Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: Dunnuck Racing]
#1302941
09/14/12 01:15 AM
09/14/12 01:15 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591 Canton, Ohio
Sport440
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
|
Quote:
I am getting some good ideas,and really appreciate them. It has been suggested to me by a friend that you guys should p.m. or email ideas to me instead though. I have no problem sharing information,but sometimes things are beyond one persons control. Thanks again Keith
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: RAMM]
#1302945
09/29/12 03:40 PM
09/29/12 03:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
|
I think an awesome standard for testing MPG would be to see how much fuel is consumed in 1 minte at a given HP value like 100 hp. Adjust the throttle to put out 100 HP at say 2000 rpm then see how much fuel is flowing. Most vehicles can maintain a steady speed at 50-100 hp or a lot less even for some more aerodynamic cars or slower speeds. Any how I think 100HP@2000 RPM should be the standard for MPG testing, then gallons per minute consumed will be the measure
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: BigBlockMopar]
#1302952
10/30/12 06:55 AM
10/30/12 06:55 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Quote:
Another vote for different oil-weight powergain/loss-measurements here!
Would be one of the easiest things to test IMO. Do a dyno-run, change the oil, run again, aso.
I agree, would like testing to go a couple of steps farther. Crankcase windage , oil control, affects of synthetic Vs dino on both. Tests to see how much oil stays up in the rotating assemblys, etc.Clear plastic panels in an oil pan for observation on some tests done years ago, but only after researching what has been learned. There is a wealth of knowledge at the engineering departments of the big auto companys and it would be great to have some of that info rather than reinventing the wheel. A look at some of the newer motors like the high rpm, smaller efficient ones coming out in the last couple of years might reveal some clues and give us a better starting point.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: gregsdart]
#1302953
10/30/12 07:13 AM
10/30/12 07:13 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Another test would be valve train tests to see how close a flat tappet can come to a roller with some of the Nascar tricks used on stroker motors. Cost vs power. My first thoughts were titanium valves and 2.0 ratio rockers combined with ceramic lifters. Put these parts on different sized shortblocks with a given head, to find out just how close the power levels can be. First off would be to establish a budget, so there is a definite savings for both building and maintaining a combo. Low rpm strokers might be the most cost effective and most attractive for budget builds. A 541 shortblock with small port wedge heads comes to mind as one test. Rpm would most likely stay at or under 6,000 rpm.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: skrews]
#1302955
10/30/12 01:23 PM
10/30/12 01:23 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,286 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,286
Bend,OR USA
|
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 11/01/12 01:55 AM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
|
|