Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. #2516336
07/02/18 12:44 PM
07/02/18 12:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 769
BRIDGEWATER, CT.
WINGNUT Offline OP
super stock
WINGNUT  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 769
BRIDGEWATER, CT.
What years did Chrysler use the 58 Lb. flywheel? Does it fit older HEMI engines besides the 426? Why such a heavy piece?
TIA, WINGNUT

Re: 58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. [Re: WINGNUT] #2516347
07/02/18 01:13 PM
07/02/18 01:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Most likely some engineer thought that the idle would be too rough with a performance cam so they put a heavy flywheel on there to keep the engine running smooth at idle.

Re: 58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. [Re: WINGNUT] #2516364
07/02/18 01:45 PM
07/02/18 01:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
some of the early pro-stocks and maybe s/s tried what was called a 60lb wheel. probably for launch. not a production item. I don't know the exact of production wheels but a good guess would be around 40lb.

Re: 58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. [Re: WINGNUT] #2516387
07/02/18 02:26 PM
07/02/18 02:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,095
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Online work
I Win
Cab_Burge  Online Work
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,095
Bend,OR USA
Maybe it is a truck flywheel work
All the early, pre 1962, 8 bolt crankshaft don't have a centering register for the crankshaft or flex plate to ride on, they center on a machined surface on the outer edge of the crankshaft and they normally have studs, bolts in them with no threads in the crankshaft flange for the bolts to screw into scope
I have seen that type of flywheel used in Mopar SB with small C.I., less than 400 C.I., in some of the old modified eliminator cars work


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. [Re: Cab_Burge] #2520148
07/10/18 07:30 PM
07/10/18 07:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
With 5.13 gears and that flywheel it'd take more power to accelerate the flywheel than to accelerate the automobile's mass!

R.

Re: 58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. [Re: WINGNUT] #2520168
07/10/18 08:00 PM
07/10/18 08:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,907
Grand Prairie,Texas
stumpy Offline
I Win
stumpy  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,907
Grand Prairie,Texas
I think that the heavy flywheel would mean less RPM loss on a shift.

Re: 58 lb. HEMI flywheel questions. [Re: dogdays] #2520180
07/10/18 08:14 PM
07/10/18 08:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,095
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Online work
I Win
Cab_Burge  Online Work
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,095
Bend,OR USA
Can you imagine a G/Gas car that weighs 3570 Lbs. + the driver weight with a 3.09 1st gear and a 7.17 ratio Dana 70 in the rear with that weight flywheel shake_head
I have seen that car raced in the mid 1970s, the driver was very busy shifting (at 8600 RPM) the first 300 Ft. shake_head shruggy
I drove a old 1970 Duster Pro bracket car back then (mid 1970s)that had a 30 Lb. flywheel with the 3.09 first gear ratio and a 5.57 rear gear ratio and Dana 60 out of that same G/Gas car shifting it at or near 7000 RPM with semi stock 340 motor with 13x30x15 inch slicks, I was real busy the first 300 feet also whistle

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 07/10/18 08:16 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1