Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
What is the history of the Mustang II? #1023939
07/01/11 01:23 PM
07/01/11 01:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,307
Minnesota
PocketThunder Offline OP
pro stock
PocketThunder  Offline OP
pro stock

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,307
Minnesota
What is the history in the making of the Mustang II front end?
Is this the same front end that is on Mustangs build in the 70's?
How did the Mustang II become to be in the street rod world?
Can i find a Mustang and take the front end of it and put it on my street rod?

Paul


69 Charger R/T. California car, 99 99 Special Order paint car, Omaha Orange. Original Paint, Interior, drivetrain, etc..
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: PocketThunder] #1023940
07/01/11 01:57 PM
07/01/11 01:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,884
Tracy CA
R
rabid scott Offline
"You're Where?"
rabid scott  Offline
"You're Where?"
R

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,884
Tracy CA
Nope, later 70's Mustangs IIs, same as the Ford Pinto.

It's called Mustang II because calling it a Pinto frontend doesn't sound as sexy.

Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: PocketThunder] #1023941
07/01/11 05:02 PM
07/01/11 05:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Mopar Ron Offline
master
Mopar Ron  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
the"mustang II" frontend
first came out on the 71-73 pinto but it is slightly smaller,
the race cars guys like some of these parts.
then in 74 the front end parts were a little bigger
and as street rodders were looking to get an independent front end other than a
corvair or jag the pinto/mustang frontends started showing up under rods.
they were a very good riding and handling addition to a more modern rod of the day
with disk brakes and rack and pinion steering,
and as the aftermarket parts started showing up they became the front end of choice,
many company's stated making cross members for the more popular rods out there
and then tube "A" arms and bigger brake kits became available and that style front end
is now the pattern that most after market kits base off of.


the mustang II frontend is much better than the front ends used in the 65-72 mustang
(they even make kits to change them to the mustang II front end)
and yes you can cut one out of mustang II and fit it to a rod,
I have done that plenty of times "BUT"
it is a little more time consuming
(cutting it out,trimming it down and fitting it to the chassis)
it is cheaper than just getting a cross member from some place like fatman
but the fatman cross member fits great and saves time and looks more professional ....
hope that helps Ron....

Last edited by Mopar Ron; 07/01/11 05:06 PM.
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Mopar Ron] #1023942
07/01/11 06:02 PM
07/01/11 06:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,575
Dreaming of the 808
AZ_A12_BEE Offline
I Live Here
AZ_A12_BEE  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,575
Dreaming of the 808
Ron, what more modern rides would do the job that the Mustang II would do?


69.5 A12 Bee, first purchased in 1976, car 169 on registry 69 Coronet R/T 440/4 spd 69 Coronet 500 Conv H code 383 4bbl/auto 37 Plymouth PU Find your spot on earth and ride it.
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: AZ_A12_BEE] #1023943
07/01/11 06:11 PM
07/01/11 06:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Mopar Ron Offline
master
Mopar Ron  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Quote:

Ron, what more modern rides would do the job that the Mustang II would do?




I am doing 2 on dakota chassis but the dakota has a wider track than a mustang II.
I did use a volare' front end under my 36 humpback panel truck.

I have 3-4 cars going together with mustang II front ends,
1-2 with dropped axles(maybe) and 3 on the dakota frames

can you say "TO MANY PROJECTS"

Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Mopar Ron] #1023944
07/01/11 10:34 PM
07/01/11 10:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,167
Maryland
GO_Fish Offline
master
GO_Fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,167
Maryland
With how common the swap was and how old the Mustang II's are, I might suppose the supply of them is about dry, and not as good as the aftermarket available now anyway? If you have access to one, go for it.


Scott B. "I'm a self-made man... I started with nothing, and I still have most of it!" 68 360 rusty B'cuda 'vert (GO Fish)13.59@ 98.72 mph 69 340 GTS stock 14.18@ 95.60 mph 01 5.9L Ram 1500 Quad Cab 4x4 01 3.5L 300M 16.23@ 86.97 mph
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: GO_Fish] #1023945
07/02/11 04:15 PM
07/02/11 04:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
As long as you understand that the MII front suspension was a "good handler" only compared to the original stuff they replaced.

Brakes were undersized for most of the fat fendered stuff. Handling needed improvement, looks were blah, which is why all the after market stuff was developed, kinda like the SBC.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Supercuda] #1023946
07/02/11 08:22 PM
07/02/11 08:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,575
Dreaming of the 808
AZ_A12_BEE Offline
I Live Here
AZ_A12_BEE  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,575
Dreaming of the 808
Quote:

Fat fendered


?


69.5 A12 Bee, first purchased in 1976, car 169 on registry 69 Coronet R/T 440/4 spd 69 Coronet 500 Conv H code 383 4bbl/auto 37 Plymouth PU Find your spot on earth and ride it.
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Supercuda] #1023947
07/02/11 09:21 PM
07/02/11 09:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Mopar Ron Offline
master
Mopar Ron  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Quote:

As long as you understand that the MII front suspension was a "good handler" only compared to the original stuff they replaced.

Brakes were undersized for most of the fat fendered stuff. Handling needed improvement, looks were blah, which is why all the after market stuff was developed, kinda like the SBC.




while I'll agree that putting the 11" brakes on instead of the 9 1/2" ones is a good improvement
I had 3 different rods with the stock A arms and 9 1/2" brakes and all of them handled and stopped just fine,
we put over 120K mi on my wifes 34 plymouth sedan with all stock stuff
the tube A arms do look better than the stock ones,
but on most cars you can't even see them,
they are almost cheaper than stock ones now.
I go with tube "A" arms and 11" brakes on the cars I do now.

and as far as handling, most all of the AC cobra kit cars have the mustang II style stuff under them as well.

would I put one under a 4,000 lbs car, probably not
but I sure would use one on just about any 30s or 40s rod under 3,600 lbs
a sway bar is a good idea as well but all my past cars did not have one and they were very reliable and fun cars to drive

Ron...

Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Mopar Ron] #1023948
07/06/11 05:41 PM
07/06/11 05:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
I believe a very similar if not the same setup was used on the 4000lb Granada and variants. If the MII had problems in bigger cars we'd have heard about it in the last 20 years or so.
It's relatively light and compact and the aftermarket support in the street rod sector is unbelievable. The geometry is pretty good too.
The Mopar bent torsion bar fronts have bad geometry and although there have been quite a few put in, many have required expensive rework to get to handle right. Look up E-burgs many negative comments about them. They represent a low point in Mopar suspension design, built during the years that ChryCo was flailing trying to keep afloat and putting out such gems as the Volare, whose fenders were known to rust off in three years or less.

R.

Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: dogdays] #1023949
07/06/11 10:47 PM
07/06/11 10:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
The Granada used a suspension similar to the Fox Mustang, not the Mustang II. Like I said, the MII is better than a 20's or 30's suspension or brakes, but I wouldn't call it the best choice by a long shot.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Supercuda] #1023950
07/06/11 10:59 PM
07/06/11 10:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Mopar Ron Offline
master
Mopar Ron  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Quote:

The Granada used a suspension similar to the Fox Mustang, not the Mustang II. Like I said, the MII is better than a 20's or 30's suspension or brakes, but I wouldn't call it the best choice by a long shot.




Just curious Steve, what front end do you feel IS the best choice for a 30's rod?
I am always open to good ideas Ron...

Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Mopar Ron] #1023951
07/07/11 10:31 PM
07/07/11 10:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Best? I dunno, I stuffed a 79 Newport front suspension under my 38, had to section the K member and centerlink to do it. Also setup the rear T bar mount up to accept A body length Tbars to widen, and cheapen, my Tbar selection. I know that someone made a kit to put a longitudinal Tbar suspension under early rods, forget who though. Only looks "good" under a fendered rod though.

An aftermarket suspension based, loosely, on the MII has most of the kinks worked out, can be made to look great on a fenderless rod and has tons of options, but using a stock MII as the basis of the swap will probably end up costing you more to replicate the aftermarket kits than it would to just buy the kit to begin with. That's probably what I'd do today, unless you want to put a last generation Panther (Ford full sized) suspension under it.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: What is the history of the Mustang II? [Re: Supercuda] #1023952
08/26/11 09:17 AM
08/26/11 09:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,734
Charlotte, NC
4
446acuda Offline
master
446acuda  Offline
master
4

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,734
Charlotte, NC
Quote:

The Granada used a suspension similar to the Fox Mustang, not the Mustang II. Like I said, the MII is better than a 20's or 30's suspension or brakes, but I wouldn't call it the best choice by a long shot.


Actually a '75-'80 Granada suspension is just like a Maverick/Falcon/64.5-up mustang. The '81-2 Granadas are fox body based.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1