Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: A727Tflite] #2627490
03/01/19 01:18 PM
03/01/19 01:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
An asymmetrical radius & blend to those entries and barriers can be made to clean up cylinder-to-cylinder distribution problems.
Shops: do it once on your flow bench, offer it as a useful service for that manifold. Make a video of the mods, sell it as a CD on Racing Junk, Amazon, eBay.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: A727Tflite] #2627740
03/02/19 12:52 AM
03/02/19 12:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 24
PA
1118Steve Offline
member
1118Steve  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 24
PA
We ran several of these in the old days. They came on the RO/WO cars. Dick Landy also did those mods.

The only other option for the Street Hemi SS cars at the time was the Rat Roaster, which was a little better, but not much. We found the Vanke/Landy intake was about a half a tenth off from the RR. The Vanke intake took a lot away from the bottom end, but it picked up quite a bit on the big end.

As I recall, the jetting was not all that different from the stocker. A bit, but certainly not drastic.


"Old Age and Treachery beats youth and enthusiasm"
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 1118Steve] #2635148
03/21/19 10:57 AM
03/21/19 10:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Would be really helpful/ interesting to see posted jetting and metering for the Vanke on a 426. Been reading for a while and searching around and the .101 with staggered .083 jets seems to be the common theme.

Interesting that those same jets come on factory 66 Hemi's, albeit a different idle circuit.


Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 1118Steve] #2635172
03/21/19 11:45 AM
03/21/19 11:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 24
PA
1118Steve Offline
member
1118Steve  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 24
PA
Whenever we raced them, we just started with stock jetting....and went from there. I probably have this stuff written down somewhere.....


"Old Age and Treachery beats youth and enthusiasm"
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 1118Steve] #2635200
03/21/19 12:38 PM
03/21/19 12:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Offline OP
master
A727Tflite  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
Originally Posted by 1118Steve
Whenever we raced them, we just started with stock jetting....and went from there. I probably have this stuff written down somewhere.....



Well this engine goes on the dyno in about a month - I would be interested in what info you have - in return I’ll let you know how close your package is to max.

Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: A727Tflite] #2635212
03/21/19 12:59 PM
03/21/19 12:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Originally Posted by Transman
Originally Posted by 1118Steve
Whenever we raced them, we just started with stock jetting....and went from there. I probably have this stuff written down somewhere.....



Well this engine goes on the dyno in about a month - I would be interested in what info you have - in return I’ll let you know how close your package is to max.



Interesting timing, as we were going to dyno my brothers 426 with Vanke in a cpl weeks, but have put it off until we can get a better idea of what we will at least need to set us up for success.

Already tracked down and purchased 2 strip kits for the AFB's to make sure we have a good mix of tunability. : )


Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: A727Tflite] #2635268
03/21/19 03:37 PM
03/21/19 03:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
One jetting problem: the cylinder to cylinder and bank to bank distribution is not constant throughout the RPM range, or throttle position (vacuum) range. The engine will still be knock limited by its hottest leanest cylinder, but which one?


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 69 F5 R/T] #2635378
03/21/19 09:26 PM
03/21/19 09:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Offline OP
master
A727Tflite  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
Originally Posted by 69 F5 R/T
Originally Posted by Transman
Originally Posted by 1118Steve
Whenever we raced them, we just started with stock jetting....and went from there. I probably have this stuff written down somewhere.....



Well this engine goes on the dyno in about a month - I would be interested in what info you have - in return I’ll let you know how close your package is to max.



Interesting timing, as we were going to dyno my brothers 426 with Vanke in a cpl weeks, but have put it off until we can get a better idea of what we will at least need to set us up for success.

Already tracked down and purchased 2 strip kits for the AFB's to make sure we have a good mix of tunability. : )


I think I am ready in regards to having enough jets, metering rods and even some boosters. And of course some spare air horn to main body and booster gaskets.

Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: polyspheric] #2635529
03/22/19 11:11 AM
03/22/19 11:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Originally Posted by polyspheric
One jetting problem: the cylinder to cylinder and bank to bank distribution is not constant throughout the RPM range, or throttle position (vacuum) range. The engine will still be knock limited by its hottest leanest cylinder, but which one?


Possibly a question that could only be answered by someone who's "been there and done that".

If it were an issue of major concern though, you would see a pattern of burnt down Vanke mtrs like a plague on the forums and no one would be considering running them any more ; )

To bad no one has one of the original Mopar upgrade kits laying around. Would be nice to see the individual parts break down of all the pieces they supplied for said modifications : )

Last edited by 69 F5 R/T; 03/22/19 11:14 AM.

Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: A727Tflite] #2635561
03/22/19 12:20 PM
03/22/19 12:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 604
TN
1DGEMAN Offline
mopar
1DGEMAN  Offline
mopar

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 604
TN
Originally Posted by Transman
Originally Posted by 1118Steve
Whenever we raced them, we just started with stock jetting....and went from there. I probably have this stuff written down somewhere.....



Well this engine goes on the dyno in about a month - I would be interested in what info you have - in return I’ll let you know how close your package is to max.



I believe Bob Mazzolini runs this manifold on his NHRA Stocker. You might give his shop a call.


Real Men shift for themselves
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 1DGEMAN] #2635592
03/22/19 02:01 PM
03/22/19 02:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,471
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,471
Minnesota
this info is from an old magazine article about the Vanke intake.
I used this as a starting point with my sock 625 cfm carbs and vanke modded intake, and it worked pretty good.

The jetting Vanke used was (probably with open headers);
rear carb
throttle side opposite side
primary stock .089 stock .089
Vanke .089 Vanke .104

Secondary stock .080 Stock .082
Vanke .089 Vanke .104

Metering rod
stock .0665 .058 Stock .0665 .058
Vanke .0665 .058 Vanke .071 .061

Front Carb
Primary jet stock .089 stock .089
Vanke .104 Vanke .104

Secondary Stock .1065? Stock .089
Vanke .1065 Vanke .095
Metering rod stock .071 .061 Stock .071 .061
Vanke .071 .061 Vanke .071 .061

The article also mentioned different pump clusters (carter # 48-294-s) different needle and seats (carter# 25-861-s) and different primary clusters (carter#58-902 and 58-903) the pump cluster orifice size is .075 and the needle and seat orifice is .111
Vanke stated this was all just a starting point and that the clusters were not all that important


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: Hemi_Joel] #2635618
03/22/19 03:26 PM
03/22/19 03:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Originally Posted by Hemi_Joel
this info is from an old magazine article about the Vanke intake.
I used this as a starting point with my sock 625 cfm carbs and vanke modded intake, and it worked pretty good.

The jetting Vanke used was (probably with open headers);
rear carb
throttle side opposite side
primary stock .089 stock .089
Vanke .089 Vanke .104

Secondary stock .080 Stock .082
Vanke .089 Vanke .104

Metering rod
stock .0665 .058 Stock .0665 .058
Vanke .0665 .058 Vanke .071 .061

Front Carb
Primary jet stock .089 stock .089
Vanke .104 Vanke .104

Secondary Stock .1065? Stock .089
Vanke .1065 Vanke .095
Metering rod stock .071 .061 Stock .071 .061
Vanke .071 .061 Vanke .071 .061

The article also mentioned different pump clusters (carter # 48-294-s) different needle and seats (carter# 25-861-s) and different primary clusters (carter#58-902 and 58-903) the pump cluster orifice size is .075 and the needle and seat orifice is .111
Vanke stated this was all just a starting point and that the clusters were not all that important


That is some Great info Hemi_Joel!

Can you elaborate on your Hemi set-up (426 or over bore/ stroked) Stock or other cam ect?

Great to see info like this still out there and individuals still willing to share it!!!!!!!


Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: A727Tflite] #2635620
03/22/19 03:28 PM
03/22/19 03:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Originally Posted by Transman


I think I am ready in regards to having enough jets, metering rods and even some boosters. And of course some spare air horn to main body and booster gaskets.


Sounds like you're right about where we are. Also have multiple sets of metering springs for fine tuning drivability once the rough is dialed in.

Maybe we should compare our build specs, as I intend to update this thread as we go through the summer or until everything is dialed in for anyone looking for this info in the future.

You do the same and we can bounce our findings off of each other and maybe make it that much easier : )


Last edited by 69 F5 R/T; 03/22/19 03:39 PM.

Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 69 F5 R/T] #2635621
03/22/19 03:33 PM
03/22/19 03:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,494
Shelby mi.
J
JAKE68 Offline
pro stock
JAKE68  Offline
pro stock
J

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,494
Shelby mi.
While all that jetting is fine for a starting point but remember the factory cars equipped with the vanke intake had larger carbs than factory street hemi.


JAKES AUTOMOTIVE
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: JAKE68] #2635622
03/22/19 03:36 PM
03/22/19 03:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Originally Posted by JAKE68
While all that jetting is fine for a starting point but remember the factory cars equipped with the vanke intake had larger carbs than factory street hemi.


Agreed, but when you get confirmed info from a reputable member who says this;

"I used this as a starting point with my sock 625 cfm carbs and vanke modded intake, and it worked pretty good."

It gives you a good indication that dual 625's can be made to work : )


Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 69 F5 R/T] #2635665
03/22/19 06:17 PM
03/22/19 06:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Offline OP
master
A727Tflite  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
69 F5 - PM sent to you.

Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 69 F5 R/T] #2635669
03/22/19 06:35 PM
03/22/19 06:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,471
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,471
Minnesota
Originally Posted by 69 F5 R/T
Originally Posted by JAKE68
While all that jetting is fine for a starting point but remember the factory cars equipped with the vanke intake had larger carbs than factory street hemi.


Agreed, but when you get confirmed info from a reputable member who says this;

"I used this as a starting point with my sock 625 cfm carbs and vanke modded intake, and it worked pretty good."

It gives you a good indication that dual 625's can be made to work : )


When I used 750's on the Vanke, I started from scratch and developed a stagger that worked using dyno testing with thermocouples in all 8 tubes plus track testing. I am 100% certain that my results were NOT dead on. But they were closer than when I started. That was 16-17 yeas ago. If someone is going o run 750's on a Vanke, I will try to find my notes.

My motor at the time I switched to the Vanke was a 4.310x 4.15, solid flat tappet w 630ish lift, short duration (can't remember the numbers) $600 worth of porting by Glen Knowlton, 11.8:1, 612 horse. Over time, I added the 750's, a .730 roller cam, more porting, and added about 100 horse. Shifted at 7400.
Then I converted a factory intake to a single plane that still looked stock on the outside and picked up another 40 horse. This was all with exhaust manifolds for FAST.


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: Hemi_Joel] #2637135
03/25/19 09:06 PM
03/25/19 09:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
69 F5 R/T Offline
member
69 F5 R/T  Offline
member

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 36
Aubigny, MB Canada
Originally Posted by Hemi_Joel
[quote=69 F5 R/T]

When I used 750's on the Vanke, I started from scratch and developed a stagger that worked using dyno testing with thermocouples in all 8 tubes plus track testing. I am 100% certain that my results were NOT dead on. But they were closer than when I started. That was 16-17 yeas ago. If someone is going o run 750's on a Vanke, I will try to find my notes.

My motor at the time I switched to the Vanke was a 4.310x 4.15, solid flat tappet w 630ish lift, short duration (can't remember the numbers) $600 worth of porting by Glen Knowlton, 11.8:1, 612 horse. Over time, I added the 750's, a .730 roller cam, more porting, and added about 100 horse. Shifted at 7400.
Then I converted a factory intake to a single plane that still looked stock on the outside and picked up another 40 horse. This was all with exhaust manifolds for FAST.


Man, to be a fly on the wall during those dyno sessions would have been Nuts!

Do you recall the change in bottom end and top end power when you switched to the gutted (pretty well plenum short runner) intake?

I could see 3-500 increase in top end power, but very curious how much low end would be lost.


Bringin Back the Iron!
Re: Vanke Intake modifications [Re: 69 F5 R/T] #2637177
03/25/19 10:36 PM
03/25/19 10:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,471
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,471
Minnesota
The rumors at the time where that the vanke was going to kill the bottom end. I was expecting a big hit, but it never happened. I assumed it was because of the cubic inches.


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1