1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
#2503023
06/01/18 03:53 AM
06/01/18 03:53 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
Does anybody know overall width and spring perch dimensions for a 1957/1958 Plymouth? I've read an E body rear bolts in but no idea how accurate that info is!!! Thanks
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#2503176
06/01/18 12:53 PM
06/01/18 12:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,236 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
The Erection Connection
|
The Erection Connection
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,236
Rio Linda, CA
|
Overall width drum-to-drum is 60 7/8" and the perches are 45 1/2".
An E-body rear will bolt in, even with the 1/2" difference in perches, but the pinion angle (6°) is wrong; the '65-'69 C-body is a better choice, same overall dimensions with the correct 3° pinion angle.
I just put the C-body rear in my '57 Dodge and it fits perfectly.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: John_Kunkel]
#2503300
06/01/18 06:07 PM
06/01/18 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
Overall width drum-to-drum is 60 7/8" and the perches are 45 1/2".
An E-body rear will bolt in, even with the 1/2" difference in perches, but the pinion angle (6°) is wrong; the '65-'69 C-body is a better choice, same overall dimensions with the correct 3° pinion angle.
I just put the C-body rear in my '57 Dodge and it fits perfectly. AWESOME John. Thanks!!!!
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#2560607
10/07/18 10:58 PM
10/07/18 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632 Florida STAYcation
IcorkSOAK
Financed his waterbed
|
Financed his waterbed
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632
Florida STAYcation
|
Overall width drum-to-drum is 60 7/8" and the perches are 45 1/2".
An E-body rear will bolt in, even with the 1/2" difference in perches, but the pinion angle (6°) is wrong; the '65-'69 C-body is a better choice, same overall dimensions with the correct 3° pinion angle.
I just put the C-body rear in my '57 Dodge and it fits perfectly. AWESOME John. Thanks!!!! Haveta be a Dana 80 to hold yurr rear end up ..... LOONEYmoputzDUDE ! ... Toooo many Twinkies over the years I hear ! ..... BTW - do you have that that homely motor home ready furr some action ??!! No 413 anymore 4 u ...youz gotsta deal with a 5.9 12 valve CUMMINS NOW ... and it's gonna be bombed !!
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: IcorkSOAK]
#2560692
10/08/18 03:52 AM
10/08/18 03:52 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
Overall width drum-to-drum is 60 7/8" and the perches are 45 1/2".
An E-body rear will bolt in, even with the 1/2" difference in perches, but the pinion angle (6°) is wrong; the '65-'69 C-body is a better choice, same overall dimensions with the correct 3° pinion angle.
I just put the C-body rear in my '57 Dodge and it fits perfectly. AWESOME John. Thanks!!!! Haveta be a Dana 80 to hold yurr rear end up ..... LOONEYmoputzDUDE ! ... Toooo many Twinkies over the years I hear ! ..... BTW - do you have that that homely motor home ready furr some action ??!! No 413 anymore 4 u ...youz gotsta deal with a 5.9 12 valve CUMMINS NOW ... and it's gonna be bombed !! LOL Lonnng time no hear from SexyPants!!!!! No more small block, 440 2x4bbl now..... I thought about a Cummins, but the chicks just don't like em. STINKY!!!!
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#2560710
10/08/18 08:16 AM
10/08/18 08:16 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632 Florida STAYcation
IcorkSOAK
Financed his waterbed
|
Financed his waterbed
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632
Florida STAYcation
|
Overall width drum-to-drum is 60 7/8" and the perches are 45 1/2".
An E-body rear will bolt in, even with the 1/2" difference in perches, but the pinion angle (6°) is wrong; the '65-'69 C-body is a better choice, same overall dimensions with the correct 3° pinion angle.
I just put the C-body rear in my '57 Dodge and it fits perfectly. AWESOME John. Thanks!!!! Haveta be a Dana 80 to hold yurr rear end up ..... LOONEYmoputzDUDE ! ... Toooo many Twinkies over the years I hear ! ..... BTW - do you have that that homely motor home ready furr some action ??!! No 413 anymore 4 u ...youz gotsta deal with a 5.9 12 valve CUMMINS NOW ... and it's gonna be bombed !! LOL Lonnng time no hear from SexyPants!!!!! No more small block, 440 2x4bbl now..... I thought about a Cummins, but the chicks just don't like em. STINKY!!!! Looney ! .. Da chicks dig the 97 Airstream Land Yacht 35 footer bester than that Disco .., more space - almost as good aero - and the motor is in the back - way quieter ..,, AND mpg that's hard to believe ! ... A N D with a 100 plus gallon diesel fuel tank ! ... I could almost drive all the way to Canuck-ada from here on one tank of fuel ! .. Not quite but close !!
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: IcorkSOAK]
#2562766
10/12/18 03:12 AM
10/12/18 03:12 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
AWESOME John. Thanks!!!! Haveta be a Dana 80 to hold yurr rear end up ..... LOONEYmoputzDUDE ! ... Toooo many Twinkies over the years I hear ! ..... BTW - do you have that that homely motor home ready furr some action ??!! No 413 anymore 4 u ...youz gotsta deal with a 5.9 12 valve CUMMINS NOW ... and it's gonna be bombed !! LOL Lonnng time no hear from SexyPants!!!!! No more small block, 440 2x4bbl now..... I thought about a Cummins, but the chicks just don't like em. STINKY!!!! Looney ! .. Da chicks dig the 97 Airstream Land Yacht 35 footer bester than that Disco .., more space - almost as good aero - and the motor is in the back - way quieter ..,, AND mpg that's hard to believe ! ... A N D with a 100 plus gallon diesel fuel tank ! ... I could almost drive all the way to Canuck-ada from here on one tank of fuel ! .. Not quite but close !! Try it next summer! Come to Vancouver and drink out of The Stanley Cup!!?!?!
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#2563188
10/12/18 11:25 PM
10/12/18 11:25 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
Gino will hoist that Cup yet!!!
I'm getting and 8 3/4 and super stock springs in my 58 Dodge. For the added weight of the Stanley Cup. And Stevey Y.
Oh Nothing......
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#2563243
10/13/18 03:20 AM
10/13/18 03:20 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
My best friend just sent me a Craigslist link. To a motorhome. A RecTrans
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY]
#2564579
10/15/18 07:41 PM
10/15/18 07:41 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,698 jersey
Spaceman Spiff
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,698
jersey
|
'67 b body rear in my car.
526 cubes of angry wedge, pushbutton shifted, 9 passenger killer!
|
|
|
Re: 1957/1958 Plymouth rear end widths...
[Re: Spaceman Spiff]
#2565215
10/17/18 01:46 AM
10/17/18 01:46 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493 Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
OP
I Live Here
|
OP
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,493
Canada
|
'67 b body rear in my car. Moved the perches one inch? I have a 66/67 B body rear, looks to be exactly what I need for tire fit, and I have Wilwoods for the back already. Not going the tapered axle/ old style drums, that's for sure!! What wheel/tire combo are you running?? Did you go with an A body rear spring or?
CrAzYMoPaRGuY
|
|
|
|
|