Who cares what's going on a BDC? The exhaust is open (usually) by then.
Using your example, the short rod would be that much QUICKER around TDC which affects intake centerline.
You lost me here? At BDC intake lobe the exhaust better not be open?
Yes, a shorter rod has less "dwell" around TDC, but this would be the overlap area, not intake centerline.
You can have different cam grinds with various duration and overlap, but the intake lobe (when degreed in) centerline usually falls within a small window when the piston position is around 3/4 stroke length from TDC. I was just curious how this came to be, and if there was significance to the piston position?
I know it is sort of like looking at the cam design backwards, starting with the lobe centerline(s) in relation to piston position, then selecting the opening or closing point and doubling it to get duration. For example, you don't see intake lobes ground with an opening point way before TDC, without a really late closing point (high duration, but normal ICL).
Example1 - 292 duration 108cl, intake opens @ 38 degrees BTDC, and Closes at 74 ABDC
If the closing point was much sooner (lower duration, with same early opening) than we would see intake lobes installed in the 90-100 degree range.
Example2 - Intake opens @ 38 degrees, but closes @ 58 degrees ABDC, results in the lobe center moving to 100 ICL, with only 276 degrees duration.
Example3 - the exhaust duration on both cams is 292, and we want equal exhaust overlap of 38 degrees ATDC, then the first example had the LSA of 108 (cam installed straight up), and the second example has a LSA of 104 (cam ICL = 100, so advanced 4 degrees.)