Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? #1798001
04/07/15 11:09 PM
04/07/15 11:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline OP
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Getting ready to start my pump gas street/strip R1 build. I have a .010/.010 3.79" crank but I'm considering buying a Scat lightweight 4" crank. The pistons are going to be customs so the price will be the same.

Experiences, thoughts or opinions?

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1798029
04/07/15 11:33 PM
04/07/15 11:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
SpareParts Offline
pro stock
SpareParts  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
What bore?

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1798034
04/07/15 11:35 PM
04/07/15 11:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
Hot 340 Offline
master
Hot 340  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
40+ years of 3.xxx stroke cranks otta be enough for us...4.00 for max effort and 4.250 max effort street. Jmo

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1798056
04/07/15 11:47 PM
04/07/15 11:47 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,200
aZLiViN
J
J_BODY Offline
I Live Here
J_BODY  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,200
aZLiViN
"Small Block Rated to 600 Max HP"..... what I read in one of the descriptions. Guess the price reflects that.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: SpareParts] #1798069
04/07/15 11:54 PM
04/07/15 11:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline OP
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Originally Posted By SpareParts
What bore?


4.09"

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1798279
04/08/15 02:47 AM
04/08/15 02:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
SpareParts Offline
pro stock
SpareParts  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
I'm biased but I like a short stroke combo personally.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: SpareParts] #1798796
04/08/15 08:11 PM
04/08/15 08:11 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
D-50 Offline
pro stock
D-50  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
I have been pleased so far with my 3.79 stroke crank in a stock 340 block. Ran a new best last weekend even though I have lost over a 1/2 tenth in the 60 ft. for some reason and it is sputtering around the mph lights.


1.33 60 ft,6.21 at 110.59 in the 1/8, pump gas small block,2950lbs,drag radials,mufflers and driven to track ...
Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799017
04/09/15 12:21 AM
04/09/15 12:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline OP
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
I'm 3260# with a 4.10 gear and figured the 4" stroke might be a little help.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799033
04/09/15 12:44 AM
04/09/15 12:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By justinp61
I'm 3260# with a 4.10 gear and figured the 4" stroke might be a little help.


I've got both and I am big on revs but my junk is light
and in my street rod its a 4" for the added torque.. that
torque is nice and it still revs decent... I take it to
7500 rpm... the 3.79 goes way higher but if you stay with
4.10 gears you will never reach the high revs... I use 4.56
gears in the smaller engine and 4.10 on the 416 engine
wave

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1799272
04/09/15 11:44 AM
04/09/15 11:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,876
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize Offline
master
Streetwize  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,876
Weddington, N.C.
3.79" can make as much or more power by trading RPM for torque, great for lighter combos and/or tigher gears. The problem with the 4" is only on the top because it's tough/expensive to get enough Head flow. A 4" (generally) will ET an automatic car quicker all else being equal though, plus it's so well proven and sorted out, it's tough to make a rational argument against just going for cubes. 3.79" even with a longer 6.200 or so rod still winds up with a fairly heavy piston due the tall 9.58-ish deck height. 9.200 deck blocks are a natural for the 3.79 though

Last edited by Streetwize; 04/09/15 11:46 AM.

WIZE

World's Quickest Diahatsu Rocky (??) 414" Stroker Small block Mopar Powered. 10.84 @ 123...and gettin' quicker!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWzLma3YGI

In Car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjXcf95e6v0
Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799275
04/09/15 11:50 AM
04/09/15 11:50 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
4
408strokerdart Offline
master
408strokerdart  Offline
master
4

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
I like the 3.79" stroke if you have limited deck height, but there is little substitute for cid on a naturally aspirated engine. If it is a tall deck application I would go 4" crank all day long.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799292
04/09/15 12:25 PM
04/09/15 12:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline OP
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Thanks Brian. The deck is 9.58".

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799493
04/09/15 04:31 PM
04/09/15 04:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
If you're buying a crank, may I suggest BPE's 4.25" crank? He's a board member and posters here rave.

Bigger cubic inches moves the torque and horsepower curves to the left. It'll make the same power but at a lower more usable rpm. Plus you may be able to save money on valvegear due to lower redline.

R.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799519
04/09/15 04:55 PM
04/09/15 04:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
More CID = more low end torque. Means less rpm, less gear, less valve train strain, less cam required, etc... All good things. 4"+ is a no brainer on a tall deck.

That being said... If you already have the 3.79“ your not going to build a worthless combo by using it. It all comes down to budget at that point.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: dizuster] #1799554
04/09/15 05:39 PM
04/09/15 05:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,876
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize Offline
master
Streetwize  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,876
Weddington, N.C.
You could save some bucks vs a 4" crank by offset grinding the rod Journals to the popular 2" "327 SBC" size and find anywhere from a 6.125" to 6.3" .927 pin SBC rod and get to about 3.90" stroke PLUS get a lighter bobweight. If I already had the crank I'd probably look at doing that...or sell it to offset the cost of the 4" to 4.25"

I have a 4.25" BPE in my 440" W2, it's a BEAST but very docile

IMG_8081.jpeg

WIZE

World's Quickest Diahatsu Rocky (??) 414" Stroker Small block Mopar Powered. 10.84 @ 123...and gettin' quicker!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWzLma3YGI

In Car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjXcf95e6v0
Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: Streetwize] #1799555
04/09/15 05:40 PM
04/09/15 05:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,876
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize Offline
master
Streetwize  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,876
Weddington, N.C.
another Pic

440shortnotches.jpg
Last edited by Streetwize; 04/09/15 05:42 PM.

WIZE

World's Quickest Diahatsu Rocky (??) 414" Stroker Small block Mopar Powered. 10.84 @ 123...and gettin' quicker!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWzLma3YGI

In Car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjXcf95e6v0
Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1799645
04/09/15 07:21 PM
04/09/15 07:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline OP
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Thanks guys for the input, 4" is probably max I'll go as already I have 2.125"/6.123" and 2.100"/6.125" rods. An entire 4.125" kit is around $2800 and I can buy a 4" crank for less then $1000. The 3.79" will either go in my 340 block sometime or be sold.

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1801203
04/11/15 07:26 PM
04/11/15 07:26 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 108
Socal
L
littleVAL Offline
member
littleVAL  Offline
member
L

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 108
Socal
I bought a K1 crank 4" 360 mains and chevy rods for $500 to the door last year and a set of k1 chevy h beem rods (645grams) for $226 I think. Was checking out some of the new SRP pro pistons for around $650 with rings and pin (422grams plus pin 106grams). I think that the 4" stroke is a better alternative for what I am going to use it for which is mostly street use. You can see that with balancing will be around $2000. For a couple of hundred more in gaskets, bearings and machining it is a good start on a short shortblock

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: littleVAL] #1801225
04/11/15 07:58 PM
04/11/15 07:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline OP
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline OP
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Where did you find the crank and pistons that cheap?

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? [Re: justinp61] #1801264
04/11/15 08:43 PM
04/11/15 08:43 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 108
Socal
L
littleVAL Offline
member
littleVAL  Offline
member
L

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 108
Socal
I found a couple of options on ebay for the pistons that I was wanting. T believe it is around MSRP for them considering they are an off the shelf chevy size. The crank I got from a company in texas. I believe it was part of the k1 clearance last year like the rods. I would give them a call and see if they still have them it is possible because they were not advertising the crank.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1