Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Aerospace brakes Good, Bad, Junk? [Re: mshred] #1682184
10/06/14 11:05 PM
10/06/14 11:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Quote:

What is the weight savings of the vented rotors vs. stock components? I would be installing these on a street/strip car and would need rotors that can stand the constant stopping of this type of driving.




Sorry, but I hadn't gotten around to actually weighing all of the components. But somewhere I read/heard that is was a little less. Yes, for a dual purpose car, it would be a good idea for the bigger, vented rotors.

Re: Aerospace brakes Good, Bad, Junk? [Re: Locomotion] #1682185
10/06/14 11:11 PM
10/06/14 11:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,421
Toronto
M
mshred Offline
master
mshred  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,421
Toronto
Quote:

Quote:

What is the weight savings of the vented rotors vs. stock components? I would be installing these on a street/strip car and would need rotors that can stand the constant stopping of this type of driving.




Sorry, but I hadn't gotten around to actually weighing all of the components. But somewhere I read/heard that is was a little less. Yes, for a dual purpose car, it would be a good idea for the bigger, vented rotors.




Np, just thought I would ask

I wanted to do light weight brakes over this winter, not sure I am ready to pull the trigger though yet...Strange I find too risky for street driving, Aerospace I read about this "pump up" problem or characteristic if you will, and wilwood I hear are quite heavy...More digging is in order for me..

Sorry if I put this thread somewhat off track...

Re: Aerospace brakes Good, Bad, Junk? [Re: mshred] #1682186
10/07/14 12:25 AM
10/07/14 12:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,616
Riverside, Ca
G
G_bob Offline
master
G_bob  Offline
master
G

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,616
Riverside, Ca
I have Aerospace Components on all four corners of the Coronet. They do retract a bit, so it takes a quick pump to get a full firm pedal. Don't HAVE to pump it to stop though, it still stops just fine, the pedal just goes further down.

Re: Aerospace brakes Good, Bad, Junk? [Re: dusturbd340W5] #1682187
10/07/14 01:27 AM
10/07/14 01:27 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,048
Richmond, Tx. (Houston)
GTSDave Offline
master
GTSDave  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,048
Richmond, Tx. (Houston)
Quote:

A big thing with the Aerospace is having the correct pedal ratio.
Mine did retract the pistons a small amount that's the way they are made to reduce drag.

Once I corrected the pedal ratio I had 0 problems setting the line lock and the car would stop just fine with no pedal pump, but the pedal did feel a little nicer if you just gave it a quick pump.




What did you do to change/correct the pedal ratio. My pedals and rod are the stock 68 Barracuda 4-Speed stuff.

It was originally equipped with the manual discs.

-Dave


PLEASE Pray for our brothers and sisters in harms way.

If you are the owner of a GTS us at the GTS Registry www.gtsregistry.com
Re: Aerospace brakes Good, Bad, Junk? [Re: GTSDave] #1682188
10/07/14 01:36 AM
10/07/14 01:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,616
Kissimmee Fl.
D
dusturbd340W5 Offline
master
dusturbd340W5  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,616
Kissimmee Fl.
I had a chassis car and ended up useing a pedal like this one
http://www.appliedracing.com/pedals-and-...y---single.html


70 duster full chassis super pro 416 CNC Indybrock heads 727 w/brake

best so far 1.212 60 6.219 in 1/8 at 110.88 9.768 at 137.81 1/4
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1