Moparts

481" W8 on dyno

Posted By: RyanJ

481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 05:56 PM

Got a few minutes here before I head off to a wedding this afternoon, figured I'd post results of a 481" W8 we dynoed last week....

Basic combo:

R3 Siamese 48* 4.20" bore
Custom Callies 4.34" stroke 340 main crank, 2.0" journal
GRP Rods, 6.20" .866" pin
Diamond flat tops, gas ported, X style forging, .043" ring pack, 15.6:1 compression
Custom Moroso 4" kickout oil pan
Custom Comp solid roller cam, low 280's @ .050", under .800" lift. 110 LSA
1.8/1.75 T&D rockers, PAC 1326 springs & Ti retainers, Ti locks.
Heads are virgin never ran Phil Coleman W8 Nascar truck heads with original valve job etc. 2.16"/1.625" 7MM/5/16" valve combo, Had Ti intakes, Custom Ferrea stainless exhausts.
SDSS modified P5007420 intake, with .625" manifold spacers blended on to fit 9.56" deck. 4500 flange/plenum conversion.
Crane utra pro .210 offset .903 lifters, 1/2" .168" wall manton pushrods.
ATI Super Damper/MSD crank trigger/Meziere water pump/Moroso 4 vane vacuum pump/Liberty timing chain & tensioner/MSD distributor/Stock Car products 1.45" rotor single stage oil pump


I had a pair of these custom 4.34" cranks made last fall for a pair of 481's, the other one we ran a few weeks ago with an 11:1 pump gas setup & N20 camshaft, 772 tall deck manifold & Bob Dowling CNC W9 heads made 770HP/680 TQ. So I knew this one with the wick turned up a bit should be pretty decent...

This motor is for a friend of mine here in State College who wanted to go faster than 9.80s the old pump gas Arrington head motor used to run... We took car to Long Island few months ago & had custom set of 2 1/8" into 2 1/4" headers made for it ('72 Challenger) with 4" merge collector, by guy who used to work for Kooks before they moved to NC. We had headers done before motor was dynoed so we could see exactly what we'd have in the car VS the dyno headers.

We ran these headers on the other 481 few weeks ago & they absolutely killed it... down like 60 HP & 70 TQ. We swapped the merge collectors out for a traditional Hooker non merge & was able to gain back ~30 HP, but was still off a good amount in TQ. So I was'nt really looking forward to swapping the headers on this one, after all the aggrevation we went through to have the headers made as well as $.

Anyhow.... We started tuning it on C16 fuel.... tried few different carbs, spacers, timing, vacuum settings etc. Played with lash & got 840 HP, 710 TQ out of it on C16.

Switched to Q16 & re-tuned motor for that, liked 31 degrees of timing best... 2" HVH spacer ontop of the 420 & 882 HP, 742 TQ.

The switch in fuel alone was basically 40 HP/ 30 TQ across the board, this was in same air on same day. We ended up having to go up 3 Jet sizes on 1050 QF carb & I think we dropped 20-25 high speed air bleeds & 10-15 on intermediate & idle bleeds to get it rich enough on the oxygenated fuel, but eventually with enough screwing with the air bleeds we got it to work. Looking back, I think the carb is a bit small for this motor, if we "need" more power in future, will probably try a larger carb, I just did'nt have anything bigger than a 1050 on hand, should have had a new SV1 made for it, but ran out of time. We put 26 pulls on it on gas... then the next day we tried methanol...

The shop owner has a brand new 1050 QFX metahnol dominator on his 500" BB GM pulling tractor motor, so we pulled that off & fired it on.... was lean, jetted & messed with timing, & best with it was 871 HP/732 TQ. The TQ down in the 4500-5400 range was up about 20 on metahnol, but after about 6000 RPM the meth dropped off & the oxygenated gas took over...

So then we switched back to Q16, made a baseline pull with dyno headers back on... 871 HP/738 TQ...

Put the Challenger headers on... Made some pulls, tweaked a little bit & 862 HP/717 TQ. For whatever reason they do hurt TQ quite a bit from 4500-about 5300, but in mid range & top end they are pretty close to the 1 7/8"-2" 3.5 collector Schoenfeld Sprint car dyno headers... So I was happy that they worked well on the engine they were designed for (We used Pipemax program to design steps & sizes) Was just funny that they did not work well at all on same size motor, but with much different cam & compression... learned a good bit there.

Biggest surprise of the 2 days we thrashed on it was the lack of changes the vacuum pump made... Did'nt care whether I had it at 8 inches or 18 inches.... relaly did not pick up hardly any power at all, putting vacuum to it, so for simplicity in the car (the owner HATES draining the breather tank) we put a pair of moroso circle track breathers on it & eliminated the pump, also gives us a place to easier mount the alternator.

Put motor in the car last weekend & spent evenings this week getting everything plumbed for new motor & we fired it 11 PM Wednesday night, sounds good, very crisp & responsive. It's at exhaust shop now having set of 4" pipes made for it & the n goes to chassis shop for scaling & alignment the following week. Hope to have it out for test & tune in July. Car was 3260 last year, BGR did an all new moly cage for it & all new back half... we did set of Holeshot bead locks & 31 X 13.5's in it... I did a significant lightening program on block, so I'm hoping we will be in the 3120 race weight range this year. Would be nice to see it in the 8's by end of year. Unfortunately with the owners schedule & mine we will not have alot of time to run it this year... but will get it sorted out along with my turbo car so we can put in a dedicated year of racing next season.

One thing you can't argue about with CID, the torque is awesome... I've only built one motor that ever made over 700 FT lbs NA before, & that was a 471" with W9's @ 16:1, Sheetmetal tunnel ram, 2 1050's on Q16. That one was around 714 TQ. @ 1.54 TQ/INCH Rick's new motor is even better. The TQ #'s these really big motors make with really good induction systems & big compression is neat.

One of coolest things was to compare this motor to 481" Big Block Chevy on same dyno... The owners pulling tractor motor (which is currently 1st in his points chase after 4 events, so it's not exactly a slouch) is a 481", Brodix "Big Brodie" heads, 2.30" valves, Profiler Sniper 4500 intake, 1050 QFX on methanol, 12.5:1, Lunati 286 @ .050" .800" solid roller, with a wet sump oil system... that motor on this dyno made 780 HP/625 TQ this spring after some changes over the winter to pick it up. Last year it was 710 HP/585 TQ on same dyno.. I re-worked the combustion chambers in the heads & we changed intakes over the winter to make the gains from the 2010 setup. Amazing to see this motor, up 100 HP & 115 TQ, but really shows how bad of a piece a traditional valve layout BB GM is. Piston dome design, combustion chamber design & too big of ports/valves actually contribute to hurting power, not making it.

I'll post a copy of dyno sheet tomorrow night, I forgot today my camera is sitting at the shop with them on. Here are couple pics I snapped with my iphone when it was on dyno & one of it sitting in car... Should be a fun ride.

Attached picture 6688483-photo(5).JPG
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 05:57 PM

2

Attached picture 6688485-photo(7).JPG
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 05:58 PM

& don't ask me why the pictures are showing up on here sideways? No idea...

Attached picture 6688489-photo(3).JPG
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 06:00 PM

Intake I did for it....

Attached picture 6688492-100_2489mod.jpg
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 06:00 PM

another

Attached picture 6688494-100_2478mod.jpg
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 06:05 PM

Pass side Challenger header mocked up on W9 motor to show the design of it (car has an Alter-K-Tion front end on it)...

Attached picture 6688501-100_2793.JPG
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 06:08 PM

Drivers side on W9 mock up motor

Attached picture 6688506-100_2806.JPG
Posted By: Triple Threat

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 06:38 PM

Thank For Sharing Ryan. My junk should be back from the machine shop in a few weeks
Posted By: dc426

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 07:27 PM

Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 08:21 PM

now u know ryan,if and i mean if i go that route of big ci,were gonna have to hit the 900hp mark
Posted By: DavidDean

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 08:43 PM

Thanks nice build, I better keep this one.
Posted By: Guitar Jones

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 09:59 PM

Looks like that guy with the pulling truck should dump his BBC and get a SBM.
Posted By: Big Squeeze

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/18/11 10:41 PM

Thanks, for the write up, Ryan......
Posted By: TrWaters

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 12:24 AM

Why are the pictures sideways?
Posted By: Leon441

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 02:56 AM

Big arm = Big peak torque

Nothing can compare to a big stroker in the gear change. Now all you need is a huffer or some nitrous to make up for that limited intake and carb.

Leon
Posted By: W5Duster436

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 04:01 AM

Posted By: greendart408

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 04:32 AM

Nice,

I know it would be a pain to do but it would be interesting to see what mechanical alky injection would do on a combo like this also. Would be alot of extra work.
Posted By: moparniac

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 04:43 AM

so this beat you old best build of 1.52 HP per CI?
Posted By: MIKES_DUSTER

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 05:54 AM

Is that a pic of your old dart??
Posted By: Chris'sBarracuda

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 08:46 AM

Quote:

so this beat you old best build of 1.52 HP per CI?




Quote:


Anyhow.... We started tuning it on C16 fuel.... tried few different carbs, spacers, timing, vacuum settings etc. Played with lash & got 840 HP, 710 TQ out of it on C16.

Switched to Q16 & re-tuned motor for that, liked 31 degrees of timing best... 2" HVH spacer ontop of the 420 & 882 HP, 742 TQ.





I come up with 1.74+ to 1.83+ hp per..

Pretty stout piece..

Are the flow numbers fairly close to this..

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...e=4#Post6675011






Chris..
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 10:30 AM

Quote:

Big arm = Big peak torque

Nothing can compare to a big stroker in the gear change. Now all you need is a huffer or some nitrous to make up for that limited intake and carb.

Leon


leon funny u say that my friend has the other 481ci motor ryan was talkin about(w a 2 stage system on it,should be t@t in 2 weeks with it
Posted By: tboomer

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 01:52 PM

Great job as always,Ryan!
Posted By: 1Fast340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 02:52 PM

great informative post
Posted By: Bigcube

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 03:47 PM

Was the peak RPM's different from the pump gas 481 motor to this one? Just thinking out loud and wondering if the header differences was attributable to usable RPM.
Posted By: emarine01

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/19/11 08:26 PM

Quote:

so this beat you old best build of 1.52 HP per CI?


I come up with 1.54 ft/lbs per cube for torque, The hp would be higher
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/20/11 09:02 PM

u gotta hear the diff in the sound on youtube,theres like 12 vid's of ryanj's motors being dynoed,starting from like 360ish ci up to my buds pump gas 481 that sounds like a lion
Posted By: MattW

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/20/11 10:39 PM


I
Quote:

Got a few minutes here before I head off to a wedding this afternoon, figured I'd post results of a 481" W8 we dynoed last week....

Basic combo:

R3 Siamese 48* 4.20" bore
Custom Callies 4.34" stroke 340 main crank, 2.0" journal
GRP Rods, 6.20" .866" pin
Diamond flat tops, gas ported, X style forging, .043" ring pack, 15.6:1 compression
Custom Moroso 4" kickout oil pan
Custom Comp solid roller cam, low 280's @ .050", under .800" lift. 110 LSA
1.8/1.75 T&D rockers, PAC 1326 springs & Ti retainers, Ti locks.
Heads are virgin never ran Phil Coleman W8 Nascar truck heads with original valve job etc. 2.16"/1.625" 7MM/5/16" valve combo, Had Ti intakes, Custom Ferrea stainless exhausts.
SDSS modified P5007420 intake, with .625" manifold spacers blended on to fit 9.56" deck. 4500 flange/plenum conversion.
Crane utra pro .210 offset .903 lifters, 1/2" .168" wall manton pushrods.
ATI Super Damper/MSD crank trigger/Meziere water pump/Moroso 4 vane vacuum pump/Liberty timing chain & tensioner/MSD distributor/Stock Car products 1.45" rotor single stage oil pump


I had a pair of these custom 4.34" cranks made last fall for a pair of 481's, the other one we ran a few weeks ago with an 11:1 pump gas setup & N20 camshaft, 772 tall deck manifold & Bob Dowling CNC W9 heads made 770HP/680 TQ. So I knew this one with the wick turned up a bit should be pretty decent...

This motor is for a friend of mine here in State College who wanted to go faster than 9.80s the old pump gas Arrington head motor used to run... We took car to Long Island few months ago & had custom set of 2 1/8" into 2 1/4" headers made for it ('72 Challenger) with 4" merge collector, by guy who used to work for Kooks before they moved to NC. We had headers done before motor was dynoed so we could see exactly what we'd have in the car VS the dyno headers.

We ran these headers on the other 481 few weeks ago & they absolutely killed it... down like 60 HP & 70 TQ. We swapped the merge collectors out for a traditional Hooker non merge & was able to gain back ~30 HP, but was still off a good amount in TQ. So I was'nt really looking forward to swapping the headers on this one, after all the aggrevation we went through to have the headers made as well as $.

Anyhow.... We started tuning it on C16 fuel.... tried few different carbs, spacers, timing, vacuum settings etc. Played with lash & got 840 HP, 710 TQ out of it on C16.

Switched to Q16 & re-tuned motor for that, liked 31 degrees of timing best... 2" HVH spacer ontop of the 420 & 882 HP, 742 TQ.

The switch in fuel alone was basically 40 HP/ 30 TQ across the board, this was in same air on same day. We ended up having to go up 3 Jet sizes on 1050 QF carb & I think we dropped 20-25 high speed air bleeds & 10-15 on intermediate & idle bleeds to get it rich enough on the oxygenated fuel, but eventually with enough screwing with the air bleeds we got it to work. Looking back, I think the carb is a bit small for this motor, if we "need" more power in future, will probably try a larger carb, I just did'nt have anything bigger than a 1050 on hand, should have had a new SV1 made for it, but ran out of time. We put 26 pulls on it on gas... then the next day we tried methanol...

The shop owner has a brand new 1050 QFX metahnol dominator on his 500" BB GM pulling tractor motor, so we pulled that off & fired it on.... was lean, jetted & messed with timing, & best with it was 871 HP/732 TQ. The TQ down in the 4500-5400 range was up about 20 on metahnol, but after about 6000 RPM the meth dropped off & the oxygenated gas took over...

So then we switched back to Q16, made a baseline pull with dyno headers back on... 871 HP/738 TQ...

Put the Challenger headers on... Made some pulls, tweaked a little bit & 862 HP/717 TQ. For whatever reason they do hurt TQ quite a bit from 4500-about 5300, but in mid range & top end they are pretty close to the 1 7/8"-2" 3.5 collector Schoenfeld Sprint car dyno headers... So I was happy that they worked well on the engine they were designed for (We used Pipemax program to design steps & sizes) Was just funny that they did not work well at all on same size motor, but with much different cam & compression... learned a good bit there.

Biggest surprise of the 2 days we thrashed on it was the lack of changes the vacuum pump made... Did'nt care whether I had it at 8 inches or 18 inches.... relaly did not pick up hardly any power at all, putting vacuum to it, so for simplicity in the car (the owner HATES draining the breather tank) we put a pair of moroso circle track breathers on it & eliminated the pump, also gives us a place to easier mount the alternator.

Put motor in the car last weekend & spent evenings this week getting everything plumbed for new motor & we fired it 11 PM Wednesday night, sounds good, very crisp & responsive. It's at exhaust shop now having set of 4" pipes made for it & the n goes to chassis shop for scaling & alignment the following week. Hope to have it out for test & tune in July. Car was 3260 last year, BGR did an all new moly cage for it & all new back half... we did set of Holeshot bead locks & 31 X 13.5's in it... I did a significant lightening program on block, so I'm hoping we will be in the 3120 race weight range this year. Would be nice to see it in the 8's by end of year. Unfortunately with the owners schedule & mine we will not have alot of time to run it this year... but will get it sorted out along with my turbo car so we can put in a dedicated year of racing next season.

One thing you can't argue about with CID, the torque is awesome... I've only built one motor that ever made over 700 FT lbs NA before, & that was a 471" with W9's @ 16:1, Sheetmetal tunnel ram, 2 1050's on Q16. That one was around 714 TQ. @ 1.54 TQ/INCH Rick's new motor is even better. The TQ #'s these really big motors make with really good induction systems & big compression is neat.

One of coolest things was to compare this motor to 481" Big Block Chevy on same dyno... The owners pulling tractor motor (which is currently 1st in his points chase after 4 events, so it's not exactly a slouch) is a 481", Brodix "Big Brodie" heads, 2.30" valves, Profiler Sniper 4500 intake, 1050 QFX on methanol, 12.5:1, Lunati 286 @ .050" .800" solid roller, with a wet sump oil system... that motor on this dyno made 780 HP/625 TQ this spring after some changes over the winter to pick it up. Last year it was 710 HP/585 TQ on same dyno.. I re-worked the combustion chambers in the heads & we changed intakes over the winter to make the gains from the 2010 setup. Amazing to see this motor, up 100 HP & 115 TQ, but really shows how bad of a piece a traditional valve layout BB GM is. Piston dome design, combustion chamber design & too big of ports/valves actually contribute to hurting power, not making it.

I'll post a copy of dyno sheet tomorrow night, I forgot today my camera is sitting at the shop with them on. Here are couple pics I snapped with my iphone when it was on dyno & one of it sitting in car... Should be a fun ride.




Thanks for the info. It would be interesting to see the results with this type of effort with the 3G hemi. Matt
Posted By: hooziewhatsit

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/20/11 10:52 PM



In theory, if you copy the pictures to your computer, open them in windows picture viewer, then click Rotate until they're correct, they should upload in the correct orientation
Posted By: HotRodDave

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/21/11 02:27 AM

Just to put this in perspective it is like a 318 makeing about 490 TQ pretty amazeing
Posted By: FASTFISH420

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/21/11 04:59 PM

Cool Motor the big inch stuff you just dont see.It made some killer torque..
Posted By: MattW

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/21/11 05:13 PM

Quote:

Just to put this in perspective it is like a 318 makeing about 490 TQ pretty amazeing




BES made 1.49 TQ/ INCH with their 3G Hemi hydraulic pump gas engine.
Posted By: RV2

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/21/11 09:39 PM

"but really shows how bad of a piece a traditional valve layout BB GM is. Piston dome design, combustion chamber design & too big of ports/valves actually contribute to hurting power, not making it."




Ryan glad to hear somebody tell the truth about those big block chevy heads!
Posted By: theclutcher

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/22/11 03:15 AM

Those heads and build sound pretty good, any flow specs on them?
At that displacement, how high it spinning?
I can wait for dyno sheet...
Posted By: ggddemon

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/22/11 04:41 PM

Quote:

Nice,

I know it would be a pain to do but it would be interesting to see what mechanical alky injection would do on a combo like this also. Would be alot of extra work.



Not a pain at all Greendart. My W8 at Nickens right now with Rons toilet system. and yeh I know we ran way short on fuel, the pump they recommended wasn't even close . lot's to play with yet.
Dave

Attached picture 6695085-motor.jpg
Posted By: ggddemon

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/22/11 04:44 PM

First pull on dyno@Nickens

Dave

Attached picture 6695089-dynosheet1.jpg
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/22/11 10:36 PM

man thats sweet,and to think 17hp away from 1000 outta a sb! as we say in ny thats GANGSTA!lol brother whats the ci on that bad boy?
Posted By: ggddemon

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/23/11 12:29 AM

Quote:

man thats sweet,and to think 17hp away from 1000 outta a sb! as we say in ny thats GANGSTA!lol brother whats the ci on that bad boy?



It's a solid block and heads that we made into a 477 c.i, hope it pans out o.k. . Last dyno was well over this one but still have some small gremlins to look into

Dave
Posted By: Bigcube

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/23/11 01:14 AM

Not to derail Ryans thread but you better check that motor out good, I think the TQ is flat lining Wow!
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/23/11 02:05 PM

M an 8100rpm out of a big sb,best of luck with it.
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/24/11 08:57 PM

We turned the 481 to 7500 RPM, peak HP is @ 7200 RPM. I will get dyno sheet up tonight if I have time, just spent a week with a 388" W7 motor on dyno that has occupied more time than I wanted.

I think 880 is about all you could ever ask to get out of a 2.16" valve Nascar truck W8. These were 15 degree Virgin Nascar truck heads from 2001, not CFE 10-13 degree moved Center 2.225 or 2.25" valve heads. The Truck heads have ~2.75" of CSA, the CFE's are anywhere from 3.0-3.25" depending on application, I would have loved to had a set on this motor for more power, but they are hard to find used & not many are willing to pony up the $ for a new set. (besides finding new castings with no spark plug holes is very difficult as well) Also all the ones I ever ever worked on & seen have had significant reliability issues due to everything being paper thin... This motor is for a part time, non points chasing bracket car that has to make 100-150 passes a year, I can't have the heads leaking water & off motor every couple of weeks. Our plan is to freshen this motor every 2 years.
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/24/11 10:26 PM

i like the reliability ur talkin about,and really as a hobby who wants to do maint every 3 passes,the motor u built me has 40 passes on it and about 40miles of street use,and hasnt even lost any lash on the valves.
Posted By: charger410

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/25/11 04:48 PM

Look forward on hearing how they go, when there bolted in
Posted By: Leon441

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/25/11 09:59 PM

Quote:

We turned the 481 to 7500 RPM, peak HP is @ 7200 RPM. I will get dyno sheet up tonight if I have time, just spent a week with a 388" W7 motor on dyno that has occupied more time than I wanted.

I think 880 is about all you could ever ask to get out of a 2.16" valve Nascar truck W8. These were 15 degree Virgin Nascar truck heads from 2001, not CFE 10-13 degree moved Center 2.225 or 2.25" valve heads. The Truck heads have ~2.75" of CSA, the CFE's are anywhere from 3.0-3.25" depending on application, I would have loved to had a set on this motor for more power, but they are hard to find used & not many are willing to pony up the $ for a new set. (besides finding new castings with no spark plug holes is very difficult as well) Also all the ones I ever ever worked on & seen have had significant reliability issues due to everything being paper thin... This motor is for a part time, non points chasing bracket car that has to make 100-150 passes a year, I can't have the heads leaking water & off motor every couple of weeks. Our plan is to freshen this motor every 2 years.




This is my experience.......

I have owned my CFE W8's for over 10 years. With the exception of a couple years where I was either building my house and sit out by choice or changing venues I raced.

Only once did I have to pull the heads and found a leak not caused by some catostropic failure below. This was not a water leak but a leak in the pushrod area of the intake runner. The heads were built and tested for a Pro Stock Truck racing effort by Patterson Racing. I bought them from Patterson. They would never decelerate against the engine as those of us with automatics would.

After a few passes I started getting an oily plug at Englishtown NJ. We performed a compression test followed by a leakdown. No leak in the combustion chamber. Spread some silicone over the effected area and won my first KOS race. I talked with Ray Barton who was very helpful in giving me some tips on handling oil in these engines. I went home and pulled the heads to check all the intake runners. Welded up the effected areas and never had trouble with this again.

I recently had a water leak. Was absolutely sure it had to be the heads. Planning to part out the engine due to a cracked crank I sent the heads off to have them completely checked out and a new valve job done. Several with these heads have tried outsourcing these heads for a valve job. After butchering CFE's trick angles the heads do not perform as original. CFE is one of the two shops I have found that get it right. If done wrong you may have to replace all the seats to get it back to right.

Over 10 years racing/owning these heads I can not blame any problems on the heads. I had a set of Arrington castings that gave far more trouble in this area. They were early Craftsman Truck heads that Bob Kesoloski ran. Not complaining won a lot of races with these to.

Leon
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 04:39 AM

Long awaited dyno sheet.... Best pull on Q16 next to best pull on Methanol.

Attached picture 6701662-100_2908.JPG
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 03:30 PM

Quote:

Long awaited dyno sheet.... Best pull on Q16 next to best pull on Methanol.


Nice....

Are ya going to try C-25???
Posted By: Pat7272

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 04:21 PM

Quote:

the other one we ran a few weeks ago with an 11:1 pump gas setup & N20 camshaft, 772 tall deck manifold & Bob Dowling CNC W9 heads made 770HP/680 TQ. So I knew this one with the wick turned up a bit should be pretty decent.../quote]

Can we hear more about this one?!
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 07:18 PM

Quote:

Quote:

the other one we ran a few weeks ago with an 11:1 pump gas setup & N20 camshaft, 772 tall deck manifold & Bob Dowling CNC W9 heads made 770HP/680 TQ. So I knew this one with the wick turned up a bit should be pretty decent.../quote]

Can we hear more about this one?!




Was same Crank & bore as Rick's... 4.34" crank, 4.20" bore

Cam was in mid 270's @ .050" on 112 with alot of exhaust duration for the N20.

11.5:1 compression

Bob Dowling CNC W9 heads (Semi small port around 275 CC), 2.20"/1.60" stainless valves..

1.6:1 MP/T&D rockers

772 tall deck manifold converted to 4500 flange

Nitrous piston & ring combo. Obviously a decent sized dish to kill compression...

Was 650 TQ @ 4500 RPM & still over 600 FT LBS @ 6800.

Both these motors are real flat up top on HP, where they run out of cyl head, 770 HP range from 6300-7000.

That motor, customer supplied some of the parts like intake, rockers, oil pan, head castings etc. That limited me a little bit on what I could do with it. Rick's I had clean slate of paper to work around a set of virgin Nascar Truck W8s, they were really the only parameter I had to work around.

There is a vid of the Pump gas version on youtube... I did not get chance to take a vid of Rick's motor, he has a crappy one on his facebook page that I saw.

Just finished up dynoing a 388" W7 dirt track motor the other day, it is on youtube as well... Almost touched 700 with it, about right for those Chapman W7s & a 268 @ .050 circle track cam. & I've got a 416 Edelbrock Flat Tappet motor sitting on dyno right now to be fired tomorrow. & I'm currently this afternoon finishing a set of Pro-Filer 13 degree BBC heads for a high RPM 3.75" stroke 500 inch Chevy pulling tractor motor going on Dyno next Tuesday, that should be a fun one as well. & then I've got a 471" 245 CNC -1 INDY head smallblock waiting in the wings as well as a 371" Procharger Edelbrock motor. I doubt we will have time to get the Procharger on dyno next week before Carlisle. The variety of stuff I get to build definitely keeps things interesting.
Posted By: ADakotaRTGuy

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 07:41 PM

Wouldn't have a set of W9's getting a CNC port job done on the would you? Those would be mine. Busy man you are Ryan. Do you have special valve covers you use with the W9's?
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 08:22 PM

Quote:

Wouldn't have a set of W9's getting a CNC port job done on the would you? Those would be mine. Busy man you are Ryan. Do you have special valve covers you use with the W9's?


mine 1st Dave aka dakota
Posted By: Hot 340

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 09:10 PM

Quote:


Was same Crank & bore as Rick's... 4.34" crank, 4.20" bore




Ryan, you think there is any power in staying with a smaller bore on those blocks for rigidity and seal?
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 06/27/11 10:11 PM

Quote:

Quote:


Was same Crank & bore as Rick's... 4.34" crank, 4.20" bore




Ryan, you think there is any power in staying with a smaller bore on those blocks for rigidity and seal?




No, these bores are plenty thick still @ 4.20.
Posted By: SCDaytona

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 07/03/11 04:38 PM






This is my experience.......

I have owned my CFE W8's for over 10 years. With the exception of a couple years where I was either building my house and sit out by choice or changing venues I raced.

Only once did I have to pull the heads and found a leak not caused by some catostropic failure below. This was not a water leak but a leak in the pushrod area of the intake runner. The heads were built and tested for a Pro Stock Truck racing effort by Patterson Racing. I bought them from Patterson. They would never decelerate against the engine as those of us with automatics would.

After a few passes I started getting an oily plug at Englishtown NJ. We performed a compression test followed by a leakdown. No leak in the combustion chamber. Spread some silicone over the effected area and won my first KOS race. I talked with Ray Barton who was very helpful in giving me some tips on handling oil in these engines. I went home and pulled the heads to check all the intake runners. Welded up the effected areas and never had trouble with this again.

I recently had a water leak. Was absolutely sure it had to be the heads. Planning to part out the engine due to a cracked crank I sent the heads off to have them completely checked out and a new valve job done. Several with these heads have tried outsourcing these heads for a valve job. After butchering CFE's trick angles the heads do not perform as original. CFE is one of the two shops I have found that get it right. If done wrong you may have to replace all the seats to get it back to right.

Over 10 years racing/owning these heads I can not blame any problems on the heads. I had a set of Arrington castings that gave far more trouble in this area. They were early Craftsman Truck heads that Bob Kesoloski ran. Not complaining won a lot of races with these to.

Leon



Leon: What is the shop other than CFE have you used for work on the CFE heads. You can PM if you don't want to name them here.
Posted By: emarine01

Re: 481" W8 on dyno - 07/04/11 08:31 PM

662 ft/lbs @ 7k.....
© 2024 Moparts Forums