Re: Commando Vs Super Commando
[Re: L.R Helbling]
#2311662
05/26/17 06:13 PM
05/26/17 06:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Commando is no skivvies.
Super Commando is no skivvies and a cape.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Commando Vs Super Commando
[Re: Supercuda]
#2311665
05/26/17 06:22 PM
05/26/17 06:22 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259 Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
|
Commando is no skivvies.
Super Commando is no skivvies and a cape. lulz!
68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
|
|
|
Re: Commando Vs Super Commando
[Re: NANKET]
#2311670
05/26/17 06:28 PM
05/26/17 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880 -
RSNOMO
Moparts Torchbearer
|
Moparts Torchbearer
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
|
No use in a reply folks, he will just argue with the information presented. Have a great day! LMAO...
|
|
|
Re: Commando Vs Super Commando
[Re: Supercuda]
#2311720
05/26/17 07:47 PM
05/26/17 07:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,856 Pattison Texas
CSK
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,856
Pattison Texas
|
Commando is no skivvies.
Super Commando is no skivvies and a cape. LMBO!!!
1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI 512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim 2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5
|
|
|
Re: Commando Vs Super Commando
[Re: B5 Bee]
#2311968
05/27/17 12:47 PM
05/27/17 12:47 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 381 Ottawa, Ontario
L.R Helbling
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 381
Ottawa, Ontario
|
As in Plymouth series hi-Po engines. What are the differences between the 2? One difference can be as much as 167 cu in. From what I can tell looking at your pics, one is Commando and the other is a Super Commando. Is it correct comparing apples with oranges? What would be the biggest Commando engine and what would be the smallest Super Commando engine? Or does it go by size at all? On a separate note, some of the responses on this post have been really clownish, I apologize for that, just ignore them.
|
|
|
Re: Commando Vs Super Commando
[Re: L.R Helbling]
#2311977
05/27/17 01:07 PM
05/27/17 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954 Blairsden, CA
Triggerfish
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954
Blairsden, CA
|
This says it all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_B_engineThe Super Commando was the high output 440, born in 67: The high-output 440 (4-barrell/mild cam/dual exhausts) was marketed as the Magnum in Dodges, the Super Commando in Plymouths, and the TNT in Chryslers. From 1972 to 1974 the engine (detuned to run on lead-free gas) was rated at 280 net hp, and dropped in hp each year until 1978, when it was rated at 255 hp (in police specification) and limited to Chrysler New Yorkers, Chrysler Newports, Dodge Monaco Police Pursuits, and Plymouth Fury Police Pursuits. It was also available in marine and heavy-duty commercial applications until that year.
|
|
|
|
|