|
|
|
Re: Long Rams 3.0
[Re: moparx]
#2635850
03/23/19 10:20 AM
03/23/19 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
jcc
OP
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
OP
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
We/I were discussing the long rams rather small plenums. Not sure I mentioned it here on this post, but I'm planning on DIY converting the more common 30" LR to the rare 15" style. Which really just means taking 2 Siamesed runners and making them one for approx 15"just past the throttle body. So does that somewhat increase/boost plenum tuning/volume, even though its located in two separate runners per LR? Still contemplating all the balance tube considerations. 
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Long Rams 3.0
[Re: Supercuda]
#2635907
03/23/19 12:25 PM
03/23/19 12:25 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Was hoping to find some sound reasoning first.
FWIW, if you're using a speed density EFI system, it's recommended to have all the cylinders tied together one way or another. The guys who are doing speed density EFI systems with Hilborn or other type individual throttle bodies generally still tie all the cylinders together, even with something small like a 1/2" hose in order to get a decent MAP reading. I guess if you were using an EFI system that used a mass air flow sensor instead of a map sensor you could get away without it. Well, using a MAF would tie them to a common point as well, the MAF sensor does need to measure all the air flow. yes but you could do that before the throttle bodies so your tie in point could be complete separate from your intake manifold. Alternatively I wonder if you could put a MAF on just one cylinder and tune assuming equal air/fuel flow to all cylinders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
