Re: first 440's
[Re: 340mouse]
#1375279
01/25/13 10:43 PM
01/25/13 10:43 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 736 New York
R/T1968R/T
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 736
New York
|
I would think the 1978 motorhome block would be best. Has the later cooling passages, less core shift than early blocks and a thick main web. .520 vs .375
Last edited by R/T1968R/T; 01/25/13 10:45 PM.
|
|
|
Re: first 440's
[Re: RapidRobert]
#1375282
01/26/13 01:50 AM
01/26/13 01:50 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
Fel-pro & Victor Reinz both have good gaskets for the application but they are to thick if the piston is in the hole... If you build at zero deck it's not an issue but so many pistons wind up .018-.024 in the hole & you add that to the head gasket dimension & quench is out the window...
"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
|
|
|
Re: first 440's
[Re: 340mouse]
#1375284
01/26/13 11:58 AM
01/26/13 11:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,941 Holly/MI
Dean_Kuzluzski
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,941
Holly/MI
|
The reason you've heard of 440's overheating is due to the "vertical tube" style radiators that were factory on all of those old Mopars. They tend to clog over time (ALL tubes progrssively), then the motor runs hot, cracks a head, motor gets blamed by the uninformed.
Horizontal tube style radiators fixed that. In this case you only lose the bottom tubes on up and it's a longer progression.
R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
|
|
|
Re: first 440's
[Re: 62maxwgn]
#1375285
01/26/13 12:37 PM
01/26/13 12:37 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,271 Vista, California
67Satty
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,271
Vista, California
|
Quote:
Quote:
I guess the ultimate 440 with stock parts would be to use the thickest wall stock bore block you could find (any year), big valve 915 heads, non HP rods, any year forged crank, 70-71 HP pistons, 69 six pack intake with a set of six pack carbs that didn't have sticking problems, oh and a 73 electronic distributor as well as a 3 bolt drive Six Pack spec camshaft with matching double roller, windage tray and 70-71 HP oil pan.
Sheldon
Just about right !!
Except I would use the the pistons from a 6 Pack motor to get the pistons closer to zero deck.
|
|
|
Re: first 440's
[Re: 67Satty]
#1375286
01/26/13 01:07 PM
01/26/13 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA
62maxwgn
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436
Blair County,PA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I guess the ultimate 440 with stock parts would be to use the thickest wall stock bore block you could find (any year), big valve 915 heads, non HP rods, any year forged crank, 70-71 HP pistons, 69 six pack intake with a set of six pack carbs that didn't have sticking problems, oh and a 73 electronic distributor as well as a 3 bolt drive Six Pack spec camshaft with matching double roller, windage tray and 70-71 HP oil pan.
Sheldon
Just about right !!
Except I would use the the pistons from a 6 Pack motor to get the pistons closer to zero deck.
The original 6pk piston's (1970) were 864 grams,first thing I would do is pitch them.The TRW replacements are probably about the same,my Ross's are zero deck and weigh somewhere around 550 if my memory is correct.
|
|
|
Re: first 440's
[Re: savoy64]
#1375291
01/26/13 03:03 PM
01/26/13 03:03 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,336 South-Central (Sebring), FL
Commando1
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,336
South-Central (Sebring), FL
|
Quote:
the earlier 440 blocks had higher nickel content and are stronger and more sought after---later smog year motors were cheapened up in the nickel content----there are mopar articles with metalurgic tests done to all the blocks (years) showing the differences in strength----you would be hard pressed to show the diffence in performance in a 600 hp motor in any of the blocks---bob
Yah. I would like yo see links to those articles also because you have it backwards.
|
|
|
Re: first 440's
[Re: flypaper]
#1375294
01/26/13 05:05 PM
01/26/13 05:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,471 renton, Washington
ph23vo
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,471
renton, Washington
|
Quote:
Quote:
I hope this seems relevant to the question and isn't hijacking the thread. I have been wanting to ask this; I remember hearing some 440's were prone to overheating. Was this a particular production year and what was the cause. Thanks!
its more like bb cars that had 22' radiator openings were more prone to overheating. just take the shroud off and you would start to have problems..
what if your big block [440-6] has a 22" rad and NEVER HAD A SHROUD AVAIL?....obviously they would not sell a package that would overheat regularly... so it can't be this..
|
|
|
|
|