Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2527228
07/26/18 02:34 AM
07/26/18 02:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,586
Topeka Kansas
K
ksj Offline
master
ksj  Offline
master
K

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,586
Topeka Kansas
69 Lawndart may chime in. Hes been busy with family stuff.

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2527521
07/26/18 06:55 PM
07/26/18 06:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Nampa, Idaho
M
Moparmatts72 Offline
member
Moparmatts72  Offline
member
M

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Nampa, Idaho
I have one and it will be boosted just hit a snag when I had to get shoulder surgery but my block also went to QMP, 50mm roller cam with roller bearings. Have most ready to finish building just need my Lifters and push rods. Hopefully soon I can build it and finish wiring and get it to the dump and post results.

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: FurryStump] #2527602
07/26/18 09:37 PM
07/26/18 09:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline OP
master
WHITEDART  Offline OP
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
Originally Posted By FurryStump
What are you using for epoxcy? Belzona super metal very expensive, but the best I have found.
belzona is crazy good. But in this application I need something with a lower viscosity that will flow into the problem area easier.. I'm not a hundred percent sure on the name at the moment


In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: Biginchmopar] #2527608
07/26/18 09:52 PM
07/26/18 09:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline OP
master
WHITEDART  Offline OP
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
Originally Posted By Biginchmopar
I'm hoping to make good power out of my deal, I guess time will tell.
If mine makes good power and has no issues then what?

I know Dart said they would make a block but that is a couple years away at least.

I'm telling you guys my block is different than Whitedart's but nobody is listening

Whitedart's block was an earlier version and the people that machined it are no longer doing the work for Ritter. Ritter moved all his stuff to a new facility with way better machines. I got blocks #3 and #4, who got #1, #2, #5, #6 and #7?

Nobody on this board I guess

Anyways Whitedart's block has problems and I wish him the best, he has one of the best machine shops in the US working on his stuff so he is in good hands.

These type of build are rare and even more rare because they are Mopars.

Like I said stay tuned.
I have heard that the Bernal of the cylinders is much better with the new blocks also that the rough machine work is better.. these are all pluses and things that needed to happen..


In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2527729
07/27/18 04:25 AM
07/27/18 04:25 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,557
New Smyrna Beach FL
S
scottb Offline
pro stock
scottb  Offline
pro stock
S

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,557
New Smyrna Beach FL
Has Kent ever contacted you about doing the right thing and shipping you a new block for free

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: DavidDean] #2527840
07/27/18 12:45 PM
07/27/18 12:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,484
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,484
SoCal
Originally Posted By DavidDean
I'm concerned, My new Ritter block shipped out Friday from Ritters headed to QMP. I was planning on having the cam tunnel bored to 60mm but I'm having second thoughts. I hope the newer blocks have more meat in that area. Thanks for sharing Shilo.


Our block I had cut for 50mm cam core....


Brian Hafliger
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: J_BODY] #2527841
07/27/18 12:46 PM
07/27/18 12:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,484
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,484
SoCal
Originally Posted By J_BODY
Believe Brian (IMM Engines) block was one of the newer pieces. He was going to use it for a new ebrock head build, but sold it and is venturing into a Gen3 build. It had already gone through QMP’s hands and as far as I’ve know had been given a thumbs up.


We are building that engine now....will have it running in a few weeks.


Brian Hafliger
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: scottb] #2527853
07/27/18 01:04 PM
07/27/18 01:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline OP
master
WHITEDART  Offline OP
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
Originally Posted By scottb
Has Kent ever contacted you about doing the right thing and shipping you a new block for free
nope


In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2527919
07/27/18 03:43 PM
07/27/18 03:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Up the page a ways, were you talking about the block's Brinell Hardness Number (BHN)?

R.

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2527942
07/27/18 04:24 PM
07/27/18 04:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Nampa, Idaho
M
Moparmatts72 Offline
member
Moparmatts72  Offline
member
M

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Nampa, Idaho
I think number of new block that have been bought

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: dogdays] #2528138
07/28/18 12:16 AM
07/28/18 12:16 AM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline OP
master
WHITEDART  Offline OP
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
Originally Posted By dogdays
Up the page a ways, were you talking about the block's Brinell Hardness Number (BHN)?

R.
it has been a while since we talked about it but if my memory serves me it varies from hole to hole top to bottom I believe from 210 to 240.. it should be getting honed again here in the next couple weeks he will check it again. I guess it makes it difficult when you're trying to achieve a quality hone.

Last edited by WHITEDART; 07/28/18 02:56 AM.

In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2528143
07/28/18 12:27 AM
07/28/18 12:27 AM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline OP
master
WHITEDART  Offline OP
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
When trying to achieve a certain RA/ RPK/ RVK...


In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2528725
07/29/18 06:55 PM
07/29/18 06:55 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
California
S
slowfab Offline
member
slowfab  Offline
member
S

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
California
I have one of the new blocks also. Dropped it off at QMP last Wednesday along with a R3 block. The Ritter will get the 60mm cam bearings. Using the Victor heads and going with turbos.

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2528758
07/29/18 08:34 PM
07/29/18 08:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Nampa, Idaho
M
Moparmatts72 Offline
member
Moparmatts72  Offline
member
M

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Nampa, Idaho
Glad to know I'm not the only one using turbos on a Ritter block.

Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: WHITEDART] #2529703
07/31/18 08:37 PM
07/31/18 08:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 452
Monrovia, So-Cal, USA
racerhog Offline
mopar
racerhog  Offline
mopar

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 452
Monrovia, So-Cal, USA
Still no idea where the coolant loss is, in the block?
I think at this point I would set screw the 3 bearings check it for alignment and go with it if it looked and felt good.

Maybe as a last resort.


Bob(Cowboy)Hogan
Monrovia So-Cal
Re: Ritter racing block design flaw [Re: racerhog] #2529757
07/31/18 10:27 PM
07/31/18 10:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline OP
master
WHITEDART  Offline OP
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
That's the plan..


In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1