Re: Why no buzz here on this neat solution?
[Re: Black_Bee]
#1725893
02/24/15 10:02 PM
02/24/15 10:02 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Got two EFI threads going on this, lol. No, I used an inline pump back then.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Why no buzz here on this neat solution?
[Re: jcc]
#1903208
08/31/15 03:47 PM
08/31/15 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,538 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,538
Rio Linda, CA
|
I did some research on surge tanks to use with the MSD Atomic I intended to use but when I read up on the EFI Tech system I decided to go with their whole system. Does what the MSD does for a lot less money. Couldn't be happier.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: Why no buzz here on this neat solution?
[Re: 72Swinger]
#1903396
08/31/15 07:51 PM
08/31/15 07:51 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050 Texas
GoodysGotaCuda
5.7L Hemi, 6spd
|
5.7L Hemi, 6spd
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
|
...those work exceptionally in off-road situations. Which make our cornering fuel concerns look like a joke. The Walbro remote pickups are also pretty stellar. My plan is a GM 5gen Camaro/CTSV pump [internally regulated] with some remote pickups and internally baffling. I have no interest in spaghetti-fuel line plumbing. It'll be one line coming out of the tank and going to the engine, done.
|
|
|
Re: Why no buzz here on this neat solution?
[Re: jcc]
#1903433
08/31/15 08:28 PM
08/31/15 08:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
If I run into problems I would get some of those corner pickups and add a scavenge pump to feed the surge tank.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
|
|