T&D rocker arms
#2370812
09/14/17 05:01 PM
09/14/17 05:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036 bean town ....Ca
WHITEDART
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
|
What is your guyses experience with actual rocker ratio versus advertised.. I'm hearing with T&D .the ratio can be slightly higher than advertised.. has anyone experience this..
In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's 5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: WHITEDART]
#2370846
09/14/17 05:57 PM
09/14/17 05:57 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,355 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,355
Bend,OR USA
|
I've seen .030 max lift difference at the retainers with both T&D and Harland Sharp 1.5 and 1.6 ratio single shaft systems ![shruggy shruggy](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/shruggy.gif) Not the same results with a set of Jesel 1.55 paired shaft system The new owner at Harland sharp told me that they add some ratio to most of their sets to allow for deflection in the valve trains, which is usually mainly due to the cheaper pushrods is what I have found ![shruggy shruggy](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/shruggy.gif) I only buy the good ones now for all of my race motors
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 09/14/17 06:01 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2370858
09/14/17 06:36 PM
09/14/17 06:36 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Most of what I use are the paired style TD rockers and I have checked them at the retainer and the paired ones were damn near dead on.. my cam was a little off but that was all.. I do use a single shaft set also that were a bit off.. thy showed 1.53 ![wave wave](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/wave.gif)
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#2370880
09/14/17 07:09 PM
09/14/17 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036 bean town ....Ca
WHITEDART
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
|
I know sometimes geometry and push rod deflection can play into the numbers.. I appreciate the feedback from everybody.. I'm making a rocker arm change and was trying to do some pre-planning
In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's 5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#2370894
09/14/17 07:49 PM
09/14/17 07:49 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036 bean town ....Ca
WHITEDART
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
|
Cam has always been ground for a 1.8.. and have been running a 1.6. And I'm now going to step up to a 1.85. This change is going to require different Springs.. but I think I will hold off on the springs until I get the Rockers. When I ordered them they said 3 to 4 weeks., I anticipate having them in a couple weeks
Last edited by WHITEDART; 09/14/17 07:54 PM.
In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's 5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: WHITEDART]
#2371412
09/15/17 08:55 PM
09/15/17 08:55 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498 El Dorado Ca
65signet
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
|
I know cheap rockers say 1.5 or 1.6 but they really are 1.4
1965 Plymouth Barracuda 273 M/SA 1970 Plymouth Duster 360/904 10.60s with J heads
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: 65signet]
#2371419
09/15/17 09:09 PM
09/15/17 09:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,355 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,355
Bend,OR USA
|
I know cheap rockers say 1.5 or 1.6 but they really are 1.4 I've checked a lot of different adjustable rocker arms, stock and after market ductile iron as well as aluminum, some have more ratio and some have less ![shruggy shruggy](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/shruggy.gif) The stock 426 Hemi rockers where the worst, I saw over .100 variance lift at the retainers It pays to check all of them ![up up](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/thumbs_up.gif)
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: WHITEDART]
#2371675
09/16/17 12:35 PM
09/16/17 12:35 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 326 Alberta
Wookie316
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 326
Alberta
|
I have a set of T&D on my Indy EZ heads. Very nice.
1971 Plum Crazy Super Bee. 572 World Aluminum block with a Cope 727 & Dana 4.10 out back. 9.88 @ 138 with a 1.35 60 NA. Dialed back to 10.0’s. 4000 lbs with me in it.
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: WHITEDART]
#2371947
09/16/17 11:39 PM
09/16/17 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561 USA
B3RE
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
|
I know sometimes geometry and push rod deflection can play into the numbers.. I appreciate the feedback from everybody.. I'm making a rocker arm change and was trying to do some pre-planning If the geometry is not right, it doesn't matter what the max lift at the valve is. It won't be an accurate indicator of the true ratio of the rocker arm. For every degree of crankshaft rotation during the lift cycle, the cam is designed to move the rocker a specific amount. When the geometry is off, it doesn't follow the design of the cam lobe, and accurately relay that info to the valve. So what if it's dead nuts at full lift if it's losing everywhere else.
Mike Beachel
I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: B3RE]
#2372833
09/18/17 05:00 PM
09/18/17 05:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,592 Motor City
6PKRTSE
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,592
Motor City
|
I have the Barton (T&D's) 1.6 rocker system on my 2ND Gen Hemi & they all seem to be spot on when we checked them all.
1963 Belvedere 440 Max Wedge Tribute 1970 Charger R/T S.E. 440 Six Pack 1970 Challenger R/T, 528 Hemi 1970 Charger 500 S.E. 440 4 BBL 1970 Plymouth Road Runner 383 1974 Chrysler New Yorker 440 1996 2500 RAM 488 V-10 4X4 2004 3500 Dually Cummins 4x4 2012 Challenger R/T Classic.
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: BradH]
#2373326
09/19/17 02:49 PM
09/19/17 02:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,592 Motor City
6PKRTSE
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,592
Motor City
|
I thought Rays where Jesels I remember reading about them when they first came out: the RBRE Gen II Hemi rocker setup was a joint-effort between Barton and T&D. I still get the itch for T&Ds on my BB Victors now and then... Yes, Mine are T&D's not Jesel's.
1963 Belvedere 440 Max Wedge Tribute 1970 Charger R/T S.E. 440 Six Pack 1970 Challenger R/T, 528 Hemi 1970 Charger 500 S.E. 440 4 BBL 1970 Plymouth Road Runner 383 1974 Chrysler New Yorker 440 1996 2500 RAM 488 V-10 4X4 2004 3500 Dually Cummins 4x4 2012 Challenger R/T Classic.
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: BradH]
#2373329
09/19/17 02:52 PM
09/19/17 02:52 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561 USA
B3RE
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
|
I thought Rays where Jesels I remember reading about them when they first came out: the RBRE Gen II Hemi rocker setup was a joint-effort between Barton and T&D. I still get the itch for T&Ds on my BB Victors now and then... You should have come to Carlsle to see the custom ones I had on display. You would have gotten hives. ![grin grin](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/grin.gif)
Mike Beachel
I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
|
|
|
Re: T&D rocker arms
[Re: WHITEDART]
#2373394
09/19/17 04:28 PM
09/19/17 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,398 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,398
Las Vegas
|
Well IMO Jesel and T&D are pretty much equal. The best stuff is WW but doubt anyone here runs them. As for actualy ration a lot of factors there. Deflection IS real to be sure, especially on mopar style shaft systems. The paird or individual rocker stuff tend to be more rigid for sure. Put BIG spring pressure on most all and numbers will change.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
|
|