Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1795277
04/03/15 12:34 PM
04/03/15 12:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,345
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,345
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Quote:

going either Fluidamper or ATI.



I have one of each...no problems w/ either.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: an8sec70cuda] #1795278
04/03/15 02:06 PM
04/03/15 02:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,352
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,352
Las Vegas
ATI period!!! No way to actually check balance on a Fluidampr also they can solidify and cause some ugly issues.


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1795279
04/03/15 02:13 PM
04/03/15 02:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825
Sk. Canada
RemCharger Offline
master
RemCharger  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825
Sk. Canada
Quote:

Little more info........The engine builder put this balancer on a 4.75 stroke Callies crank. Dyno'd at 1000hp.


Seem to be reliable at 6-700, seen them slip at 800, 1000? No way I would short the mill on a good balancer.

Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: RemCharger] #1795280
04/04/15 12:39 AM
04/04/15 12:39 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
I'll be going ATI. Thanks for all the input. I thought it was a low performance / stock replacement unit. Also going to do a thorough inspection on engine. Cant trust what they have told me. Was told they would send build sheet and cam card with engine, still waiting.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1801996
04/12/15 10:04 PM
04/12/15 10:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
...UPDATE... upon closer inspection looks like something has moved / shifted....Look where the bare metal shows no paint and you'll see it. This was after maybe 20 min on dyno...Also still waiting on build sheet, cam card, among other things promised. Patience is wearing thin.....

007.jpg008.jpg
Last edited by steve660; 04/12/15 10:07 PM.

PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1802001
04/12/15 10:06 PM
04/12/15 10:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
1 more picture....Im sure I'll be told this is normal. It's just a giant lock ring, right.

009.jpg

PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1817192
05/02/15 05:50 PM
05/02/15 05:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
This engine supposedly made 1000 hp, yet only had 150 cyl psi. Don't see how that's possible. Must be a happy dyno. Not sure on the cam specs, they wont send me or didn't keep cam card.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1817213
05/02/15 06:14 PM
05/02/15 06:14 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,403
Ambridge, Pa.
R
rickraw Offline
top fuel
rickraw  Offline
top fuel
R

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,403
Ambridge, Pa.
Don't know what that is but I would chuck it in the thrash. Kick up the cash & get an ATI period.

Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: rickraw] #1817230
05/02/15 06:26 PM
05/02/15 06:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
...

Last edited by steve660; 05/05/15 08:13 PM.

PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1817437
05/03/15 12:38 AM
05/03/15 12:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,644
North Carolina
sasquatch Offline
master
sasquatch  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,644
North Carolina
Like someone said that is a powerbond and yes we use and sell them quite a bit with very good results. However, it has no business on the front of a 622 with 1000 Hp. ATI period. The powerbond units are great for 400 to 600 HP or so bracket style engines. Sorry for your trouble brother. But don't blame the part in this case.

Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: steve660] #1817449
05/03/15 12:50 AM
05/03/15 12:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,156
Park Forest, IL
slantzilla Offline
Too Many Posts
slantzilla  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,156
Park Forest, IL
Originally Posted By steve660
This engine supposedly made 1000 hp, yet only had 150 cyl psi. Don't see how that's possible. Must be a happy dyno. Not sure on the cam specs, they wont send me or didn't keep cam card.


I was at the ICH swap and saw the spec card and dyno sheet on a pump gas 451 MM built. Ported 452's, Purple Stripe 474 cam and 10-1 made 525 horse and 570 tq. I'm thinking way happy dyno.


"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: slantzilla] #1818551
05/04/15 03:19 PM
05/04/15 03:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Hey, you could give it to me! I'll even pay postage.

From my point of view, the rubbed off paint marks show that the damper was doing exactly what it was supposed to. As the power stroke pushes the hub ahead, the inertia ring stays behind, tethered by the rubber that's between the two. Then the rubber unstretches and the inertia ring is back to the starting point, when another power stroke happens and the same things occur again.

The rubbed off paint shows you how much the inertia ring actually moves. I'm surprised at how much it is, but I've never had a damper on a 1000? hp engine either.

R.

Re: Good balancer or elcheapo.... [Re: dogdays] #1818634
05/04/15 05:11 PM
05/04/15 05:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
Originally Posted By dogdays
Hey, you could give it to me! I'll even pay postage.

From my point of view, the rubbed off paint marks show that the damper was doing exactly what it was supposed to. As the power stroke pushes the hub ahead, the inertia ring stays behind, tethered by the rubber that's between the two. Then the rubber unstretches and the inertia ring is back to the starting point, when another power stroke happens and the same things occur again.

The rubbed off paint shows you how much the inertia ring actually moves. I'm surprised at how much it is, but I've never had a damper on a 1000? hp engine either.



R.


I don't think it's suppose to move ,but I could be wrong.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo....UPDATE....MUSCLE MOTORS.. [Re: steve660] #1818647
05/04/15 05:33 PM
05/04/15 05:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
Please note: the SEMA damper standard (S.F.I. 18-1) does not rate a damper’s effectiveness, or certify that it works at all (let alone on a specific motor) - only that it didn’t explode during the test. Their interest is limited to safety and qualify control, not specific engineering results.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo....UPDATE....MUSCLE MOTORS.. [Re: steve660] #1818751
05/04/15 07:55 PM
05/04/15 07:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 655
Huntsville, AL
A
Airwoofer Offline
mopar
Airwoofer  Offline
mopar
A

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 655
Huntsville, AL
I put a Powerbond dampener on my 540 but wish I had used an ATI. The reason is the PB is thinner and the pulleys needed spacers to match what I had on the previous install with a different motor that had an ATI. It also interfered with the cast Indy front cover but I may have the wrong version of that and it was fixed easily enough with a milling machine.

The PB has that huge snap ring in front which I think makes them easier to rebuild. But sending the other dampener to ATI with $75 also gets that done. We'll see how it does as the 540 is very close to first fire after severely hammering on the Proparts (TTI) 2 1/8 step headers to get them to fit in the car.

Re: Good balancer or elcheapo....UPDATE....MUSCLE MOTORS.. [Re: steve660] #1818892
05/04/15 10:23 PM
05/04/15 10:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
Some damper designs are more tolerant of internal engine mods, in which changes to stroke are probably safer.
If you're not sure, read up.
The "harmonic orders" that cause the problems are not a function of balance, or power, or reciprocating weight. They are far more closely related to:
1. crankshaft length
2. stroke length
3. main journal size
4. rod journal size
5. number of mains

Increases to 1. & 2. reduce overall crankshaft stiffness and reduce the RPM at which harmful orders occur (from which the engine needs protection). Increases to 3., 4., & 5. increase stiffness and increase the critical RPM.

Bottom line: don't use a damper designed for an engine with different crank geometry unless you're sure its design accepts the differences.
A stock 383 has very different crank stiffness from a 4.15" stroker with BBC rods.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo....UPDATE....MUSCLE MOTORS.. [Re: polyspheric] #1818909
05/04/15 10:34 PM
05/04/15 10:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 916
MB,CAN
PC-CHARGER Offline
super stock
PC-CHARGER  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 916
MB,CAN
Is there a mathematical formula to calculate the harmonic orders and a what RPM the may become prevalent? From what you said, a common BB stroker crank with a 4.25 stroke and 2.2 Chevy pins would significantly change the RPM that the harmonics would occur.

Re: Good balancer or elcheapo....UPDATE....MUSCLE MOTORS.. [Re: polyspheric] #1819009
05/05/15 12:10 AM
05/05/15 12:10 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
steve660 Offline OP
enthusiast
steve660  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 289
Lowes
Originally Posted By polyspheric
Some damper designs are more tolerant of internal engine mods, in which changes to stroke are probably safer.
If you're not sure, read up.
The "harmonic orders" that cause the problems are not a function of balance, or power, or reciprocating weight. They are far more closely related to:
1. crankshaft length
2. stroke length
3. main journal size
4. rod journal size
5. number of mains

Increases to 1. & 2. reduce overall crankshaft stiffness and reduce the RPM at which harmful orders occur (from which the engine needs protection). Increases to 3., 4., & 5. increase stiffness and increase the critical RPM.

Bottom line: don't use a damper designed for an engine with different crank geometry unless you're sure its design accepts the differences.
A stock 383 has very different crank stiffness from a 4.15" stroker with BBC rods.


Bottom line: Don't cheap out on a balancer.


PSO headed 632 from MM. Cracked cylinder, loose valve seats, low oil pressure, low cylinder pressure.
..... Now its a door stop....
Re: Good balancer or elcheapo....UPDATE....MUSCLE MOTORS.. [Re: steve660] #1819199
05/05/15 10:12 AM
05/05/15 10:12 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 503
Idaho
1320Dart Offline
mopar
1320Dart  Offline
mopar

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 503
Idaho
In the MP book, in the racing BB section. They talk about dampers. They say to go with a heavy damper. I like the Pro Race brand.
http://www.pro-race.com/prorace.htm

They are SFI approved. I've always had good luck with them. twocents


Greg

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cost is irrelevant, making memories is far more valuable!biggrin
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1