"14.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
Testing procedures and/or standards contained in this specification are intended for use only as a guide in determining compliance with the minimum performance requirements as defined herein. The granting and assignment of the "This Manufacturer Certifies That This
Product Meets SFI Specification 16. 1" logo/designation is in no way an endorsement or certification of product performance or reliability by SFI. SFI, its officers, directors and/or members assume no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for failure or malfunctions of a product under this program."

SAE could propound an aftermarket belt or racing standard. They have a number of seat belt standards already. No reason NHRA couldn't petition and adopt that instead....

---

Yes indeed... why not use the SAE standards... a
auto company runs MILLIONS more cars with the SAE
standard on the belts... we have to have them last
in most cases(and longer) 10 years(that is the warranty)
for most cars when it comes to the safety... the
saferty equipment in production cars is longer than
the engine/chassis warranty.... can you imagine the
law suits any car company would have with a seat belt
failure..a failure there is easy to spot.. I've been
to court cases for Chrysler on fuel related cases
and in those the belts were still in tact(fire)..
yes they may have melted after the car was sitting
there burning... but still in tact ... just saying