Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: CUDA8U]
#1016651
06/20/11 08:15 AM
06/20/11 08:15 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
Hands down it's the 440 w it's 3/4 taller decks for more stroke potential or stock stroke/good heads. Even if you (commonly) stroke a 360 to 408, cubewise it's still a small BB & will take more radical (way less streetable) mods to get what you want. Build a killer long block then you can play w the cam/intake/ign etc & I've never heard anyone say they've built an eng w too much power, on the contrary...EDIT If you're not going to stroke it then a 400 w 440 crank (451) may b better (smaller/lighter) & is a better fit in an body & 470 (offset ground 440 3.750" crank) cubes is a practical limit in a B block
Last edited by RapidRobert; 06/20/11 08:49 AM.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: RapidRobert]
#1016652
06/20/11 09:01 AM
06/20/11 09:01 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
cheapest? spray it. what's your stock engine making now? 250 hp? what's a 250 spray kit cost? couple hundred bucks? oh...did you want longevity too?
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: 70Cuda383]
#1016654
06/20/11 09:18 AM
06/20/11 09:18 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,060 Pendleton NY
terzmo
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,060
Pendleton NY
|
Quote:
cheapest? spray it.
what's your stock engine making now? 250 hp? what's a 250 spray kit cost? couple hundred bucks?
oh...did you want longevity too?
and how long does it hold up...
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: CUDA8U]
#1016656
06/20/11 10:56 AM
06/20/11 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,665 Milwaukee, WI
Prince_Valiant
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,665
Milwaukee, WI
|
Quote:
WHICH ENGINE IS THE CHEAPEST AND EASIEST TO BUILD TO 500PLUS HP?
THAT'S EASY...IT'S A BI...ahem, 'scuse me. Sorry.
That's easy, a big block.
But perhaps better is rather than a number, what's your goal with the vehicle? What type? What will you want to do? What time do you envision?
1979 Dodge Lil' Red Express - 360 rwhp, 13.2 @ 103mph 1968 Coronet: 318, 2.76, 15.2 @ 92mph! (SOLD) 1976 Valiant: 360, 3.90, 12.90 @ 106 (SOLD) 1989 Shelby CSX #500/500
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: Prince_Valiant]
#1016658
06/20/11 11:44 AM
06/20/11 11:44 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
In stock form the heads flow about the same, a little well though out port and either can be made to flow enough, good pistons and rebuld kits are similar in price, a reground roller cam in a 360 mag is just as cheap as a flat tappet for a BB and combine it with some KB 167 pistons will get you 10.5 compression and tight quench ( a lot more money to get good quench with a BB 915 heads are hard to find and not normally cheap and with a cheap piston like a KB 237 you will need block milling to get a tight quench). TTI headers are gonna run similar $$$ or if you like to keep it super low budget you can get some summit brand headers real cheap for a SB. After all is said and done I think the SB could save you a few bucks (not much)but you are not gonna have the TQ of a similarly built BB, on the other hand an automatic SB car can run a 904 that costs less HP and weighs a lot less than a 727 that is required with a BB, also the engine would weigh a lot less, all added together you can save at least 150 LBS over an iron headed 440 plus a drive train soaking up less of the HP. 500 hp SB with the car set up right will be faster than a 500 HP 440, the 440 car would be more docile on the street from stop light to stop light but the SB car will handle better.
If you are really on a budget and have a car set up one way or the other then that is probably the cheapest way to go. Changin a BB car to SB costs money and vise versa.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: Leadfoot]
#1016659
06/20/11 01:26 PM
06/20/11 01:26 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678 Fresno, CA
Jim_Lusk
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
If you're trying to squeeze the Big Block into an A body your cost savings just went out the window.
Not really. Even if you go the most expensive route for mounts it's only $160. For 500 hp you're gonna need all the same beefier parts (suspension, rear end, brakes, etc.). Headers are another story, but good headers are expensive for either motor and if the big block is a "B" motor you can use "cheap" headers.
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: Jim_Lusk]
#1016660
06/20/11 02:14 PM
06/20/11 02:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221 Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
I love BB A bodies, but to just stuff "stock" vs. "stock", i'd go 360 magnum, why, well unless you get an earlier 383/440 which are getting scarce, the later 440s are pigs in stock form IMO, no compression, crappy heads that flow around 215/160, I've done this a few times & in stock bottom end form wasn't too impressed, got beatin up from plenty of SB chevy novas, My last build was with a junkyard 360 magnum out of a 95 truck, i purchased a set of RHS heads, stock they flow 240s/170s, a "small" re-ground roller cam & bolt-ons, with a 650dp, summit headers 2800 11" stall, stock 904 with RMVB, 3.73 gears, i would drive too & from the track & click off many 12.5 passes shifting at 5100, with a better cam, a good converter & a 4.30 gear, i'd be in the 11s still running on pump 91. I ran my fastest pass on a (400.00) plate system with 125 pills, Not even sorted out for max power, it pulled off a 7.4 pass @ 95 & i lifted abruptly do to drifting, there was more in it, tuned for max on a 150 shot i'll garuantee it would have pulled off a 7.0 @ 98-99. Just stuff a junkyard 360 magnum shortblock in it with RHS or EQ heads, a nice roller cam, RPM intake, 750 carb, a 9.5" converter & at least a 4.11 gear & have a blast, then collect a couple more 360 magnums for spares. I only had 1800.00 in the "whole" engine, includeing the 350.00 i paid for it , My old 451 cost me a good 4500.00+ & ran 6.9/7.0s NA
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: CUDA8U]
#1016661
06/20/11 03:27 PM
06/20/11 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134 Kelowna, B.C. Canada
DPelletier
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
|
The question (as stated) has only one correct answer: Big Block (specifically a 440) Dave
1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack
1974 'Cuda
2008 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Ram 3500 Diesel
2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel
2003 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Durango Limited
[url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
|
|
|
Re: BIG BLOCK VS SMALL
[Re: terzmo]
#1016664
06/20/11 03:58 PM
06/20/11 03:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825 Sk. Canada
RemCharger
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825
Sk. Canada
|
Quote:
Personally I would build the 440 over the 383 as the costs are the same. Actually have done that with one motor...440 stroked and bored to 498...comp cam...10 to 1 KB pistons...Running over 450 hp on pump gas and is very streetable....
383s can make fun power too. Good friend of mine has a 70 rt se chally with a 383/ el dabrock heads, made 500 on an crank dyno. Cam selection and machining are important to get right. You need to be sure of what you want, or want to accomplish, I'm wondering why you grabbed the # 500 out of the air. Is there a certain et you are trying to achieve, or.... The easiest way of course is to make up some 500 HP stickers and put them on the valve covers. Nobody would know unless you took it to the track. And turn your capslock button off please.
|
|
|
|
|