Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DPelletier] #1228725
05/09/12 04:31 PM
05/09/12 04:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT Offline
Management Trainee
1_WILD_RT  Offline
Management Trainee

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
Quote:



....just because a design is old doesn't necessarily mean it doesn't work well.





Dave





Just to take this idea a step further....

7198852-sr-71_1.jpg (228 downloads)

"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: 1_WILD_RT] #1228726
05/09/12 04:53 PM
05/09/12 04:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
or;




Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DPelletier] #1228727
05/09/12 06:36 PM
05/09/12 06:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 115
Manteca, CA
DRJDVM Offline
member
DRJDVM  Offline
member

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 115
Manteca, CA
Won alot and dominated the Trans Am circuit.......yes

But correct me if I'm wrong... Those weren't totally stock..... And THAT WAS 40+ YEARS AGO!!!!!!

And then people pull out magazine articles from the 70's to discuss suspension design? You have got to be kidding me.....

Things change with time......design and technology change.....if you don't like the RMS kit then fine..... But to tout suspensions that dominated 40 years ago is ridiculous

The RMS kit has its flaws and isn't for everyone.... And that's okay.... But stop living in the past

Guys.... It's okay to not live in the 70's still..... It's okay to not keep your mopar 100% stock original.....

Let it go...... Last I checked it's 2012..... Not 1970

If you want to drive a car that feels like and handles like the "top of the line in 1970" then that's your choice.... Some of us choose to evolve alittle and have open minds for newer stuff

Show me some failures...... And give me a good reason why no one but big trucks still use torsion bars

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DRJDVM] #1228728
05/09/12 06:58 PM
05/09/12 06:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
R
RSNOMO Offline
Moparts Torchbearer
RSNOMO  Offline
Moparts Torchbearer
R

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
A design that withstands the test of time is a testament to its integrity...

NEW doesn't necessarily mean BETTER...

If it can't live, then it's nothing but a flash in the pan...

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: RSNOMO] #1228729
05/09/12 08:11 PM
05/09/12 08:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
And tires are still round but there is no comparison between 1970 tires and 2012 tires. Tires today are superior in everyway, just like todays suspensions are superior in every way.

Back in the day, you either had a 1/4 mile suspension or a handling suspension.. not both on the same car (for the most part.. few exceptions naturally). Today we have both, on the same car.

I for one am glad WE have a much larger choise for suspensions.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1228730
05/09/12 08:21 PM
05/09/12 08:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 323
A
A57_RT Offline
Parts Problem
A57_RT  Offline
Parts Problem
A

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 323
Dam, relax, thats simply an old article. Youd think I said dump bb-s down every BB but I didnt.

The other place I posed it I also said Ive had almost evey 66-74 moper there is and never thought they mis handeled unless it was way worn out.

But good shocks and 60-s and they were fun...

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: A57_RT ] #1228731
05/09/12 08:28 PM
05/09/12 08:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,175
Park Forest, IL
slantzilla Offline
Too Many Posts
slantzilla  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,175
Park Forest, IL
Torsion bars aren't really the issue with a Mopar front end. Placement of the mounts for the upper A-arm is.


"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DRJDVM] #1228732
05/09/12 08:34 PM
05/09/12 08:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

Won alot and dominated the Trans Am circuit.......yes

But correct me if I'm wrong... Those weren't totally stock..... And THAT WAS 40+ YEARS AGO!!!!!!

And then people pull out magazine articles from the 70's to discuss suspension design? You have got to be kidding me.....

Things change with time......design and technology change.....if you don't like the RMS kit then fine..... But to tout suspensions that dominated 40 years ago is ridiculous

The RMS kit has its flaws and isn't for everyone.... And that's okay.... But stop living in the past

Guys.... It's okay to not live in the 70's still..... It's okay to not keep your mopar 100% stock original.....

Let it go...... Last I checked it's 2012..... Not 1970

If you want to drive a car that feels like and handles like the "top of the line in 1970" then that's your choice.... Some of us choose to evolve alittle and have open minds for newer stuff

Show me some failures...... And give me a good reason why no one but big trucks still use torsion bars




Stop living in the past?? You do KNOW that this site is dedicated to cars from the past right?

Listen, I don't much care what anyone does with their cars and YES I do want to drive a car that "feels and handles like top of the line 1970" (you say that like it's a bad thing! )

Honestly I have nothing bad to say about Alterkation or any of the other aftermarket suspension systems out there, HOWEVER to imply that the stock Mopar torsion bar setup was a bad design or inadequate to the task of driving (even spirited driving) on todays streets is just dead wrong.

Yes it's an old design just like the cars they were installed in, the engines that powered them, etc. etc.

Though I don't care if people want to make thier car into a mix of old and new, you are right that I just don't understand the desire. If I wanted to drive a new car, I'd buy one. ....or better yet I'd go out into the garage and hop in the Mercedes which does pretty much everything better than ANY 1970 car in 1000X the comfort. I still like my old Superbee better though....weird, huh?


Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: A57_RT ] #1228733
05/09/12 08:41 PM
05/09/12 08:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
A57,

Me relax? I wasn't replying to you.. and I don't really care what you posted.

As I said, I'm glad theres a lot more options for suspensions nowadays.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: A57_RT ] #1228734
05/09/12 10:44 PM
05/09/12 10:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 982
W. Sacto CA. USA
P
phantomx Offline
super stock
phantomx  Offline
super stock
P

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 982
W. Sacto CA. USA
That big long bolt with the spacer on the tie rod end would scare me away. It would be much better if it were double sheer instead of single. I'm no engineer though, just a guy who understands how things work and have my own opinions and feelings about things
Travis..


70 GTX project, orig 440-4, 4 spd, track pack, FC7, stripper/street racer special.
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: phantomx] #1228735
05/09/12 10:51 PM
05/09/12 10:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,577
Long Island, NY USA
B
BergmanAutoCraft Offline
master
BergmanAutoCraft  Offline
master
B

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,577
Long Island, NY USA
Torsion bars were good enough to win the run to thexshore road race event this year. Probably the cheapest car there beat EVERYONE new and old.

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: A57_RT ] #1228736
05/09/12 11:35 PM
05/09/12 11:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,452
Morristown Tn.
7
71birdJ68 Offline
master
71birdJ68  Offline
master
7

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,452
Morristown Tn.
I've got a good idea. Take a car with one of these front ends and turn it over to a 18 year old boy to drive and do as he wants everyday of the week for 40 years and no babying of the car and then we will know how durable it is.Or better give it to a bunch of GI's in Affganadamstain.

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: 2fast4yourBrain] #1228737
05/10/12 12:50 AM
05/10/12 12:50 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688
Marlboro, NY, USA
R
Rick_Ehrenberg Offline
top fuel
Rick_Ehrenberg  Offline
top fuel
R

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688
Marlboro, NY, USA
Quote:

As far as alterkation durability, seems like you'd see more breakage of all those drag cars doing wheelstands with them.




Pure jounce, like coming down from a wheelie, I think the RMS setup is fine. It is lateral forces and road impacts where it becomes problematic.

Rick

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption #1228738
05/10/12 01:27 AM
05/10/12 01:27 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,467
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,467
So Cal
Quote:

...(2) not enough adjustability in factory stock form to take full advantage of modern tire technology, and ...




Not true. There's people that have got 1-3 degrees caster with stock geometry bushing.

The GM A-body guys have a tough time getting to 2-3 deg positive caster because the UCA dogbone will hit the steering shaft.

When I just service replaced my UCA bushing with the rubber offset Moog's I can get MORE caster and camber than a GM A-body with stock UCA's with any bushing installed.

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DRJDVM] #1228739
05/10/12 01:41 AM
05/10/12 01:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,467
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,467
So Cal
Quote:

Won alot and dominated the Trans Am circuit.......yes

But correct me if I'm wrong... Those weren't totally stock..... And THAT WAS 40+ YEARS AGO!!!!!!

And then people pull out magazine articles from the 70's to discuss suspension design? You have got to be kidding me.....

Things change with time......design and technology change.....if you don't like the RMS kit then fine..... But to tout suspensions that dominated 40 years ago is ridiculous

The RMS kit has its flaws and isn't for everyone.... And that's okay.... But stop living in the past

Guys.... It's okay to not live in the 70's still..... It's okay to not keep your mopar 100% stock original.....

Let it go...... Last I checked it's 2012..... Not 1970

If you want to drive a car that feels like and handles like the "top of the line in 1970" then that's your choice.... Some of us choose to evolve alittle and have open minds for newer stuff

Show me some failures...... And give me a good reason why no one but big trucks still use torsion bars




Would you consider the improvements you've done to your 69 Camaro stock based suspension.

I would.

People here aren't debating about still running stone stock bias ply tires, 318 front springs, and stock sized sway bars.

Two different paths to modifications. Still modification with new parts.

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: patrick] #1228740
05/10/12 03:26 AM
05/10/12 03:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
DirectSubjection Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only
DirectSubjection  Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
Quote:

Just curious, but if torsion bar systems are so great, how come they aren't used anymore?

they are, just on 4wd IFS trucks.....





My 1-ton Chevy dually had them.


Ride eternal, shiny and chrome
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DRJDVM] #1228741
05/10/12 05:52 AM
05/10/12 05:52 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 819
Central Ohio
rtidd440 Offline
super street
rtidd440  Offline
super street

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 819
Central Ohio
Quote:

Won alot and dominated the Trans Am circuit.......yes

But correct me if I'm wrong... Those weren't totally stock..... And THAT WAS 40+ YEARS AGO!!!!!!

And then people pull out magazine articles from the 70's to discuss suspension design? You have got to be kidding me.....

Things change with time......design and technology change.....if you don't like the RMS kit then fine..... But to tout suspensions that dominated 40 years ago is ridiculous

The RMS kit has its flaws and isn't for everyone.... And that's okay.... But stop living in the past

Guys.... It's okay to not live in the 70's still..... It's okay to not keep your mopar 100% stock original.....

Let it go...... Last I checked it's 2012..... Not 1970

If you want to drive a car that feels like and handles like the "top of the line in 1970" then that's your choice.... Some of us choose to evolve alittle and have open minds for newer stuff

Show me some failures...... And give me a good reason why no one but big trucks still use torsion bars




XV Stage 1 suspension. Stock but with the springs, swaybar, and shock damping dialed in. Add modern tires on the apropriate wheels. 1 G in the corners. Sounds ust as good as a new technology to me.

Im all for doing what you want with your own car, but aside from racing I dont get this torsion bar hate thing. Muscle era mopars have torsion bars. Same with a rack and pinion. Hardly a modern wonder. Looks like some of the crap on riding lawnmowers. Its used nowadays because its cheap and easy to adapt to many different models, not because its any better. If you want to turn your Mopar into a corvette or whatever, why dont you just start out with a corvette. It seems to me that its the same level of blasphemy as putting a sbc in your 69 Dart.

I wish someone would test the stock control arms vs some of the aftermarket stuff. There is no way welded tubes are stronger than the stamped steel stock control arms. Anybody got a big press?


Rob 70 Swinger 340 4spd FC7 4 sale 69 Charger auto Q5 14 Challenger SRT8 Core 6spd black Deposit on Hellcat
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DirectSubjection] #1228742
05/10/12 09:00 AM
05/10/12 09:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,452
Morristown Tn.
7
71birdJ68 Offline
master
71birdJ68  Offline
master
7

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,452
Morristown Tn.
Quote:

Quote:

Just curious, but if torsion bar systems are so great, how come they aren't used anymore?

they are, just on 4wd IFS trucks.....





My 1-ton Chevy dually had them.



You'd be suppressed just now many new cars and trucks use T bars, several sons of nippon vehicles

Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DRJDVM] #1228743
05/10/12 10:17 AM
05/10/12 10:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
Well lets take the 1970 Trans Am series:

Ford 72pts
AMC 59pts
Chevy 40pts
Dodge 18pts
Plymouth 15pts

Dodge/Plymouth didn't win a single race that year.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: ALTERKATION - 3rd dwg and caption [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1228744
05/10/12 10:31 AM
05/10/12 10:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,388
Pikes Peak Country
T
TC@HP2 Offline
master
TC@HP2  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,388
Pikes Peak Country
Nothing to do with suspension. It was engine/trans longevity issues. Look at qualifying for a better picture.

Look, suspensions can be sprung by a coil, a leaf, torsion, or air spring. This concept has not changed much in a couple hundred years. The contact patch on the road could care less about what is appliying the force so long as it does not override the available traction of the tire in use but maximizes it at all available directional changes. At that point, then the geometric layout will either support the application of force or will impede it. Damping control will dictate how fast or slow the force is applied. The only real thing that has changed between the 70s and now is our ability to better control the grip at the contact patch, the damping and its application of force, and perhaps the size of the overall spring package.

Coil over kits are nice because they are compact and light. That is the biggest advantage over a coil or torsion spring. They DO NOT apply force in any better manner than a properly rated and dampened coil or torsion spring.

Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1