Moparts

Chassis dyno...

Posted By: 70Cuda383

Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 04:33 PM

I know that hp at the wheels is typically 20-25% lower than at the crank due to driveline losses... What about torque? Does the drive line also consume 20-25% of the torque?


I'm thinking that it would have to since the torque is a function of the RPM, but then again, 5000 rpm on the dyno chart (engine speed) is not 5000 rpm of tire speed due to gear reduction and tire sizes.
Posted By: Dunnuck Racing

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 05:50 PM

Horsepower is a mathematical formula,torque is an actual measurement.
Dynos measure the torque,so the loss of torque has to be there. The 20-25% numbers are a big argument among different manufacturers.
Hope this helps.
Keith
Posted By: deaks

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 06:26 PM

My car was chassis dynoed at 460 hp at 6300 but was still climbing, i now run the limiter at 6500.
Car is 3200 race ready, i reckon my flywheel hp is somewhere close to 600, which would equate to around 25%.
Best tuning tool around.
Mick
Posted By: an8sec70cuda

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 06:27 PM

I'm assuming you're about to put your car on a chassis dyno...don't put your car on it just to see what kind of power it is making. It has been discussed here many times, but the dyno is just a tool. Don't get discouraged if it only says you're making 300 hp, but don't get excited if it says you're making 700 either.
Same car, same day, on 2 different dynos can yield very different results.
Posted By: 70Cuda383

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 07:31 PM

yes I know about dynos and how much they can change from brand to brand, shop to shop, operator to operator, even day to day on the same dyno.

shop in town was doing 3 basline pulls for $30, figured with my new 5.9L in the dakota, might as well go see what the torque curve looks like, find out where the best place to shift it ought to be, find out if I'm really running out of head flow above 5,000 rpm and the power is dropping WAY off, etc.

but, since it's spitting out some rear wheel power numbers, and it seems the vast majority of folks out there talk about crank hp when talking about a certain combo, since that seems to be the "universal standard" that takes out gear ratios, autos vs sticks, etc. on power output.

I know that there's no good way to take a chassis dyno and calculate flywheel power, and vice versa, since every vehicle combo will be different, and that the only way to know either number for sure, is to dyno it!

that all being said, I know that Hp is a calculation of Torque vs RPM, and that at 5252 every dyno graph hp/tq curve crosses. but was just curious as to whether or not a chassis dyno uses different formula's to calculate the Hp/Tq, since there's gear reduction/torque multiplication in the rear differential and tire size diameter, and that the torque the chassis dyno is seeing is rear wheel torque, not flywheel torque...and how that correlates to flywheel torque.


ok...now that the dyno pulls are done, I made 285hp and 325 torque. does that mean I'm in the 375 hp ballpark at the flywheel, and 400 ft lbs of torque ballpark at the flywheel? or is my motor making 375/325?

Posted By: furious70

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 07:58 PM

You would apply the correction % (whatever you decide to use) to both the TQ and HP numbers. As was said, HP is an equation derived from TQ and RPM, so HP cannot go +20% unless TQ does.
Posted By: 70Cuda383

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 08:07 PM

Quote:

You would apply the correction % (whatever you decide to use) to both the TQ and HP numbers. As was said, HP is an equation derived from TQ and RPM, so HP cannot go +20% unless TQ does.




fair enough. thanks!
Posted By: 70Cuda383

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 08:10 PM

so...shift it at 5500 rpm? or 5200?

Attached picture 6882190-5.9LWhiplashDyno.jpg
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 08:29 PM

I find it hard to believe that there is a % loss.
So same driveline on different motor with more hp takes more energy to drive?????

I remeber when i chassie dynoed my Dart, after full power i had to coast down to idle cause the dyno calculated the loss from that.
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 08:31 PM

forgot to mension, after one pull i accidently pressed the brake and the calculated engie hp went sky high.
Posted By: furious70

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 08:55 PM

It has to do with the force required to accelerate being exponential, not linear. So yes, a stronger engine will try to spin everything quicker, and it takes exponentially more force to do that.
Posted By: BSB67

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/21/11 11:48 PM

6000.

The only real way to tell is at the track
Posted By: 70Cuda383

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/22/11 01:03 AM

6,000 RPM sure does sing!!!


http://youtu.be/u4YXAdjfO6o
Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/22/11 01:20 AM

7600 is a little higher note
Posted By: 70Cuda383

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/22/11 02:09 AM

yea, I know 6,000 is child's play for the guys with serious racer engines. but with this cam, 6,000 is all she's got! I need more head, more exhaust, and probably more intake to spin more than 6,000 anyway!
Posted By: turbobitt

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/22/11 02:12 AM

Quote:

I know that hp at the wheels is typically 20-25% lower than at the crank due to driveline losses... What about torque? Does the drive line also consume 20-25% of the torque?





There is no possible way that there is a 20-25% loss. I would say closer to 10% and 15% on the extreame high side. I had my Turbo Buick on the rollers(dynojet) a few weeks ago and made 840 HP @ 26# boost and ran out of fuel pump. Going back tomorrow and hoping for 1000HP. At this level, If you assumed 20% then something would be melting off the car assuming the loss would be due to friction.

Allan G.
Posted By: goldmember

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/22/11 03:24 AM

Quote:

Quote:

I know that hp at the wheels is typically 20-25% lower than at the crank due to driveline losses... What about torque? Does the drive line also consume 20-25% of the torque?





There is no possible way that there is a 20-25% loss. I would say closer to 10% and 15% on the extreame high side. I had my Turbo Buick on the rollers(dynojet) a few weeks ago and made 840 HP @ 26# boost and ran out of fuel pump. Going back tomorrow and hoping for 1000HP. At this level, If you assumed 20% then something would be melting off the car assuming the loss would be due to friction.

Allan G.


I pretty much agree with this. With a torque converter the numbers can be a mess,but a manual trans is more accurate. I use 18% loss for my best guess,your % lost may be less. We have a Dakota,with an automatic,similar cam specs,4bbl carb,junkyard 360 magnum,etc,makes 315 at the tire,runs 12.20's 107mph @3550lbs. It's dead above 5200rpm as well. I can fix it but my buddy isn't ready for that yet.
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/22/11 08:38 AM

if ti took all this much power woudnt it "engine brake" with as much force?
newtons law?
so a 1000hp motor would brake with 250 hp?
Posted By: Grizzly

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/23/11 07:34 AM

I'm no expert, but by the looks of it 5000rpm. The torque is starting to fall off and so is the hp.

With your 5 speed gear spreads, the next gear shift should be keeping you in the fat part of the curve. Won't hurt to wind it out in 4th though.

Love that Dakota, by the way. Nice job on the engine build too.
Posted By: JAKE68

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/23/11 02:03 PM

We have a chassis dyno that we use to tune, On motors that we have engine dynoed and then chassis dynoed depending on the converter have been from 21-28% loss difference. With a stick it has been 18-20% loss This is not something i live by but just reference. The chassis dyno should only be for tuning and not see what THE NUMBER IS. I dont care what the number is I tune to see if there is any more. We also determine if converter is right for the outcome.
Posted By: turbobitt

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/23/11 05:37 PM

Quote:

We have a chassis dyno that we use to tune, On motors that we have engine dynoed and then chassis dynoed depending on the converter have been from 21-28% loss difference. With a stick it has been 18-20% loss This is not something i live by but just reference. The chassis dyno should only be for tuning and not see what THE NUMBER IS. I dont care what the number is I tune to see if there is any more. We also determine if converter is right for the outcome.



This sounds like a calibration difference between dyno's. 28% loss - ask yourself where is it going ?? I would love to believe that my 928 RWHP dyno pull yesterday could be actually that much higher at the crank.

Allan G.
Posted By: 5126brl No more

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/23/11 07:52 PM

I dynoed the engine on a DTS at Larrys in stonington and it made 591hp. Took car to a chassis dyno in wallingford 2 years later and made 482 hp at the wheels ,. this is a 4-speed so I lost 109 hp. in the drive train. whats that? about 18%?
Posted By: goldmember

Re: Chassis dyno... - 10/23/11 08:50 PM

Yep.
© 2024 Moparts Forums