Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: quench, gasket bore and compressed height [Re: NachoRT74] #2399020
11/05/17 07:56 PM
11/05/17 07:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
If CR is a modest 9 and fuel AKI is 92 (?)
Then Figure (b)
Shows that full throttle ignition timing can be less advanced
And that should yield some power and torque gain
... but like said above
those graphs are for 2000 rpm
and we really need to see the equivalent figures for
4000, 5000 and 6000 rpm.

Re: quench, gasket bore and compressed height [Re: NachoRT74] #2403782
11/15/17 12:04 AM
11/15/17 12:04 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
I ran the KB quench pad pistons in my old 440 combo as I used 906 heads. I do remember I had to buy .074 Cometic head gaskets to make it work. My heads had been milled already and my combustion chambers were right about .025 deep. My quench pads were .054 above the deck. So when I used the .074 gaskets with .054 quench pad above the block I had .020 from the gasket and the .025 deep chambers as I had right around .045 quench. The comp came out right at 10.0 and I can tell you I ran 92 or 93 pump in it with 36 to 38 total timing and it did not ping or detonate at all. In fact the eng is still running in a Duster and running fine on the 92 pump. Ron

Re: quench, gasket bore and compressed height [Re: NachoRT74] #2404764
11/17/17 01:04 AM
11/17/17 01:04 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 132
Kingman, Az
Scojodak Offline
member
Scojodak  Offline
member

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 132
Kingman, Az
A tight quench is mechanical octane!


Dakota for life!
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1