Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
8.75 Casting number 1634983 not 741 742 489 #2021372
02/28/16 04:27 PM
02/28/16 04:27 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 485
Central California
MoParFish Offline OP
mopar
MoParFish  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 485
Central California
Found a 66 D100 yesterday at pic-a-part that was picked clean other than the rear end so, I figured I'd grab it for my 63 D100 if I ever wanted to get rid of the tapered axles. Plus it looked to have 3.55s by counting turns, which is what I was going to throw in for a lil better freeway rpm. Has 3.91s now and plenty of low end with the Poly 318 and NP420 4spd. Weird thing is the casting number on the junk yard drop out is 1634983. With a little web searching, it appears to be an earlier (1957??) open drop out someone threw in it. I read there may be different thrust block thicknesses between some earlier and later units but, axle end play seems fine. Not high priority now but, I'll pull it all down and check it out further. Just kinda curious what pinion/bearing configuration it is. Figured I'd post it as I have never seen anything other than 741, 742 or 489 on 8.75s...

8371.jpg8372.jpg8373.jpg

Sworn Member Central Valley MoPar Drag Pack. You can reach me at (done-et-chasing@going-rounds.gone)... :-)

[img]https://s6.postimg.org/v3mbggksx/SAC16.jpg[/img]image hosting more than 5mb
Re: 8.75 Casting number 1634983 not 741 742 489 [Re: MoParFish] #2021431
02/28/16 06:06 PM
02/28/16 06:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,808
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,808
Rio Linda, CA

1634985 is the fairly common earlier version of the 742, the 983 appears from time-to-time but not sure it's a large stem pinion or not.

If the flange axle end play is OK, it's either a Sure-Grip or the open carrier has the wide thrust block.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 8.75 Casting number 1634983 not 741 742 489 [Re: MoParFish] #2023544
03/03/16 12:15 AM
03/03/16 12:15 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 23
Canada
C
CdnValiant Offline
member
CdnValiant  Offline
member
C

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 23
Canada
'985 is equivalent to the later '742...983 is equivalent to the later '741

Re: 8.75 Casting number 1634983 not 741 742 489 [Re: CdnValiant] #2023905
03/03/16 04:38 PM
03/03/16 04:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,808
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,808
Rio Linda, CA

Then what's the difference between the 1634983 and 1820657? The 657 is also equivalent to the later 741.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 8.75 Casting number 1634983 not 741 742 489 [Re: MoParFish] #2023913
03/03/16 04:53 PM
03/03/16 04:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,016
Polson, MT
DoctorDiff Offline
master
DoctorDiff  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,016
Polson, MT
There were also several other casting numbers used.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1