a 2014 300 with the Pentastar motor, & it is noisy on cold start & for about 2 miles, but then it quiets down. It runs well. I took it over to my Dodge dealer last fall with about 90,000 miles & had them listen to it, & they wanted to do surgery, but I do not trust the mechanics at that dealer for serious stuff like this. A few weeks later, I took it to a different local Chrysler dealer with heavy mechanics I trust a lot more, & their head tech said the motor sounded fine so no valve train problems.

The way these lifters are made, seems like they ALL will go bad. Not even a matter of IF, but WHEN. I'm looking for a newer one right now that is certified. Time to trade this one in since it's out of drivetrain warranty & it's AWD.


No Man With A Good Car Needs To Be Justified
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: Sunroofcuda] #2655906
05/16/19 07:20 AM
05/16/19 07:20 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
3hundred Offline
I Live Here
3hundred  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
Originally Posted by Sunroofcuda
I've got a 2014 300 with the Pentastar motor, & it is noisy on cold start & for about 2 miles, but then it quiets down.


That sounds like my '13 300S, 85,000 miles. Kinda sounded like exhaust leak. Took it in and they found 5 bad rocker arms, they replaced all 24 with an updated part, all under warranty. I had them change the plugs and PCV since they were already in there and saved a few bucks on the maintenance. I traded it off shortly afterwards not because of any engine concern but found a smoking deal on the '16 300 I have now.

Robert


'68 Fury Convertible
'69 300 Convertible
'15 Durango 5.7 Hemi
'16 300 S Hemi
Re: Negative issues with the 3.6 and trans ? [Re: 3hundred] #2655967
05/16/19 10:39 AM
05/16/19 10:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,392
Highland, MI.
Sunroofcuda Offline
master
Sunroofcuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,392
Highland, MI.
Originally Posted by 3hundred
Originally Posted by Sunroofcuda
I've got a 2014 300 with the Pentastar motor, & it is noisy on cold start & for about 2 miles, but then it quiets down.


That sounds like my '13 300S, 85,000 miles. Kinda sounded like exhaust leak. Took it in and they found 5 bad rocker arms, they replaced all 24 with an updated part, all under warranty. I had them change the plugs and PCV since they were already in there and saved a few bucks on the maintenance. I traded it off shortly afterwards not because of any engine concern but found a smoking deal on the '16 300 I have now.

Robert


I have an idea if they cracked my motor open, most if not all rocker arms would be bad. They said they were all good when I was still under warranty. Time to just sell it. I'm due trans service & tune-up right now.

I wonder if the later 3.6's still have this issue?


No Man With A Good Car Needs To Be Justified






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1