Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
383 VS 440 #1017121
06/20/11 07:08 PM
06/20/11 07:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,039
ALBERTA CANADA
C
CUDA8U Offline OP
super stock
CUDA8U  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,039
ALBERTA CANADA
WHICH IS BETTER TO BUILD FOR A STREETABLE APPLICATION ON PUMP GAS BUT CAN STILL TEAR UP THE STREETS?
I'M HOPING TO BE AROUND 500HP ON PUMP GAS.

COULD YOU GIVE REASONS FOR YOUR CHOICE PLS.

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: CUDA8U] #1017122
06/20/11 07:31 PM
06/20/11 07:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
The 440 for the same reason as the one I gave in your other thread. ....as I said, it isn't rocket science: the 383 and 440 are very similar only the 440 is 15% larger. Not sure what more you need to know

....and PLEASE turn off your cap locks.

Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: DPelletier] #1017123
06/20/11 07:55 PM
06/20/11 07:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,278
San Jose, California
D
DennisH Offline
Vacation
DennisH  Offline
Vacation
D

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,278
San Jose, California
I'm under that at 415 RWHP. 440. Almost enough for me to tear around town on pump gas. I'll always take more if I can get it.

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: DennisH ] #1017124
06/20/11 09:18 PM
06/20/11 09:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
I'll be the "stand alone" here. Not knocking off the 440 at all, (I'm a 413 guy! ) but I'd go with the 383. It can go to 500hp, but it WOULD definitely need the better heads to start with. Other reasons for which many "may" say it's insane but:
Less rotating weight (crank mass) in the motor.
Strong rods (when NEW) proven to go OVER 6200-6500 rpms with
a good safety margin to boot.
Oversquare bore/stroke combo with a 1.89 rod ratio - great for HI-RPM HP, midrange to hi-end torque.
Easy to obtain, cheap to build, but piston prices have risen lately!
In otherwords, it's an overgrown 340!!
Only drawbacks - it NEEDS a lightweight body to run really HARD to "coin" the sub 11 sec and faster brackets. Motor needs a "pro" type oiling system for the sub-12 sec brackets, which include enlarged main oil feed and return block passages
and possibly external oil lines and filters. Helps make them live longer!! A little more work than whats needed on the 440,
but they DO HAUL THE MAIL!!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: CUDA8U] #1017125
06/20/11 09:28 PM
06/20/11 09:28 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,427
DC, MD Suburbs
440PURSUIT Offline
pro stock
440PURSUIT  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,427
DC, MD Suburbs
Try the 383 with a 4.25 stroke and good heads, 496ci. Mine did 648 horse under 6k RPM and under 10:1. Hydraulic roller.


1969 Hemi Charger R/T,
1969 Charger RT Clone
1969 Charger Pro Tour Project
1971 Barracuda Convert
1970 440 6pack Superbird,
1968 Fury I Police Pursuit 440 Super Commando 2 door sedan (Black/Blue)
1969 Dart GTS 340 Convert
1967 Barracuda Convert
1968 Barracuda Coupe
1972 Road Runner 340-4
1972 Charger Rallye 400-4
1972 Charger w 383
1972 Sebring Plus 440-6 Clone
1967 A100
1969 Coronet Pro Street
2009 Challengeer SRT8 stick
2006 Dodge Magnum 5.7
2017 3500 Dually
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: HYPER8oSoNic] #1017126
06/20/11 09:32 PM
06/20/11 09:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
7
71yelladustr Offline
super stock
71yelladustr  Offline
super stock
7

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
440 all the way. When you say "tear up the streets" torque is what you want, not so much horsepower. Not saying the 383 isnt capable, but the 440 will be more docile and driveable at the same power level while making more torque.


392 gen III hemi on E-85 727 trans Dana 60
10.02@134
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: CUDA8U] #1017127
06/20/11 09:40 PM
06/20/11 09:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 19,701
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
I Live Here
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 19,701
Kirkland, Washington
440, it has more displacement (you asked). And I'll be the 12th person to say TURN OFF YOUR CAPS

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: HYPER8oSoNic] #1017128
06/20/11 09:54 PM
06/20/11 09:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,039
ALBERTA CANADA
C
CUDA8U Offline OP
super stock
CUDA8U  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,039
ALBERTA CANADA
so what's you opinion on the edelbrock top end kits?

and how much porting can be done to these head/intake combo?

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: CUDA8U] #1017129
06/20/11 10:10 PM
06/20/11 10:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,915
Pendleton NY
T
terzmo Offline
top fuel
terzmo  Offline
top fuel
T

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,915
Pendleton NY
A 440 is obvious as the 383 supporters most likely vote for the underdog everytime....it just makes sense, that dollar for dollar the 440 is just as economical to build as a 383.....so what advantage is there with 57 less cubes....read the want ads and for one example...you'll see..."mopar for sale...383 with 440 heads" If the thing was that great it would run it's own heads....

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: CUDA8U] #1017130
06/20/11 10:13 PM
06/20/11 10:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,322
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,322
oklahoma
The answer to your question lies in my misspelled username

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: terzmo] #1017131
06/20/11 10:17 PM
06/20/11 10:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,025
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,025
Kalispell Mt.
440 has bigger bore that helps un-shroud the valve and make more HP with the same heads. Also for the street the extra TQ is fun Any money you save buying a 383 will be lost when buying pistons. The differance in weight is minimal, not like the differance going from BB to SB and either big block build it is gonna be a pain to change plugs compared to the SB so the minimal differance in deck height don't really make it much easier. If the choice is 440 or 383 build the 440 every time.

BTW after 67 the 440 and 383 used the same heads


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: HotRodDave] #1017132
06/20/11 10:21 PM
06/20/11 10:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,233
petaluma,ca. u.s.a.
west Offline
master
west  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,233
petaluma,ca. u.s.a.

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: CUDA8U] #1017133
06/20/11 10:37 PM
06/20/11 10:37 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

so what's you opinion on the edelbrock top end kits?

and how much porting can be done to these head/intake combo?




Eddys have good head/intake combo's. Myself,
I was thinking along the lines of Indys and a
"deep ported intake" read: aluminum, non-Magnum, type Like I said, it takes a bit more to make a 383 run really hard!!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: 71yelladustr] #1017134
06/20/11 10:48 PM
06/20/11 10:48 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

440 all the way. When you say "tear up the streets" torque is what you want, not so much horsepower. Not saying the 383 isnt capable, but the 440 will be more docile and driveable at the same power level while making more torque.




I hear you loud and clear. ..but one factor overlooked, the advantage of 57 cubes CAN be offset by LESS vehicle weight, where HP is the
ruling factor of overcoming frictional drag on the top-end scale. Less weight doesn't need as much torque as it does hp.



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: terzmo] #1017135
06/20/11 10:57 PM
06/20/11 10:57 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

A 440 is obvious as the 383 supporters most likely vote for the underdog everytime....it just makes sense, that dollar for dollar the 440 is just as economical to build as a 383.....so what advantage is there with 57 less cubes....read the want ads and for one example...you'll see..."mopar for sale...383 with 440 heads" If the thing was that great it would run it's own heads....




For one year 440's were running 383/413 non Maxi-heads, before the Magnum heads were used on Magnum engines, so on and so forth.



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: HYPER8oSoNic] #1017136
06/21/11 08:56 AM
06/21/11 08:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,278
San Jose, California
D
DennisH Offline
Vacation
DennisH  Offline
Vacation
D

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,278
San Jose, California
There is no replacement. For displacement. 440.

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: terzmo] #1017137
06/21/11 09:31 AM
06/21/11 09:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 73,560
U.S.S.A.
J
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 73,560
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

....read the want ads and for one example...you'll see..."mopar for sale...383 with 440 heads" If the thing was that great it would run it's own heads....




You see ads like that because the seller is UNEDUCATED about mopar big blocks ... FYI the 383 - 2bbl runs the EXACT SAME heads as the 440, only difference is the valve springs .

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: JohnRR] #1017138
06/21/11 09:55 AM
06/21/11 09:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,174
ill
D
dennismopar73 Offline
top fuel
dennismopar73  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,174
ill
400 block, stoker kit ,make 500 cci,
street/race, lighter block, be had cheap,
set rpm heads, mid to low 11s, could be able run in the 10 without whole lot work,
jmo

Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: dennismopar73] #1017139
06/21/11 11:17 AM
06/21/11 11:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,025
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,025
Kalispell Mt.
The weight differance is mabey 20# tops while the cube differance is 57 cubic inches, 20 LBS is not nearly as significant as 57 cubic inches


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: 383 VS 440 [Re: HotRodDave] #1017140
06/21/11 12:13 PM
06/21/11 12:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,174
ill
D
dennismopar73 Offline
top fuel
dennismopar73  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,174
ill
more than 20# , try 75+ little over 3/4 in across the whole block,
main area in the low dec much stronger.

Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Advertisement
Forum Statistics
Forums32
Topics194,459
Posts2,271,009
Members25,844
Most Online1,424
Jun 20th, 2018
Moparts Newest Topics
71 cuda conv project on eBay
by jeff968. 04/22/19 10:45 AM
Auction if you're in PA
by 62maxwgn. 04/22/19 09:57 AM
St. Louis Easter car show-pics P1
by FM3AAR. 04/22/19 09:47 AM
Jeg's & Summit gaming their discounts
by BradH. 04/22/19 09:08 AM

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1