Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: Plumb Wired]
#1327967
10/29/12 03:31 PM
10/29/12 03:31 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 636 Central,Ohio
FASTFISH420
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 636
Central,Ohio
|
For my combo 9.0 deck.. I run a 3.72 stroke 2.25 main with 2.0 rod journal 6 inch rod with a 4.22 bore.
Last edited by FASTFISH420; 10/29/12 03:33 PM.
1969 Barracuda 8 second all/motor small block
2014 Shelby GT500 Mustang
Uratchko Racing Engines
www.URE-RACING.com
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: joes68340s]
#1327972
10/30/12 02:31 PM
10/30/12 02:31 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,060 Western New York
sixpackbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,060
Western New York
|
I am going to do a 4.185x3.79 W9 for a nasty street car. 3.79 is a more efficient way to go. I'll sacrafice a few cubes in favor of puting more power pulses down the race track.
Last edited by sixpackbee; 10/30/12 02:32 PM.
1959 Bugeye Sprite 1967 Charger Black L code 1967 Coronet R/T Convert Green 440 auto bought from original owner 1968 Charger R/T Bronze 440 4 spd console AM/FM 1969 Super Bee WM21H B5 A40 D21 N96 1969 Barracuda Formula S 340 Convert pilot car 1969 Hemi Road Runner RM23J D32 Omaha orange 4.10 Dana N96 N85 1970 Super Bee WM23N FE5 V1X 3.91 axle package, N96 1970 Road Runner RM21N B3 V1X D13 1971 MG Midget 1971 Road Runner RM23H GW3, A57 1972 Road Runner RM23P FY1, D21
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: dodgeboy11]
#1327975
10/31/12 10:04 AM
10/31/12 10:04 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646 Plymouth Meeting, PA
bigtimeauto
Trophy Winner
|
Trophy Winner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
|
Quote:
Everything else the same, the shorter stroke will make more horsepower at a higher rpm than the longer stroke, but I would bet that add more airflow to the longer stroke and it will make more horsepower at the same higher rpm than the previous setup did with the shorter stroke.
well if we added more airflow for the longer stroke couldn't we just add more airflow to the shorter stroke and make more power once again? i would rather have my piston speed due to engine rpm over stroke.
I'll tke the higher rpm, biggest bore, shortest deck and just long enough stroke everyday over those out of square strokers.
BB, TT5,Procharged 3300lb Street Car 4.79/154
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: fishy340]
#1327977
10/31/12 05:47 PM
10/31/12 05:47 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,709 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
Mr. Helpful
|
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,709
Fulton County, PA
|
I asked this question recently; maybe this would be a good place to ask again.
We have a MP NOS 3.79 crank in the 1053 material. What is the limit and the potential of this piece? I have an idea of using it in a drag race engine in the 650-700 HP area or in a nice street engine.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: Leon441]
#1327978
11/01/12 12:17 AM
11/01/12 12:17 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 168 Washington State, USA
Winchester 73
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 168
Washington State, USA
|
Quote:
Pro stock does not limit stroke. They limit the cubes at 500. Thats why they run the little stroke and huge bore. More power that way.
I just never understood the 3.79 stroke. 3.800" is much more common in higher end engines. If you have a low deck block 3.800 is about the limit for stroke.
If I had a tall block I would rather have 4.00" but nothing wrong with the shorter stroke if you don't have room.
Leon
i think youre looking at it wrong-they limit cubic inches not valve size thats why they go for huge bores-big head breating.this doesnt concern most folks building mopars becus we have a select menu of heads and cubic inches to put under them .
nascar engine builders have said that a given cubic inch limit that bore vs stroke is not worth enuff persuing and these guys fight for very little hp
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: Brian Hafliger]
#1327981
11/01/12 09:06 AM
11/01/12 09:06 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,257 acworth / N. georgia - south e...
cheapstreetdustr
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,257
acworth / N. georgia - south e...
|
there are still some classes out there that limit cubic inch in heads up racing... or atleast the weight brake cut off is around 385"cubes.. this crank is perfect for that..and 4yrs ago i could not find a 3.79 crank to fit my needs.. during MY search..I came across a few guys looking for them also..fwiw
365" Iron J heads,,3480lbs best 1.39 60ft on SS springs.10.54,124 mph ...6.67 1/8th et.average 60fts 1.46 w/ small cam &.063 no2 pill tagged & insured [image][/image]
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: Dos Snails]
#1327983
11/04/12 10:22 PM
11/04/12 10:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267 North, Alabama
D-50
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
|
I have a 3.79 stroke crank in my 394 ci motor with 360-2 Indy heads at 10.9 to 1 compression that Brett Miller and Vic Bloomer built and it made 662 at 7300 on 93 octane fuel. I am very happy with the performance so far. I have got a lot of tuning left to do. The best I have ran so far is a 1.34 60ft,6.34 at 108 mph at 2950 lbs.I think there is still alot left in it. I am running a mechanical fuel pump and a 950 holley with no jet changes and no timing changes. I am shifting at 6800.
1.33 60 ft,6.21 at 110.59 in the 1/8, pump gas small block,2950lbs,drag radials,mufflers and driven to track ...
|
|
|
Re: Any Interest in Smallblock 3.79" Stroke
[Re: D-50]
#1327984
11/05/12 11:28 AM
11/05/12 11:28 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 528 N.W. Indiana
DblOJoe
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 528
N.W. Indiana
|
Quote:
I have a 3.79 stroke crank in my 394 ci motor with 360-2 Indy heads at 10.9 to 1 compression that Brett Miller and Vic Bloomer built and it made 662 at 7300 on 93 octane fuel. I am very happy with the performance so far. I have got a lot of tuning left to do. The best I have ran so far is a 1.34 60ft,6.34 at 108 mph at 2950 lbs.I think there is still alot left in it. I am running a mechanical fuel pump and a 950 holley with no jet changes and no timing changes. I am shifting at 6800.
Maybe I could get Vic to clone this for me...
|
|
|
|
|