Re: Getting my new 440 dyno this week
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1302683
09/12/12 11:43 AM
09/12/12 11:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,046 Minnesota
72blubird
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,046
Minnesota
|
You will lose about 7-10% horsepower with the manifolds. I just had my motor on a dyno. It made 501 w/headers 468/manifolds so less than 7% loss.
What was I thinking....
|
|
|
Re: Getting my new 440 dyno this week
[Re: 72blubird]
#1302684
09/12/12 12:24 PM
09/12/12 12:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,374 Houston,Tx.
Lee446
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,374
Houston,Tx.
|
If a bowl cleanup was all the port work done, I'd say this combo is good for 425 hp. I doubt that this engine will run on pump gas with that compression and 906's unless it is a quench motor.The manifolds don't help. Good cam choice though.
Last edited by Lee446; 09/12/12 12:32 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Getting my new 440 dyno this week
[Re: moparguy1967]
#1302692
09/14/12 11:49 PM
09/14/12 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698 NE Oklahoma
Von
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
|
Quote:
Peak hp 520 at 5600 Peak tq 560 at 4500
Nice numbers!! Let us know how it runs at the track!
72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72.
Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
|
|
|
Re: Getting my new 440 dyno this week
[Re: Von]
#1302693
09/15/12 08:07 AM
09/15/12 08:07 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
Me thinks the 906s are a tad more than just "cleaned up"
I had rebuilt 906s with a professional valve job on my 438" stroker in a 383 block. simply bolting on edelbrock heads felt like I picked up about 50 hp, and on the engine dyno with the eddy heads, it only made 505hp, 535 tq, (over 500 ft lbs from 3000 rpm through 5500 rpm)
VERY similar build though...but I was running the Comp XE-275-HL hyd cam. 275° advertised, around 230° @ .050 (I forget the actual specs), .525 lift
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: Getting my new 440 dyno this week
[Re: moparguy1967]
#1302694
09/15/12 08:38 AM
09/15/12 08:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,923 NC
440Jim
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,923
NC
|
Quote:
Peak hp 520 at 5600 Peak tq 560 at 4500
You should be very happy with the results.
I was a little surprised the torque peak was that high (rpm). The MP 0.528" cam is very mild and has good street manners, as you found it will go to 6000 rpm with headers, etc.
What size were the dyno headers? Maybe that raised the torque peak. I would guess the headers vs exhaust manifolds are around 30 hp.
|
|
|
Re: Getting my new 440 dyno this week
[Re: 440Jim]
#1302695
09/15/12 07:17 PM
09/15/12 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 329 Frederick, MD
moparguy1967
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 329
Frederick, MD
|
Quote:
Quote:
Peak hp 520 at 5600 Peak tq 560 at 4500
You should be very happy with the results.
I was a little surprised the torque peak was that high (rpm). The MP 0.528" cam is very mild and has good street manners, as you found it will go to 6000 rpm with headers, etc.
What size were the dyno headers? Maybe that raised the torque peak. I would guess the headers vs exhaust manifolds are around 30 hp.
The headers he had were old and beat up. I would say they were 1 3/4".
I had read somewhere that with a small lift cam( around .500 with lash), that header would not make as much of a difference as you would think. Something about air velocity and such.
|
|
|
|
|