Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: AndyF]
#1710696
12/14/14 08:08 PM
12/14/14 08:08 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,946 Connecticut
5126brl No more
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,946
Connecticut
|
Thanks AndyF. I have been reading your book daily! Awesome reading. I am trying to do this with a stock sixpack intake manifold. Not enough meat around intake manifolds ports so that I can open my Bulldog heads to MW ports. Any ideas from you are Great!!
Last edited by 4406brl; 12/14/14 10:01 PM.
|
|
|
Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: 5126brl No more]
#1710700
12/15/14 01:06 AM
12/15/14 01:06 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
|
My 518 C.I. pump gas low deck stroker motor in my 3450 lb Duster ran low tens with the low deck sixpak intake and semi stock (Jetted and tuned) 440 six pak carbs. It had a set of Eddy RPM heads on it that where CNC ported with 440 port sizes, not M.W. port sizes. It did that through the full 3 inch exhaust to the rear bumpers and three inch tall K&N sixpak air cleaner on it, all on Oregon 91 octane pump swill Your deal will be traction limited just like mine was Good luck, have fun and let us know your results with the sixpak on it
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 12/15/14 04:28 AM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1710701
12/15/14 03:28 AM
12/15/14 03:28 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
I built one a couple of years ago with RPM heads. It wasn't really sensitive to the rpm, have no idea of where it made its power, but we pulled it to over 6000. The heads were homeported, the intake was a Team G with a dominator and run with pump gas. It was in a 3600 lbs car with a powerglide(?, wasn't my idea) and 3.23 gears with 275/60/5 ET Street radials. It run 10.4 in the 1/4 mile.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: jyrki]
#1710702
12/15/14 10:40 AM
12/15/14 10:40 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,627 anywhere@ anytime
actionange
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,627
anywhere@ anytime
|
Eddy Performer heads with a MP M-1 intake and 1050 Dominator. .632 lift 230@ .050 duration solid roller 4.10 gear with a 9.5 Lupo Dynamic converter. Ran a best of 10.67 @ 128 And had nice street manners drove it everywhere I do however like the idea of the Indy intake mentioned earlier. Then you can port those heads and really attain your goal...
|
|
|
Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: actionange]
#1710704
12/16/14 09:39 AM
12/16/14 09:39 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,946 Connecticut
5126brl No more
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,946
Connecticut
|
Great info from all modman intake looks like a good option for the 540 and mw ports. will finish tweaking stock intake runners this week and see what that does.
|
|
|
Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: 5126brl No more]
#1710705
12/16/14 10:03 AM
12/16/14 10:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,996 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,996
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
This combo will eat cam duration for lunch. The rpm for torque and hp will be very low even with a tunnelram using standard port heads. I would be concerned about that Modman intake, and research it some before committing to it. VERY big plenum.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: anyone running 540 ci. with std. ports
[Re: gregsdart]
#1710706
12/16/14 11:13 AM
12/16/14 11:13 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The few times I put six pack on big inch std port heads I never liked the results--It never seems like enough and that driving a big inch on that small center two barrel just seems like asking for trouble I know the NHRA stock guys make six packs look good but ......
|
|
|
|
|