Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: RapidRobert]
#2543106
08/29/18 04:37 PM
08/29/18 04:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
The upper radiator hose barely has any coolant flow through it; my survivor 69 Charger with completely untouched original 383 has MUCH more pressure/flow in the upper radiator hose. We're definitely on to something there. I've wondered about the slit head gaskets too but iirc people have said they are OK for the most part. But we certainly have a restricted flow for some reason that has to be what is causing this. can you post a larger pic that shows all the holes from front to rear? (to try & get an idea if the total/overall restriction is somewhere other than the gaskets). I have a good cooling mod read for you on circle track chat, a subset from moparchat (VERY informative) that relates directly to this but one thing at a time. No the slits are not why, there are thousands of big blocks out there running head gaskets like that.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: 70B5Cuda]
#2543134
08/29/18 05:14 PM
08/29/18 05:14 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425 Eastern Ontario
shaker340
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Eastern Ontario
|
Can anyone confirm the comment about 340 26 inch Radiator lower inlet being smaller than would be on a big block 26 inch radiator? I am using a 340 rad and the lower hose is same diameter from water pump to the lower inlet.
I am working thru a 440 running too warm according to my gages which I am trying to confirm their accuracy. Mine is doing 220 highway and 230 idling.
Mike
2008 Challenger SRT8 1940 Chrysler Royal coupe
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: JohnRR]
#2543141
08/29/18 05:41 PM
08/29/18 05:41 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
The upper radiator hose barely has any coolant flow through it; my survivor 69 Charger with completely untouched original 383 has MUCH more pressure/flow in the upper radiator hose. We're definitely on to something there. I've wondered about the slit head gaskets too but iirc people have said they are OK for the most part. But we certainly have a restricted flow for some reason that has to be what is causing this. can you post a larger pic that shows all the holes from front to rear? (to try & get an idea if the total/overall restriction is somewhere other than the gaskets). I have a good cooling mod read for you on circle track chat, a subset from moparchat (VERY informative) that relates directly to this but one thing at a time. No the slits are not why, there are thousands of big blocks out there running head gaskets like that. Well it's good to see you John (its been awhile) & we've missed you! (ahem). what I was saying which you can see if you reread it is that the minimal flow is an obvious clue. John I am disheartened to see that you have not let this go after all these years.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: Morty426]
#2543151
08/29/18 05:58 PM
08/29/18 05:58 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936 own private Idaho
ngpSatellite
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936
own private Idaho
|
I bet your water pump is bad.
I built a car for a guy and the new water pump he had was bad. The impeller was spinning on the shaft.
It would do the same thing with the slowly rising temperature.
A fan shroud is a must Also check the WPHousing.. A lot of the aluminum WPH s look OEM but some of the ports narrow down quite considerably (like too a 1/2 inch) on the inside. I put back an old iron OEM WPH and my 383 and it runs cool as a cucumber......
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: shaker340]
#2543302
08/30/18 01:20 AM
08/30/18 01:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,908 Nebraska
4406bbl
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,908
Nebraska
|
[quote=shaker340]Can anyone confirm the comment about 340 26 inch Radiator lower inlet being smaller than would be on a big block 26 inch radiator? I am using a 340 rad and the lower hose is same diameter from water pump to the lower inlet.
I am working thru a 440 running too warm according to my gages which I am trying to confirm their accuracy. Mine is doing 220 highway and 230 idling.
Inlet outlet are same size 26" 340-440 rad 70 and up. I measured a 2998949, 3673925 both smallblocks, and 2998956,3443959,3443960,bigblock all 1.5 top 1.75 lower only thing changes is hose location. Those temps sound like radiator or gauge to me. I drove 900 miles with no fan, clutch failed so I removed it, home from mopar nats august, hot out, air on, and my 440 ran 180. But my block was is standard bore, original radiator.
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: 4406bbl]
#2543365
08/30/18 11:03 AM
08/30/18 11:03 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425 Eastern Ontario
shaker340
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Eastern Ontario
|
4406bbl thanks for checking on the radiator inlet and outlet port sizes.
I did confirm the gage is accurate with a second gage and laser temp gun. So I am going to try less timing, going from 15 initial to 8 initial and a step richer jetting, to see if temp drops. Motor is stock bore motor home, at 8:1 comp so it probably doesn't need all that ignition. If this does nothing, then rad will get pulled and tested, its a used unit I have had for near 20 years hanging around in my parts collection.
Mike
Last edited by shaker340; 08/30/18 11:06 AM.
2008 Challenger SRT8 1940 Chrysler Royal coupe
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: 70B5Cuda]
#2543366
08/30/18 11:10 AM
08/30/18 11:10 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560 Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick
Still wishing...
|
Still wishing...
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
|
Unless you changed temp sensors, swapping clusters only confirmed your dash gauge is consistent. If the sensor is FUBAR, the gauge only knows what the sensor tells it.
You can get an IR temp gun at any auto parts store if Harbor Freight isn't handy.
My buddy's MaxWedge was doing the run warmer than it should deal. Apparently not all water pumps are created equal because they replaced the new pump they installed when they built the engine with a different new pump and it behaves now.
Years ago my brother had a Sears rebuilt 318 that always ran warm. Drove it that way for years until a frost plug started leaking. Went to replace them all and discovered all the old ones had just been driven thru when the engine was "rebuilt". He fished them all out along with all the crud that had gathered around them and no more warm 318.
Kevin
Tree'd
Last edited by Twostick; 08/30/18 11:12 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: Twostick]
#2543385
08/30/18 11:55 AM
08/30/18 11:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425 Eastern Ontario
shaker340
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Eastern Ontario
|
Smiths Falls
I didn't change clusters, I have aftermarket gage cluster in the truck, and used a B&M temp gage to confirm gage cluster reading along with and IR temp gun.
Last edited by shaker340; 08/30/18 11:59 AM.
2008 Challenger SRT8 1940 Chrysler Royal coupe
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: shaker340]
#2543455
08/30/18 02:37 PM
08/30/18 02:37 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285 Pacific NW USA
CompSyn
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
|
4406bbl thanks for checking on the radiator inlet and outlet port sizes.
I did confirm the gage is accurate with a second gage and laser temp gun. So I am going to try less timing, going from 15 initial to 8 initial and a step richer jetting, to see if temp drops. Motor is stock bore motor home, at 8:1 comp so it probably doesn't need all that ignition. If this does nothing, then rad will get pulled and tested, its a used unit I have had for near 20 years hanging around in my parts collection.
Mike That is correct. My 69 “053” big block radiator has 1.5” inch upper and 1.75” inch lower inlets. Later today I can measure the small block radiators I have. So if the radiator inlets are right, I’d make sure the pulley ratio is correct for the number of water pump impellers. Also there was a comment about aftermarket aluminum water pump housings. If you have one of those I try going back to the factory cast iron to eleminate that question.
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: RapidRobert]
#2543538
08/30/18 06:11 PM
08/30/18 06:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
The upper radiator hose barely has any coolant flow through it; my survivor 69 Charger with completely untouched original 383 has MUCH more pressure/flow in the upper radiator hose. We're definitely on to something there. I've wondered about the slit head gaskets too but iirc people have said they are OK for the most part. But we certainly have a restricted flow for some reason that has to be what is causing this. can you post a larger pic that shows all the holes from front to rear? (to try & get an idea if the total/overall restriction is somewhere other than the gaskets). I have a good cooling mod read for you on circle track chat, a subset from moparchat (VERY informative) that relates directly to this but one thing at a time. No the slits are not why, there are thousands of big blocks out there running head gaskets like that. Well it's good to see you John (its been awhile) & we've missed you! (ahem). what I was saying which you can see if you reread it is that the minimal flow is an obvious clue. John I am disheartened to see that you have not let this go after all these years. I read it fine, you are claiming his diminished flow is because of the slits in the gasket is how it reads. There is minimal flow thru those slits , his dimished flow has little to do with the size of those slits, someone a lot smarter than you, or I, redesigned that head gasket. Why ???
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: shaker340]
#2543539
08/30/18 06:12 PM
08/30/18 06:12 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560 Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick
Still wishing...
|
Still wishing...
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
|
Smiths Falls
I didn't change clusters, I have aftermarket gage cluster in the truck, and used a B&M temp gage to confirm gage cluster reading along with and IR temp gun. Sorry, I thought you were the OP. We're practically neighbors. I'm down by Spencerville. If you do the cruise nite on Thursdays we've likely crossed paths. Haven't been this summer but we show up in a 65 Polara wagon. Kevin
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: CompSyn]
#2543579
08/30/18 08:09 PM
08/30/18 08:09 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285 Pacific NW USA
CompSyn
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
|
4406bbl thanks for checking on the radiator inlet and outlet port sizes.
I did confirm the gage is accurate with a second gage and laser temp gun. So I am going to try less timing, going from 15 initial to 8 initial and a step richer jetting, to see if temp drops. Motor is stock bore motor home, at 8:1 comp so it probably doesn't need all that ignition. If this does nothing, then rad will get pulled and tested, its a used unit I have had for near 20 years hanging around in my parts collection.
Mike That is correct. My 69 “053” big block radiator has 1.5” inch upper and 1.75” inch lower inlets. Later today I can measure the small block radiators I have. Update: I’ve got a radiator out of a 1968 Dodge Charger with 318 and air conditioning. It is a 26” inch two-core. Part number #2898041. Both upper and lower inlets are 1.5” inch. Don’t know what the other small block radiator applications had but one would probably want to be aware of potential differences between big block and small block radiators.
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: shaker340]
#2543588
08/30/18 08:42 PM
08/30/18 08:42 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
So I am going to try less timing, going from 15 initial to 8 initial Mike I would strongly suggest staying at 15 & not retarding it. Not sure what your total/springs are but 15 is fine & not the problem
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: RapidRobert]
#2543755
08/31/18 10:18 AM
08/31/18 10:18 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425 Eastern Ontario
shaker340
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Eastern Ontario
|
Robert it made no difference backing the timing to 5 degrees, and will put it back to 15. Spark plugs looked great too, so mixture is about right.
What happened last nite the gage showed 240 idling but I was able to put my hand on valve cover, I know the gasket can reduce the temp. But the IR temp gun showed heads at 200, water pump was 180, rad top tank was 200, upper hose was 165, lower was 135. So I am not convinced yet I have a heat issue.
I am starting to suspect the temp sender, and have another new one to swap in to see if any change.
Mike
2008 Challenger SRT8 1940 Chrysler Royal coupe
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: shaker340]
#2543823
08/31/18 12:54 PM
08/31/18 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
Robert it made no difference backing the timing to 5 degrees, and will put it back to 15. Spark plugs looked great too, so mixture is about right.
What happened last nite the gage showed 240 idling but I was able to put my hand on valve cover, I know the gasket can reduce the temp. But the IR temp gun showed heads at 200, water pump was 180, rad top tank was 200, upper hose was 165, lower was 135. So I am not convinced yet I have a heat issue.
I am starting to suspect the temp sender, and have another new one to swap in to see if any change.
Mike Sounds like your gauge is not reading correctly , what type/brand is it ?
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: 70B5Cuda]
#2543860
08/31/18 01:45 PM
08/31/18 01:45 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425 Eastern Ontario
shaker340
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Eastern Ontario
|
JohnRR I am using the Intellitronix brand of gages and also using a B&M temp gage that reads same number as an alternate. So I will try swap the sender to see if any change in readings.
Moparx I am agreeing with you and hoping its just the sender.
What was interesting that I forgot to post was that the IR temp gun pointed directly at the nut of the sender was reading 240. And the cast area around it was around 200.
Last edited by shaker340; 08/31/18 01:53 PM.
2008 Challenger SRT8 1940 Chrysler Royal coupe
|
|
|
Re: 340/6 radiator way too small for 440?
[Re: 4406bbl]
#2543930
08/31/18 05:51 PM
08/31/18 05:51 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425 Eastern Ontario
shaker340
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Eastern Ontario
|
I have an overflow bottle set up, so I will be getting a thermometer to check that out too.
2008 Challenger SRT8 1940 Chrysler Royal coupe
|
|
|
|
|