Posted By: lilcuda
'67 GTX on BaT
Posted By: gtx6970
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 05/28/23 07:08 PM
Good looking car.
Buddy of mine has his eyes on it. Hopefully its actually in Scottsdale AZ
He talked to the seller a day or 2 ago. If it doesnt meet reserve . I think he is going to go up and take a look. This car cks about every one of his boxes for sure.
The coolant stains on the block have have been address per the comments in the post.
Buddy of mine has his eyes on it. Hopefully its actually in Scottsdale AZ
He talked to the seller a day or 2 ago. If it doesnt meet reserve . I think he is going to go up and take a look. This car cks about every one of his boxes for sure.
The coolant stains on the block have have been address per the comments in the post.
Posted By: topside
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 05/28/23 10:29 PM
Agree, very attractive and great colors.
I saw it run through either Mecum or B-J recently: I remember the incorrect fender nameplate placement.
In the photo of the engine underside, it looks like a coolant leak discolored the engine paint near the starter.
That could be a problem.
Note text states Seller bought it earlier this year...
I saw it run through either Mecum or B-J recently: I remember the incorrect fender nameplate placement.
In the photo of the engine underside, it looks like a coolant leak discolored the engine paint near the starter.
That could be a problem.
Note text states Seller bought it earlier this year...
Posted By: larrymopar360
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 05/28/23 11:32 PM
Hey when it's started cold and idling in video what's the odd engine noise at about 46 through 56 seconds? Is it just something echoing off building? Seemed to run strong and definitely a very nice looking car!
Posted By: TJP
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 05/29/23 04:03 AM
Originally Posted by topside
Agree, very attractive and great colors.
I saw it run through either Mecum or B-J recently: I remember the incorrect fender nameplate placement.
In the photo of the engine underside, it looks like a coolant leak discolored the engine paint near the starter.
That could be a problem.
Note text states Seller bought it earlier this year...
I saw it run through either Mecum or B-J recently: I remember the incorrect fender nameplate placement.
In the photo of the engine underside, it looks like a coolant leak discolored the engine paint near the starter.
That could be a problem.
Note text states Seller bought it earlier this year...
Always a red flag to me.
Had a customer several years back buy an early GS Riviera, the pic's show what was found behind the Starter
The JB ? was removed with a propane torch, revealing a poor attempt at welding the crack. The last pic is of the oil pan
. BTW: It was claimed to be a "freshly rebuilt motor supposedly done by a Buick Nailhead SPECIALIST" Not sure how the deal turned out with the seller but I suspect there was likely some $$ returned as the buyer was quite well connected 
Posted By: gtx6970
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 05/29/23 06:47 PM
Sold.
$67,000
Looked like a nice car. But even i didn't expect it to go that much
$67,000
Looked like a nice car. But even i didn't expect it to go that much
Posted By: NANKET
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 06/07/23 04:18 PM
That’s a nice looking GTX with good options. Brought good money.
Don’t copy what they did on the restoration.
Some wrong detail and plating items and the dash is too shiny.
Not to have 3 stickers on the core support in 1967
I didn’t watch the vodeo.
Don’t copy what they did on the restoration.
Some wrong detail and plating items and the dash is too shiny.
Not to have 3 stickers on the core support in 1967
I didn’t watch the vodeo.
Posted By: larrymopar360
Re: '67 GTX on BaT - 06/07/23 08:35 PM
And nobody else had a concern with the noise at idle?