Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Wet sump pan #2069214
05/08/16 10:07 AM
05/08/16 10:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline OP
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
I didn't want to hijack Andy's billet pan thread, but the discussion moved to pumping losses and the effect of main web windows on power.
So lets talk wet sump pans: is bigger better in order vis-a-vie pumping losses?
I have a Dakota, so there is no center link or k=member in the way, and I'm modifying a circle track pan (dropping the sump 3").
This thing will be huge but since it started as a circle track piece, it is boiler plate heavy.


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2069380
05/08/16 03:20 PM
05/08/16 03:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,200
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,200
Bend,OR USA
I remember being told at one of the old Mopar drag seminars that the oil level should be a minimum of six inches lower than any of the crankshaft rotating parts, IE rod caps or rod bolts , whatever is the lowest up
As far as pumping loss a crankshaft scraper and adequate oil drain back will help reduce the oil mass influensing the density of the rotating air mass in the crankcase area, liquids don't compress very wellwork Most of the current state of the art drag race wet sump oil pans for motors that the main webbing ends at the center of the main caps use huge oil pans with enormous sumps with kick outs on the passenger sides and not much oil in them work scope thumbs
Are you using a vacume pump? If not, why not?


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2069387
05/08/16 03:32 PM
05/08/16 03:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,042
Oregon
Yes, I'm pretty sure most everyone will agree that bigger is better on a wet sump pan. The only trick is making sure that you have an actual sump for the oil to collect in at the bottom of the big pan.

I'm not sure if kickouts work on Mopar big block engines since the skirt is 3 inches deep. There are people who window the block to get a kickout and maybe that works for them. It certainly takes a bunch of time and money to do it.

For a wet sump dyno pan I usually run the sump about 12 inches deep like the one in this picture.

shortblock.jpg
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2069428
05/08/16 05:01 PM
05/08/16 05:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
B G Racing Offline
master
B G Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
bigger is better when you have the clearance,when it's limited or you just want extra insurance just add a 3 quart accusump.

Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2069631
05/08/16 09:52 PM
05/08/16 09:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline OP
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
Cab, I have a full kick out and am looking at mounting options for a scraper. The best way seems to be welding tabs to the tube that let me put bolts in on that side.
I have a pan evacuation system, but no vacuum pump.
I cut this pan apart to rework the baffles from left turn to straight as well as lower the sump. I'm using trap doors to hold oil around the pickup.


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2069645
05/08/16 10:01 PM
05/08/16 10:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
Bigcube Offline
I Live Here
Bigcube  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
I had one custom built a while back. I wanted a built in pickup with internal baffles, scraper with windage tray. It is shallow with a rather large kickout. Fit's the car nice and holds 12 qt's. I've been happy with it.






Jim

Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2069691
05/08/16 10:47 PM
05/08/16 10:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
sgcuda Offline
master
sgcuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
Wow, that pan sure is a beauty.


[image][/image]
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: AndyF] #2069749
05/08/16 11:48 PM
05/08/16 11:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
rowin4 Offline
master
rowin4  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
Originally Posted By AndyF
Yes, I'm pretty sure most everyone will agree that bigger is better on a wet sump pan. The only trick is making sure that you have an actual sump for the oil to collect in at the bottom of the big pan.

I'm not sure if kickouts work on Mopar big block engines since the skirt is 3 inches deep. There are people who window the block to get a kickout and maybe that works for them. It certainly takes a bunch of time and money to do it.

For a wet sump dyno pan I usually run the sump about 12 inches deep like the one in this picture.



With a deep pan like that my front tires would be in the air setting still.


it's ok to butt heads, just don't do it with a butthead
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2070007
05/09/16 12:02 PM
05/09/16 12:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 304
Florida
M
Mark Whitener Offline
enthusiast
Mark Whitener  Offline
enthusiast
M

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 304
Florida
A pan with the deepest sump the chassis will allow will control the oil the best. The area around the pump or pump pickup needs to be relatively small, trap door divider close. and top plates to get the cover even closer to the pump/pickup will keep oil from sloshing up as much at the launch and at the shutdown.


Mark Whitener
[url=www.racingfuelsystems.com[/url]
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2070615
05/10/16 09:11 AM
05/10/16 09:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,097
back in Georgia
dthemi Offline
master
dthemi  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,097
back in Georgia
Like someone said earlier, a skirted Block like a Mope isn't going to benefit from a big bulge on the side of the pan like a Chevy or ford would. Kick outs in the sump are OK for more oil capacity without going lower, but that's about it.

When I finish my next predator engine, I'll be testing it with a huge wet system, then with a complete Dailey dry system to see if power changes. I don't think it'll be anything if vacuum is similar. The only thing I really hope to gain is less aerated oil for the bearings

Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2070880
05/10/16 05:11 PM
05/10/16 05:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline OP
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
When done, mine won't be far from the picture Andy posted, but it's a small block. Don't have final dimensions yet, but it won't be 12 inches deep, more like 9". It will have plenty of volume, since the sump is 15 inches square.


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2070895
05/10/16 05:40 PM
05/10/16 05:40 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
I built this one.. its steel right now but I will
build another in alum.. its 9.5 qts but I only run
8 qts... has trap doors, chambers and baffles
wave

DSC00098.JPG
Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 05/10/16 05:41 PM.
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071214
05/11/16 12:50 AM
05/11/16 12:50 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
rowin4 Offline
master
rowin4  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
After reading these postings I got thinking that it seems mopars are the only ones I have seen these real deep pans . I know back in the sixties there were some on chevy's but now that the cars are lower most run a dragster type pan or kick out type. Being that chevy cranks hang out of the bottom of the block to start with 3-4" , the 6" theory would mean that the oil level would start at 9-10" from the pan rail , then add on the rest of the pan for capacity. I know in a perfect world it would be better but most of us don't.


it's ok to butt heads, just don't do it with a butthead
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071299
05/11/16 08:23 AM
05/11/16 08:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
rebel Offline
master
rebel  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
I made this pan to match the gap in my K frame. Holds 12 Quarts but I still run an Accusump for safety. The motor has a crank scraper & Vac pump & with the perferated steel surge baffles it seems to control the oil real well.

2012-08-11 17.01.46.jpg2012-08-11 17.01.18.jpg30-07-10_13321.jpg
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071756
05/11/16 11:27 PM
05/11/16 11:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline OP
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
nice. what is the little brass guy above your drain plug?


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071761
05/11/16 11:33 PM
05/11/16 11:33 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By poboyengineering
nice. what is the little brass guy above your drain plug?


Looks like a temp sender.. I have one in the drain plug itself
on both the engine and trans
wave

Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071762
05/11/16 11:36 PM
05/11/16 11:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline OP
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
didn't consider that one. makes sense.
is yours on the race car or the Rampage, MrP?


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071774
05/11/16 11:48 PM
05/11/16 11:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By poboyengineering
didn't consider that one. makes sense.
is yours on the race car or the Rampage, MrP?


On the Rampage.. I have 1 temp gauge for both of them...
just flip a switch to read either
wave

Re: Wet sump pan [Re: poboyengineering] #2071779
05/11/16 11:52 PM
05/11/16 11:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
poboyengineering Offline OP
mopar
poboyengineering  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
Trick! That will come in handy for Dragweek. Are you in this year?


It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.

Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
Re: Wet sump pan [Re: MR_P_BODY] #2071782
05/11/16 11:55 PM
05/11/16 11:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
I built this one.. its steel right now but I will
build another in alum.. its 9.5 qts but I only run
8 qts... has trap doors, chambers and baffles
wave


Don't want to jack this thread but is that remote filter plumbed directly into the block or are you running some sort of adapter plate?


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1