Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Performer RPM intake or not? #1696101
11/08/14 03:28 PM
11/08/14 03:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
I've been tossing around the idea of sliding a Performer RPM intake on the Imperial. I found a cheap intake locally.

The car is my 72 Imperial with a stock 440. I will be adding my Edelbrock heads and a 261* .463" cam with a 114 LSA. It is topped with a 600 cfm AFB on a stock intake.

I want torque between 1500 and 2500 rpm and don't care about power above 4500 rpm.

The engine has the stock air cleaner on it. I'm not sure if it would clear the hood or if I would need a drop base air cleaner.

It would seem a bit out of place to drop a stock iron intake on top of a set of iron heads.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696102
11/08/14 03:38 PM
11/08/14 03:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
I ran this intake on my first and last 440.I still use it on my 440/493. The last 440 had '452 heads, a MP 284/484 cam and a Holley 750 and 1 7/8 headers. Lots of fun in that one. I've used that intake exclusively since 2002. It seals great and makes great power at all levels.

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: Kern Dog] #1696103
11/08/14 03:44 PM
11/08/14 03:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
I'm tempted but don't know if it will clear the hood.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696104
11/08/14 03:45 PM
11/08/14 03:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
Azzkikrcuda Offline
top fuel
Azzkikrcuda  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
Not even a question with the mods you are doing, GET IT. You should be able to fit it with a drop base and shorter air filter.

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1696105
11/08/14 03:49 PM
11/08/14 03:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
It'll be kinda funny popping the hood on the faded old Imperial and seeing all that aluminum on the engine.


I was really tempted to go with the HP style exhaust manifolds but I don't want to get into messing with the exhaust pipes. Mine may be a bit too old to survive welding and I don't need to drop the coin on new exhaust.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696106
11/08/14 04:07 PM
11/08/14 04:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,152
SO. CAL.
7
70blackfish Offline
master
70blackfish  Offline
master
7

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,152
SO. CAL.
440's really like headers.....

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696107
11/08/14 04:33 PM
11/08/14 04:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
It should fit w/ a drop base. I had one on my old 67 coronet. Good intake. I ran a 488 summit cam. Seemed to like it. I also ran a CH4B and a 1/2" 4 hole spacer.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: 70blackfish] #1696108
11/08/14 04:46 PM
11/08/14 04:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

440's really like headers.....




No.

I am not getting into the exhaust at this time.

If my devious little plot holds true I'd have to replace it all again anyway.

Besides, this car is meant to be QUIET while cruising. Headers are much louder than iron manifolds.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696109
11/08/14 05:01 PM
11/08/14 05:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
Quote:



The car is my 72 Imperial with a stock 440. I will be adding my Edelbrock heads and a 261* .463" cam with a 114 LSA. It is topped with a 600 cfm AFB on a stock intake.

I want torque between 1500 and 2500 rpm and don't care about power above 4500 rpm.






Certainly nothing wrong with trying it. But at this power level, it will likely have nothing over the CH4B.

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: BSB67] #1696110
11/08/14 05:13 PM
11/08/14 05:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

Quote:



The car is my 72 Imperial with a stock 440. I will be adding my Edelbrock heads and a 261* .463" cam with a 114 LSA. It is topped with a 600 cfm AFB on a stock intake.

I want torque between 1500 and 2500 rpm and don't care about power above 4500 rpm.






Certainly nothing wrong with trying it. But at this power level, it will likely have nothing over the CH4B.




I can't find a CH4B on the cheap. I'd stuff an old Performer on it if I had one.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696111
11/08/14 05:45 PM
11/08/14 05:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,551
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,551
Rittman Ohio
Mine fits under the stock hood with a Summit drop base and a 4"element.
You might be able to see it with this picture.
Gus


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: fourgearsavoy] #1696112
11/08/14 06:07 PM
11/08/14 06:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline
member
rory73  Offline
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
I went for a Weiand Action+ (8009) dual plane which is about the same size as the stock intake. Nice on a street car too. Since you've already got the RPM it won't hurt bolting it on.

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: rory73] #1696113
11/08/14 06:21 PM
11/08/14 06:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

I went for a Weiand Action+ (8009) dual plane which is about the same size as the stock intake. Nice on a street car too. Since you've already got the RPM it won't hurt bolting it on.




I don't have the RPM intake.

Another concern is the transmission, throttle, and cruise control linkages. If I buy an intake I need to spend more money on that stuff.

Most annoying.

All I want is good torque from idle up through the cruising range.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696114
11/08/14 06:39 PM
11/08/14 06:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

All I want is good torque from idle up through the cruising range.


OK so what ex is on there now, the low perf logs/restricted muffs/non mandrel bends? I know you said you dont want to mess with the ex but that's the most restricted part of the overall air pump (eng) plus I would mod the dist subsystems (last). EDIT I ain't a cam guy but make the right choice there especially for the low RPM torque you are after

Last edited by RapidRobert; 11/08/14 06:43 PM.
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696115
11/08/14 06:42 PM
11/08/14 06:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline
member
rory73  Offline
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
You've probably seen these already but have a look here:

http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/hrdp-0712-mopar-intake-manifold-comparo/
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/mopp-0207-intake-manifold-engine-and-rpm-range-test/

Of course it's only an indication and should be taken with a pinch of salt.
Personally I like the 8009, it fits well and is an improvement over the stock design. Easily available s/h too. YMMV.

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: RapidRobert] #1696116
11/08/14 06:48 PM
11/08/14 06:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

Quote:

All I want is good torque from idle up through the cruising range.


OK so what ex is on there now, the low perf logs/restricted muffs/non mandrel bends? I know you said you dont want to mess with the ex but that's the most restricted part of the overall air pump (eng) plus I would mod the dist subsystems (last). EDIT I ain't a cam guy but make the right choice there especially for the low RPM torque you are after





I'm not touching the exhaust.

Period.

End of sentence.


Why, you ask?

First, what is under the car now is a fairly nice 2-1/2" setup with nice bends, H-pipe, decent mufflers, and resonators to help quiet the sound.

Second, future mods would mean throwing it all away.



We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: rory73] #1696117
11/08/14 06:51 PM
11/08/14 06:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

You've probably seen these already but have a look here:

http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/hrdp-0712-mopar-intake-manifold-comparo/
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/mopp-0207-intake-manifold-engine-and-rpm-range-test/

Of course it's only an indication and should be taken with a pinch of salt.
Personally I like the 8009, it fits well and is an improvement over the stock design. Easily available s/h too. YMMV.




I was actually reading those when you made that post.

I, too, like the 8009 and was just digging around online for one.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: feets] #1696118
11/08/14 06:52 PM
11/08/14 06:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

I'm not touching the exhaust.
First, what is under the car now is a fairly nice 2-1/2" setup with nice bends, H-pipe, decent mufflers, and resonators to help quiet the sound.

Second, future mods would mean throwing it all away.


alright, that makes good sense to me


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: RapidRobert] #1696119
11/08/14 07:51 PM
11/08/14 07:51 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,558
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick Offline
Still wishing...
Twostick  Offline
Still wishing...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,558
Downtown Roebuck Ont
My R+D buddy flowed a stock 440 spreadbore intake and came to the conclusion CFM wise that it wouldn't give up anything up to about 5500 rpm.

Whether there is a lot of runner velocity difference between the stock one and an RPM that might affect low and midrange power .

He figured there wasn't enough difference up to that engine speed between a stock one and any of the standard rise intakes ie Performer, C4B, Weiand 360 deg etc to bother changing one unless you wanted to save the weight difference.

Another respected builder in my area has found the same thing dyno testing the regular rise intakes. He told a buddy of mine "pile them all on the floor, there isn't 10 hp between the lot of them". Again this is with the standard rise type intake which an RPM clearly is not.

For your intended purpose I would paint those heads engine color, stick with the stock intake (plug the air injector and EGR if it has it) and spend the Performer RPM money on building and tuning a Thermoquad. 850 CFM when you need it and fuel mileage when you want it. Win win.

Kevin

Re: Performer RPM intake or not? [Re: Twostick] #1696120
11/08/14 08:17 PM
11/08/14 08:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Thanks for the input.

I'd rather spend the money on an updated EFI system. I'd install what I have but that would be replacing the A/C compressor. I'm not into making new lines and all that stuff at this tine.
My system is currently charged with 84 ounces of R12 and I'd hate to see it get away. It blows colder than my 2012 Chrysler 200.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1