Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 #2213811
12/14/16 11:53 AM
12/14/16 11:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
northcoastmopar Offline OP
master
northcoastmopar  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
Looking for a second vehicle truck to replace my recently departed 1500 Ram 5.7. Have been scouring the local ads for a decent condition 2nd generation Dakota 4x4.

All other things being equal...condition, miles, appearance...which V8 should I try to find..the 4.7 or the 5.2? Either one would be paired to an automatic. The vehicle would be occasionally used by my son in college or the wife and neither can nor want to drive a stick.

The truck won't tow much, maybe a couple harleys once in a while or a project car but nothing heavy duty. Mainly just to have for the son to drive on breaks and for me to use for home projects and drive during bad weather.

Not looking to spend a lot of time increasing the engine performance, more interested in durability and reasonable maintenance.

Thanks in advance!

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2213895
12/14/16 03:05 PM
12/14/16 03:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
The 4.7 doesn't have a very good track record, they self destructs if they have not seen very regular oil changes, and then they still has issues. I think MB decided the 4.7 only needed to survive to 150K miles, sure some go longer, but they are the exception rather then the rule.

I'm looking for a drive train for my next hot rod, and will probably get a Dakota as a donor. If it has a 4.7, I won't even look at it. 5.2 or 5.9, or even the 3.9 would be the better choices, in my opinion. Gene

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2213915
12/14/16 03:46 PM
12/14/16 03:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,493
Western Colorado High Desert
moparmarks Offline
I Live Here
moparmarks  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,493
Western Colorado High Desert
My 97 5.2 is pushing 300K. Great little motor.


72 Satellite Sebring Plus 440, 72 Dart 5.9 4-spd, 68 Valiant, 73 W200, 78 D100 sb, 78 D200, 98 DAKOTA, .
Moparmarks Parts & Restorations
Desert Mopar Metal
Grand Jct. CO
970-261-7039
http://moparmark.com/
motormangj@gmail.com
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2214006
12/14/16 07:37 PM
12/14/16 07:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,408
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,408
Kalispell Mt.
the 5.2 and 5.9 engines are great but the trans in stock form kinda sucks. The 4.7 engine kinda sucks but the trans is awesome.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: HotRodDave] #2214306
12/15/16 11:07 AM
12/15/16 11:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
northcoastmopar Offline OP
master
northcoastmopar  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
Thanks guys, 5.2 it is. Hard to beat an old 318.

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2214318
12/15/16 11:38 AM
12/15/16 11:38 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,182
aZLiViN
J
J_BODY Offline
I Live Here
J_BODY  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,182
aZLiViN
on a brighter note the 4.7 runs circles around the old magnum... but as noted, when things go wrong, it can get expensive.

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: J_BODY] #2214926
12/16/16 03:25 AM
12/16/16 03:25 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,310
Walnut Creek, CA
blown340 Offline
master
blown340  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,310
Walnut Creek, CA
I've had alot of experience with the 4.7L's and they have been bulletproof for me for many many many miles. With that said, I bought all of them new and maintained them properly from the start. Without maintenance they seem to fall apart quickly.

I'd take a 4.7L stock for stock over a 318 anyday if I had really good documentation of its maintenance history. Without that I'd probably go 318 unless the 4.7L was very low miles.

-Jon


70 challenger convertible. 340/5 speed. blown, intercooled, efi, blah blah blah 71 valiant scamp 318/A833OD/AC/PS 00 dakota RC 4.7L 5 spd autoX'r. SRT10/T56 swap in process 73 W200 Power wagon, PTO winch, 4 spd
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2215046
12/16/16 01:11 PM
12/16/16 01:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 293
Michigan
C
ccarson Offline
enthusiast
ccarson  Offline
enthusiast
C

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 293
Michigan
93-96 5.2 magnum with the 518 overdrive auto

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2215187
12/16/16 05:48 PM
12/16/16 05:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,306
Laveen, Arizona
GTSDart340 Offline
pro stock
GTSDart340  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,306
Laveen, Arizona
I have an 01 Durango with the 4.7, 191k miles. Runs great, but uses a fair amount of oil.


1949 International KB-2 "Mater" - 302/T5

1968 Dodge Dart GTS "The Drat" - 340/727

2006 Dodge Magnum R/T - Hemi

2016 Dodge Durango Limited - 3.6
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2215442
12/17/16 01:34 AM
12/17/16 01:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
You will find, most guys that like the 4.7 bought them new, and took really good care of them. You will be buying a used truck, who knows how well it was cared for? Someone can tell you they took "really good care" of something they drove, but all you would have would be their word. "Really good care" means different things to different people.

Do you feel lucky? Gene

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2215470
12/17/16 02:39 AM
12/17/16 02:39 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,020
N.W. Florida
F
Fat_Mike Offline
master
Fat_Mike  Offline
master
F

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,020
N.W. Florida
I've never owned a 4.7, but have driven a friend's 2007 Ram 1500 4X4 that has one, and am impressed with the performance compared to my same truck of the 2001 model year with a 5.2. HOWEVER, when, not if, but when it's time to replace that 4.7 (they all fail eventually) you'll spend twice the money of a 5.2/5.9 ... IF you're lucky enough to find one.

Last edited by Fat_Mike; 12/17/16 07:24 PM.
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: poorboy] #2215473
12/17/16 02:44 AM
12/17/16 02:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 954
garnett kansas
rhad Offline
super stock
rhad  Offline
super stock

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 954
garnett kansas
my sis in law has a 01 dakota with a 4.7 she bought new,changed oil on time every time,its now somewhere north of 200000 without a problem,she drove it back and forth to work about 50 miles one way 5 days a week
i changed out one in a durango and wasnt to impressed with all the plumbing ,chains,etc,and it was kinda a dog in the durango,and piggy on fuel


my ladder of success is missing some rungs
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2217312
12/19/16 10:53 PM
12/19/16 10:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,408
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,408
Kalispell Mt.
I have an 01 dakota 4.7 5 speed and a 99 dakota 318 5 speed, both 3.55 gears both ex cab 4X4 both pretty much bone stock and the 318 will out pull the 4.7 by a lot any day of the week no questions asked and spank it in a race, the 4.7 will get about 1 more MPG empty about the same full. My 07 4.7 HO auto will pull with the 318 and might even beat it in an empty race but it would be close and would come down to the NV3500 not being able to shift fast enough.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2217638
12/20/16 11:42 AM
12/20/16 11:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Check your local for sale ads long enough and you'll see a trend. Plenty of Dodges for sale with blown 4.7's, none or very few with pooched 5.2 or 5.9's.

Originally Posted By ccarson
93-96 5.2 magnum with the 518 overdrive auto


I think you mean 92-95. 96+ was the electronic transmission.

Originally Posted By northcoastmopar
Either one would be paired to an automatic. The vehicle would be occasionally used by my son in college or the wife and neither can nor want to drive a stick.


Sounds like the best reason to hunt one down with a stick! If they don't want to learn they don't have to drive it. Sounds like a win-win to me.

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2217752
12/20/16 02:26 PM
12/20/16 02:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,600
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,600
in a cattle trailer down by th...
I had a 92 Dakota with the 5.2 in it. I beat that truck hard and it took it. Had 450,000 miles on it when it was sold and was still running.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon!
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: Guitar Jones] #2218423
12/21/16 03:42 PM
12/21/16 03:42 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,963
new jersey usa
1
11secdart Offline
master
11secdart  Offline
master
1

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,963
new jersey usa
I had two Durangos an 00 and a n 02 . The 02 I bought new with 4.7 ,, 3.91 rear and trailer tow pkg and it was great it towed my 20 ft enclosed with race car etc all over the place with no problems I did have to have the ball joints done for a recall and the rear started acting up at 80,000 mikes so I traded it on my 08 H.Q.C. . I have the 5.2 Magnum in my 92 D150 I bought new in 92 and still have the motors been great with 0 problems even after tears of bracket racing it on occasion. I always liked the Dakotas , all years. My friend has an 02 R/ T with a 408 that runs mid 12s for sale, cool truck.

IMG_0910.jpg
Last edited by 11secdart; 12/21/16 09:38 PM.

68 Dart 410 / 904
92 D150 original owner
21 Ram 1500 Quad Cab, Big Horn , Hemi ,4x4
23 Audi Q5
16 Honda HRV
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2222253
12/28/16 04:31 PM
12/28/16 04:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
I'm the kind of guy who can't ever leave anything stock, so my opinion will be somewhat biased.

I've owned both 5.2/5.9 and 4.7 dakotas.

I've heard horror stories of catostraphoc failures of 4.7s. Lots of them. Most of the time these get chalked up to poor maintenance. I also know of a few 5.2/5.9 horror stories--also from poor maintenance.

The 4.7 truck I had, was bought used with 35k miles on it. I changed the oil every 4-5k miles. At 100k miles it developed a tick that sounded like a valve noise, but drove it another 20k miles with no oil pressure issues, no loss of power, and no misfires or engine codes.

I don't like the 4.7 because there's virtually no aftermarket support for it. As for daily driving, it was ok. Got around 17 mpg in a 4700 lb truck. (Quad cab dakota). For towing, it was weak. Required lots of RPM and downshifting. I couldn't imagine this same engine in a full size truck trying to pull 7k lbs like they were rated for.

I like the 5.2/5.9 because there's a ton of aftermarket for them, and they respond well to mods. I've never towed with a 5.2 or 5.9 though. They can be fairly bulletproof though and when maintained will easily go 250k+ miles with minimal wear because of the efi. I've opened up 100k plus motors and found original cross hatching still in the bores.


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2222853
12/29/16 04:23 PM
12/29/16 04:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
northcoastmopar Offline OP
master
northcoastmopar  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
I'm assuming the 3.7 V6 has the same issues as 4.7 since as I understand it's the 4.7 with two fewer cylinders?
Having trouble locating a decent 5.2 that's not badly rusted. Especially above the rear wheels.

Came across a nice condition '04 with the 3.7 and according to the carfax it's dealer maintained since new with regular oil changes and all the recommended service intervals. I know it won't have the grunt of a V8 and the mileage won't be much better if at all. But again, I'm not going to do much towing with it. Mainly home depot runs, towing bikes, and 4x4 for winter.

Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2223392
12/30/16 03:27 PM
12/30/16 03:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,408
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,408
Kalispell Mt.
3.7 in a 2wd dakota is a dog, down shifting needed unless your going down hill, especially in an automatic. Have all the same issues as a 4.7 with no up side. It feels like driving one of those old dump trucks with a slant six when you try to pull ANYTHING and the MPG sucks.

Don't be afraid to look out of your area, they salt the roads in OH to ruin all the cars and support sales of new ones, even a trip down to nashville could net a great deal on a no rust dakota. I lived in TN for a long time and was appalled at the young rust bucket cars that would show up ocasionally from OH.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: 2nd Gen Dakota V8s - please school me - 4.7 or 5.2 [Re: northcoastmopar] #2233395
01/13/17 10:30 AM
01/13/17 10:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
northcoastmopar Offline OP
master
northcoastmopar  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,366
Cleveland, Ohio
Ok, how many miles are too much on a 5.9L truck and what are some of the things I should look for?
I'm planning to look at an 03 Quad Cab SLT 4x4 with a 5.9L but it has 161k miles. The body and interior are in good shape based on the pics but I don't have documentation on how well it was maintained. It's being sold by a one-man dealer who buys at auction and then flips on craigslist.

I like that the truck has the 5.9L, tow package, skid plate, 3.92 rear, anti-spin rear.

I know ball joints are an issue on these things along with the plenum gasket. Anything else to look for?

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1