Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: dvw]
#1972439
12/19/15 12:36 AM
12/19/15 12:36 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
If you trim the K-frame the pan will come right off with the drag link pulled. If you drill the outer tie rod locations, idler arm and pitman arm holes in the drag link you can insert tapered spacers in the holes. Now the entire steering linkage comes off with 4 nuts. The headers don't appear to be an issue. What steering issues, bump steer? caster? easily fixed. This would be my cheap solution. Doug I really like this idea as with other projects it would keep costs down. What do you think of this system Doug as I could get rid of the tortion bars, use my brakes, free up some room, and have some more adjust-ability. I would still have to deal with bump steer but from the way you sound its doable. http://www.gerstsuspensions.com/coil-over-conversion-kit.html
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972442
12/19/15 12:39 AM
12/19/15 12:39 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Strange struts.. comes with everything except the rack... $1800-$2000 depending on what size you want... thats brakes and all
Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 12/19/15 12:39 AM.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972494
12/19/15 01:52 AM
12/19/15 01:52 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,982 MI, usa
dvw
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,982
MI, usa
|
If you trim the K-frame the pan will come right off with the drag link pulled. If you drill the outer tie rod locations, idler arm and pitman arm holes in the drag link you can insert tapered spacers in the holes. Now the entire steering linkage comes off with 4 nuts. The headers don't appear to be an issue. What steering issues, bump steer? caster? easily fixed. This would be my cheap solution. Doug I really like this idea as with other projects it would keep costs down. What do you think of this system Doug as I could get rid of the tortion bars, use my brakes, free up some room, and have some more adjust-ability. I would still have to deal with bump steer but from the way you sound its doable. Not familiar with them. Doesn't look bad from a glance. I can tell you the torsion bars really haven't been an issue for me. If they bother you and you have to buy shocks anyway then I could see this kit as an option. My car has offset control arm bushings, less than a $100 in modified strut rods, tie rod sleeves, and heims. It drives straight at 150mph and front suspension is square. Just took a little effort, but pretty straight forward. This shot shows how square the front stays. Doug http://www.gerstsuspensions.com/coil-over-conversion-kit.html
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: dvw]
#1972510
12/19/15 02:19 AM
12/19/15 02:19 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
If you trim the K-frame the pan will come right off with the drag link pulled. If you drill the outer tie rod locations, idler arm and pitman arm holes in the drag link you can insert tapered spacers in the holes. Now the entire steering linkage comes off with 4 nuts. The headers don't appear to be an issue. What steering issues, bump steer? caster? easily fixed. This would be my cheap solution. Doug I really like this idea as with other projects it would keep costs down. What do you think of this system Doug as I could get rid of the tortion bars, use my brakes, free up some room, and have some more adjust-ability. I would still have to deal with bump steer but from the way you sound its doable. Not familiar with them. Doesn't look bad from a glance. I can tell you the torsion bars really haven't been an issue for me. If they bother you and you have to buy shocks anyway then I could see this kit as an option. My car has offset control arm bushings, less than a $100 in modified strut rods, tie rod sleeves, and heims. It drives straight at 150mph and front suspension is square. Just took a little effort, but pretty straight forward. This shot shows how square the front stays. Doug http://www.gerstsuspensions.com/coil-over-conversion-kit.html That car looks and runs GREAT. Nice job on the front suspension. When I get a chance and an empty bay in my shop I will move this car over and check the front end out. Thanks for the sugestions
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972592
12/19/15 12:03 PM
12/19/15 12:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,048 Richmond, Tx. (Houston)
GTSDave
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,048
Richmond, Tx. (Houston)
|
I still have basically stock, with a trimmed K-Member in the Cuda. Tubular uppers and lowers. Torsion bars are still in place but headers are a pain as I run a 4 speed. Looking to replace the ProParts headers on there now and was getting ready to build new ones but space is an issue...... Since I run NSS with the Cuda, I must stay with stock. The exception is the control arms, as long as they are bolt in replacements. It does drive VERY well though and I have no complaints there. For me the advantage with the rack with struts would be having room to work on everything. Space is tight in my car. By the way, what headers are in this pic? -Dave
PLEASE Pray for our brothers and sisters in harms way. If you are the owner of a GTS us at the GTS Registry www.gtsregistry.com
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: GTSDave]
#1972652
12/19/15 01:58 PM
12/19/15 01:58 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
I still have basically stock, with a trimmed K-Member in the Cuda. Tubular uppers and lowers. Torsion bars are still in place but headers are a pain as I run a 4 speed. Looking to replace the ProParts headers on there now and was getting ready to build new ones but space is an issue...... Since I run NSS with the Cuda, I must stay with stock. The exception is the control arms, as long as they are bolt in replacements. It does drive VERY well though and I have no complaints there. For me the advantage with the rack with struts would be having room to work on everything. Space is tight in my car. By the way, what headers are in this pic? -Dave Dave I texed the previous owner to make sure on the headers. They are TTI 2- 2 1/8 stepped header
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: a493demon]
#1972655
12/19/15 02:00 PM
12/19/15 02:00 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
i'll try and post a pic of a k-frame I have with tubular lowers on it . I have been thinking about switching from my bone stock set up for years just haven't yet. Thank-you. I would appreciate that.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972664
12/19/15 02:12 PM
12/19/15 02:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,334 Morrow, OH
markz528
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,334
Morrow, OH
|
I went with the Alterkation for my 67 Coronet. Was able to reuse my Wilwood brakes even though Wilwood competes for being one of the most slimeball companies on earth..............
67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph 67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph 69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: J_BODY]
#1972665
12/19/15 02:14 PM
12/19/15 02:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
Room is nice and it will spoil you real quick. This car I'm looking for a few other reasons to. Most tracks rules dictate a diaper on 8 second cars, adding the mega block weight on an already heavier A body, and fast footbrake cars need ways to slow down the hit on bottom bulb racing so adjust-ability is needed. Us 60 years olds like to make things easier when we work on our cars by ourselves AND on the floor. LOL
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: markz528]
#1972668
12/19/15 02:19 PM
12/19/15 02:19 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
I went with the Alterkation for my 67 Coronet. Was able to reuse my Wilwood brakes even though Wilwood competes for being one of the most slimeball companies on earth.............. I was doing some reading on this set-up in the tech archives but it was an older post. Seems guys either love it or hate it but I'll try to dig up some newer info on this company. Having the Wilwood brakes already and being able to still use them would be a big help in keeping costs down.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: mokid]
#1972742
12/19/15 04:33 PM
12/19/15 04:33 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
I can tell you who not to go to, Don't go to High Speed Welding in Chicago they are clueless, don't go to Andy McCoy Chassis in Washington Mo. unless you want your front wheels to break off mid-track, Thanks for the heads-up. That sounds bad.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972858
12/19/15 08:07 PM
12/19/15 08:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: mokid]
#1972870
12/19/15 08:22 PM
12/19/15 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243 Charlotte, North Carolina
sgcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
I can tell you who not to go to, Don't go to High Speed Welding in Chicago they are clueless, don't go to Andy McCoy Chassis in Washington Mo. unless you want your front wheels to break off mid-track, Is High Speed Welding the same as the old High Speed Salvage that used to advertise the 2 sbc motors welded together? If it is, you are absolutely right. I would buy a done up [censored] car before having them do anything to my car.
[image][/image]
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972890
12/19/15 08:54 PM
12/19/15 08:54 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,702 W. Kentucky
justinp61
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,702
W. Kentucky
|
I really like this idea as with other projects it would keep costs down. What do you think of this system Doug as I could get rid of the tortion bars, use my brakes, free up some room, and have some more adjust-ability. I would still have to deal with bump steer but from the way you sound its doable. http://www.gerstsuspensions.com/coil-over-conversion-kit.html Has anyone ran this ^^? I wonder how much travel it has at the wheel? I have to say I like the looks of the LCA arms in a493demons photos though.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1972930
12/19/15 09:54 PM
12/19/15 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,553 baldwinsville new york
a493demon
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,553
baldwinsville new york
|
I LIKE THIS. Who made the lower arm? To be honest I'm not sure . Think the guy I got it from said they might be CAP but not I'm sure .
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: DavidDean]
#1972947
12/19/15 10:17 PM
12/19/15 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 456 corpus christi tex
Cheatham
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 456
corpus christi tex
|
I agree that's what I have . Very nice piece . A friend here in Texas saw mine and got one for his Dart. Same here Bobs Pro Fab and you can use your brakes
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: SpareParts]
#1972954
12/19/15 10:26 PM
12/19/15 10:26 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,227 aZLiViN
J_BODY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,227
aZLiViN
|
J body does your K bolt in or welded to the car? bolt in. I asked him about selling them as a "kit" years ago, but he wasn't interested.... and as Mike said, remember.... this is a RACE CAR. He wasn't too keen on using it for any street use although he said he could build something that he felt would be more "robust" for that duty.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1972981
12/19/15 11:17 PM
12/19/15 11:17 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 220
Jerry Kathe
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 220
|
Coincidentally this is a 74 duster. I was looking at the same thing to lower the car and use better headers. The choice I made was quite a bit of work, but the key components are actually cheaper than any complete bolt on tubular k member kit that I could find. [url=[URL=http://smg.photobucket.com/user/jkathe/media/20151213_130656.jpg.html] [/url] ]photobucket[/url] I did have most of the material already on hand, but the strut kit w/brakes, rack, header kit dont cost all that much in comparison.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Jerry Kathe]
#1973033
12/20/15 12:45 AM
12/20/15 12:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
fredericksburg,va
|
Coincidentally this is a 74 duster. I was looking at the same thing to lower the car and use better headers. The choice I made was quite a bit of work, but the key components are actually cheaper than any complete bolt on tubular k member kit that I could find. [url=[URL=http://smg.photobucket.com/user/jkathe/media/20151213_130656.jpg.html] [/url] ]photobucket[/url] I did have most of the material already on hand, but the strut kit w/brakes, rack, header kit dont cost all that much in comparison. Looks like an old South Bend with a lot of levers
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1973158
12/20/15 10:48 AM
12/20/15 10:48 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,987 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,987
A shed in England
|
Apologies for the Hi-jacking, I've been looking at this too. What has always concerned me is how they match the rear suspension, for example, if you are using Caltracs, can you get the recommended rise / extension of 5 inches? (IIRC)
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: J_BODY]
#1973217
12/20/15 01:19 PM
12/20/15 01:19 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
Thanks for all the ideas, pictures, and suggestions guys. Lots of good ideas.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Tig]
#1973221
12/20/15 01:35 PM
12/20/15 01:35 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Apologies for the Hi-jacking, I've been looking at this too. What has always concerned me is how they match the rear suspension, for example, if you are using Caltracs, can you get the recommended rise / extension of 5 inches? (IIRC) If you were to change to a strut set up you would be close to loosing 300# on the front end.. with that much change in the front/rear ratio you wouldnt need that travel.. see what your front/rear weight percentage is now and then with a strut set up.. you might even need to lower the engine to help out
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: justinp61]
#1973239
12/20/15 02:17 PM
12/20/15 02:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247 Mt. Vernon, Ohio
dartman366
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247
Mt. Vernon, Ohio
|
I really like this idea as with other projects it would keep costs down. What do you think of this system Doug as I could get rid of the tortion bars, use my brakes, free up some room, and have some more adjust-ability. I would still have to deal with bump steer but from the way you sound its doable. http://www.gerstsuspensions.com/coil-over-conversion-kit.html Has anyone ran this ^^? I wonder how much travel it has at the wheel? I have to say I like the looks of the LCA arms in a493demons photos though. looks identical to my CAP lca's and radius rod's , I also run their upper controll arm's and have had no issues, now I just need to find someone that has a tubular K frame that is set up with rack and pinion steering and no motor mounts (i use a plate) so I can use all the stuff that I already have, including my Strange brakes.
Last edited by dartman366; 12/20/15 02:18 PM.
Light travels faster than the speed of sound,,,this is why some people seem bright untill you hear them speak.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: SpareParts]
#1973248
12/20/15 02:46 PM
12/20/15 02:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,826 las vegas
70AARcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,826
las vegas
|
It kinda looks like the old Dillinger Chassis stuff that's no longer available Got a set of dillinger lca setting on shelf collecting dust.
Tony
70 AARCuda Vitamin C 71 Dart Swinger 360 10.318 @ 128.22(10-04-14 Bakersfield) 71 Demon 360 10.666 @122.41 (01-29-17 @ Las Vegas) 71 Duster 408 (10.29 @ 127.86 3/16/19 Las Vegas)
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: dartman366]
#1973250
12/20/15 02:47 PM
12/20/15 02:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
I really like this idea as with other projects it would keep costs down. What do you think of this system Doug as I could get rid of the tortion bars, use my brakes, free up some room, and have some more adjust-ability. I would still have to deal with bump steer but from the way you sound its doable. http://www.gerstsuspensions.com/coil-over-conversion-kit.html Has anyone ran this ^^? I wonder how much travel it has at the wheel? I have to say I like the looks of the LCA arms in a493demons photos though. looks identical to my CAP lca's and radius rod's , I also run their upper controll arm's and have had no issues, now I just need to find someone that has a tubular K frame that is set up with rack and pinion steering and no motor mounts (i use a plate) so I can use all the stuff that I already have, including my Strange brakes. Ya I already messaged the manufacture in the link I posted to see if I could use my mopar based Wilwoods that I already have and its a no-go. I would lose lots of money selling mine and rebuying new ones.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1973258
12/20/15 03:04 PM
12/20/15 03:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247 Mt. Vernon, Ohio
dartman366
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247
Mt. Vernon, Ohio
|
John, what spindles are you using and are you planning on changing those also, I would have to go look at my set-up again but if I remember correct every thing bolted to the spindle flange where the origional brakes were attached.
Light travels faster than the speed of sound,,,this is why some people seem bright untill you hear them speak.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: dartman366]
#1973265
12/20/15 03:11 PM
12/20/15 03:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
John, what spindles are you using and are you planning on changing those also, I would have to go look at my set-up again but if I remember correct every thing bolted to the spindle flange where the origional brakes were attached. This car is all stock Mopar up front so stock mopar spindles. My small tire 74 Duster is stock mopar spindles too with an after marker system and rack n pinion steering but we did LOTS of work to get the steering right. My black 70 car is really the nicest with strange struts. VERY easy to work on.
Last edited by pittsburghracer; 12/20/15 03:13 PM.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1973268
12/20/15 03:16 PM
12/20/15 03:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247 Mt. Vernon, Ohio
dartman366
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,247
Mt. Vernon, Ohio
|
John, what spindles are you using and are you planning on changing those also, I would have to go look at my set-up again but if I remember correct every thing bolted to the spindle flange where the origional brakes were attached. This car is all stock Mopar up front so stock mopar spindles. My small tire 74 Duster is stock mopar spindles too with an after marker system and rack n pinion steering but we did LOTS of work to get the steering right. My black 70 car is really the nicest with strange struts. VERY easy to work on. I removed the stock 76 disc spindles and went to a factory 10" drum spindle on mine.
Light travels faster than the speed of sound,,,this is why some people seem bright untill you hear them speak.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Tig]
#1973302
12/20/15 03:55 PM
12/20/15 03:55 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,702 W. Kentucky
justinp61
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,702
W. Kentucky
|
Apologies for the Hi-jacking, I've been looking at this too. What has always concerned me is how they match the rear suspension, for example, if you are using Caltracs, can you get the recommended rise / extension of 5 inches? (IIRC) My car is street/strip and runs Cal-Tracs and not real fast, it ran high 6.50s with the 408 and who knows what it'll run with the 434. I need the travel for my car to work. If I understood what I read I can use my Strange brakes as they are on the large 73 and up spindle. I e-mailed Carl Gerst and asked about the travel on his coil over conversion and about using it on the street too. His reply to the travel question: On the coilover for stock k frame, at the wheel is just a hair over 5", I'd like more, but can't get a longer coilover in without hitting something unfortunately, if you braced the original shock tower with a down tube/roll cage, and mounted into the original shock tower itself, you get get a coilover long enough to get over 6" of travel. About driving it on the street: Oh yeah! This setup is far stronger than factory, and much smoother, no binding on the strut rods either, like the factory ones, all in all, much more stable front suspension.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1973345
12/20/15 05:34 PM
12/20/15 05:34 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 655 Huntsville, AL
Airwoofer
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 655
Huntsville, AL
|
Currently there are two guys making tubular LCAs. I have the HDK version but Junior636 has bout the same thing and a weld-on pivot suport. I am running the HDK without a support with a little different pivot shaft, but have not had in on the road/track yet. These use 3" travel shocks and get about 4" at the spindle. My UCAs were already on the car when I bought it, and are probably 19 yrs old. That Dillinger setup was pretty nice but he dropped out I think. Junior636s stuff is the system on that GTS website. He has threads on FABO and YB. I have some pics of my setup on the install thread on my Demon in the susp section. Your car has the shock towre tied to the snout bar so you would probably not need the support hoop that HDK and junior636 offer. I still used HDKs upper shock mount that goes inside the shock tower and ties to it. It would work with that green car also. https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ubbt...tml#Post1955700
Last edited by Airwoofer; 12/20/15 05:37 PM.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Airwoofer]
#1973405
12/20/15 07:35 PM
12/20/15 07:35 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 153 Antioch, CA
lucky13
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 153
Antioch, CA
|
Currently there are two guys making tubular LCAs. I have the HDK version but Junior636 has bout the same thing and a weld-on pivot suport. I am running the HDK without a support with a little different pivot shaft, but have not had in on the road/track yet. These use 3" travel shocks and get about 4" at the spindle. My UCAs were already on the car when I bought it, and are probably 19 yrs old. That Dillinger setup was pretty nice but he dropped out I think. Junior636s stuff is the system on that GTS website. He has threads on FABO and YB. I have some pics of my setup on the install thread on my Demon in the susp section. Your car has the shock towre tied to the snout bar so you would probably not need the support hoop that HDK and junior636 offer. I still used HDKs upper shock mount that goes inside the shock tower and ties to it. It would work with that green car also. https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ubbt...tml#Post1955700 not that it really matters but, the GTS system is built by 71Street over on FABO. I don't think Junior636 ever sold any of his arms, yet. Although they do look alot alike
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: SpareParts]
#1973470
12/20/15 09:06 PM
12/20/15 09:06 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
Monte your gtx had a system you built right? How much travel did you have? I'm guessing you didn't need much. My problem(part of it) is on a 26" radial I need front end travel, also I am admittedly kinda cheap so I am trying to build my own.
Just can't understand some of the prices asked for these golden front ends I built my own, well before there were any aftermarket ones. Build a few and you will see why they are not cheap. My GTX had very little travel, but that was because I had it tied down and didn't need it, but could have had a LOT. I used stock upper control arms and built my own lowers and frame brackets. Since I had Wilwood brakes already, I modified a factory spindle to accept a lower balljoint just like the top and built my own steering arms. For info, most guys don't actually need NEAR as much front travel as they THINK they do
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: scottb]
#1973665
12/21/15 04:16 AM
12/21/15 04:16 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563 Janesville, WI
SpareParts
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
|
I now his first design had some problem was just looking at the design he had now He has a new design huh? Got a link?
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: scottb]
#1973678
12/21/15 04:46 AM
12/21/15 04:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,334 Park Forest, IL
slantzilla
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,334
Park Forest, IL
|
I now his first design had some problem was just looking at the design he had now Before you trust a word that AJ tells you, talk to people that have his system in their car and working. Trust me on this. http://www.ajeracing.com/mopar.phpThe stuff does look a lot different than the kit I got. Beware of the powder coating, it covers up a lot of sins.
"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1973690
12/21/15 06:03 AM
12/21/15 06:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 699 st.louis,mo.
dart games
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 699
st.louis,mo.
|
I have a aje front end in my 71 dart,its drag race only,havent had 1 problem with it,dont know about there street stuffi use competion engerring travel limeters on it set at 3 inch
Last edited by 440outlawdart; 12/21/15 06:06 AM.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: B G Racing]
#1973754
12/21/15 12:25 PM
12/21/15 12:25 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
John,if your interested we have some good used strut front end stuff at the shop,maybe a whole front strut frame section,Call AJ. John... this is your best bet... with that mega block on the front end you will add about 40# to the front weight.. you need the lightest front end out there.. thats struts... period
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1973760
12/21/15 12:30 PM
12/21/15 12:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,155 Tucson, Arizona
clonestocker
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,155
Tucson, Arizona
|
Hey, 1967dartgt - Those are some nice pictures. Tory's stuff is very nice. matt
[img] [/img]
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: B G Racing]
#1973791
12/21/15 01:32 PM
12/21/15 01:32 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
John,if your interested we have some good used strut front end stuff at the shop,maybe a whole front strut frame section,Call AJ. Thanks Bob. If you aren't to busy today and get a chance can you PM me AJ's phone number. Thanks
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1973795
12/21/15 01:37 PM
12/21/15 01:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
John,if your interested we have some good used strut front end stuff at the shop,maybe a whole front strut frame section,Call AJ. John... this is your best bet... with that mega block on the front end you will add about 40# to the front weight.. you need the lightest front end out there.. thats struts... period I hear you on that about the weight. I'm betting its 40 plus pounds. I'm not a wheelie type of guy and this car did some higher than I prefer for the last owner and in doing so did the funky MOPAR front end movements.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1973804
12/21/15 01:47 PM
12/21/15 01:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273 PA.
pittsburghracer
OP
"Little"John
|
OP
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,273
PA.
|
The front suspension in my small tire car was made by Overkill Racecars. When I bought the car Stephen told me the front end could use some work especially since I planned on going from a small block to a big block. With the stock firewall we had to move a couple of bars in the front cradle (for oil pan clearance) and get the engine located before we could start getting the camber and toe-in straightened out. I tried to call Overkill to see if he had any suggestions but was unable to get a hold of him. I left a message an 6 weeks LATER he returned my call. He kinda came out and said WE meaning US had to fix his mess. Its not track tested yet but I think we have his kit mastered. Its a shame you have to fix someone's crap. http://www.overkillracecars.com/Products.html
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: clonestocker]
#1973911
12/21/15 05:04 PM
12/21/15 05:04 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 240 Spring City , Pa.
SIKPUP
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 240
Spring City , Pa.
|
Hey, 1967dartgt - Those are some nice pictures. Tory's stuff is very nice. matt Does anyone have a link for this ?
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: SIKPUP]
#1973918
12/21/15 05:16 PM
12/21/15 05:16 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Hey, 1967dartgt - Those are some nice pictures. Tory's stuff is very nice. matt Does anyone have a link for this ? No website. You can pm me any questions you have.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: rickseeman]
#1974827
12/22/15 10:53 PM
12/22/15 10:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,163 Melbourne , Australia
LA360
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,163
Melbourne , Australia
|
Who makes these "strut" front ends this thread is talking about? I've never seen one. They're not a kit as such, any I have seen done were done by chassis shops or done by the owner themselves. Pretty simple really, fab up a K-Frame or cross member, make lower control arms and mounts for the top of the shock. I will see if I can find a pic
Alan Jones
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: rickseeman]
#1974849
12/22/15 11:22 PM
12/22/15 11:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 220
Jerry Kathe
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 220
|
Who makes these "strut" front ends this thread is talking about? I've never seen one. _________________________ 2011 Drag Pak Challenger 2011 Jerry Bickel Avenger You need to go back and speak with Mr. Bickel......sounds like you got hustled ...
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: SpareParts]
#1975080
12/23/15 12:43 PM
12/23/15 12:43 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942 Metro Detroit
OUTLAWD
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
|
Yeah I'd assume so lol.
Half tempted to adapt a strut to mine via brackets that the stock K member bolts pass through... that's still bolt in suspension right? I have entertained the same thing..."bolt in" is a relatively loose term
Faster, Faster until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
71 Swinger - slowly collecting dust/parts 66 Belv. II - just a streetcar 88 Mustang - turbo LS beater
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: fishy340]
#1975372
12/23/15 09:03 PM
12/23/15 09:03 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563 Janesville, WI
SpareParts
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
|
I like my RMS set up,but if I didnt buy and wait 9 weeks for my Santuffs...I'd get Torys car would sit lower and it's lighter then mine. Race car problems^^^^^^ You need a new converter
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: mokid]
#1975404
12/23/15 10:25 PM
12/23/15 10:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
fredericksburg,va
|
I have Struts and Rack on my 68 Barracuda now but I wouldn't do it again Reasons?
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1975462
12/24/15 12:07 AM
12/24/15 12:07 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,165 Central Ohio, USA
Bigbeep
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,165
Central Ohio, USA
|
I have Struts and Rack on my 68 Barracuda now but I wouldn't do it again Reasons? Yeah, reasons? I boogered mine up last fall and am seriously looking at struts.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1975585
12/24/15 11:52 AM
12/24/15 11:52 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Yes it is a lot lighter then factory stuff. It's in the 40 lbs range depending what you choose as cool over. I believe the wait time right now is early spring for one, March or April.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: slantzilla]
#1975632
12/24/15 01:30 PM
12/24/15 01:30 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,570 Tulsa, Oklahoma
340Cuda
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,570
Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
Before you trust a word that AJ tells you, talk to people that have his system in their car and working. Trust me on this.
I agree 100%, several years ago I ordered a set of their wheelie bars. They charged my credit card in minutes but it was months before they sent me anything. Bill
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Bull1tt]
#1976587
12/26/15 03:41 PM
12/26/15 03:41 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
While the HDK kit maybe nice, it is a blatant copy RMS kit. I wouldn't purchase one for that reason.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1976601
12/26/15 04:03 PM
12/26/15 04:03 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 155 Post falls, Idaho
rgreule
member
|
member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 155
Post falls, Idaho
|
i have the HDK in my duster.
it has a few differences than the RMS.
-upper coilover mounts are different giving you 2 inches more travel. -Denny offers different styles for different applications. -the lower control arms are adjustable giving you adjustable track width.
he made mine with no motor mounts or sway bar stuff since im using a motor plate.
And Denny is fantastic to deal with and is a true mopar hot rodder
Last edited by rgreule; 12/26/15 04:08 PM.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1976742
12/26/15 08:56 PM
12/26/15 08:56 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
While the HDK kit maybe nice, it is a blatant copy RMS kit. I wouldn't purchase one for that reason. No, it's not a blatant copy. Similar maybe, exact copy....NO. It's a K-member for a Mopar. Of course they are similar........they are all similar because they all do the same thing and bolt in the same place. How could they not be similar
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1976831
12/26/15 11:30 PM
12/26/15 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,112 LONG ISLAND
fishy340
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,112
LONG ISLAND
|
They are NOT all similar especially the one in 67darts compared to mine,and by God none of the 2 i just mentioned are like that magnum force thing that looks like it belongs on a military vehicle. Happy New year.
Last edited by fishy340; 12/26/15 11:31 PM.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: fishy340]
#1976897
12/27/15 01:35 AM
12/27/15 01:35 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
They are NOT all similar especially the one in 67darts compared to mine,and by God none of the 2 i just mentioned are like that magnum force thing that looks like it belongs on a military vehicle. Happy New year. They all do the same thing............eliminate the torsion bars in favor of coilovers and bolt in the stock location.............that seems similar to me.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#1976949
12/27/15 03:02 AM
12/27/15 03:02 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
While the HDK kit maybe nice, it is a blatant copy RMS kit. I wouldn't purchase one for that reason. No, it's not a blatant copy. Similar maybe, exact copy....NO. It's a K-member for a Mopar. Of course they are similar........they are all similar because they all do the same thing and bolt in the same place. How could they not be similar That's the great thing about the Internet, you are intitled to your own opinion. You may feel this way Monte, but I have had talks with a certain owner of a company on this subject and he feels otherwise. It's funny how RMS offers all of those options on his front end and now so does HDK. Interesting, but just my opinion. It's great being able to drive to RMS and Tory's shop to be able to talk face to face on these matters. RMS by far offers the most options for your front end kits.
Last edited by 1967dartgt; 12/27/15 12:52 PM.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1977047
12/27/15 12:44 PM
12/27/15 12:44 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 577 Arkansas
Adrielp
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 577
Arkansas
|
Does anyone know if these bolt in Shock tower supports allow for stud type shocks to be mounted near or in the stock location? Just wondering as this would make changing over to coil overs pretty easy without changing very much.
Adriel Paradise Substation Design Engineer III
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Adrielp]
#1977051
12/27/15 12:57 PM
12/27/15 12:57 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Does anyone know if these bolt in Shock tower supports allow for stud type shocks to be mounted near or in the stock location? Just wondering as this would make changing over to coil overs pretty easy without changing very much. Tory's setup your shocks mount in stock location. He makes a bracket that ties in to your upper control arms if you need it. I have Afco da stud mounted shocks on my car.
Last edited by 1967dartgt; 12/27/15 12:59 PM.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1977138
12/27/15 02:42 PM
12/27/15 02:42 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 577 Arkansas
Adrielp
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 577
Arkansas
|
Does anyone know if these bolt in Shock tower supports allow for stud type shocks to be mounted near or in the stock location? Just wondering as this would make changing over to coil overs pretty easy without changing very much. Tory's setup your shocks mount in stock location. He makes a bracket that ties in to your upper control arms if you need it. I have Afco da stud mounted shocks on my car. Do you have any pics with the upper shock supports mounted? I've got some afco stud mount shocks that I plan on using with the stock control arms. I could go ahead convert to coil overs if one of these supports allows for that style of mounting at the top of the shock. Would be nice to lose the torsion bars and the weight.
Adriel Paradise Substation Design Engineer III
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1977155
12/27/15 03:06 PM
12/27/15 03:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,155 Tucson, Arizona
clonestocker
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,155
Tucson, Arizona
|
Brad, do you not use Torys uppers? They're kinda neat. Bolt into the stock upper mount and tie into the upper control arm bolts. Mine use an eyelet on top.
[img] [/img]
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1977361
12/27/15 08:14 PM
12/27/15 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
No I don't use them, I have my cage tied in there.
Last edited by 1967dartgt; 12/27/15 08:17 PM.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1977792
12/28/15 11:49 AM
12/28/15 11:49 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295 Here
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295
Here
|
While the HDK kit maybe nice, it is a blatant copy RMS kit. I wouldn't purchase one for that reason. No, it's not a blatant copy. Similar maybe, exact copy....NO. It's a K-member for a Mopar. Of course they are similar........they are all similar because they all do the same thing and bolt in the same place. How could they not be similar That's the great thing about the Internet, you are intitled to your own opinion. You may feel this way Monte, but I have had talks with a certain owner of a company on this subject and he feels otherwise. It's funny how RMS offers all of those options on his front end and now so does HDK. Interesting, but just my opinion. It's great being able to drive to RMS and Tory's shop to be able to talk face to face on these matters. RMS by far offers the most options for your front end kits. I'm leaning towards the blatant copy angle. I also respect/compliment the choice not to purchase from that aspect. If I remember correctly, it originally was intended as a copy, but poorly executed, and everyone knows a copy is never as good as the original. It seems to have evolved with improvements of the the original copy, I agree. The few changes noted here might make a plausible defense for a patent (there is non existing) infringement dispute, but RMS is clearly the leader in this solution, and its well deserved title, my internet opinion.
" All sorts of things can happen when you are open to new Ideas" Inventor of Kevlar
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#1977936
12/28/15 04:16 PM
12/28/15 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295 Here
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295
Here
|
"Why is it a direct copy"
Because the vendor says its not when it is.
Other vendors giving RMS his due instead of suggesting they invented the "wheel", would hush a lot of criticism, and will never happen as egos are pretty enlarged in this hobby.
So anybody want to share with us who was the "first" to design, develop, and offer a little changed over the years mutlti platform mopar IFS, if it was not RMS?
" All sorts of things can happen when you are open to new Ideas" Inventor of Kevlar
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: B G Racing]
#1977965
12/28/15 04:51 PM
12/28/15 04:51 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,287 Hamilton,Ont
72chrgrally
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,287
Hamilton,Ont
|
John asked a simple question and got many replies,why it has to be a debate is crazy. Because this is Moparts. FWIW I have an LRT front end on my car, I bought it when I had to run torsion bars as a class requirement. Now the class is gone and I'm going to convert to coil overs and try to sort out any geometry issues that might pop up.
Photobucket sucks
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: racerx]
#1977973
12/28/15 05:02 PM
12/28/15 05:02 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,087 The Wet Coast, Canada
megajoltman
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,087
The Wet Coast, Canada
|
I've notice on Bob's website that he shows his k-frame front suspension on Rick's challenger and (it could be just the angle of the pic.) was taken, but how low does this k-member sits?And also I know there's video out there with Rick's challenger using Bobs front suspension on it but I can't seem to find it. Are you looking for how much clearence from the ground or stance of it?
1969 Dart 383/727/D60
CTD Ram 4x4 Mega Cab
Procharged 350Z
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: jcc]
#1977977
12/28/15 05:09 PM
12/28/15 05:09 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
"Why is it a direct copy"
Because the vendor says its not when it is.
Other vendors giving RMS his due instead of suggesting they invented the "wheel", would hush a lot of criticism, and will never happen as egos are pretty enlarged in this hobby.
So anybody want to share with us who was the "first" to design, develop, and offer a little changed over the years mutlti platform mopar IFS, if it was not RMS? I don't know who was the first..........nor do I care. It may be your opinion that the HDK is a blatant copy........but that is a serious accusation that you have no proof of, just an opinion. The first one I ever saw, I built and was looked at by lots of people at various Mopar events. Do I think I built the first one?....hardly, but I had never seen one before I built my own. The idea of removing the T-bars and using racks, goes back to the 70s Pro-Stocks at least. I still have the Car Craft magazine that has a detailed look at how it was done on the Mopar Missle. They removed the t-bar, solid mounted the rear of the lower control arm and sunk the rack in the K-member. Anyone with an ounce of mechanical ability could read that, look at the pics and see how to make it better......because that is what I did. So to me, saying that someones system is a blatant copy is far fetched. Because I know that myself, I look at all of them and see SOMETHING that I would change, if I was doing it myself and I feel certain that most all the companies that make them felt the same way. We all know the HDK shocks mount way different, so that alone eliminates the "blatant copy" remarks. Yeah, the k-members themselves look similar........but don't they HAVE to, since they all mount in the same spot and do the same thing? I don't know Hemi Denny, nor do I know Mr. Reilly, other than talking to him on the phone 20 something years ago, when he called to ask what I did to manage the bump steer issue on my own car, when using a factory Pinto rack. I also own no K-member or system from ANY of these companies, so have no vested interest in any of them either. If some were accusing Bill, I would be saying the same thing. As was alluded to above........various companies have been making "street rod" kits for years, that used Pinto racks, Mustang II control arms and spindles. Smart guys thought, hey, it would be easy to make a k-member to put those same common parts under a Mopar. Is only ONE allowed to have that idea? I think not
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1978050
12/28/15 07:26 PM
12/28/15 07:26 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295 Here
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295
Here
|
Until there's a patient issued, anyone can make an EXACT copy then sell it $100 cheaper. And nothing can be done about it. Which one would you buy? Come on guys you b&m about everything. I assume I can separate "you" from me, because I know what I would buy, and I also have personal experience what the public would buy and therefore your point is proven, but since I'm still allowed so far to have my own opinion, it's not what I would do. I will profess, I have over the decades had lots of first time innovative stuff, competitors often copied, and falsely called their own design, some just changed the color and made themselves look stupid, so two things to takeaway, I'm sensitive to the issue, and until you walked in similar shoes, you likely don't get it. I'm not against copying a great idea, just man up you did.
" All sorts of things can happen when you are open to new Ideas" Inventor of Kevlar
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1978052
12/28/15 07:29 PM
12/28/15 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
Until there's a patient issued, anyone can make an EXACT copy then sell it $100 cheaper. And nothing can be done about it. Which one would you buy? Come on guys you b&m about everything. Exactly........it's about business and making an existing product better. My buddy builds pit jacks. Are they an EXACT copy of Pro-Jacks, no, are they based FROM it, you bet. His are bigger, stronger for heavy cars and lift higher. Pro-Jack threatened to sue him. He told them to pound sand, as his were NOT a copy, which they were not. They were BETTER.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#1978055
12/28/15 07:36 PM
12/28/15 07:36 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295 Here
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,295
Here
|
There are different kinds of patents, one being design, and slight changes for increased strength etc would not be a valid difference. There is a patent attorney as a member, "AAR????", but he seldom pokes his up anymore. We are wasting our time discussing patent issues, as few vendors take the time and spend the money within 12 months of the item being offered commercially in order to acquire patent rights, nor are willing to spend the money on lawyers shutting down every garage rendition of their product.
" All sorts of things can happen when you are open to new Ideas" Inventor of Kevlar
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: jcc]
#1978100
12/28/15 08:42 PM
12/28/15 08:42 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
I've played the patient game.. for me I had 5 patients but all of them were for Chrysler.. one of them they gave me $1.. others I got up to $3000... all of them were Chrysler property... IF they would have SOLD any of them I would have had the patient rights and got money BUT the way all the auto companies play it is to SWAP patients so no dollars change hands and no one gets the rights other than the originating company... I have a patient in EVERY car that has factory injection.. a recovery tank on the pump assembly.. plus the no lead restrictor in the filler tube(the smaller hole part so you cant add the leaded fuel)
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: jcc]
#1978158
12/28/15 09:59 PM
12/28/15 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
fredericksburg,va
|
Until there's a patient issued, anyone can make an EXACT copy then sell it $100 cheaper. And nothing can be done about it. Which one would you buy? Come on guys you b&m about everything. I assume I can separate "you" from me, because I know what I would buy, and I also have personal experience what the public would buy and therefore your point is proven, but since I'm still allowed so far to have my own opinion, it's not what I would do. I will profess, I have over the decades had lots of first time innovative stuff, competitors often copied, and falsely called their own design, some just changed the color and made themselves look stupid, so two things to takeaway, I'm sensitive to the issue, and until you walked in similar shoes, you likely don't get it. I'm not against copying a great idea, just man up you did. I don't have any patients but I'm in the cabinet business, high end stuff. I get ripped off all the time with people claiming there cabinets where built by me, not knowing who I am at the time when talking to them. You ought to see there faces when I tell them that's not my cabinets. Sorry you got stepped on but It's just part of doing business and we are in a copy cat world. As far as the front end, I would go with the best one for MY application, no matter who built it last or first.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: megajoltman]
#1978178
12/28/15 10:41 PM
12/28/15 10:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,136 Mo.
racerx
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,136
Mo.
|
I've notice on Bob's website that he shows his k-frame front suspension on Rick's challenger and (it could be just the angle of the pic.) was taken, but how low does this k-member sits?And also I know there's video out there with Rick's challenger using Bobs front suspension on it but I can't seem to find it. Are you looking for how much clearence from the ground or stance of it? I'm looking for the clearance from the center of the bar(k-frame) to the ground. As I've said before maybe it's the angle in which the pic. was taken...........
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: racerx]
#1978251
12/28/15 11:53 PM
12/28/15 11:53 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,087 The Wet Coast, Canada
megajoltman
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,087
The Wet Coast, Canada
|
I've notice on Bob's website that he shows his k-frame front suspension on Rick's challenger and (it could be just the angle of the pic.) was taken, but how low does this k-member sits?And also I know there's video out there with Rick's challenger using Bobs front suspension on it but I can't seem to find it. Are you looking for how much clearence from the ground or stance of it? I'm looking for the clearance from the center of the bar(k-frame) to the ground. As I've said before maybe it's the angle in which the pic. was taken........... I can get you a measurement from my Dart either tonight or tomorrow. I can tell you my oil pan hangs down a lot lower than the k frame....
1969 Dart 383/727/D60
CTD Ram 4x4 Mega Cab
Procharged 350Z
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1978314
12/29/15 01:09 AM
12/29/15 01:09 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
Interesting upper ball joint angle. That little narrow bracket holding the lower control arm would have my crapping my pants everytime I hit the brakes. Then there is some rod that ties the lower control arms together. That upper control arm isnt made correctly imo
Last edited by sixpackgut; 12/29/15 01:20 AM.
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: sixpackgut]
#1978344
12/29/15 01:36 AM
12/29/15 01:36 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
fredericksburg,va
|
Interesting upper ball joint angle. That little narrow bracket holding the lower control arm would have my crapping my pants everytime I hit the brakes. Then there is some rod that ties the lower control arms together. That upper control arm isnt made correctly imo What spindle is that?
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1978360
12/29/15 02:02 AM
12/29/15 02:02 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Interesting upper ball joint angle. That little narrow bracket holding the lower control arm would have my crapping my pants everytime I hit the brakes. Then there is some rod that ties the lower control arms together. That upper control arm isnt made correctly imo What spindle is that? That is a HDK kit.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: megajoltman]
#1978362
12/29/15 02:03 AM
12/29/15 02:03 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,136 Mo.
racerx
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,136
Mo.
|
I've notice on Bob's website that he shows his k-frame front suspension on Rick's challenger and (it could be just the angle of the pic.) was taken, but how low does this k-member sits?And also I know there's video out there with Rick's challenger using Bobs front suspension on it but I can't seem to find it. Are you looking for how much clearence from the ground or stance of it? I'm looking for the clearance from the center of the bar(k-frame) to the ground. As I've said before maybe it's the angle in which the pic. was taken........... I can get you a measurement from my Dart either tonight or tomorrow. I can tell you my oil pan hangs down a lot lower than the k frame.... You have an pm...
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: SpareParts]
#1978385
12/29/15 03:08 AM
12/29/15 03:08 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
After switching to a rack do most of you switch to a rear sump pan? I would think that would be ideal, I plan to do that when I finish my K member You can then basically run any pan you want. A long chassis pan, mid or rear sump. I want to change mine but havnt yet
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1978387
12/29/15 03:13 AM
12/29/15 03:13 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
fredericksburg,va
|
Interesting upper ball joint angle. That little narrow bracket holding the lower control arm would have my crapping my pants everytime I hit the brakes. Then there is some rod that ties the lower control arms together. That upper control arm isnt made correctly imo What spindle is that? That is a HDK kit. Their design or some factory part? In other words, did they tool it up?
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1978391
12/29/15 03:22 AM
12/29/15 03:22 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
It's the spindle they supply with there kit. It's there upper control arm they designed. I am sure it is a out sourced mustang II spindle, who knows where it is made. So it is all the parts they designed to work together.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1978392
12/29/15 03:23 AM
12/29/15 03:23 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
Think its a mustang 2 spindle
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: sixpackgut]
#1978468
12/29/15 12:01 PM
12/29/15 12:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,702 W. Kentucky
justinp61
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,702
W. Kentucky
|
Think its a mustang 2 spindle His site lists either Wilwood or 2" drop Mustang II. Both spindles use the same brake components.
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: justinp61]
#1978820
12/29/15 08:05 PM
12/29/15 08:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
fredericksburg,va
|
Think its a mustang 2 spindle His site lists either Wilwood or 2" drop Mustang II. Both spindles use the same brake components. That would explain it, had Mustang ll stock spindles on my last car( didn't look like those) and had 3 inches between frame and ground. Is the 2" drop for raising or lowering the car?
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#1978838
12/29/15 08:31 PM
12/29/15 08:31 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
Think its a mustang 2 spindle His site lists either Wilwood or 2" drop Mustang II. Both spindles use the same brake components. That would explain it, had Mustang ll stock spindles on my last car( didn't look like those) and had 3 inches between frame and ground. Is the 2" drop for raising or lowering the car? Lowers the car
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: racerx]
#1978886
12/29/15 09:36 PM
12/29/15 09:36 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,087 The Wet Coast, Canada
megajoltman
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,087
The Wet Coast, Canada
|
I've notice on Bob's website that he shows his k-frame front suspension on Rick's challenger and (it could be just the angle of the pic.) was taken, but how low does this k-member sits?And also I know there's video out there with Rick's challenger using Bobs front suspension on it but I can't seem to find it. Are you looking for how much clearence from the ground or stance of it? I'm looking for the clearance from the center of the bar(k-frame) to the ground. As I've said before maybe it's the angle in which the pic. was taken........... 5 3/4 inches from ground to the bottom center of the k frame bar with a 26" front tire.
1969 Dart 383/727/D60
CTD Ram 4x4 Mega Cab
Procharged 350Z
|
|
|
Re: What front-end system system would you go with?
[Re: megajoltman]
#1978892
12/29/15 09:41 PM
12/29/15 09:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,136 Mo.
racerx
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,136
Mo.
|
I've notice on Bob's website that he shows his k-frame front suspension on Rick's challenger and (it could be just the angle of the pic.) was taken, but how low does this k-member sits?And also I know there's video out there with Rick's challenger using Bobs front suspension on it but I can't seem to find it. Are you looking for how much clearence from the ground or stance of it? I'm looking for the clearance from the center of the bar(k-frame) to the ground. As I've said before maybe it's the angle in which the pic. was taken........... 5 3/4 inches from ground to the bottom center of the k frame bar with a 26" front tire. perfect....sir Thaxs
|
|
|
|
|