Posted By: dave571
what motor would you turbo? - 05/18/10 04:53 AM
I'm planning out a turbo for my 74 club cab dually.
Automatic. Will be used for regular driving, and some hauling.
The truck is set up for a big block already, and I have 2 motors that are prime candidates.
Both are stockers, unmolested, and run awesome, with no smoke or ticking. Kinda cool.
1)76 400. it's out of a cordoba/charger. untouched, with the tq still on. 452's yadda yadda yadda
2)69 383 2bbl. Also untouched, 906's, and runs smooth as glass.
With eiher one, My plan was/is to leave the motor as stock as possible. Basic intake and carb change to match the turbo. A small turbo for quick spooling(torque is goal more than all out power). Intercooler to keep it from pinging under load, etc..
My debate is, does the larger displacement of the 400, and lower compression ratio, make it clearly more desirable for this build?(I agree it should make better power) OR does the steel crank and the still pretty low comp a 2bbl 383 has make it the better choice?
Both are in mine already, so there is no money involved.
I'v measured 400's to typically be around 7.5:1 compression. I measured a 68 2 bbl 383 once, and it was on the low 8's, so I would expect this 69 to be similiar.
Any input appreciated
Automatic. Will be used for regular driving, and some hauling.
The truck is set up for a big block already, and I have 2 motors that are prime candidates.
Both are stockers, unmolested, and run awesome, with no smoke or ticking. Kinda cool.
1)76 400. it's out of a cordoba/charger. untouched, with the tq still on. 452's yadda yadda yadda
2)69 383 2bbl. Also untouched, 906's, and runs smooth as glass.
With eiher one, My plan was/is to leave the motor as stock as possible. Basic intake and carb change to match the turbo. A small turbo for quick spooling(torque is goal more than all out power). Intercooler to keep it from pinging under load, etc..
My debate is, does the larger displacement of the 400, and lower compression ratio, make it clearly more desirable for this build?(I agree it should make better power) OR does the steel crank and the still pretty low comp a 2bbl 383 has make it the better choice?
Both are in mine already, so there is no money involved.
I'v measured 400's to typically be around 7.5:1 compression. I measured a 68 2 bbl 383 once, and it was on the low 8's, so I would expect this 69 to be similiar.
Any input appreciated